The danger is that primary voters will come to question his ability to give Trump the electoral drubbing he deserves. (Photo: Dominick Reuter/AFP/Getty Images)
Jun 21, 2019
I get what Joe Biden was trying to say, but I'll never understand how he tried--and utterly failed--to say it.
Yes, there was a time when the Senate was a chummy men's club whose members, on some issues, put collegiality ahead of ideology. Yes, I see how the Democratic front-runner might want to hold out the hope, however slim, of a return to the days of "civility" when political foes could find common ground. Yes, I know that Biden is still Biden, which means you never know what might come out of his mouth.
But no, no, a thousand times no, you don't name former senators James Eastland of Mississippi and Herman Talmadge of Georgia in your fond reminiscences of the good old days. There are plenty of conservative Republicans whom Biden might have cited. He didn't have to dredge up two vicious Dixiecrat racists who devoted their long careers to denying African Americans basic civil and human rights.
That's what Biden did, however, at a fundraiser Tuesday in New York City. After recalling that he had served in the Senate with segregationists Eastland and Talmadge, Biden went on: "Guess what? At least there was some civility. We got things done. We didn't agree on much of anything. We got things done. We got it finished. But today, you look at the other side and you're the enemy. Not the opposition, the enemy. We don't talk to each other anymore."
When a passel of his opponents for the Democratic nomination pounced on the remarks and called for an apology, Biden was initially defiant. "Apologize for what?" he said to reporters Wednesday. "There's not a racist bone in my body; I've been involved in civil rights my whole career. Period. Period. Period."
I don't doubt the integrity of Biden's bones. But conjuring the ghost of Eastland, who considered African Americans "an inferior race," and the specter of Talmadge, who fought civil rights legislation every inch of the way, was either a bad strategic choice or a worrisome gaffe.
Is Biden trying to emulate Bill Clinton and create a "Sister Souljah moment," in which he reassures whites by offending African Americans? I doubt it. Such a move would be self-defeating even in a general-election campaign against President Trump, in my view, but it would be positively insane in the Democratic primaries. Biden's early lead is strongest among black Democrats. If they were to look elsewhere, he could easily fall back into the pack.
More likely, it was just Biden being Biden -- and a reminder that choosing him as the Democratic nominee is not a risk-free proposition.
Biden's longevity in Washington is both his Thor's hammer and his Achilles' heel. Voters are familiar with him from his decades as a senator and his eight years as Barack Obama's vice president. They think of him as a mainstream Democrat and associate him with a time when Congress and the presidency were competent and functional.
Voters also recall specifics of his past, such as his role in the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, but he can neutralize such episodes if he confronts them directly. The unanswered question is how well he understands the Democratic Party of today and how both it and the nation have changed.
As he launched his campaign, Biden had to make clear he understood that his tactile style of personal interaction was inappropriate in the #MeToo era. Then, to be viable in a party that sees abortion rights under siege, he had to abruptly abandon his longtime position in favor of the Hyde Amendment, which sharply limits the use of federal funds for abortion. Now, he gives his supporters indigestion by stirring memories of the Jim Crow South.
The danger for Biden isn't that Democrats will think he is racist or wants to take away women's reproductive rights or intends anything untoward with all his hugging. The danger is that primary voters will come to question his ability to give Trump the electoral drubbing he deserves.
That is why next week's debates in Miami are as important for Biden as they are for any of the other contenders. He has provided fodder for the attacks that will surely come his way. Will he respond like a veteran campaigner in sync with his party and equipped for battle? Or will he come across as a man of yesteryear?
Don't even think about counting Biden out; he's still the clear front-runner. But this is a race, not an investiture. The crown has to be earned.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 Washington Post
I get what Joe Biden was trying to say, but I'll never understand how he tried--and utterly failed--to say it.
Yes, there was a time when the Senate was a chummy men's club whose members, on some issues, put collegiality ahead of ideology. Yes, I see how the Democratic front-runner might want to hold out the hope, however slim, of a return to the days of "civility" when political foes could find common ground. Yes, I know that Biden is still Biden, which means you never know what might come out of his mouth.
But no, no, a thousand times no, you don't name former senators James Eastland of Mississippi and Herman Talmadge of Georgia in your fond reminiscences of the good old days. There are plenty of conservative Republicans whom Biden might have cited. He didn't have to dredge up two vicious Dixiecrat racists who devoted their long careers to denying African Americans basic civil and human rights.
That's what Biden did, however, at a fundraiser Tuesday in New York City. After recalling that he had served in the Senate with segregationists Eastland and Talmadge, Biden went on: "Guess what? At least there was some civility. We got things done. We didn't agree on much of anything. We got things done. We got it finished. But today, you look at the other side and you're the enemy. Not the opposition, the enemy. We don't talk to each other anymore."
When a passel of his opponents for the Democratic nomination pounced on the remarks and called for an apology, Biden was initially defiant. "Apologize for what?" he said to reporters Wednesday. "There's not a racist bone in my body; I've been involved in civil rights my whole career. Period. Period. Period."
I don't doubt the integrity of Biden's bones. But conjuring the ghost of Eastland, who considered African Americans "an inferior race," and the specter of Talmadge, who fought civil rights legislation every inch of the way, was either a bad strategic choice or a worrisome gaffe.
