Hopelessly Divided? Think Again.
"We are a divided nation!" Donald Trump tweets, while Hillary Clinton bemoans "the divisions" that are keeping "our people apart."
So, it seems, most of us hold these truths to be self-evident: We are a polarized people and becoming more so every day. What could be more solid proof than the popularity of Trump's extreme views and the unrelenting protests of the Bernie-or-busters?
"We are a divided nation!" Donald Trump tweets, while Hillary Clinton bemoans "the divisions" that are keeping "our people apart."
So, it seems, most of us hold these truths to be self-evident: We are a polarized people and becoming more so every day. What could be more solid proof than the popularity of Trump's extreme views and the unrelenting protests of the Bernie-or-busters?
It sure can feel like the only thing on which Americans can agree is that our deep ideological divisions are gridlocking government, so nothing can get done by either side.
Surprisingly, though, despite all the handwringing about dysfunctional division, there is much that unites us -- even on contentious topics. A 2014 study comparing red congressional districts and states to blue ones asked 388 questions on hot-topic issues ranging from abortion to gun control. In two-thirds of cases, researchers found "no statistical differences" in the answers between Republican and Democratic strongholds.
That's the big picture. Now take a look at five issues where polls uncover wide agreement:
- Climate change. Americans' concern about global warming is at an eight-year high, with a record 65 percent of us now blaming human activity for rising temperatures.
- Gun control. Eighty-five percent of Americans -- including large majorities of both Republicans and Democrats -- favor closing gun-sale loopholes by enforcing background checks for private gun sales and at gun shows.
- Our federal tax system. Six in 10 of us believe that upper-income Americans do not pay enough in taxes, while 82 percent are bothered -- either "some" or "a lot" -- that corporations are not paying their fair tax share.
- The influence of big business. More than three-quarters of Americans believe that large corporations and a few rich people wield excessive and unfair power in this country. A whopping 71 percent of Americans across the political spectrum believe that the economy is rigged in favor of a few special interests.
- Special interests' influence in our political institutions. Eighty-four percent of Americans think that money has too much influence in elections. Nearly 8 in 10 favor limits on both raising and spending money in congressional campaigns. Meanwhile, 78 percent of Americans, including 80 percent of Republicans, want to overturn the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision that further opened the floodgates to corporate campaign spending, including spending from undisclosed sources.
So how can such common ground exist while we still can't seem to address any of these deep problems?
A big clue is found in the last bullet point above, the crisis we love to call "privately held government." Through this lens, we can see that the problem is less that we're gridlocked along partisan lines and more that we've allowed the power of private wealth to lock up our public problem-solving process -- i.e., democracy itself.
When our representatives spend more time each day dialing for dollars than dealing with citizen viewpoints and values, we're in big trouble. Four to five hours a day fundraising on the phone has become common. Inevitably, elected officials end up promoting the interests of their donors, not because they are crooks but because we've set the rules up so that legislators' very jobs depend on how well they serve the funders. Figuring this out, as the cliche goes, doesn't take a Ph.D. in political science.
So the big question: Can those inside this "rigged" system actually reform it?
Ultimately, of course, only those inside have the power to seal the deal, and right now we're witnessing history on this journey to move sentiments from the outside into power on the inside.
In response to massive citizen anger and pressure, the Democratic Party's platform commits to leveling the playing field for candidates and enlarging the number of voters by reforming rules governing how we fund elections, including contribution disclosure, as well as how we vote (including making Election Day a national holiday) and how we confront gerrymandering. The party also commits itself to move forward an amendment to the Constitution effectively overruling Supreme Court decisions that have awarded corporations rights to heavily influence our elections. But, caveat voter: To make its lofty promises real, this same party will have to turn its back on the same moneyed elite it is currently relying upon.
The Republican platform, meanwhile, completely ignores the stranglehold money has on politics. Nowhere in the 54-page document is there a mention of campaign finance reform. Nonetheless, there are at least a few Republican politicians, some in Congress, and some trying to influence it from the outside, who are fed up with the money chase and prepared to support legislation that would give them back some level of independence.
We citizens cannot rest until an agenda that makes our democratic system equally accessible to all is enacted. That won't happen without the help of both parties. The presidential race is crucial, of course, but electing to Congress those who support this democracy agenda is also key.
So let's challenge the discouraging and false notion that we're hopelessly divided. Instead, let's celebrate how much we agree on and get to work identifying candidates willing to address the root of the crisis that blocks action on this wide agreement. With confidence we can then embrace our foundational task as citizens: building a democracy "movement of movements" that does not quit until all voices are heard.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"We are a divided nation!" Donald Trump tweets, while Hillary Clinton bemoans "the divisions" that are keeping "our people apart."
So, it seems, most of us hold these truths to be self-evident: We are a polarized people and becoming more so every day. What could be more solid proof than the popularity of Trump's extreme views and the unrelenting protests of the Bernie-or-busters?
It sure can feel like the only thing on which Americans can agree is that our deep ideological divisions are gridlocking government, so nothing can get done by either side.
Surprisingly, though, despite all the handwringing about dysfunctional division, there is much that unites us -- even on contentious topics. A 2014 study comparing red congressional districts and states to blue ones asked 388 questions on hot-topic issues ranging from abortion to gun control. In two-thirds of cases, researchers found "no statistical differences" in the answers between Republican and Democratic strongholds.
That's the big picture. Now take a look at five issues where polls uncover wide agreement:
- Climate change. Americans' concern about global warming is at an eight-year high, with a record 65 percent of us now blaming human activity for rising temperatures.
- Gun control. Eighty-five percent of Americans -- including large majorities of both Republicans and Democrats -- favor closing gun-sale loopholes by enforcing background checks for private gun sales and at gun shows.
- Our federal tax system. Six in 10 of us believe that upper-income Americans do not pay enough in taxes, while 82 percent are bothered -- either "some" or "a lot" -- that corporations are not paying their fair tax share.
- The influence of big business. More than three-quarters of Americans believe that large corporations and a few rich people wield excessive and unfair power in this country. A whopping 71 percent of Americans across the political spectrum believe that the economy is rigged in favor of a few special interests.
- Special interests' influence in our political institutions. Eighty-four percent of Americans think that money has too much influence in elections. Nearly 8 in 10 favor limits on both raising and spending money in congressional campaigns. Meanwhile, 78 percent of Americans, including 80 percent of Republicans, want to overturn the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision that further opened the floodgates to corporate campaign spending, including spending from undisclosed sources.
So how can such common ground exist while we still can't seem to address any of these deep problems?
A big clue is found in the last bullet point above, the crisis we love to call "privately held government." Through this lens, we can see that the problem is less that we're gridlocked along partisan lines and more that we've allowed the power of private wealth to lock up our public problem-solving process -- i.e., democracy itself.
When our representatives spend more time each day dialing for dollars than dealing with citizen viewpoints and values, we're in big trouble. Four to five hours a day fundraising on the phone has become common. Inevitably, elected officials end up promoting the interests of their donors, not because they are crooks but because we've set the rules up so that legislators' very jobs depend on how well they serve the funders. Figuring this out, as the cliche goes, doesn't take a Ph.D. in political science.
So the big question: Can those inside this "rigged" system actually reform it?
Ultimately, of course, only those inside have the power to seal the deal, and right now we're witnessing history on this journey to move sentiments from the outside into power on the inside.
In response to massive citizen anger and pressure, the Democratic Party's platform commits to leveling the playing field for candidates and enlarging the number of voters by reforming rules governing how we fund elections, including contribution disclosure, as well as how we vote (including making Election Day a national holiday) and how we confront gerrymandering. The party also commits itself to move forward an amendment to the Constitution effectively overruling Supreme Court decisions that have awarded corporations rights to heavily influence our elections. But, caveat voter: To make its lofty promises real, this same party will have to turn its back on the same moneyed elite it is currently relying upon.
The Republican platform, meanwhile, completely ignores the stranglehold money has on politics. Nowhere in the 54-page document is there a mention of campaign finance reform. Nonetheless, there are at least a few Republican politicians, some in Congress, and some trying to influence it from the outside, who are fed up with the money chase and prepared to support legislation that would give them back some level of independence.
We citizens cannot rest until an agenda that makes our democratic system equally accessible to all is enacted. That won't happen without the help of both parties. The presidential race is crucial, of course, but electing to Congress those who support this democracy agenda is also key.
So let's challenge the discouraging and false notion that we're hopelessly divided. Instead, let's celebrate how much we agree on and get to work identifying candidates willing to address the root of the crisis that blocks action on this wide agreement. With confidence we can then embrace our foundational task as citizens: building a democracy "movement of movements" that does not quit until all voices are heard.
