Mother Earth Day 2014: Time for a Paradigm Change
Rights for Mother Earth, not Corporations
With each day's headlines it becomes more and more clear that our modern, industrialized culture is a suicide machine. Not only has our consumption of fossil fuels polluted our air, land, and water to an extent that threatens the long-term survival of humans and other species, but our political system has evolved into a Frankenstein monster. Corporations, institutions created by people, have gained so much power they threaten our very survival.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court re-asserted corporations' right to free speech by lifting caps on campaign spending. This move further amplifies the voices of these "legal persons" in our so-called democratic process. Actual human beings now have even less influence on political decisions that affect them than they had before--which, according to a forthcoming study of oligarchy in U.S. politics, was not very much.
This extreme polarization comes at a time when environmental and financial crises are having increasingly devastating impacts on people and communities. Thus, at a time when we need our political institutions to be even more responsive to rapidly changing and uncertain conditions, they have become deaf to the voices of people they are -in theory--supposed to serve.
In response to these multiple crises of our democracy, ecology, and economy, people's movements around the world have been coming together to challenge the dominant paradigm of global capitalism and corporate power. These movements helped re-name "Earth Day" in 2009 to "International Mother Earth Day"--recognizing both the international dimension of our environmental responsibilities and, more importantly, the intrinsic connections between humans and the natural world. They are calling for the legal recognition of rights for Mother Earth.
Reference to "Mother Earth" signifies a radical shift in paradigms. To view the Earth as our mother--as the source of all life, health, and sustenance, means that our own well-being depends on our respect and care for her. To see nature as a living being commands a reverence that prevents her exploitation for monetary gain. Indigenous cultures have preserved this ancient knowledge and, through popular movements, they have been bringing this knowledge to a wider public.
In 2010, one of the most important international environmental meetings took place in Cochabamba, Boliva. Frustrated by the persistent failures of the UN climate negotiations, Bolivian president, Evo Morales called upon fellow heads of state and social movements to join him for the World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth.
The People's Agreement generated by the conference of more than 30,000 representatives of governments and civil society put forward several promising proposals for addressing the climate crisis. These include a resolution of the "ecological debt" the rich countries of the global North owe to the countries of the global South, the establishment of a global Climate Justice Tribunal, and a Universal Declaration on the Rights of Mother Earth.
What is most promising about these proposals is not their likelihood for immediate policy impact, but rather their radical departure from the prevailing policy proposals which will do little to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These proposals require the mass mobilization of popular movements around the kind of paradigm-shifting solutions that are required to avert the worst effects of the climate crisis.
As the Cochabamba People's Agreement points out: "The corporations and governments of the so-called 'developed' countries, in complicity with a segment of the scientific community, have led us to discuss climate change as a problem limited to the rise in temperature without questioning the cause, which is the capitalist system." Such language is unthinkable in the policy arenas dominated by governments. Yet, it is our only hope for survival.
The leadership of global social movements can help bring about the alternative ways of thinking and living that are possible. But only if we all play our parts in these movements.
Many U.S. liberals resist the language of "Mother Earth" because it conjures up images of new-age spiritualism or otherwise diminishes the seriousness and legitimacy of environmental agendas. Yet, decades of environmental activism have failed to deter practices that threaten the viability of our ecosystems. Conventional approaches to environmental activism have failed to target the dominant consumerist culture that depends upon constantly expanding consumption. Thus many "Earth Day" activities are no more than green consumer fairs.
The Cochabamba Agreement declares that "[u]nder capitalism, Mother Earth is converted into a source of raw materials, and human beings into consumers and a means of production, into people that are seen as valuable only for what they own, and not for what they are."
Those seeking a better world for us and for future generations must embrace the language and ideas of our indigenous brothers and sisters and help change our civilizational paradigm. We can start by helping tell the story of International Mother Earth Day--the new name for the old "Earth Day."
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
With each day's headlines it becomes more and more clear that our modern, industrialized culture is a suicide machine. Not only has our consumption of fossil fuels polluted our air, land, and water to an extent that threatens the long-term survival of humans and other species, but our political system has evolved into a Frankenstein monster. Corporations, institutions created by people, have gained so much power they threaten our very survival.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court re-asserted corporations' right to free speech by lifting caps on campaign spending. This move further amplifies the voices of these "legal persons" in our so-called democratic process. Actual human beings now have even less influence on political decisions that affect them than they had before--which, according to a forthcoming study of oligarchy in U.S. politics, was not very much.
This extreme polarization comes at a time when environmental and financial crises are having increasingly devastating impacts on people and communities. Thus, at a time when we need our political institutions to be even more responsive to rapidly changing and uncertain conditions, they have become deaf to the voices of people they are -in theory--supposed to serve.
In response to these multiple crises of our democracy, ecology, and economy, people's movements around the world have been coming together to challenge the dominant paradigm of global capitalism and corporate power. These movements helped re-name "Earth Day" in 2009 to "International Mother Earth Day"--recognizing both the international dimension of our environmental responsibilities and, more importantly, the intrinsic connections between humans and the natural world. They are calling for the legal recognition of rights for Mother Earth.
Reference to "Mother Earth" signifies a radical shift in paradigms. To view the Earth as our mother--as the source of all life, health, and sustenance, means that our own well-being depends on our respect and care for her. To see nature as a living being commands a reverence that prevents her exploitation for monetary gain. Indigenous cultures have preserved this ancient knowledge and, through popular movements, they have been bringing this knowledge to a wider public.
In 2010, one of the most important international environmental meetings took place in Cochabamba, Boliva. Frustrated by the persistent failures of the UN climate negotiations, Bolivian president, Evo Morales called upon fellow heads of state and social movements to join him for the World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth.
