What's going in some GOP-led states is especially troubling because it shows a brazen partisan disregard for election results. (Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)
Dec 04, 2018
As the dust refuses to settle from the 2018 midterms, there are stubborn reminders that there really are two Americas when it comes to voting and elections.
This week, Republican-majority legislatures in Michigan and Wisconsin--both created by GOP-led extreme gerrymanders in 2011--are trying to rush through legislation to strip power from Democratic statewide winners of executive branch offices in November.
In Wisconsin, the GOP wants to limit the power of the incoming Democratic governor and attorney general over how public benefit programs can be run, and on how regulations can be implemented--the fine print of governing. In Michigan, where voters elected a Democratic governor, attorney general and secretary of state, it's even worse, as GOP legislators want to limit the attorney general's power to litigate (and to create a new legislative power to do so) and to pre-empt campaign finance regulation.
"They lost and they're throwing a fit."
"They lost and they're throwing a fit," was how Jon Erpenbach, a Wisconsin Democratic state senator, put it to the New York Times.
But that's not quite correct. In many otherwise purple states, the GOP has been rejecting political norms--such as respecting popular vote outcomes--and grabbing power in any manner it can for years. The Wisconsin and Michigan moves echo what North Carolina Republicans have pursued since 2016 after that also GOP-gerrymandered state elected a Democratic governor, where its legislature targeted gubernatorial powers, state election boards and even its state judiciary.
The latest Republican bullying doesn't make Democrats the political party of angels--as amply demonstrated in their post-2016 presidential reforms (where, instead of adding more national convention delegates to reflect a growing diversity, they sidelined loyalists for the first vote to nominate 2020's candidate). But what's going in some GOP-led states is especially troubling because it shows a brazen partisan disregard for election results.
The power grabs in Wisconsin and Michigan are making headlines this week, but they are not alone. Only last week did Georgia's losing Democratic gubernatorial candidate, Stacey Abrams, file a federal suit that detailed an extraordinary barrier-filled playbook wielded by her competitor, former Secretary of State Brian Kemp, to thwart multitudes. (A runoff is being held Tuesday, December 4, to determine Kemp's successor.)
Go back a few weeks and there were GOP-led barriers in North Dakota in the form of a new state law that said voters must show IDs with street addresses to get a ballot, which thousands of Native Americans lacked. There were similar barriers in New Hampshire, where its GOP-led legislature acted to complicate voting for university students.
In Arizona, the GOP Secretary of State offered bland excuses when advocacy groups noted that the motor vehicle agency was not forwarding address changes from 380,000 Arizonans to county officials, which would stymie delivery of mail-in ballots. Missouri faced another version of this voter data snafu. In Kansas, a GOP Secretary of State lost the governor's race, but not before his allies tried to limit Latino voting. And Florida's U.S. Senate recount was marked by GOP accusations of vote fraud until their candidate won in a recount by less than 0.002 percent of 8-million-plus votes cast statewide.
These examples are reminders that the GOP is a party with a strong streak not only of reluctance to relinquishing power or heeding vote outcomes, but also of seeing it as politically virtuous to do whatever it takes to preserve its power.
These examples are reminders that the GOP is a party with a strong streak not only of reluctance to relinquishing power or heeding vote outcomes, but also of seeing it as politically virtuous to do whatever it takes to preserve its power. The biggest example of this reflex is its ongoing packing of the federal courts, which began in President Obama's final years, when the GOP-led Senate refused to seat scores of appointees and a Supreme Court justice, but now is filling benches with Federalist Society-approved right-wingers.
One can only speculate where these dysfunctional dynamics are headed. It is perhaps too easy to take heart in some of 2018's apparent voting rights victories--without wondering aloud what partisan ambushes may lie ahead.
The biggest victory for voting rights and criminal justice reform was Florida's passage of Amendment 4, which ended the blanket disenfranchisement of 1.4 million ex-felons. The ACLU says that vote created the largest group of new voters in America since the 1971 passage of the 26th Amendment lowering the national voting age to 18.
On the partisan gerrymandering front, four states--Colorado, Michigan, Missouri and Utah--passed ballot initiatives to create non-legislative commissions to draw up their congressional and statehouse districts after the 2020 U.S. census. In Michigan, voters also passed Election Day registration (as did Maryland).
"Suppression of voters continues to be an urgent national problem with severe implications for racial justice and the fairness of our elections. But these reforms are real victories that deserve to be celebrated," wrote Bobby Hoffman, ACLU Advocacy and Policy Counsel, on the ACLU blog.
Hoffman's encouraging words are true enough, to a point. However, the partisan battles are not going away over larger or smaller electorates, inclusive or exclusive rules, and whether government branches are representative or not.
On Monday night, North Carolina's GOP-led legislature--the apparent role model for the current power grab in Michigan and Wisconsin--introduced legislation to consolidate its control over the state's voting rules (including rules already thrown out in court).
Such apparent disregard for political and judicial norms--commonly called checks and balances--could be a sign of political desperation. Or it could be a harbinger of more troubling times to come. Or maybe it is a bit of both.
As the Washington Post found in a nationwide June 2017 poll, "half of Republicans say they would support postponing the 2020 election if Trump proposed it." Let's hope the next national presidential election doesn't come to that; but for one political party, the GOP, nothing seems off the table--especially if voters are saying your time is up.
This article was produced by Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Steven Rosenfeld
Steven Rosenfeld is a senior writing fellow and the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He is a national political reporter focusing on democracy issues. He has reported for nationwide public radio networks, websites, and newspapers and produced talk radio and music podcasts. He has written five books, including profiles of campaigns, voter suppression, voting rights guides, and a WWII survival story currently being made into a film. His latest book is Democracy Betrayed: How Superdelegates, Redistricting, Party Insiders, and the Electoral College Rigged the 2016 Election (Hot Books, March 2018).
As the dust refuses to settle from the 2018 midterms, there are stubborn reminders that there really are two Americas when it comes to voting and elections.
This week, Republican-majority legislatures in Michigan and Wisconsin--both created by GOP-led extreme gerrymanders in 2011--are trying to rush through legislation to strip power from Democratic statewide winners of executive branch offices in November.
In Wisconsin, the GOP wants to limit the power of the incoming Democratic governor and attorney general over how public benefit programs can be run, and on how regulations can be implemented--the fine print of governing. In Michigan, where voters elected a Democratic governor, attorney general and secretary of state, it's even worse, as GOP legislators want to limit the attorney general's power to litigate (and to create a new legislative power to do so) and to pre-empt campaign finance regulation.
"They lost and they're throwing a fit."
"They lost and they're throwing a fit," was how Jon Erpenbach, a Wisconsin Democratic state senator, put it to the New York Times.
But that's not quite correct. In many otherwise purple states, the GOP has been rejecting political norms--such as respecting popular vote outcomes--and grabbing power in any manner it can for years. The Wisconsin and Michigan moves echo what North Carolina Republicans have pursued since 2016 after that also GOP-gerrymandered state elected a Democratic governor, where its legislature targeted gubernatorial powers, state election boards and even its state judiciary.
The latest Republican bullying doesn't make Democrats the political party of angels--as amply demonstrated in their post-2016 presidential reforms (where, instead of adding more national convention delegates to reflect a growing diversity, they sidelined loyalists for the first vote to nominate 2020's candidate). But what's going in some GOP-led states is especially troubling because it shows a brazen partisan disregard for election results.
The power grabs in Wisconsin and Michigan are making headlines this week, but they are not alone. Only last week did Georgia's losing Democratic gubernatorial candidate, Stacey Abrams, file a federal suit that detailed an extraordinary barrier-filled playbook wielded by her competitor, former Secretary of State Brian Kemp, to thwart multitudes. (A runoff is being held Tuesday, December 4, to determine Kemp's successor.)
Go back a few weeks and there were GOP-led barriers in North Dakota in the form of a new state law that said voters must show IDs with street addresses to get a ballot, which thousands of Native Americans lacked. There were similar barriers in New Hampshire, where its GOP-led legislature acted to complicate voting for university students.
In Arizona, the GOP Secretary of State offered bland excuses when advocacy groups noted that the motor vehicle agency was not forwarding address changes from 380,000 Arizonans to county officials, which would stymie delivery of mail-in ballots. Missouri faced another version of this voter data snafu. In Kansas, a GOP Secretary of State lost the governor's race, but not before his allies tried to limit Latino voting. And Florida's U.S. Senate recount was marked by GOP accusations of vote fraud until their candidate won in a recount by less than 0.002 percent of 8-million-plus votes cast statewide.
These examples are reminders that the GOP is a party with a strong streak not only of reluctance to relinquishing power or heeding vote outcomes, but also of seeing it as politically virtuous to do whatever it takes to preserve its power.
These examples are reminders that the GOP is a party with a strong streak not only of reluctance to relinquishing power or heeding vote outcomes, but also of seeing it as politically virtuous to do whatever it takes to preserve its power. The biggest example of this reflex is its ongoing packing of the federal courts, which began in President Obama's final years, when the GOP-led Senate refused to seat scores of appointees and a Supreme Court justice, but now is filling benches with Federalist Society-approved right-wingers.
One can only speculate where these dysfunctional dynamics are headed. It is perhaps too easy to take heart in some of 2018's apparent voting rights victories--without wondering aloud what partisan ambushes may lie ahead.
The biggest victory for voting rights and criminal justice reform was Florida's passage of Amendment 4, which ended the blanket disenfranchisement of 1.4 million ex-felons. The ACLU says that vote created the largest group of new voters in America since the 1971 passage of the 26th Amendment lowering the national voting age to 18.
On the partisan gerrymandering front, four states--Colorado, Michigan, Missouri and Utah--passed ballot initiatives to create non-legislative commissions to draw up their congressional and statehouse districts after the 2020 U.S. census. In Michigan, voters also passed Election Day registration (as did Maryland).
"Suppression of voters continues to be an urgent national problem with severe implications for racial justice and the fairness of our elections. But these reforms are real victories that deserve to be celebrated," wrote Bobby Hoffman, ACLU Advocacy and Policy Counsel, on the ACLU blog.
Hoffman's encouraging words are true enough, to a point. However, the partisan battles are not going away over larger or smaller electorates, inclusive or exclusive rules, and whether government branches are representative or not.
On Monday night, North Carolina's GOP-led legislature--the apparent role model for the current power grab in Michigan and Wisconsin--introduced legislation to consolidate its control over the state's voting rules (including rules already thrown out in court).
Such apparent disregard for political and judicial norms--commonly called checks and balances--could be a sign of political desperation. Or it could be a harbinger of more troubling times to come. Or maybe it is a bit of both.
As the Washington Post found in a nationwide June 2017 poll, "half of Republicans say they would support postponing the 2020 election if Trump proposed it." Let's hope the next national presidential election doesn't come to that; but for one political party, the GOP, nothing seems off the table--especially if voters are saying your time is up.
This article was produced by Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.
Steven Rosenfeld
Steven Rosenfeld is a senior writing fellow and the editor and chief correspondent of Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute. He is a national political reporter focusing on democracy issues. He has reported for nationwide public radio networks, websites, and newspapers and produced talk radio and music podcasts. He has written five books, including profiles of campaigns, voter suppression, voting rights guides, and a WWII survival story currently being made into a film. His latest book is Democracy Betrayed: How Superdelegates, Redistricting, Party Insiders, and the Electoral College Rigged the 2016 Election (Hot Books, March 2018).
As the dust refuses to settle from the 2018 midterms, there are stubborn reminders that there really are two Americas when it comes to voting and elections.
This week, Republican-majority legislatures in Michigan and Wisconsin--both created by GOP-led extreme gerrymanders in 2011--are trying to rush through legislation to strip power from Democratic statewide winners of executive branch offices in November.
In Wisconsin, the GOP wants to limit the power of the incoming Democratic governor and attorney general over how public benefit programs can be run, and on how regulations can be implemented--the fine print of governing. In Michigan, where voters elected a Democratic governor, attorney general and secretary of state, it's even worse, as GOP legislators want to limit the attorney general's power to litigate (and to create a new legislative power to do so) and to pre-empt campaign finance regulation.
"They lost and they're throwing a fit."
"They lost and they're throwing a fit," was how Jon Erpenbach, a Wisconsin Democratic state senator, put it to the New York Times.
