SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Netanyahu Can Disinform on Iran Just as Well as Iraq
Jun 24, 2014
The turmoil in Iraq has led TV chat shows to trot out an array of hawks, many of whom had been cheerleaders for the 2003 invasion that set up the current crisis. NBC's Meet the Press was no exception, bringing on former Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney (6/15/14) and then more recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (6/22/14), who warned that the wrong moves now could strengthen Iran.
It's worth remembering that Netanyahu was wrong about Iraq when it mattered. Jim Lobe (LobeLog, 9/29/13) has recalled some of Netanyahu's 2002 congressional testimony, which included assertions like this:
There is not question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons-no question whatsoever.
Interesting, then, to see Meet the Press host David Gregory pose a question to Netanyahu this way:
You're well-briefed on how the United States is approaching its negotiations with Iran to get it to abandon a nuclear weapons program. Are you concerned, based on anything that you've seen, that the US is softening its negotiating stance to try to get Iran's help in Iraq?
The problem might be how "well-briefed" David Gregory is. Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program; there are some allegations that the country may have done some research that was geared towards eventual weapons development, but those allegations remain just that-allegations.
The current negotiations concern uranium enrichment, which is not the same thing as a weapons program.
And it is not clear why anyone would think Netanyahu is an expert on this matter anyway. He has consistently warned that Iran was getting closer to developing the bomb (Wide Asleep in America, 7/16/13), with no evidence to support his claims-and plenty, as nuclear expert Yousaf Butt (Reuters, 2/22/13) has written, backing up Iran's longstanding contention that it is not developing nuclear weapons.
There have been many questions raised about why the Iraq hawks are still on TV talking about Iraq. That's a fine point. But Netanyahu's ubiquity as an Iran expert is a reminder that Iraq isn't the only issue on which TV bookers have relied on guests who have been, and continue to be, wrong.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The turmoil in Iraq has led TV chat shows to trot out an array of hawks, many of whom had been cheerleaders for the 2003 invasion that set up the current crisis. NBC's Meet the Press was no exception, bringing on former Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney (6/15/14) and then more recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (6/22/14), who warned that the wrong moves now could strengthen Iran.
It's worth remembering that Netanyahu was wrong about Iraq when it mattered. Jim Lobe (LobeLog, 9/29/13) has recalled some of Netanyahu's 2002 congressional testimony, which included assertions like this:
There is not question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons-no question whatsoever.
Interesting, then, to see Meet the Press host David Gregory pose a question to Netanyahu this way:
You're well-briefed on how the United States is approaching its negotiations with Iran to get it to abandon a nuclear weapons program. Are you concerned, based on anything that you've seen, that the US is softening its negotiating stance to try to get Iran's help in Iraq?
The problem might be how "well-briefed" David Gregory is. Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program; there are some allegations that the country may have done some research that was geared towards eventual weapons development, but those allegations remain just that-allegations.
The current negotiations concern uranium enrichment, which is not the same thing as a weapons program.
And it is not clear why anyone would think Netanyahu is an expert on this matter anyway. He has consistently warned that Iran was getting closer to developing the bomb (Wide Asleep in America, 7/16/13), with no evidence to support his claims-and plenty, as nuclear expert Yousaf Butt (Reuters, 2/22/13) has written, backing up Iran's longstanding contention that it is not developing nuclear weapons.
There have been many questions raised about why the Iraq hawks are still on TV talking about Iraq. That's a fine point. But Netanyahu's ubiquity as an Iran expert is a reminder that Iraq isn't the only issue on which TV bookers have relied on guests who have been, and continue to be, wrong.
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The turmoil in Iraq has led TV chat shows to trot out an array of hawks, many of whom had been cheerleaders for the 2003 invasion that set up the current crisis. NBC's Meet the Press was no exception, bringing on former Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney (6/15/14) and then more recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (6/22/14), who warned that the wrong moves now could strengthen Iran.
It's worth remembering that Netanyahu was wrong about Iraq when it mattered. Jim Lobe (LobeLog, 9/29/13) has recalled some of Netanyahu's 2002 congressional testimony, which included assertions like this:
There is not question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons-no question whatsoever.
Interesting, then, to see Meet the Press host David Gregory pose a question to Netanyahu this way:
You're well-briefed on how the United States is approaching its negotiations with Iran to get it to abandon a nuclear weapons program. Are you concerned, based on anything that you've seen, that the US is softening its negotiating stance to try to get Iran's help in Iraq?
The problem might be how "well-briefed" David Gregory is. Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program; there are some allegations that the country may have done some research that was geared towards eventual weapons development, but those allegations remain just that-allegations.
The current negotiations concern uranium enrichment, which is not the same thing as a weapons program.
And it is not clear why anyone would think Netanyahu is an expert on this matter anyway. He has consistently warned that Iran was getting closer to developing the bomb (Wide Asleep in America, 7/16/13), with no evidence to support his claims-and plenty, as nuclear expert Yousaf Butt (Reuters, 2/22/13) has written, backing up Iran's longstanding contention that it is not developing nuclear weapons.
There have been many questions raised about why the Iraq hawks are still on TV talking about Iraq. That's a fine point. But Netanyahu's ubiquity as an Iran expert is a reminder that Iraq isn't the only issue on which TV bookers have relied on guests who have been, and continue to be, wrong.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy