SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
ExxonMobil Takes The Olympic Gold In Deceitful Advertising
ExxonMobil wants you to know that it has a long "to-do" list.
In an ad it debuted during the opening ceremonies of the Olympics on Friday night, the world's largest oil company presented itself as nothing more than a merry band of do-gooders who were "mapping the oceans," "turning algae into biofuel," and "defeating malaria."
"And you thought we just made the gas," joked a woman at the end, giving us a knowing smile.
Aug 11, 2016
ExxonMobil wants you to know that it has a long "to-do" list.
In an ad it debuted during the opening ceremonies of the Olympics on Friday night, the world's largest oil company presented itself as nothing more than a merry band of do-gooders who were "mapping the oceans," "turning algae into biofuel," and "defeating malaria."
"And you thought we just made the gas," joked a woman at the end, giving us a knowing smile.
By now we've learned that Exxon does a lot more than make the gas: they make a lot of hot air, as well. Thanks to an expose last fall by journalists at InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times, we learned that as early as the 1970s, Exxon scientists had concluded that the continued use of their product, fossil fuels, would have a devastating impact on the climate.
Instead of warning the public -- say, by buying an ad during the Olympics -- company executives buried the results and pumped millions of dollars into misleading the public about global warming while lobbying against political efforts to deal with the problem.
Exxon didn't admit what they knew about global warming because addressing the crisis would require them to change their core business: drilling for more oil and gas. Exxon was a fossil fuel company, full stop, and despite any fancy advertising, that's exactly what they are today. At their 2015 shareholder meeting, Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson famously batted down shareholder requests to diversify the company's portfolio to include renewable energy, saying simply, "We choose not to lose money on purpose." (Exxon then went on to post its lowest profits in years as oil prices plummeted). This year, the company defeated similar shareholder resolutions urging them to move away from fossil fuels or even just report on the company's climate impact.
None of this has stopped Exxon from pretending it's really just a philanthropic entity with a little oil business on the side. It's a textbook move of corporate greenwashing, just like BP renaming itself "Beyond Petroleum" or Chevron touting their efforts in energy efficiency.
With Exxon under investigation by multiple state Attorneys General for potentially lying about climate change, it's no wonder they're investing so heavily in advertising.
"Having a prominent corporate responsibility message helps you defend against people who are attacking you in the court of public opinion," a marketing consultant told the New York Times back in 2009, when oil companies were rushing to improve their image around the Copenhagen climate talks. "Companies realize the court of public opinion is very important to them. They need in a sense to project their virtues."
Those virtues are often grossly overstated. While it's laudable that Exxon puts millions into fighting malaria, for instance, the money is fractions-of-pennies on the dollar when it comes to the amount they're spending on searching for more fossil fuels. And in the long run, it's those fossil fuels that may have the larger impact on the disease: numerous studies have shown that unchecked climate change will expand the range of mosquito born diseases and other health disasters.
Exxon deserves some credit for its good deeds, but those few acts of altruism don't outweigh the company's crimes. We don't give a bank robber a Get Out of Jail Free card for planting a couple daisies on his way back from the heist. We're not going to let Exxon off the hook for producing a few nice advertisements while they continue to try and rob us of a safe climate future.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
ExxonMobil wants you to know that it has a long "to-do" list.
In an ad it debuted during the opening ceremonies of the Olympics on Friday night, the world's largest oil company presented itself as nothing more than a merry band of do-gooders who were "mapping the oceans," "turning algae into biofuel," and "defeating malaria."
"And you thought we just made the gas," joked a woman at the end, giving us a knowing smile.
By now we've learned that Exxon does a lot more than make the gas: they make a lot of hot air, as well. Thanks to an expose last fall by journalists at InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times, we learned that as early as the 1970s, Exxon scientists had concluded that the continued use of their product, fossil fuels, would have a devastating impact on the climate.
Instead of warning the public -- say, by buying an ad during the Olympics -- company executives buried the results and pumped millions of dollars into misleading the public about global warming while lobbying against political efforts to deal with the problem.
Exxon didn't admit what they knew about global warming because addressing the crisis would require them to change their core business: drilling for more oil and gas. Exxon was a fossil fuel company, full stop, and despite any fancy advertising, that's exactly what they are today. At their 2015 shareholder meeting, Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson famously batted down shareholder requests to diversify the company's portfolio to include renewable energy, saying simply, "We choose not to lose money on purpose." (Exxon then went on to post its lowest profits in years as oil prices plummeted). This year, the company defeated similar shareholder resolutions urging them to move away from fossil fuels or even just report on the company's climate impact.
