SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"In just one example of the staggering overbreadth of the search warrant, it would require DreamHost to turn over the IP logs of all visitors to the site." (Photo: Gage Skidmore/flickr/cc)
In J20 Investigation, DOJ Overreaches Again. And Gets Taken to Court Again
We've already written about problems with the government's investigation into the J20 protests--a series of demonstrations on January 20, the day of President Trump's inauguration--which resulted in the arrest of hundreds of protesters.
Aug 15, 2017
We've already written about problems with the government's investigation into the J20 protests--a series of demonstrations on January 20, the day of President Trump's inauguration--which resulted in the arrest of hundreds of protesters.
But prosecutors in DC are still at it. And they're still using unconstitutional methods to pursue their investigation.
This time they served a search warrant on hosting provider DreamHost that would require the company to turn over essentially all information on a website it hosts, www.disruptj20.org--a site that was dedicated to organizing and planning the protest.
Did you click on that link? Well, that's apparently information the government wants to know. In just one example of the staggering overbreadth of the search warrant, it would require DreamHost to turn over the IP logs of all visitors to the site. Millions of visitors--activists, reporters, or you (if you clicked on the link)--would have records of their visits turned over to the government. The warrant also sought production of all emails associated with the account and unpublished content, like draft blog posts and photos.
No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this. Those concerns are especially relevant here, where DOJ is investigating a website that served as a hub for the planning and exercise of First Amendment-protected activities.
DreamHost did the right thing: it stood up for its users. It offered the government a chance to narrow the scope of the warrant. And when the government refused, DreamHost went to court.
A hearing is scheduled for August 18, in Superior Court in Washington, D.C. EFF will continue to monitor the situation.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Mark Rumold
Mark Rumold is a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, working primarily on privacy, surveillance, government secrecy, and national security issues.
We've already written about problems with the government's investigation into the J20 protests--a series of demonstrations on January 20, the day of President Trump's inauguration--which resulted in the arrest of hundreds of protesters.
But prosecutors in DC are still at it. And they're still using unconstitutional methods to pursue their investigation.
This time they served a search warrant on hosting provider DreamHost that would require the company to turn over essentially all information on a website it hosts, www.disruptj20.org--a site that was dedicated to organizing and planning the protest.
Did you click on that link? Well, that's apparently information the government wants to know. In just one example of the staggering overbreadth of the search warrant, it would require DreamHost to turn over the IP logs of all visitors to the site. Millions of visitors--activists, reporters, or you (if you clicked on the link)--would have records of their visits turned over to the government. The warrant also sought production of all emails associated with the account and unpublished content, like draft blog posts and photos.
No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this. Those concerns are especially relevant here, where DOJ is investigating a website that served as a hub for the planning and exercise of First Amendment-protected activities.
DreamHost did the right thing: it stood up for its users. It offered the government a chance to narrow the scope of the warrant. And when the government refused, DreamHost went to court.
A hearing is scheduled for August 18, in Superior Court in Washington, D.C. EFF will continue to monitor the situation.
Mark Rumold
Mark Rumold is a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, working primarily on privacy, surveillance, government secrecy, and national security issues.
We've already written about problems with the government's investigation into the J20 protests--a series of demonstrations on January 20, the day of President Trump's inauguration--which resulted in the arrest of hundreds of protesters.
But prosecutors in DC are still at it. And they're still using unconstitutional methods to pursue their investigation.
This time they served a search warrant on hosting provider DreamHost that would require the company to turn over essentially all information on a website it hosts, www.disruptj20.org--a site that was dedicated to organizing and planning the protest.
Did you click on that link? Well, that's apparently information the government wants to know. In just one example of the staggering overbreadth of the search warrant, it would require DreamHost to turn over the IP logs of all visitors to the site. Millions of visitors--activists, reporters, or you (if you clicked on the link)--would have records of their visits turned over to the government. The warrant also sought production of all emails associated with the account and unpublished content, like draft blog posts and photos.
No plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth, other than to cast a digital dragnet as broadly as possible. But the Fourth Amendment was designed to prohibit fishing expeditions like this. Those concerns are especially relevant here, where DOJ is investigating a website that served as a hub for the planning and exercise of First Amendment-protected activities.
DreamHost did the right thing: it stood up for its users. It offered the government a chance to narrow the scope of the warrant. And when the government refused, DreamHost went to court.
A hearing is scheduled for August 18, in Superior Court in Washington, D.C. EFF will continue to monitor the situation.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.