Is Biden trying to emulate Bill Clinton and create a "Sister Souljah moment," in which he reassures whites by offending African Americans? I doubt it. Such a move would be self-defeating even in a general-election campaign against President Trump, in my view, but it would be positively insane in the Democratic primaries. Biden's early lead is strongest among black Democrats. If they were to look elsewhere, he could easily fall back into the pack.
More likely, it was just Biden being Biden -- and a reminder that choosing him as the Democratic nominee is not a risk-free proposition.
Biden's longevity in Washington is both his Thor's hammer and his Achilles' heel. Voters are familiar with him from his decades as a senator and his eight years as Barack Obama's vice president. They think of him as a mainstream Democrat and associate him with a time when Congress and the presidency were competent and functional.
Voters also recall specifics of his past, such as his role in the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, but he can neutralize such episodes if he confronts them directly. The unanswered question is how well he understands the Democratic Party of today and how both it and the nation have changed.
As he launched his campaign, Biden had to make clear he understood that his tactile style of personal interaction was inappropriate in the #MeToo era. Then, to be viable in a party that sees abortion rights under siege, he had to abruptly abandon his longtime position in favor of the Hyde Amendment, which sharply limits the use of federal funds for abortion. Now, he gives his supporters indigestion by stirring memories of the Jim Crow South.
The danger for Biden isn't that Democrats will think he is racist or wants to take away women's reproductive rights or intends anything untoward with all his hugging. The danger is that primary voters will come to question his ability to give Trump the electoral drubbing he deserves.
That is why next week's debates in Miami are as important for Biden as they are for any of the other contenders. He has provided fodder for the attacks that will surely come his way. Will he respond like a veteran campaigner in sync with his party and equipped for battle? Or will he come across as a man of yesteryear?
Don't even think about counting Biden out; he's still the clear front-runner. But this is a race, not an investiture. The crown has to be earned.
I get what Joe Biden was trying to say, but I'll never understand how he tried--and utterly failed--to say it.
Yes, there was a time when the Senate was a chummy men's club whose members, on some issues, put collegiality ahead of ideology. Yes, I see how the Democratic front-runner might want to hold out the hope, however slim, of a return to the days of "civility" when political foes could find common ground. Yes, I know that Biden is still Biden, which means you never know what might come out of his mouth.
But no, no, a thousand times no, you don't name former senators James Eastland of Mississippi and Herman Talmadge of Georgia in your fond reminiscences of the good old days. There are plenty of conservative Republicans whom Biden might have cited. He didn't have to dredge up two vicious Dixiecrat racists who devoted their long careers to denying African Americans basic civil and human rights.
That's what Biden did, however, at a fundraiser Tuesday in New York City. After recalling that he had served in the Senate with segregationists Eastland and Talmadge, Biden went on: "Guess what? At least there was some civility. We got things done. We didn't agree on much of anything. We got things done. We got it finished. But today, you look at the other side and you're the enemy. Not the opposition, the enemy. We don't talk to each other anymore."
When a passel of his opponents for the Democratic nomination pounced on the remarks and called for an apology, Biden was initially defiant. "Apologize for what?" he said to reporters Wednesday. "There's not a racist bone in my body; I've been involved in civil rights my whole career. Period. Period. Period."
I don't doubt the integrity of Biden's bones. But conjuring the ghost of Eastland, who considered African Americans "an inferior race," and the specter of Talmadge, who fought civil rights legislation every inch of the way, was either a bad strategic choice or a worrisome gaffe.
Is Biden trying to emulate Bill Clinton and create a "Sister Souljah moment," in which he reassures whites by offending African Americans? I doubt it. Such a move would be self-defeating even in a general-election campaign against President Trump, in my view, but it would be positively insane in the Democratic primaries. Biden's early lead is strongest among black Democrats. If they were to look elsewhere, he could easily fall back into the pack.
More likely, it was just Biden being Biden -- and a reminder that choosing him as the Democratic nominee is not a risk-free proposition.
Biden's longevity in Washington is both his Thor's hammer and his Achilles' heel. Voters are familiar with him from his decades as a senator and his eight years as Barack Obama's vice president. They think of him as a mainstream Democrat and associate him with a time when Congress and the presidency were competent and functional.
Voters also recall specifics of his past, such as his role in the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, but he can neutralize such episodes if he confronts them directly. The unanswered question is how well he understands the Democratic Party of today and how both it and the nation have changed.
As he launched his campaign, Biden had to make clear he understood that his tactile style of personal interaction was inappropriate in the #MeToo era. Then, to be viable in a party that sees abortion rights under siege, he had to abruptly abandon his longtime position in favor of the Hyde Amendment, which sharply limits the use of federal funds for abortion. Now, he gives his supporters indigestion by stirring memories of the Jim Crow South.
The danger for Biden isn't that Democrats will think he is racist or wants to take away women's reproductive rights or intends anything untoward with all his hugging. The danger is that primary voters will come to question his ability to give Trump the electoral drubbing he deserves.
That is why next week's debates in Miami are as important for Biden as they are for any of the other contenders. He has provided fodder for the attacks that will surely come his way. Will he respond like a veteran campaigner in sync with his party and equipped for battle? Or will he come across as a man of yesteryear?
Don't even think about counting Biden out; he's still the clear front-runner. But this is a race, not an investiture. The crown has to be earned.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.