SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
We must not " just surrender to those who are turning America into a militaristic state," Hightower writes. (Photo: Kenny Holston 21/Flickr)
Only a few months ago, President Barack Obama announced the good news that our combat role in Afghanistan -- the longest war in U.S. history -- would finally end by New Year's Day.
Put away that champagne.
A flock of screeching war hawks brought heavy political pressure on Obama to reverse himself. So our troops will stay in that war-ravaged, corrupt, bankrupted, ethnically divided country for at least another year or two.
Only a few months ago, President Barack Obama announced the good news that our combat role in Afghanistan -- the longest war in U.S. history -- would finally end by New Year's Day.
Put away that champagne.
A flock of screeching war hawks brought heavy political pressure on Obama to reverse himself. So our troops will stay in that war-ravaged, corrupt, bankrupted, ethnically divided country for at least another year or two.
Amazingly, the hawks argued that Obama shouldn't "rush" the timeline for training Afghan security forces to defend their own country.
Rush? Hello: IT'S BEEN 13 YEARS!
"Operation Enduring Freedom," as the government originally dubbed this mess of a military mission, should be renamed "Operation Endless War."
Here we go again -- not merely conducting training exercises, but continuing to mire our courageous but overstretched military forces in the Afghans' civil war, including using U.S. ground troops in combat missions against the Afghan Taliban.
How many more Americans will die or be horribly maimed in that hapless land? How many more billions of our tax dollars will be dumped into Afghanistan's abyss? And why?
Why are we there? Why are we wasting so many lives and so much of the money we desperately need here at home?
And why are We the People not consulted on such a massive and momentous decision?
It's reported that the Pentagon not only wants to keep troops there through 2016, but beyond. How many troops? What are they to achieve? That's a secret.
When Obama announced last May that the United States would have no combat role in Afghanistan after this year, he said, "It's harder to end wars than to start them."
True, but that doesn't mean we can just surrender to those who are turning America into a militaristic state. If Obama won't fight them, we must. To help, go to www.peace-action.org.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Only a few months ago, President Barack Obama announced the good news that our combat role in Afghanistan -- the longest war in U.S. history -- would finally end by New Year's Day.
Put away that champagne.
A flock of screeching war hawks brought heavy political pressure on Obama to reverse himself. So our troops will stay in that war-ravaged, corrupt, bankrupted, ethnically divided country for at least another year or two.
Amazingly, the hawks argued that Obama shouldn't "rush" the timeline for training Afghan security forces to defend their own country.
Rush? Hello: IT'S BEEN 13 YEARS!
"Operation Enduring Freedom," as the government originally dubbed this mess of a military mission, should be renamed "Operation Endless War."
Here we go again -- not merely conducting training exercises, but continuing to mire our courageous but overstretched military forces in the Afghans' civil war, including using U.S. ground troops in combat missions against the Afghan Taliban.
How many more Americans will die or be horribly maimed in that hapless land? How many more billions of our tax dollars will be dumped into Afghanistan's abyss? And why?
Why are we there? Why are we wasting so many lives and so much of the money we desperately need here at home?
And why are We the People not consulted on such a massive and momentous decision?
It's reported that the Pentagon not only wants to keep troops there through 2016, but beyond. How many troops? What are they to achieve? That's a secret.
When Obama announced last May that the United States would have no combat role in Afghanistan after this year, he said, "It's harder to end wars than to start them."
True, but that doesn't mean we can just surrender to those who are turning America into a militaristic state. If Obama won't fight them, we must. To help, go to www.peace-action.org.
Only a few months ago, President Barack Obama announced the good news that our combat role in Afghanistan -- the longest war in U.S. history -- would finally end by New Year's Day.
Put away that champagne.
A flock of screeching war hawks brought heavy political pressure on Obama to reverse himself. So our troops will stay in that war-ravaged, corrupt, bankrupted, ethnically divided country for at least another year or two.
Amazingly, the hawks argued that Obama shouldn't "rush" the timeline for training Afghan security forces to defend their own country.
Rush? Hello: IT'S BEEN 13 YEARS!
"Operation Enduring Freedom," as the government originally dubbed this mess of a military mission, should be renamed "Operation Endless War."
Here we go again -- not merely conducting training exercises, but continuing to mire our courageous but overstretched military forces in the Afghans' civil war, including using U.S. ground troops in combat missions against the Afghan Taliban.
How many more Americans will die or be horribly maimed in that hapless land? How many more billions of our tax dollars will be dumped into Afghanistan's abyss? And why?
Why are we there? Why are we wasting so many lives and so much of the money we desperately need here at home?
And why are We the People not consulted on such a massive and momentous decision?
It's reported that the Pentagon not only wants to keep troops there through 2016, but beyond. How many troops? What are they to achieve? That's a secret.
When Obama announced last May that the United States would have no combat role in Afghanistan after this year, he said, "It's harder to end wars than to start them."
True, but that doesn't mean we can just surrender to those who are turning America into a militaristic state. If Obama won't fight them, we must. To help, go to www.peace-action.org.