SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Exxon Shareholders are Resisting -- Here's Why It Matters
In a historic vote, Exxon shareholders passed a climate resolution on the same day that Trump allegedly begins to exit the Paris climate agreement
Jun 01, 2017
ExxonMobil held its Annual General Meeting (AGM) for shareholders in Dallas, Texas on Wednesday. This event draws attention from activists each year, and Greenpeace certainly wasn't going to miss the party. In the days leading up to Exxon's investor prom, we put up billboards and flew our airship with a warning to financial audiences and concerned citizens alike -- we all pay the price for Exxon's greed.
However, the most important moment of the day came from within the usually stodgy and perfunctory meeting itself. For the first time, Exxon shareholders -- by an impressive 62% majority -- voted for a resolution that requires the company to publish an annual report detailing the risks of climate policies and technological advances to its oil and gas holdings. The full text of the resolution is here:
This might not sound like much, but it is in fact a huge deal. Socially responsible investor groups, pension funds, and others have introduced climate change resolutions at oil company AGMs for years. Unfortunately, they've been voted down by the large institutional investors -- companies like Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard -- who typically vote in line with management on these issues. But this year was different! These same massive investors led the charge, or as the Washington Post put it, "the rebellion," to pass this resolution.
Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street are not just any investors. Blackrock, through its managed investments and funds managed through its Aladdin software, has sway over $15 trillion of assets. That's 7% of the world's assets. Vanguard and State Street are the largest Exxon shareholders and some of the largest shareholders in almost any Fortune 500 company you can name. Their understanding of risk and opportunity has almost unparalleled influence over equity markets.
So when Blackrock says it is concerned about a failure to account for climate risks, it's clear that this is an issue with deep financial implications. Here's Blackrock's own language:
"As a long-term investor, we are willing to be patient with companies when our engagement affirms they are working to address our concerns. However,when we do not see progress despite ongoing engagement, or companies are insufficiently responsive to our efforts to protect the long-term economic interests of our clients, we will not hesitate to exercise our right to vote against management recommendations."
Even more stunning is the contrast between today's vote and today's "scoop" that Trump will be pulling out of the Paris Agreement. To date, only two countries have opted out of the accord- Nicaragua (because they felt it was too weak) and Syria (because they were mired in a civil war). Trump's decision to withdraw would be a stunning display of isolationism that reveals his administration's deep ignorance of energy and financial markets. Trump is pretty good at building gold facades and regurgitating coal company talking points; firms that successfully manage trillions of dollars are moving forward with climate policies
Exxon and other oil companies are feeling pressure on all sides, whether it's investigations from Attorneys General, shareholder rebellions, or growing grassroots resistance to dirty energy infrastructure. After decades of deception, powerful forces are demanding transparency and accountability. Anyone betting that a Trump administration is enough to reverse trend should prepare for some serious losses.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Greenpeace
Kelly Mitchell
Kelly Mitchell is the Energy Campaign Director for Greenpeace, based in Chicago. Since 2006, she has worked with activists and organizations across the country to confront corporate polluters and transform U.S. energy policy. She currently leads Greenpeace's campaign for an economy powered by 100 percent renewable energy, pushing some of the largest companies in the world to embrace wind and solar and working alongside communities to develop a just and democratic energy system.
ExxonMobil held its Annual General Meeting (AGM) for shareholders in Dallas, Texas on Wednesday. This event draws attention from activists each year, and Greenpeace certainly wasn't going to miss the party. In the days leading up to Exxon's investor prom, we put up billboards and flew our airship with a warning to financial audiences and concerned citizens alike -- we all pay the price for Exxon's greed.
However, the most important moment of the day came from within the usually stodgy and perfunctory meeting itself. For the first time, Exxon shareholders -- by an impressive 62% majority -- voted for a resolution that requires the company to publish an annual report detailing the risks of climate policies and technological advances to its oil and gas holdings. The full text of the resolution is here:
This might not sound like much, but it is in fact a huge deal. Socially responsible investor groups, pension funds, and others have introduced climate change resolutions at oil company AGMs for years. Unfortunately, they've been voted down by the large institutional investors -- companies like Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard -- who typically vote in line with management on these issues. But this year was different! These same massive investors led the charge, or as the Washington Post put it, "the rebellion," to pass this resolution.
Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street are not just any investors. Blackrock, through its managed investments and funds managed through its Aladdin software, has sway over $15 trillion of assets. That's 7% of the world's assets. Vanguard and State Street are the largest Exxon shareholders and some of the largest shareholders in almost any Fortune 500 company you can name. Their understanding of risk and opportunity has almost unparalleled influence over equity markets.
So when Blackrock says it is concerned about a failure to account for climate risks, it's clear that this is an issue with deep financial implications. Here's Blackrock's own language:
"As a long-term investor, we are willing to be patient with companies when our engagement affirms they are working to address our concerns. However,when we do not see progress despite ongoing engagement, or companies are insufficiently responsive to our efforts to protect the long-term economic interests of our clients, we will not hesitate to exercise our right to vote against management recommendations."
Even more stunning is the contrast between today's vote and today's "scoop" that Trump will be pulling out of the Paris Agreement. To date, only two countries have opted out of the accord- Nicaragua (because they felt it was too weak) and Syria (because they were mired in a civil war). Trump's decision to withdraw would be a stunning display of isolationism that reveals his administration's deep ignorance of energy and financial markets. Trump is pretty good at building gold facades and regurgitating coal company talking points; firms that successfully manage trillions of dollars are moving forward with climate policies
Exxon and other oil companies are feeling pressure on all sides, whether it's investigations from Attorneys General, shareholder rebellions, or growing grassroots resistance to dirty energy infrastructure. After decades of deception, powerful forces are demanding transparency and accountability. Anyone betting that a Trump administration is enough to reverse trend should prepare for some serious losses.
Kelly Mitchell
Kelly Mitchell is the Energy Campaign Director for Greenpeace, based in Chicago. Since 2006, she has worked with activists and organizations across the country to confront corporate polluters and transform U.S. energy policy. She currently leads Greenpeace's campaign for an economy powered by 100 percent renewable energy, pushing some of the largest companies in the world to embrace wind and solar and working alongside communities to develop a just and democratic energy system.
ExxonMobil held its Annual General Meeting (AGM) for shareholders in Dallas, Texas on Wednesday. This event draws attention from activists each year, and Greenpeace certainly wasn't going to miss the party. In the days leading up to Exxon's investor prom, we put up billboards and flew our airship with a warning to financial audiences and concerned citizens alike -- we all pay the price for Exxon's greed.
However, the most important moment of the day came from within the usually stodgy and perfunctory meeting itself. For the first time, Exxon shareholders -- by an impressive 62% majority -- voted for a resolution that requires the company to publish an annual report detailing the risks of climate policies and technological advances to its oil and gas holdings. The full text of the resolution is here:
This might not sound like much, but it is in fact a huge deal. Socially responsible investor groups, pension funds, and others have introduced climate change resolutions at oil company AGMs for years. Unfortunately, they've been voted down by the large institutional investors -- companies like Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard -- who typically vote in line with management on these issues. But this year was different! These same massive investors led the charge, or as the Washington Post put it, "the rebellion," to pass this resolution.
Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street are not just any investors. Blackrock, through its managed investments and funds managed through its Aladdin software, has sway over $15 trillion of assets. That's 7% of the world's assets. Vanguard and State Street are the largest Exxon shareholders and some of the largest shareholders in almost any Fortune 500 company you can name. Their understanding of risk and opportunity has almost unparalleled influence over equity markets.
So when Blackrock says it is concerned about a failure to account for climate risks, it's clear that this is an issue with deep financial implications. Here's Blackrock's own language:
"As a long-term investor, we are willing to be patient with companies when our engagement affirms they are working to address our concerns. However,when we do not see progress despite ongoing engagement, or companies are insufficiently responsive to our efforts to protect the long-term economic interests of our clients, we will not hesitate to exercise our right to vote against management recommendations."
Even more stunning is the contrast between today's vote and today's "scoop" that Trump will be pulling out of the Paris Agreement. To date, only two countries have opted out of the accord- Nicaragua (because they felt it was too weak) and Syria (because they were mired in a civil war). Trump's decision to withdraw would be a stunning display of isolationism that reveals his administration's deep ignorance of energy and financial markets. Trump is pretty good at building gold facades and regurgitating coal company talking points; firms that successfully manage trillions of dollars are moving forward with climate policies
Exxon and other oil companies are feeling pressure on all sides, whether it's investigations from Attorneys General, shareholder rebellions, or growing grassroots resistance to dirty energy infrastructure. After decades of deception, powerful forces are demanding transparency and accountability. Anyone betting that a Trump administration is enough to reverse trend should prepare for some serious losses.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.