

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Yesterday, the U.S. Census Bureau released 2013 numbers on poverty in the United States and it is a mixed bag: poverty levels in the U.S. are decreasing--but not nearly enough. In fact, the changes are so minimal that they are not statistically significant for most groups. The two positive changes in the numbers are for children and Latinos, both of whom saw decent decreases in terms of their poverty rates and total number of people in poverty. But the fact remains that poverty levels have not gone back to prerecession numbers for any group, wages continue to be stagnant, and family income remains unchanged.
Let's flesh this out: it's worth a reminder that poverty is defined as living at or below the poverty line, which for a family of four in 2013 was $23,834. Yep, that is not a typo--there isn't supposed to be a "6" where the "2" is. Not sure how anyone makes a living with less than $30K but that is another topic for another day.
Now back to the numbers: 14.5 percent of Americans lived in poverty in 2013--that represents more than 45 million people, including 13 million Latinos. While this poverty rate is lower than in 2012, it is a decrease of only .5 percent. Among Latinos the decrease was a respectable 2 percentage points--down from 25.6 percent in 2012 to 23.5 percent in 2013.
The Latino child poverty rate also fell for a third year in a row. In 2013, the poverty rate among Hispanic kids was 30.4 percent, compared to 33.8 in 2012 and 34.1 in 2011. But it's clear we still have a long way to go: there are 5.4 million Hispanic children in poverty, more than any other group; and our kids have among the highest poverty rates of any racial and ethnic group at more than 30 percent.
While the economy improved in 2013 that hasn't translated into significantly better economic outcomes for the low-income workers or the middle class. Median family income stayed virtually the same between 2012 and 2013, continuing its 14-year decline due in large part to stagnant wages. Although income for Latinos did rise from $39,572 to 40,963 in 2013, it is still lower than the $43,025 that Hispanics earned in 2006.
It is also worth underscoring that millions of Latinos are working at poverty-level wages. While the unemployment rate for Hispanics declined between September 2012 and August 2013--from 8.9 percent to 7.5 percent--more than 40 percent of Latino workers earn poverty level wages.
These poverty numbers are not a reality that we can't change. As my colleagues Rebecca Vallas and Melissa Boteach write there are policy solutions that can reverse these trends. For example, raising the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would benefit 6.8 million Latinos;good jobs--with fair pay and benefits such as paid family and medical leave, and paid sick days--would also make a difference in lifting people out of poverty. Moreover, key investments in education, job training and child care would improve the livelihoods of all Americans, including Latinos. And let's not forget immigration reform to help workers who are already contributing to this nation's economy earn a good living that supports their families.
But Congress seems intent on making things worse. In 2013, this Congress enacted across-the-board cuts in education, job training, and child care services, alongside reductions in nutrition assistance, housing, and other vital programs for low-income families. Congress must change course and invest in job creation, pass comprehensive immigration reform, raise the minimum wage, and enact measures to improve the economic security of all families.
For Latinos the stakes are high. While the reduction in poverty in our community is good news during an otherwise disappointing time (given the lack of movement on issues that we care about--like immigration reform), much work remains. This new set of numbers are yet another reminder that we need to grow our power and influence so that we elect leaders in Congress who will focus on creating and strengthening the ladder of opportunity for all Americans--including Latinos.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Yesterday, the U.S. Census Bureau released 2013 numbers on poverty in the United States and it is a mixed bag: poverty levels in the U.S. are decreasing--but not nearly enough. In fact, the changes are so minimal that they are not statistically significant for most groups. The two positive changes in the numbers are for children and Latinos, both of whom saw decent decreases in terms of their poverty rates and total number of people in poverty. But the fact remains that poverty levels have not gone back to prerecession numbers for any group, wages continue to be stagnant, and family income remains unchanged.
Let's flesh this out: it's worth a reminder that poverty is defined as living at or below the poverty line, which for a family of four in 2013 was $23,834. Yep, that is not a typo--there isn't supposed to be a "6" where the "2" is. Not sure how anyone makes a living with less than $30K but that is another topic for another day.
Now back to the numbers: 14.5 percent of Americans lived in poverty in 2013--that represents more than 45 million people, including 13 million Latinos. While this poverty rate is lower than in 2012, it is a decrease of only .5 percent. Among Latinos the decrease was a respectable 2 percentage points--down from 25.6 percent in 2012 to 23.5 percent in 2013.
The Latino child poverty rate also fell for a third year in a row. In 2013, the poverty rate among Hispanic kids was 30.4 percent, compared to 33.8 in 2012 and 34.1 in 2011. But it's clear we still have a long way to go: there are 5.4 million Hispanic children in poverty, more than any other group; and our kids have among the highest poverty rates of any racial and ethnic group at more than 30 percent.
