SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
By Signing CETA with Justin Trudeau, the EU Isn't Undermining Donald Trump - They're Helping Him
A trade deal with Canada seems an urgent necessity in this brave new world. But, 40,000 of the biggest US corporations have subsidiaries in Canada which could use CETA to sue European governments
Feb 13, 2017
This week the European Parliament finally gets a vote on the Canada-EU trade deal CETA. It's taken years to get to this point, and the vote is likely to be close, reflecting just how contentious global trade policies have become.
Many MEPs are worried about CETA, reflecting the views of millions of European citizens who have been lobbying them to vote it down. They are concerned about the impact it will have on food standards, public services and financial regulation. CETA, like its better known US cousin TTIP is all about deregulation.
There are deep concerns about the 'corporate court' system which will afford so many more corporations special legal process to sue European governments for passing laws they don't like. For all the EU's reforms, environmental regulation, public service nationalisation, financial regulation - all could be challenged, costing the taxpayer on both sides of the Atlantic a fortune.
Despite this, MEPs are wrestling over how to vote. Because in our brave new world, a trade deal with Justin Trudeau's Canada, which shares so many of our values, seems an urgent necessity. Wouldn't it be a reaffirmation of the very liberal international order threatened by Trump? Wouldn't it help us bring together a non-Trump economic bloc?
It's a seductive logic - and enjoyable to give Trump a poke in the eye. But it isn't true. There's nothing more helpful to Trump and the wave of European populism than passing CETA this week.
First CETA would open up Europe to direct challenge by US corporations in special corporate courts. Something like 40,000 of the biggest US corporations have subsidiaries in Canada which could use CETA to sue European governments. This is a game-changer - we've never faced anything like it, and we will get sued for simply passing laws aimed at protecting people and the environment.
Canadian's big mining sector doesn't have any higher 'values' than US big business either. These companies have already shown themselves more than willing to take on governments like Romania, in secret 'courts', under a separate deal, when that government saw fit to halt a mining project built on a site of environmental and historical importance.
For all his rhetoric, Trump is a firm supporter of deregulation and corporate power. A quick look at how US oil, financial, military and pharmaceutical stock rose after Trump's election showed that clearly. Trump is stripping away corporate regulation at a frightening speed. Why would he be against anything that gives US corporations the power to bully foreign countries?
Don't forget - Trump's own interests are involved here. For example, Trump owns quite a lot of land in Scotland and has a history of challenging Scottish regulation which poses any threat to his golfing profits. A corporate court in CETA would help him in future.
Second, CETA has nothing to do with reaffirming European and Canadian values. As a matter of fact, it's all about changing our values. CETA isn't about people at all, but forwarding corporate interests to the point where 'people' barely feature in decision-making. CETA's process of regulatory 'harmonisation' attempts to force regulators to think only about how laws can be as 'minimally trade distorting' as possible. Is that really the pinnacle of European and Canadian 'values'?
Trump claims that corporations have become too mixed up with foreigners, too disinterested in forwarding the interests of the state. We cannot fight this with 'more of the same', by pretending that economic globalisation has been wonderful for everyone and let's have more of it. The idea that trade deals create only 'winners' is totally discredited. But CETA assumes everything is 'win-win' and makes no provision for these losers - even though serious assessments warn that up to 200,000 jobs could be lost and workers relative wages could fall.
This simply helps Trump's rhetoric about salvation to be found in the aggressive nation state, backed to the hilt by corporate power. How do we fight Trumpism? By showing that the solution to devastating corporate trade pacts isn't 'beggar my neighbour' economics, but a trade system based on the needs of society - building public services, creating decent jobs, laws to constrain the most powerful exploiting the least powerful. Without this, everything that Trump represents will grow.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Independent
Nick Dearden
Nick Dearden is the director of Global Justice Now (formerly World Development Movement) and former director of Jubilee Debt Campaign.
This week the European Parliament finally gets a vote on the Canada-EU trade deal CETA. It's taken years to get to this point, and the vote is likely to be close, reflecting just how contentious global trade policies have become.
Many MEPs are worried about CETA, reflecting the views of millions of European citizens who have been lobbying them to vote it down. They are concerned about the impact it will have on food standards, public services and financial regulation. CETA, like its better known US cousin TTIP is all about deregulation.
There are deep concerns about the 'corporate court' system which will afford so many more corporations special legal process to sue European governments for passing laws they don't like. For all the EU's reforms, environmental regulation, public service nationalisation, financial regulation - all could be challenged, costing the taxpayer on both sides of the Atlantic a fortune.
Despite this, MEPs are wrestling over how to vote. Because in our brave new world, a trade deal with Justin Trudeau's Canada, which shares so many of our values, seems an urgent necessity. Wouldn't it be a reaffirmation of the very liberal international order threatened by Trump? Wouldn't it help us bring together a non-Trump economic bloc?
It's a seductive logic - and enjoyable to give Trump a poke in the eye. But it isn't true. There's nothing more helpful to Trump and the wave of European populism than passing CETA this week.
First CETA would open up Europe to direct challenge by US corporations in special corporate courts. Something like 40,000 of the biggest US corporations have subsidiaries in Canada which could use CETA to sue European governments. This is a game-changer - we've never faced anything like it, and we will get sued for simply passing laws aimed at protecting people and the environment.