The People's Agreement generated by the conference of more than 30,000 representatives of governments and civil society put forward several promising proposals for addressing the climate crisis. These include a resolution of the "ecological debt" the rich countries of the global North owe to the countries of the global South, the establishment of a global Climate Justice Tribunal, and a Universal Declaration on the Rights of Mother Earth.
What is most promising about these proposals is not their likelihood for immediate policy impact, but rather their radical departure from the prevailing policy proposals which will do little to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These proposals require the mass mobilization of popular movements around the kind of paradigm-shifting solutions that are required to avert the worst effects of the climate crisis.
As the Cochabamba People's Agreement points out: "The corporations and governments of the so-called 'developed' countries, in complicity with a segment of the scientific community, have led us to discuss climate change as a problem limited to the rise in temperature without questioning the cause, which is the capitalist system." Such language is unthinkable in the policy arenas dominated by governments. Yet, it is our only hope for survival.
The leadership of global social movements can help bring about the alternative ways of thinking and living that are possible. But only if we all play our parts in these movements.
Many U.S. liberals resist the language of "Mother Earth" because it conjures up images of new-age spiritualism or otherwise diminishes the seriousness and legitimacy of environmental agendas. Yet, decades of environmental activism have failed to deter practices that threaten the viability of our ecosystems. Conventional approaches to environmental activism have failed to target the dominant consumerist culture that depends upon constantly expanding consumption. Thus many "Earth Day" activities are no more than green consumer fairs.
The Cochabamba Agreement declares that "[u]nder capitalism, Mother Earth is converted into a source of raw materials, and human beings into consumers and a means of production, into people that are seen as valuable only for what they own, and not for what they are."
Those seeking a better world for us and for future generations must embrace the language and ideas of our indigenous brothers and sisters and help change our civilizational paradigm. We can start by helping tell the story of International Mother Earth Day--the new name for the old "Earth Day."
With each day's headlines it becomes more and more clear that our modern, industrialized culture is a suicide machine. Not only has our consumption of fossil fuels polluted our air, land, and water to an extent that threatens the long-term survival of humans and other species, but our political system has evolved into a Frankenstein monster. Corporations, institutions created by people, have gained so much power they threaten our very survival.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court re-asserted corporations' right to free speech by lifting caps on campaign spending. This move further amplifies the voices of these "legal persons" in our so-called democratic process. Actual human beings now have even less influence on political decisions that affect them than they had before--which, according to a forthcoming study of oligarchy in U.S. politics, was not very much.
This extreme polarization comes at a time when environmental and financial crises are having increasingly devastating impacts on people and communities. Thus, at a time when we need our political institutions to be even more responsive to rapidly changing and uncertain conditions, they have become deaf to the voices of people they are -in theory--supposed to serve.
In response to these multiple crises of our democracy, ecology, and economy, people's movements around the world have been coming together to challenge the dominant paradigm of global capitalism and corporate power. These movements helped re-name "Earth Day" in 2009 to "International Mother Earth Day"--recognizing both the international dimension of our environmental responsibilities and, more importantly, the intrinsic connections between humans and the natural world. They are calling for the legal recognition of rights for Mother Earth.
Reference to "Mother Earth" signifies a radical shift in paradigms. To view the Earth as our mother--as the source of all life, health, and sustenance, means that our own well-being depends on our respect and care for her. To see nature as a living being commands a reverence that prevents her exploitation for monetary gain. Indigenous cultures have preserved this ancient knowledge and, through popular movements, they have been bringing this knowledge to a wider public.
In 2010, one of the most important international environmental meetings took place in Cochabamba, Boliva. Frustrated by the persistent failures of the UN climate negotiations, Bolivian president, Evo Morales called upon fellow heads of state and social movements to join him for the World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth.
The People's Agreement generated by the conference of more than 30,000 representatives of governments and civil society put forward several promising proposals for addressing the climate crisis. These include a resolution of the "ecological debt" the rich countries of the global North owe to the countries of the global South, the establishment of a global Climate Justice Tribunal, and a Universal Declaration on the Rights of Mother Earth.
What is most promising about these proposals is not their likelihood for immediate policy impact, but rather their radical departure from the prevailing policy proposals which will do little to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These proposals require the mass mobilization of popular movements around the kind of paradigm-shifting solutions that are required to avert the worst effects of the climate crisis.
As the Cochabamba People's Agreement points out: "The corporations and governments of the so-called 'developed' countries, in complicity with a segment of the scientific community, have led us to discuss climate change as a problem limited to the rise in temperature without questioning the cause, which is the capitalist system." Such language is unthinkable in the policy arenas dominated by governments. Yet, it is our only hope for survival.
The leadership of global social movements can help bring about the alternative ways of thinking and living that are possible. But only if we all play our parts in these movements.
Many U.S. liberals resist the language of "Mother Earth" because it conjures up images of new-age spiritualism or otherwise diminishes the seriousness and legitimacy of environmental agendas. Yet, decades of environmental activism have failed to deter practices that threaten the viability of our ecosystems. Conventional approaches to environmental activism have failed to target the dominant consumerist culture that depends upon constantly expanding consumption. Thus many "Earth Day" activities are no more than green consumer fairs.
The Cochabamba Agreement declares that "[u]nder capitalism, Mother Earth is converted into a source of raw materials, and human beings into consumers and a means of production, into people that are seen as valuable only for what they own, and not for what they are."
Those seeking a better world for us and for future generations must embrace the language and ideas of our indigenous brothers and sisters and help change our civilizational paradigm. We can start by helping tell the story of International Mother Earth Day--the new name for the old "Earth Day."