

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As summer comes to an end, much of the country is still suffering from drought conditions.

Looking ahead, there seems to be little relief for farmers and ranchers in the short-term. The National Weather Service predicts that drought conditions will continue for the Plains and much of the West through the Fall with little indication that precipitation levels will return to normal, let alone to the level needed to alleviate drought conditions. Compounding this, the oil and gas fracking boom, especially in the Rockies, is starting to become a competitor for water resources. Fracking requires a significant amount of water. A recent report highlighted that the amount of water currently needed for fracking operations in Colorado is up to 13 billion gallons per year, enough to serve nearly 300,000 people.
For their operations, oil and gas companies pay as much as $1000 to $2000 for an acre foot of water. In contrast, farmers and ranchers pay about $30 per acre foot and can pay up to $100 when water is scarce. The large amounts paid by the oil and gas companies are often a welcome relief for cash-strapped utilities and water departments, which sets up an uncomfortable dynamic. Farmers and ranchers cannot match the price paid by oil and gas companies, which means they face an increasing risk of water shortage that will likely impede their crop and cattle production. At the same time, utilities and water departments need money and the increased price that oil and gas companies pay would help fund infrastructure upkeep and other necessary improvements.
So, either farmers and ranchers (and eventually consumers) lose out on affordable water or the utilities and water departments lose out on funding. The only party that doesn't lose out is the oil and gas companies, who are already making record profits from fracking. These kinds of lose-lose-win situations will likely only increase in number, as we seem to be losing the battle against extreme energy and lack of action on climate change will result in increased water shortages.
But, it doesn't have to be this way. Shifting the focus from extreme energy to renewable sources like wind and solar would both stave off the worst impact of climate change and provide an energy source that doesn't consume huge amounts of water. It's not too late yet, but we are facing a rapidly closing window of opportunity.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

Looking ahead, there seems to be little relief for farmers and ranchers in the short-term. The National Weather Service predicts that drought conditions will continue for the Plains and much of the West through the Fall with little indication that precipitation levels will return to normal, let alone to the level needed to alleviate drought conditions. Compounding this, the oil and gas fracking boom, especially in the Rockies, is starting to become a competitor for water resources. Fracking requires a significant amount of water. A recent report highlighted that the amount of water currently needed for fracking operations in Colorado is up to 13 billion gallons per year, enough to serve nearly 300,000 people.
For their operations, oil and gas companies pay as much as $1000 to $2000 for an acre foot of water. In contrast, farmers and ranchers pay about $30 per acre foot and can pay up to $100 when water is scarce. The large amounts paid by the oil and gas companies are often a welcome relief for cash-strapped utilities and water departments, which sets up an uncomfortable dynamic. Farmers and ranchers cannot match the price paid by oil and gas companies, which means they face an increasing risk of water shortage that will likely impede their crop and cattle production. At the same time, utilities and water departments need money and the increased price that oil and gas companies pay would help fund infrastructure upkeep and other necessary improvements.
So, either farmers and ranchers (and eventually consumers) lose out on affordable water or the utilities and water departments lose out on funding. The only party that doesn't lose out is the oil and gas companies, who are already making record profits from fracking. These kinds of lose-lose-win situations will likely only increase in number, as we seem to be losing the battle against extreme energy and lack of action on climate change will result in increased water shortages.
But, it doesn't have to be this way. Shifting the focus from extreme energy to renewable sources like wind and solar would both stave off the worst impact of climate change and provide an energy source that doesn't consume huge amounts of water. It's not too late yet, but we are facing a rapidly closing window of opportunity.

Looking ahead, there seems to be little relief for farmers and ranchers in the short-term. The National Weather Service predicts that drought conditions will continue for the Plains and much of the West through the Fall with little indication that precipitation levels will return to normal, let alone to the level needed to alleviate drought conditions. Compounding this, the oil and gas fracking boom, especially in the Rockies, is starting to become a competitor for water resources. Fracking requires a significant amount of water. A recent report highlighted that the amount of water currently needed for fracking operations in Colorado is up to 13 billion gallons per year, enough to serve nearly 300,000 people.
For their operations, oil and gas companies pay as much as $1000 to $2000 for an acre foot of water. In contrast, farmers and ranchers pay about $30 per acre foot and can pay up to $100 when water is scarce. The large amounts paid by the oil and gas companies are often a welcome relief for cash-strapped utilities and water departments, which sets up an uncomfortable dynamic. Farmers and ranchers cannot match the price paid by oil and gas companies, which means they face an increasing risk of water shortage that will likely impede their crop and cattle production. At the same time, utilities and water departments need money and the increased price that oil and gas companies pay would help fund infrastructure upkeep and other necessary improvements.
So, either farmers and ranchers (and eventually consumers) lose out on affordable water or the utilities and water departments lose out on funding. The only party that doesn't lose out is the oil and gas companies, who are already making record profits from fracking. These kinds of lose-lose-win situations will likely only increase in number, as we seem to be losing the battle against extreme energy and lack of action on climate change will result in increased water shortages.
But, it doesn't have to be this way. Shifting the focus from extreme energy to renewable sources like wind and solar would both stave off the worst impact of climate change and provide an energy source that doesn't consume huge amounts of water. It's not too late yet, but we are facing a rapidly closing window of opportunity.