Canadian's big mining sector doesn't have any higher 'values' than US big business either. These companies have already shown themselves more than willing to take on governments like Romania, in secret 'courts', under a separate deal, when that government saw fit to halt a mining project built on a site of environmental and historical importance.
For all his rhetoric, Trump is a firm supporter of deregulation and corporate power. A quick look at how US oil, financial, military and pharmaceutical stock rose after Trump's election showed that clearly. Trump is stripping away corporate regulation at a frightening speed. Why would he be against anything that gives US corporations the power to bully foreign countries?
Don't forget - Trump's own interests are involved here. For example, Trump owns quite a lot of land in Scotland and has a history of challenging Scottish regulation which poses any threat to his golfing profits. A corporate court in CETA would help him in future.
Second, CETA has nothing to do with reaffirming European and Canadian values. As a matter of fact, it's all about changing our values. CETA isn't about people at all, but forwarding corporate interests to the point where 'people' barely feature in decision-making. CETA's process of regulatory 'harmonisation' attempts to force regulators to think only about how laws can be as 'minimally trade distorting' as possible. Is that really the pinnacle of European and Canadian 'values'?
Trump claims that corporations have become too mixed up with foreigners, too disinterested in forwarding the interests of the state. We cannot fight this with 'more of the same', by pretending that economic globalisation has been wonderful for everyone and let's have more of it. The idea that trade deals create only 'winners' is totally discredited. But CETA assumes everything is 'win-win' and makes no provision for these losers - even though serious assessments warn that up to 200,000 jobs could be lost and workers relative wages could fall.
This simply helps Trump's rhetoric about salvation to be found in the aggressive nation state, backed to the hilt by corporate power. How do we fight Trumpism? By showing that the solution to devastating corporate trade pacts isn't 'beggar my neighbour' economics, but a trade system based on the needs of society - building public services, creating decent jobs, laws to constrain the most powerful exploiting the least powerful. Without this, everything that Trump represents will grow.
Nick Dearden
Nick Dearden is the director of Global Justice Now (formerly World Development Movement) and former director of Jubilee Debt Campaign.
This week the European Parliament finally gets a vote on the Canada-EU trade deal CETA. It's taken years to get to this point, and the vote is likely to be close, reflecting just how contentious global trade policies have become.
Many MEPs are worried about CETA, reflecting the views of millions of European citizens who have been lobbying them to vote it down. They are concerned about the impact it will have on food standards, public services and financial regulation. CETA, like its better known US cousin TTIP is all about deregulation.
There are deep concerns about the 'corporate court' system which will afford so many more corporations special legal process to sue European governments for passing laws they don't like. For all the EU's reforms, environmental regulation, public service nationalisation, financial regulation - all could be challenged, costing the taxpayer on both sides of the Atlantic a fortune.
Despite this, MEPs are wrestling over how to vote. Because in our brave new world, a trade deal with Justin Trudeau's Canada, which shares so many of our values, seems an urgent necessity. Wouldn't it be a reaffirmation of the very liberal international order threatened by Trump? Wouldn't it help us bring together a non-Trump economic bloc?
It's a seductive logic - and enjoyable to give Trump a poke in the eye. But it isn't true. There's nothing more helpful to Trump and the wave of European populism than passing CETA this week.
First CETA would open up Europe to direct challenge by US corporations in special corporate courts. Something like 40,000 of the biggest US corporations have subsidiaries in Canada which could use CETA to sue European governments. This is a game-changer - we've never faced anything like it, and we will get sued for simply passing laws aimed at protecting people and the environment.
Canadian's big mining sector doesn't have any higher 'values' than US big business either. These companies have already shown themselves more than willing to take on governments like Romania, in secret 'courts', under a separate deal, when that government saw fit to halt a mining project built on a site of environmental and historical importance.
For all his rhetoric, Trump is a firm supporter of deregulation and corporate power. A quick look at how US oil, financial, military and pharmaceutical stock rose after Trump's election showed that clearly. Trump is stripping away corporate regulation at a frightening speed. Why would he be against anything that gives US corporations the power to bully foreign countries?
Don't forget - Trump's own interests are involved here. For example, Trump owns quite a lot of land in Scotland and has a history of challenging Scottish regulation which poses any threat to his golfing profits. A corporate court in CETA would help him in future.
Second, CETA has nothing to do with reaffirming European and Canadian values. As a matter of fact, it's all about changing our values. CETA isn't about people at all, but forwarding corporate interests to the point where 'people' barely feature in decision-making. CETA's process of regulatory 'harmonisation' attempts to force regulators to think only about how laws can be as 'minimally trade distorting' as possible. Is that really the pinnacle of European and Canadian 'values'?
Trump claims that corporations have become too mixed up with foreigners, too disinterested in forwarding the interests of the state. We cannot fight this with 'more of the same', by pretending that economic globalisation has been wonderful for everyone and let's have more of it. The idea that trade deals create only 'winners' is totally discredited. But CETA assumes everything is 'win-win' and makes no provision for these losers - even though serious assessments warn that up to 200,000 jobs could be lost and workers relative wages could fall.
This simply helps Trump's rhetoric about salvation to be found in the aggressive nation state, backed to the hilt by corporate power. How do we fight Trumpism? By showing that the solution to devastating corporate trade pacts isn't 'beggar my neighbour' economics, but a trade system based on the needs of society - building public services, creating decent jobs, laws to constrain the most powerful exploiting the least powerful. Without this, everything that Trump represents will grow.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.