SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Mount Polley mine tailings lake breach occured on August 4, 2014. (Credit: Cariboo Regional District)
No Reason to Celebrate One Year After Mount Polley Mine Disaster
On August 4 last year, Quesnel Lake residents and communities along the Fraser River were eagerly anticipating one of the largest sockeye returns in recent history.
What they got instead was a nightmare: over 24 billion litres of mine waste burst through Imperial Metals' Mount Polley dam into their watershed.
Mount Polley is the largest mining waste spill in Canada's history. The consequences and overall costs of this disaster concern us all, including a steep cost on the industry's reputation and public trust.
Aug 03, 2015
On August 4 last year, Quesnel Lake residents and communities along the Fraser River were eagerly anticipating one of the largest sockeye returns in recent history.
What they got instead was a nightmare: over 24 billion litres of mine waste burst through Imperial Metals' Mount Polley dam into their watershed.
Mount Polley is the largest mining waste spill in Canada's history. The consequences and overall costs of this disaster concern us all, including a steep cost on the industry's reputation and public trust.
Yet a year later, the mine is running again under a restricted permit. While both the company and the B.C. government attempt to be reassuring, many questions remain unanswered.
What are the long-term impacts of the tailings breach on the local ecosystems? Initial water bans warned people not to drink or bathe. Quesnel Lake rose seven centimetres after the spill and its temperature increased by 2.5 degrees. The long-term effects of contaminants found in samples will need monitoring. The toxins are of concern to human health, animals, and aquatic life.
Despite approval to restart, there are still no long-term plans regarding site clean-up costs, water treatment, and mining wastes management. The B.C. government is not being precautionary enough. Locally affected First Nations and communities are being forced to live with risks and too few answers.
What kind of financial assurance do we have from Imperial Metals to cover clean-up costs, damages, perpetual care of the site, or costs from other potential failures? Imperial Metals has lost over 40 percent of its share value since the disaster last year; investors are clearly concerned about the risks associated with its mining operations.
We should be too. Imperial Metals is still under subject to two investigations that could lead to civil and criminal charges against it, which in turn could lead to costly sanctions or litigations. The public could be left on the hook if the company is unable to pay the bill.
The independent review of the Mount Polley disaster predicted two tailings dam failures every decade in B.C. We should not have to ask which two rivers or watersheds are next.
We need to prevent future failures by strengthening and updating our outdated mining laws--some of which were written over 150 years ago.The government's commitment to review the Mining Code is welcomed, but it needs to be broad enough to address the full range of necessary changes.
Mining shouldn't mean toxic fish and water bans. As we commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Mount Polley disaster, let's commit to moving out of the gold rush mentality and into an era of modern, more responsible mining.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Ana Simeon
Ana Simeon is the Community Engagement Coordinator for Sierra Club B.C. in Canada.
Ugo Lapointe
Ugo Lapointe is with MiningWatch Canada.
On August 4 last year, Quesnel Lake residents and communities along the Fraser River were eagerly anticipating one of the largest sockeye returns in recent history.
What they got instead was a nightmare: over 24 billion litres of mine waste burst through Imperial Metals' Mount Polley dam into their watershed.
Mount Polley is the largest mining waste spill in Canada's history. The consequences and overall costs of this disaster concern us all, including a steep cost on the industry's reputation and public trust.
Yet a year later, the mine is running again under a restricted permit. While both the company and the B.C. government attempt to be reassuring, many questions remain unanswered.
What are the long-term impacts of the tailings breach on the local ecosystems? Initial water bans warned people not to drink or bathe. Quesnel Lake rose seven centimetres after the spill and its temperature increased by 2.5 degrees. The long-term effects of contaminants found in samples will need monitoring. The toxins are of concern to human health, animals, and aquatic life.
Despite approval to restart, there are still no long-term plans regarding site clean-up costs, water treatment, and mining wastes management. The B.C. government is not being precautionary enough. Locally affected First Nations and communities are being forced to live with risks and too few answers.
What kind of financial assurance do we have from Imperial Metals to cover clean-up costs, damages, perpetual care of the site, or costs from other potential failures? Imperial Metals has lost over 40 percent of its share value since the disaster last year; investors are clearly concerned about the risks associated with its mining operations.
We should be too. Imperial Metals is still under subject to two investigations that could lead to civil and criminal charges against it, which in turn could lead to costly sanctions or litigations. The public could be left on the hook if the company is unable to pay the bill.
The independent review of the Mount Polley disaster predicted two tailings dam failures every decade in B.C. We should not have to ask which two rivers or watersheds are next.
We need to prevent future failures by strengthening and updating our outdated mining laws--some of which were written over 150 years ago.The government's commitment to review the Mining Code is welcomed, but it needs to be broad enough to address the full range of necessary changes.
Mining shouldn't mean toxic fish and water bans. As we commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Mount Polley disaster, let's commit to moving out of the gold rush mentality and into an era of modern, more responsible mining.
Ana Simeon
Ana Simeon is the Community Engagement Coordinator for Sierra Club B.C. in Canada.
Ugo Lapointe
Ugo Lapointe is with MiningWatch Canada.
On August 4 last year, Quesnel Lake residents and communities along the Fraser River were eagerly anticipating one of the largest sockeye returns in recent history.
What they got instead was a nightmare: over 24 billion litres of mine waste burst through Imperial Metals' Mount Polley dam into their watershed.
Mount Polley is the largest mining waste spill in Canada's history. The consequences and overall costs of this disaster concern us all, including a steep cost on the industry's reputation and public trust.
Yet a year later, the mine is running again under a restricted permit. While both the company and the B.C. government attempt to be reassuring, many questions remain unanswered.
What are the long-term impacts of the tailings breach on the local ecosystems? Initial water bans warned people not to drink or bathe. Quesnel Lake rose seven centimetres after the spill and its temperature increased by 2.5 degrees. The long-term effects of contaminants found in samples will need monitoring. The toxins are of concern to human health, animals, and aquatic life.
Despite approval to restart, there are still no long-term plans regarding site clean-up costs, water treatment, and mining wastes management. The B.C. government is not being precautionary enough. Locally affected First Nations and communities are being forced to live with risks and too few answers.
What kind of financial assurance do we have from Imperial Metals to cover clean-up costs, damages, perpetual care of the site, or costs from other potential failures? Imperial Metals has lost over 40 percent of its share value since the disaster last year; investors are clearly concerned about the risks associated with its mining operations.
We should be too. Imperial Metals is still under subject to two investigations that could lead to civil and criminal charges against it, which in turn could lead to costly sanctions or litigations. The public could be left on the hook if the company is unable to pay the bill.
The independent review of the Mount Polley disaster predicted two tailings dam failures every decade in B.C. We should not have to ask which two rivers or watersheds are next.
We need to prevent future failures by strengthening and updating our outdated mining laws--some of which were written over 150 years ago.The government's commitment to review the Mining Code is welcomed, but it needs to be broad enough to address the full range of necessary changes.
Mining shouldn't mean toxic fish and water bans. As we commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Mount Polley disaster, let's commit to moving out of the gold rush mentality and into an era of modern, more responsible mining.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.