SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Netanyahu Can Disinform on Iran Just as Well as Iraq
Jun 24, 2014
The turmoil in Iraq has led TV chat shows to trot out an array of hawks, many of whom had been cheerleaders for the 2003 invasion that set up the current crisis. NBC's Meet the Press was no exception, bringing on former Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney (6/15/14) and then more recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (6/22/14), who warned that the wrong moves now could strengthen Iran.
It's worth remembering that Netanyahu was wrong about Iraq when it mattered. Jim Lobe (LobeLog, 9/29/13) has recalled some of Netanyahu's 2002 congressional testimony, which included assertions like this:
There is not question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons-no question whatsoever.
Interesting, then, to see Meet the Press host David Gregory pose a question to Netanyahu this way:
You're well-briefed on how the United States is approaching its negotiations with Iran to get it to abandon a nuclear weapons program. Are you concerned, based on anything that you've seen, that the US is softening its negotiating stance to try to get Iran's help in Iraq?
The problem might be how "well-briefed" David Gregory is. Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program; there are some allegations that the country may have done some research that was geared towards eventual weapons development, but those allegations remain just that-allegations.
The current negotiations concern uranium enrichment, which is not the same thing as a weapons program.
And it is not clear why anyone would think Netanyahu is an expert on this matter anyway. He has consistently warned that Iran was getting closer to developing the bomb (Wide Asleep in America, 7/16/13), with no evidence to support his claims-and plenty, as nuclear expert Yousaf Butt (Reuters, 2/22/13) has written, backing up Iran's longstanding contention that it is not developing nuclear weapons.
There have been many questions raised about why the Iraq hawks are still on TV talking about Iraq. That's a fine point. But Netanyahu's ubiquity as an Iran expert is a reminder that Iraq isn't the only issue on which TV bookers have relied on guests who have been, and continue to be, wrong.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The turmoil in Iraq has led TV chat shows to trot out an array of hawks, many of whom had been cheerleaders for the 2003 invasion that set up the current crisis. NBC's Meet the Press was no exception, bringing on former Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney (6/15/14) and then more recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (6/22/14), who warned that the wrong moves now could strengthen Iran.
It's worth remembering that Netanyahu was wrong about Iraq when it mattered. Jim Lobe (LobeLog, 9/29/13) has recalled some of Netanyahu's 2002 congressional testimony, which included assertions like this:
There is not question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons-no question whatsoever.
Interesting, then, to see Meet the Press host David Gregory pose a question to Netanyahu this way:
You're well-briefed on how the United States is approaching its negotiations with Iran to get it to abandon a nuclear weapons program. Are you concerned, based on anything that you've seen, that the US is softening its negotiating stance to try to get Iran's help in Iraq?
The problem might be how "well-briefed" David Gregory is. Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program; there are some allegations that the country may have done some research that was geared towards eventual weapons development, but those allegations remain just that-allegations.
The current negotiations concern uranium enrichment, which is not the same thing as a weapons program.
And it is not clear why anyone would think Netanyahu is an expert on this matter anyway. He has consistently warned that Iran was getting closer to developing the bomb (Wide Asleep in America, 7/16/13), with no evidence to support his claims-and plenty, as nuclear expert Yousaf Butt (Reuters, 2/22/13) has written, backing up Iran's longstanding contention that it is not developing nuclear weapons.
There have been many questions raised about why the Iraq hawks are still on TV talking about Iraq. That's a fine point. But Netanyahu's ubiquity as an Iran expert is a reminder that Iraq isn't the only issue on which TV bookers have relied on guests who have been, and continue to be, wrong.
Peter Hart
Peter Hart is the Domestic Communications Director at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
The turmoil in Iraq has led TV chat shows to trot out an array of hawks, many of whom had been cheerleaders for the 2003 invasion that set up the current crisis. NBC's Meet the Press was no exception, bringing on former Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney (6/15/14) and then more recently Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (6/22/14), who warned that the wrong moves now could strengthen Iran.
It's worth remembering that Netanyahu was wrong about Iraq when it mattered. Jim Lobe (LobeLog, 9/29/13) has recalled some of Netanyahu's 2002 congressional testimony, which included assertions like this:
There is not question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons-no question whatsoever.
Interesting, then, to see Meet the Press host David Gregory pose a question to Netanyahu this way:
You're well-briefed on how the United States is approaching its negotiations with Iran to get it to abandon a nuclear weapons program. Are you concerned, based on anything that you've seen, that the US is softening its negotiating stance to try to get Iran's help in Iraq?
The problem might be how "well-briefed" David Gregory is. Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program; there are some allegations that the country may have done some research that was geared towards eventual weapons development, but those allegations remain just that-allegations.
The current negotiations concern uranium enrichment, which is not the same thing as a weapons program.
And it is not clear why anyone would think Netanyahu is an expert on this matter anyway. He has consistently warned that Iran was getting closer to developing the bomb (Wide Asleep in America, 7/16/13), with no evidence to support his claims-and plenty, as nuclear expert Yousaf Butt (Reuters, 2/22/13) has written, backing up Iran's longstanding contention that it is not developing nuclear weapons.
There have been many questions raised about why the Iraq hawks are still on TV talking about Iraq. That's a fine point. But Netanyahu's ubiquity as an Iran expert is a reminder that Iraq isn't the only issue on which TV bookers have relied on guests who have been, and continue to be, wrong.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.