Aug 13, 2014
If John Boehner is so worried about the president's executive orders, why didn't he sue George W. Bush?
What a hoot to see House Speaker John Boehner up on his hind legs, braying like a goofy mule as he declares that by golly he's filing a lawsuit against President Barack Obama for "aggressive unilateralism." Or, was it unilateral aggressivism?
The Ohio Republican says it's an outrage that a president would issue executive orders to set policy without the approval of Congress -- at least on things that Boehner doesn't approve of.
"Everywhere I go," spaketh the speaker, "I'm asked: When will the House stand up on behalf of the people to stop the encroachment of executive power under President Obama?"
Really? Everywhere? That's the question he gets?
Maybe he needs to get around to more places. I think he'd find that most people are more concerned about the imploding middle class, rising poverty, inequality, climate change, surges of violence in the Middle East and former Soviet Union, and even the failure of Boehner's own "leadership" to address these real-life issues.
Nonetheless, Boehner is suing Obama for his "effort to erode the power of the legislative branch."
Let's check the numbers. So far, Obama's White House has issued 183 presidential orders. Yet George W. Bush was far more outrageous, using this power 291 times. Did Boehner try to sue George W. for aggressive unilateralism?
No. Boehner endorsed his fellow Republican's executive orders, even writing to Bush in 2008 pleading with him to exercise that presidential power for a national emergency -- in this case, exempting a "historic steamboat" in his home state of Ohio from safety regulations.
And what about Ronald Reagan's 381 executive orders, Richard Nixon's 346, Dwight Eisenhower's 484, Herbert Hoover's 968, and Teddy Roosevelt's 1,081?
I happen to oppose the use of these orders -- but I also oppose using them to play crass partisan politics, as this goofy speaker is doing.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.