But that's not quite correct. In many otherwise purple states, the GOP has been rejecting political norms--such as respecting popular vote outcomes--and grabbing power in any manner it can for years. The Wisconsin and Michigan moves echo what North Carolina Republicans have pursued since 2016 after that also GOP-gerrymandered state elected a Democratic governor, where its legislature targeted gubernatorial powers, state election boards and even its state judiciary.
The latest Republican bullying doesn't make Democrats the political party of angels--as amply demonstrated in their post-2016 presidential reforms (where, instead of adding more national convention delegates to reflect a growing diversity, they sidelined loyalists for the first vote to nominate 2020's candidate). But what's going in some GOP-led states is especially troubling because it shows a brazen partisan disregard for election results.
The power grabs in Wisconsin and Michigan are making headlines this week, but they are not alone. Only last week did Georgia's losing Democratic gubernatorial candidate, Stacey Abrams, file a federal suit that detailed an extraordinary barrier-filled playbook wielded by her competitor, former Secretary of State Brian Kemp, to thwart multitudes. (A runoff is being held Tuesday, December 4, to determine Kemp's successor.)
Go back a few weeks and there were GOP-led barriers in North Dakota in the form of a new state law that said voters must show IDs with street addresses to get a ballot, which thousands of Native Americans lacked. There were similar barriers in New Hampshire, where its GOP-led legislature acted to complicate voting for university students.
In Arizona, the GOP Secretary of State offered bland excuses when advocacy groups noted that the motor vehicle agency was not forwarding address changes from 380,000 Arizonans to county officials, which would stymie delivery of mail-in ballots. Missouri faced another version of this voter data snafu. In Kansas, a GOP Secretary of State lost the governor's race, but not before his allies tried to limit Latino voting. And Florida's U.S. Senate recount was marked by GOP accusations of vote fraud until their candidate won in a recount by less than 0.002 percent of 8-million-plus votes cast statewide.
These examples are reminders that the GOP is a party with a strong streak not only of reluctance to relinquishing power or heeding vote outcomes, but also of seeing it as politically virtuous to do whatever it takes to preserve its power.
These examples are reminders that the GOP is a party with a strong streak not only of reluctance to relinquishing power or heeding vote outcomes, but also of seeing it as politically virtuous to do whatever it takes to preserve its power. The biggest example of this reflex is its ongoing packing of the federal courts, which began in President Obama's final years, when the GOP-led Senate refused to seat scores of appointees and a Supreme Court justice, but now is filling benches with Federalist Society-approved right-wingers.
One can only speculate where these dysfunctional dynamics are headed. It is perhaps too easy to take heart in some of 2018's apparent voting rights victories--without wondering aloud what partisan ambushes may lie ahead.
The biggest victory for voting rights and criminal justice reform was Florida's passage of Amendment 4, which ended the blanket disenfranchisement of 1.4 million ex-felons. The ACLU says that vote created the largest group of new voters in America since the 1971 passage of the 26th Amendment lowering the national voting age to 18.
On the partisan gerrymandering front, four states--Colorado, Michigan, Missouri and Utah--passed ballot initiatives to create non-legislative commissions to draw up their congressional and statehouse districts after the 2020 U.S. census. In Michigan, voters also passed Election Day registration (as did Maryland).
"Suppression of voters continues to be an urgent national problem with severe implications for racial justice and the fairness of our elections. But these reforms are real victories that deserve to be celebrated," wrote Bobby Hoffman, ACLU Advocacy and Policy Counsel, on the ACLU blog.
Hoffman's encouraging words are true enough, to a point. However, the partisan battles are not going away over larger or smaller electorates, inclusive or exclusive rules, and whether government branches are representative or not.
On Monday night, North Carolina's GOP-led legislature--the apparent role model for the current power grab in Michigan and Wisconsin--introduced legislation to consolidate its control over the state's voting rules (including rules already thrown out in court).
Such apparent disregard for political and judicial norms--commonly called checks and balances--could be a sign of political desperation. Or it could be a harbinger of more troubling times to come. Or maybe it is a bit of both.
As the Washington Post found in a nationwide June 2017 poll, "half of Republicans say they would support postponing the 2020 election if Trump proposed it." Let's hope the next national presidential election doesn't come to that; but for one political party, the GOP, nothing seems off the table--especially if voters are saying your time is up.
This article was produced by Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.