SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Investment in renewable energy is key, but that doesn't mean "the market" can be trusted to do the work that needs to be done. (Photo: Mohamed Ali / flickr / cc)
Recently, people have been telling me that capitalists are investing lots of money in renewable energy, or that some companies have decided to reduce their environmental impact out of self-interest.
Thanks for the info, guys.
But again, I thought it might be useful to point these people to my book -- y'know, since they clearly haven't read it yet.
For example, this part beginning on page 100:
Recently, people have been telling me that capitalists are investing lots of money in renewable energy, or that some companies have decided to reduce their environmental impact out of self-interest.
Thanks for the info, guys.
But again, I thought it might be useful to point these people to my book -- y'know, since they clearly haven't read it yet.
For example, this part beginning on page 100:
Solar and wind companies are already bringing clean energy to many millions of consumers around the world, including through innovative leasing models that allow customers to avoid the upfront costs of purchasing their own rooftop solar panels. But despite these recent successes, the market has proved extremely volatile and according to projections from the International Energy Agency, investment levels in clean energy need to quadruple by 2030 if we are to meet emission targets aimed at staying below 2 degrees Celsius of warming.
It's easy to mistake a thriving private market in green energy for a credible climate action plan, but, though related, they are not the same thing. It's entirely possible to have a booming market in renewables, with a whole new generation of solar and wind entrepreneurs growing very wealthy--and for our countries to still fall far short of lowering emissions in line with science in the brief time we have left. To be sure of hitting those tough targets, we need systems that are more reliable than boom-and-bust private markets.
It's one thing to say that forward-thinking businesses can make a positive contribution to solving the climate crisis (surely they can). But it's quite another thing to say that voluntary initiatives can get us to zero carbon in a couple decades.
As I'm the first to admit, one of the most promising approaches to climate action has even been championed by a corporate titan: Virgin founder Richard Branson, who says we have a moral responsibility to take the profits from burning fossil fuels and channel them into the green transition. It's just that as the Branson example shows (and as I discuss at length in my book), sometimes the capitalist drive for ever more short-term profit and growth gets in the way, and the green dreams end up on the back burner.
Really, that shouldn't surprise anyone, and we should have never expected billionaires to police themselves: that's what governments are for. So if they aren't up to the job, let's do something about it.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Recently, people have been telling me that capitalists are investing lots of money in renewable energy, or that some companies have decided to reduce their environmental impact out of self-interest.
Thanks for the info, guys.
But again, I thought it might be useful to point these people to my book -- y'know, since they clearly haven't read it yet.
For example, this part beginning on page 100:
Solar and wind companies are already bringing clean energy to many millions of consumers around the world, including through innovative leasing models that allow customers to avoid the upfront costs of purchasing their own rooftop solar panels. But despite these recent successes, the market has proved extremely volatile and according to projections from the International Energy Agency, investment levels in clean energy need to quadruple by 2030 if we are to meet emission targets aimed at staying below 2 degrees Celsius of warming.
It's easy to mistake a thriving private market in green energy for a credible climate action plan, but, though related, they are not the same thing. It's entirely possible to have a booming market in renewables, with a whole new generation of solar and wind entrepreneurs growing very wealthy--and for our countries to still fall far short of lowering emissions in line with science in the brief time we have left. To be sure of hitting those tough targets, we need systems that are more reliable than boom-and-bust private markets.
It's one thing to say that forward-thinking businesses can make a positive contribution to solving the climate crisis (surely they can). But it's quite another thing to say that voluntary initiatives can get us to zero carbon in a couple decades.
As I'm the first to admit, one of the most promising approaches to climate action has even been championed by a corporate titan: Virgin founder Richard Branson, who says we have a moral responsibility to take the profits from burning fossil fuels and channel them into the green transition. It's just that as the Branson example shows (and as I discuss at length in my book), sometimes the capitalist drive for ever more short-term profit and growth gets in the way, and the green dreams end up on the back burner.
Really, that shouldn't surprise anyone, and we should have never expected billionaires to police themselves: that's what governments are for. So if they aren't up to the job, let's do something about it.
Recently, people have been telling me that capitalists are investing lots of money in renewable energy, or that some companies have decided to reduce their environmental impact out of self-interest.
Thanks for the info, guys.
But again, I thought it might be useful to point these people to my book -- y'know, since they clearly haven't read it yet.
For example, this part beginning on page 100:
Solar and wind companies are already bringing clean energy to many millions of consumers around the world, including through innovative leasing models that allow customers to avoid the upfront costs of purchasing their own rooftop solar panels. But despite these recent successes, the market has proved extremely volatile and according to projections from the International Energy Agency, investment levels in clean energy need to quadruple by 2030 if we are to meet emission targets aimed at staying below 2 degrees Celsius of warming.
It's easy to mistake a thriving private market in green energy for a credible climate action plan, but, though related, they are not the same thing. It's entirely possible to have a booming market in renewables, with a whole new generation of solar and wind entrepreneurs growing very wealthy--and for our countries to still fall far short of lowering emissions in line with science in the brief time we have left. To be sure of hitting those tough targets, we need systems that are more reliable than boom-and-bust private markets.
It's one thing to say that forward-thinking businesses can make a positive contribution to solving the climate crisis (surely they can). But it's quite another thing to say that voluntary initiatives can get us to zero carbon in a couple decades.
As I'm the first to admit, one of the most promising approaches to climate action has even been championed by a corporate titan: Virgin founder Richard Branson, who says we have a moral responsibility to take the profits from burning fossil fuels and channel them into the green transition. It's just that as the Branson example shows (and as I discuss at length in my book), sometimes the capitalist drive for ever more short-term profit and growth gets in the way, and the green dreams end up on the back burner.
Really, that shouldn't surprise anyone, and we should have never expected billionaires to police themselves: that's what governments are for. So if they aren't up to the job, let's do something about it.