None of this has stopped Exxon from pretending it's really just a philanthropic entity with a little oil business on the side. It's a textbook move of corporate greenwashing, just like BP renaming itself "Beyond Petroleum" or Chevron touting their efforts in energy efficiency.
With Exxon under investigation by multiple state Attorneys General for potentially lying about climate change, it's no wonder they're investing so heavily in advertising.
"Having a prominent corporate responsibility message helps you defend against people who are attacking you in the court of public opinion," a marketing consultant told the New York Times back in 2009, when oil companies were rushing to improve their image around the Copenhagen climate talks. "Companies realize the court of public opinion is very important to them. They need in a sense to project their virtues."
Those virtues are often grossly overstated. While it's laudable that Exxon puts millions into fighting malaria, for instance, the money is fractions-of-pennies on the dollar when it comes to the amount they're spending on searching for more fossil fuels. And in the long run, it's those fossil fuels that may have the larger impact on the disease: numerous studies have shown that unchecked climate change will expand the range of mosquito born diseases and other health disasters.
Exxon deserves some credit for its good deeds, but those few acts of altruism don't outweigh the company's crimes. We don't give a bank robber a Get Out of Jail Free card for planting a couple daisies on his way back from the heist. We're not going to let Exxon off the hook for producing a few nice advertisements while they continue to try and rob us of a safe climate future.
From Your Site Articles
ExxonMobil wants you to know that it has a long "to-do" list.
In an ad it debuted during the opening ceremonies of the Olympics on Friday night, the world's largest oil company presented itself as nothing more than a merry band of do-gooders who were "mapping the oceans," "turning algae into biofuel," and "defeating malaria."
"And you thought we just made the gas," joked a woman at the end, giving us a knowing smile.
By now we've learned that Exxon does a lot more than make the gas: they make a lot of hot air, as well. Thanks to an expose last fall by journalists at InsideClimate News and the Los Angeles Times, we learned that as early as the 1970s, Exxon scientists had concluded that the continued use of their product, fossil fuels, would have a devastating impact on the climate.
Instead of warning the public -- say, by buying an ad during the Olympics -- company executives buried the results and pumped millions of dollars into misleading the public about global warming while lobbying against political efforts to deal with the problem.
Exxon didn't admit what they knew about global warming because addressing the crisis would require them to change their core business: drilling for more oil and gas. Exxon was a fossil fuel company, full stop, and despite any fancy advertising, that's exactly what they are today. At their 2015 shareholder meeting, Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson famously batted down shareholder requests to diversify the company's portfolio to include renewable energy, saying simply, "We choose not to lose money on purpose." (Exxon then went on to post its lowest profits in years as oil prices plummeted). This year, the company defeated similar shareholder resolutions urging them to move away from fossil fuels or even just report on the company's climate impact.
None of this has stopped Exxon from pretending it's really just a philanthropic entity with a little oil business on the side. It's a textbook move of corporate greenwashing, just like BP renaming itself "Beyond Petroleum" or Chevron touting their efforts in energy efficiency.
With Exxon under investigation by multiple state Attorneys General for potentially lying about climate change, it's no wonder they're investing so heavily in advertising.
"Having a prominent corporate responsibility message helps you defend against people who are attacking you in the court of public opinion," a marketing consultant told the New York Times back in 2009, when oil companies were rushing to improve their image around the Copenhagen climate talks. "Companies realize the court of public opinion is very important to them. They need in a sense to project their virtues."
Those virtues are often grossly overstated. While it's laudable that Exxon puts millions into fighting malaria, for instance, the money is fractions-of-pennies on the dollar when it comes to the amount they're spending on searching for more fossil fuels. And in the long run, it's those fossil fuels that may have the larger impact on the disease: numerous studies have shown that unchecked climate change will expand the range of mosquito born diseases and other health disasters.
Exxon deserves some credit for its good deeds, but those few acts of altruism don't outweigh the company's crimes. We don't give a bank robber a Get Out of Jail Free card for planting a couple daisies on his way back from the heist. We're not going to let Exxon off the hook for producing a few nice advertisements while they continue to try and rob us of a safe climate future.
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.