While the economy improved in 2013 that hasn't translated into significantly better economic outcomes for the low-income workers or the middle class. Median family income stayed virtually the same between 2012 and 2013, continuing its 14-year decline due in large part to stagnant wages. Although income for Latinos did rise from $39,572 to 40,963 in 2013, it is still lower than the $43,025 that Hispanics earned in 2006.
It is also worth underscoring that millions of Latinos are working at poverty-level wages. While the unemployment rate for Hispanics declined between September 2012 and August 2013--from 8.9 percent to 7.5 percent--more than 40 percent of Latino workers earn poverty level wages.
These poverty numbers are not a reality that we can't change. As my colleagues Rebecca Vallas and Melissa Boteach write there are policy solutions that can reverse these trends. For example, raising the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would benefit 6.8 million Latinos;good jobs--with fair pay and benefits such as paid family and medical leave, and paid sick days--would also make a difference in lifting people out of poverty. Moreover, key investments in education, job training and child care would improve the livelihoods of all Americans, including Latinos. And let's not forget immigration reform to help workers who are already contributing to this nation's economy earn a good living that supports their families.
But Congress seems intent on making things worse. In 2013, this Congress enacted across-the-board cuts in education, job training, and child care services, alongside reductions in nutrition assistance, housing, and other vital programs for low-income families. Congress must change course and invest in job creation, pass comprehensive immigration reform, raise the minimum wage, and enact measures to improve the economic security of all families.
For Latinos the stakes are high. While the reduction in poverty in our community is good news during an otherwise disappointing time (given the lack of movement on issues that we care about--like immigration reform), much work remains. This new set of numbers are yet another reminder that we need to grow our power and influence so that we elect leaders in Congress who will focus on creating and strengthening the ladder of opportunity for all Americans--including Latinos.
Yesterday, the U.S. Census Bureau released 2013 numbers on poverty in the United States and it is a mixed bag: poverty levels in the U.S. are decreasing--but not nearly enough. In fact, the changes are so minimal that they are not statistically significant for most groups. The two positive changes in the numbers are for children and Latinos, both of whom saw decent decreases in terms of their poverty rates and total number of people in poverty. But the fact remains that poverty levels have not gone back to prerecession numbers for any group, wages continue to be stagnant, and family income remains unchanged.
Let's flesh this out: it's worth a reminder that poverty is defined as living at or below the poverty line, which for a family of four in 2013 was $23,834. Yep, that is not a typo--there isn't supposed to be a "6" where the "2" is. Not sure how anyone makes a living with less than $30K but that is another topic for another day.
Now back to the numbers: 14.5 percent of Americans lived in poverty in 2013--that represents more than 45 million people, including 13 million Latinos. While this poverty rate is lower than in 2012, it is a decrease of only .5 percent. Among Latinos the decrease was a respectable 2 percentage points--down from 25.6 percent in 2012 to 23.5 percent in 2013.
The Latino child poverty rate also fell for a third year in a row. In 2013, the poverty rate among Hispanic kids was 30.4 percent, compared to 33.8 in 2012 and 34.1 in 2011. But it's clear we still have a long way to go: there are 5.4 million Hispanic children in poverty, more than any other group; and our kids have among the highest poverty rates of any racial and ethnic group at more than 30 percent.
While the economy improved in 2013 that hasn't translated into significantly better economic outcomes for the low-income workers or the middle class. Median family income stayed virtually the same between 2012 and 2013, continuing its 14-year decline due in large part to stagnant wages. Although income for Latinos did rise from $39,572 to 40,963 in 2013, it is still lower than the $43,025 that Hispanics earned in 2006.
It is also worth underscoring that millions of Latinos are working at poverty-level wages. While the unemployment rate for Hispanics declined between September 2012 and August 2013--from 8.9 percent to 7.5 percent--more than 40 percent of Latino workers earn poverty level wages.
These poverty numbers are not a reality that we can't change. As my colleagues Rebecca Vallas and Melissa Boteach write there are policy solutions that can reverse these trends. For example, raising the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would benefit 6.8 million Latinos;good jobs--with fair pay and benefits such as paid family and medical leave, and paid sick days--would also make a difference in lifting people out of poverty. Moreover, key investments in education, job training and child care would improve the livelihoods of all Americans, including Latinos. And let's not forget immigration reform to help workers who are already contributing to this nation's economy earn a good living that supports their families.
But Congress seems intent on making things worse. In 2013, this Congress enacted across-the-board cuts in education, job training, and child care services, alongside reductions in nutrition assistance, housing, and other vital programs for low-income families. Congress must change course and invest in job creation, pass comprehensive immigration reform, raise the minimum wage, and enact measures to improve the economic security of all families.
For Latinos the stakes are high. While the reduction in poverty in our community is good news during an otherwise disappointing time (given the lack of movement on issues that we care about--like immigration reform), much work remains. This new set of numbers are yet another reminder that we need to grow our power and influence so that we elect leaders in Congress who will focus on creating and strengthening the ladder of opportunity for all Americans--including Latinos.