

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
After the recent tar sands pipeline spill in Arkansas, where thousands of gallons of toxic oil ran through the streets of a small community, the climate change organization 350.org is asking Americans to join in the public commenting process for the Keystone XL pipeline.
The U.S. State Department is reviewing applications for permits needed for the international pipeline to advance. The State Department is soliciting public comment on the issue until April 22.

350.org, which helped plan a mass rally in Washington, DC on President's Day and mass arrests last year to protest the planned pipeline, now wants to flood the State Department with one million substantive comments from citizens. Learn more here.
The organization is also honoring the retirement of Dr. James Hansen, one of America's most respected climatologists, as head of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies.
350.org leader Bill McKibben explains why Hansen has been so critical to the climate change movement and why public comments on the pipeline are needed:
"One reason we're fighting the pipeline is because Jim Hansen did the math to show that if we combusted the tar sands on top of all else we burn, it would be 'game over for the climate.' So far that message hasn't gotten through: the State Department hired a bunch of compromised oil industry analysts to 'review' KXL, and unsurprisingly they decided it would have 'minimal' environmental impact. We need to get them to take reality seriously, and change that assessment."
If you would like to file a comment, you can do so via the Federal Register or at the 350.org site. Substantive comments from people in the pipeline states are especially useful.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.S. State Department is reviewing applications for permits needed for the international pipeline to advance. The State Department is soliciting public comment on the issue until April 22.

350.org, which helped plan a mass rally in Washington, DC on President's Day and mass arrests last year to protest the planned pipeline, now wants to flood the State Department with one million substantive comments from citizens. Learn more here.
The organization is also honoring the retirement of Dr. James Hansen, one of America's most respected climatologists, as head of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies.
350.org leader Bill McKibben explains why Hansen has been so critical to the climate change movement and why public comments on the pipeline are needed:
"One reason we're fighting the pipeline is because Jim Hansen did the math to show that if we combusted the tar sands on top of all else we burn, it would be 'game over for the climate.' So far that message hasn't gotten through: the State Department hired a bunch of compromised oil industry analysts to 'review' KXL, and unsurprisingly they decided it would have 'minimal' environmental impact. We need to get them to take reality seriously, and change that assessment."
If you would like to file a comment, you can do so via the Federal Register or at the 350.org site. Substantive comments from people in the pipeline states are especially useful.
The U.S. State Department is reviewing applications for permits needed for the international pipeline to advance. The State Department is soliciting public comment on the issue until April 22.

350.org, which helped plan a mass rally in Washington, DC on President's Day and mass arrests last year to protest the planned pipeline, now wants to flood the State Department with one million substantive comments from citizens. Learn more here.
The organization is also honoring the retirement of Dr. James Hansen, one of America's most respected climatologists, as head of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies.
350.org leader Bill McKibben explains why Hansen has been so critical to the climate change movement and why public comments on the pipeline are needed:
"One reason we're fighting the pipeline is because Jim Hansen did the math to show that if we combusted the tar sands on top of all else we burn, it would be 'game over for the climate.' So far that message hasn't gotten through: the State Department hired a bunch of compromised oil industry analysts to 'review' KXL, and unsurprisingly they decided it would have 'minimal' environmental impact. We need to get them to take reality seriously, and change that assessment."
If you would like to file a comment, you can do so via the Federal Register or at the 350.org site. Substantive comments from people in the pipeline states are especially useful.