SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Latest lobby pushed is just latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends. (File photo: breakingenergy.com)
Big Oil Sets Up Crude Export Lobby Group
The growing political fight over relaxing America's decades-old crude export ban intensified at the end of last week, when 14 oil and gas firms set up a lobbying group specifically to push to relax the ban.
The group, entitled Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE), is the first lobby group to be formed to purely lobby to overturn the ban.
It is the latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends.
Oct 27, 2014
The growing political fight over relaxing America's decades-old crude export ban intensified at the end of last week, when 14 oil and gas firms set up a lobbying group specifically to push to relax the ban.
The group, entitled Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE), is the first lobby group to be formed to purely lobby to overturn the ban.
It is the latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends.
The group was formed just days after the US Government Accountability Office recommended against lifting the ban and warned that greenhouse gas emissions would rise if the ban was lifted.
It is important to remember what the GAO said last week in its report. It argued that "additional crude oil production may pose risks to the quality and quantity of surface groundwater sources; increase greenhouse gas and other emissions; and increase the risk of spills from crude oil transportation."
According to its lobbying disclosure form, PACE is being run out of the Washington office of law firm Williams & Jensen, which describes itself on its website as "Washington's lobbying powerhouse".
The lobbying disclosure form, obtained by Greenwire, shows the coalition is seeking a "repeal of the 1970s-era prohibition on American crude oil exports as warranted by the numerous economic and consumer benefits derived from our country's abundance of domestic oil supplies."
George Baker, the lobbyist hired to lead the group argues that "More than anything else, the formation of PACE reflects growing public awareness of the need to align policies in Washington with the economic opportunities made possible by America's oil abundance."
In outlining the supposed "benefits" of lifting the ban PACE is ignoring the GAO report, and trying to spin the benefits of lifting the ban. That is not surprising given PACE's membership includes Marathon Oil, Anadarko Petroleum, Encana Oil and Gas, Concho Resources, Laredo Petroleum, Hess Corp, Noble Energy, Pioneer Natural Resources, Chesapeake Energy Corp, Devon Energy Corp, EOG Resources, Continental Resources, Occidental Petroleum Corp and ConocoPhillips.
Daren Beaudo, a spokesman for ConocoPhillips told Reuters that the 14 producers had "united to create an advocacy initiative to help repeal the outdated ban on crude oil exports."
The ability to export crude is "vital to the country's economic growth and national security, job creation, and strengthening our competitive position in the global marketplace," he added.
If Beaudo is worried about national security, maybe he should read the Pentagon's latest Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap, which begins by saying "Climate change will affect the Department of Defense's ability to defend the Nation and poses immediate risks."
Also cited: Nick Juliano, "Independent producers launch coalition to push for exports", Greenwire, 24 October 2014
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
© 2023 Oil Change International
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
The growing political fight over relaxing America's decades-old crude export ban intensified at the end of last week, when 14 oil and gas firms set up a lobbying group specifically to push to relax the ban.
The group, entitled Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE), is the first lobby group to be formed to purely lobby to overturn the ban.
It is the latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends.
The group was formed just days after the US Government Accountability Office recommended against lifting the ban and warned that greenhouse gas emissions would rise if the ban was lifted.
It is important to remember what the GAO said last week in its report. It argued that "additional crude oil production may pose risks to the quality and quantity of surface groundwater sources; increase greenhouse gas and other emissions; and increase the risk of spills from crude oil transportation."
According to its lobbying disclosure form, PACE is being run out of the Washington office of law firm Williams & Jensen, which describes itself on its website as "Washington's lobbying powerhouse".
The lobbying disclosure form, obtained by Greenwire, shows the coalition is seeking a "repeal of the 1970s-era prohibition on American crude oil exports as warranted by the numerous economic and consumer benefits derived from our country's abundance of domestic oil supplies."
George Baker, the lobbyist hired to lead the group argues that "More than anything else, the formation of PACE reflects growing public awareness of the need to align policies in Washington with the economic opportunities made possible by America's oil abundance."
In outlining the supposed "benefits" of lifting the ban PACE is ignoring the GAO report, and trying to spin the benefits of lifting the ban. That is not surprising given PACE's membership includes Marathon Oil, Anadarko Petroleum, Encana Oil and Gas, Concho Resources, Laredo Petroleum, Hess Corp, Noble Energy, Pioneer Natural Resources, Chesapeake Energy Corp, Devon Energy Corp, EOG Resources, Continental Resources, Occidental Petroleum Corp and ConocoPhillips.
Daren Beaudo, a spokesman for ConocoPhillips told Reuters that the 14 producers had "united to create an advocacy initiative to help repeal the outdated ban on crude oil exports."
The ability to export crude is "vital to the country's economic growth and national security, job creation, and strengthening our competitive position in the global marketplace," he added.
If Beaudo is worried about national security, maybe he should read the Pentagon's latest Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap, which begins by saying "Climate change will affect the Department of Defense's ability to defend the Nation and poses immediate risks."
Also cited: Nick Juliano, "Independent producers launch coalition to push for exports", Greenwire, 24 October 2014
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
The growing political fight over relaxing America's decades-old crude export ban intensified at the end of last week, when 14 oil and gas firms set up a lobbying group specifically to push to relax the ban.
The group, entitled Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE), is the first lobby group to be formed to purely lobby to overturn the ban.
It is the latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends.
The group was formed just days after the US Government Accountability Office recommended against lifting the ban and warned that greenhouse gas emissions would rise if the ban was lifted.
It is important to remember what the GAO said last week in its report. It argued that "additional crude oil production may pose risks to the quality and quantity of surface groundwater sources; increase greenhouse gas and other emissions; and increase the risk of spills from crude oil transportation."
According to its lobbying disclosure form, PACE is being run out of the Washington office of law firm Williams & Jensen, which describes itself on its website as "Washington's lobbying powerhouse".
The lobbying disclosure form, obtained by Greenwire, shows the coalition is seeking a "repeal of the 1970s-era prohibition on American crude oil exports as warranted by the numerous economic and consumer benefits derived from our country's abundance of domestic oil supplies."
George Baker, the lobbyist hired to lead the group argues that "More than anything else, the formation of PACE reflects growing public awareness of the need to align policies in Washington with the economic opportunities made possible by America's oil abundance."
In outlining the supposed "benefits" of lifting the ban PACE is ignoring the GAO report, and trying to spin the benefits of lifting the ban. That is not surprising given PACE's membership includes Marathon Oil, Anadarko Petroleum, Encana Oil and Gas, Concho Resources, Laredo Petroleum, Hess Corp, Noble Energy, Pioneer Natural Resources, Chesapeake Energy Corp, Devon Energy Corp, EOG Resources, Continental Resources, Occidental Petroleum Corp and ConocoPhillips.
Daren Beaudo, a spokesman for ConocoPhillips told Reuters that the 14 producers had "united to create an advocacy initiative to help repeal the outdated ban on crude oil exports."
The ability to export crude is "vital to the country's economic growth and national security, job creation, and strengthening our competitive position in the global marketplace," he added.
If Beaudo is worried about national security, maybe he should read the Pentagon's latest Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap, which begins by saying "Climate change will affect the Department of Defense's ability to defend the Nation and poses immediate risks."
Also cited: Nick Juliano, "Independent producers launch coalition to push for exports", Greenwire, 24 October 2014
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.