"We are a divided nation!" Donald Trump tweets, while Hillary Clinton bemoans "the divisions" that are keeping "our people apart."
So, it seems, most of us hold these truths to be self-evident: We are a polarized people and becoming more so every day. What could be more solid proof than the popularity of Trump's extreme views and the unrelenting protests of the Bernie-or-busters?
It sure can feel like the only thing on which Americans can agree is that our deep ideological divisions are gridlocking government, so nothing can get done by either side.
Surprisingly, though, despite all the handwringing about dysfunctional division, there is much that unites us -- even on contentious topics. A 2014 study comparing red congressional districts and states to blue ones asked 388 questions on hot-topic issues ranging from abortion to gun control. In two-thirds of cases, researchers found "no statistical differences" in the answers between Republican and Democratic strongholds.
That's the big picture. Now take a look at five issues where polls uncover wide agreement:
- Climate change. Americans' concern about global warming is at an eight-year high, with a record 65 percent of us now blaming human activity for rising temperatures.
- Gun control. Eighty-five percent of Americans -- including large majorities of both Republicans and Democrats -- favor closing gun-sale loopholes by enforcing background checks for private gun sales and at gun shows.
- Our federal tax system. Six in 10 of us believe that upper-income Americans do not pay enough in taxes, while 82 percent are bothered -- either "some" or "a lot" -- that corporations are not paying their fair tax share.
- The influence of big business. More than three-quarters of Americans believe that large corporations and a few rich people wield excessive and unfair power in this country. A whopping 71 percent of Americans across the political spectrum believe that the economy is rigged in favor of a few special interests.
- Special interests' influence in our political institutions. Eighty-four percent of Americans think that money has too much influence in elections. Nearly 8 in 10 favor limits on both raising and spending money in congressional campaigns. Meanwhile, 78 percent of Americans, including 80 percent of Republicans, want to overturn the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision that further opened the floodgates to corporate campaign spending, including spending from undisclosed sources.
So how can such common ground exist while we still can't seem to address any of these deep problems?
A big clue is found in the last bullet point above, the crisis we love to call "privately held government." Through this lens, we can see that the problem is less that we're gridlocked along partisan lines and more that we've allowed the power of private wealth to lock up our public problem-solving process -- i.e., democracy itself.
When our representatives spend more time each day dialing for dollars than dealing with citizen viewpoints and values, we're in big trouble. Four to five hours a day fundraising on the phone has become common. Inevitably, elected officials end up promoting the interests of their donors, not because they are crooks but because we've set the rules up so that legislators' very jobs depend on how well they serve the funders. Figuring this out, as the cliche goes, doesn't take a Ph.D. in political science.
So the big question: Can those inside this "rigged" system actually reform it?
Ultimately, of course, only those inside have the power to seal the deal, and right now we're witnessing history on this journey to move sentiments from the outside into power on the inside.
In response to massive citizen anger and pressure, the Democratic Party's platform commits to leveling the playing field for candidates and enlarging the number of voters by reforming rules governing how we fund elections, including contribution disclosure, as well as how we vote (including making Election Day a national holiday) and how we confront gerrymandering. The party also commits itself to move forward an amendment to the Constitution effectively overruling Supreme Court decisions that have awarded corporations rights to heavily influence our elections. But, caveat voter: To make its lofty promises real, this same party will have to turn its back on the same moneyed elite it is currently relying upon.
The Republican platform, meanwhile, completely ignores the stranglehold money has on politics. Nowhere in the 54-page document is there a mention of campaign finance reform. Nonetheless, there are at least a few Republican politicians, some in Congress, and some trying to influence it from the outside, who are fed up with the money chase and prepared to support legislation that would give them back some level of independence.
We citizens cannot rest until an agenda that makes our democratic system equally accessible to all is enacted. That won't happen without the help of both parties. The presidential race is crucial, of course, but electing to Congress those who support this democracy agenda is also key.
So let's challenge the discouraging and false notion that we're hopelessly divided. Instead, let's celebrate how much we agree on and get to work identifying candidates willing to address the root of the crisis that blocks action on this wide agreement. With confidence we can then embrace our foundational task as citizens: building a democracy "movement of movements" that does not quit until all voices are heard.