

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Big Industrial Ag pretends to go organic. PC behemoths mimic Apple products. Barack Obama goes to the right of the Republicans on civil liberties. Mitt Romney suddenly portrays himself as a left-leaning moderate on immigration. It seems no matter the arena, the most cliched move in corporate and political combat is to co-opt an opponent's message, expecting nobody to notice or care.

One spot for the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (read: the casinos) shows a woman climbing onto her desk to demand a vacation. Another for McDonald's implores us to fight back against employers and "overthrow the working lunch." Still another for a Coca-Cola subsidiary seizes on the stress of harsh working conditions to create buzz for a branded "Take the Year Off" contest.
"Marketers are adopting the theme of workers' rights at a time when unions themselves are confronting declines in membership and influence," notes the Times. "In effect, some labor experts say, they are turning a pro-worker theme on its head to serve the corporate interest."
In one sense, this is good news for organized labor -- at a moment when unions are under assault, the ads reflect polls showing persistent mass support for both the concept of worker solidarity and the economic outrage voiced by worker protests. Indeed, companies wouldn't be echoing such themes if they didn't know they were wildly popular.
And yet, that's also why organized labor can't take too much solace. Image-wise, the ad campaign undermines unions by effectively severing the popular pro-worker message from the labor movement brand. Preposterously, the spots insinuate that workers can get better treatment -- and wield real power in the employer-employee relationship -- wholly without unions.
It's a fantasy, of course.
Not coincidentally, as union density in America has declined, so too have workers' wages, benefits, workplace protections and negotiating power. Additionally, as the Economic Policy Institute documents, unions not only help their own members but they also set industry-wide standards. So when unions lose ground, all workers lose out.
The ads imply the opposite by suggesting that individual workers don't need solidarity (ie. collective bargaining, unions, etc.) to get ahead, and what's particularly galling is that this message comes from interests that have been hostile to the labor movement.
For example, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority may ostensibly speak for a city with a comparatively high union density -- but that's not because that city's key tourism industry is friendly to labor. On the contrary, the casino industry has often led vicious fights against unions.
McDonald's and Coca-Cola are even worse. While the former touts the virtues of lunch breaks -- workplace benefits standardized through labor movement activism -- journalist Eric Schlosser has documented the fast food company's aggressive union busting. Meanwhile, the beverage conglomerate advertising the need for more worker vacations -- again, benefits originally secured through labor organizing -- has fought organizing drives in the United States and has faced international outrage over alleged anti-union violence abroad.
Put it all together, and you see the sleight of hand: in the same way rapacious oil companies try to greenwash their brands to align them with environmental sentiment, the particular industries and companies airing these ads are subtly "workerwashing" their brands in an attempt to equate themselves with populist economic outrage.
That they can accomplish this with so few noticing proves that in the age of truthiness, anything can be corporatized -- even the anti-corporate zeitgeist.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Big Industrial Ag pretends to go organic. PC behemoths mimic Apple products. Barack Obama goes to the right of the Republicans on civil liberties. Mitt Romney suddenly portrays himself as a left-leaning moderate on immigration. It seems no matter the arena, the most cliched move in corporate and political combat is to co-opt an opponent's message, expecting nobody to notice or care.

One spot for the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (read: the casinos) shows a woman climbing onto her desk to demand a vacation. Another for McDonald's implores us to fight back against employers and "overthrow the working lunch." Still another for a Coca-Cola subsidiary seizes on the stress of harsh working conditions to create buzz for a branded "Take the Year Off" contest.
"Marketers are adopting the theme of workers' rights at a time when unions themselves are confronting declines in membership and influence," notes the Times. "In effect, some labor experts say, they are turning a pro-worker theme on its head to serve the corporate interest."
In one sense, this is good news for organized labor -- at a moment when unions are under assault, the ads reflect polls showing persistent mass support for both the concept of worker solidarity and the economic outrage voiced by worker protests. Indeed, companies wouldn't be echoing such themes if they didn't know they were wildly popular.
And yet, that's also why organized labor can't take too much solace. Image-wise, the ad campaign undermines unions by effectively severing the popular pro-worker message from the labor movement brand. Preposterously, the spots insinuate that workers can get better treatment -- and wield real power in the employer-employee relationship -- wholly without unions.
It's a fantasy, of course.
Not coincidentally, as union density in America has declined, so too have workers' wages, benefits, workplace protections and negotiating power. Additionally, as the Economic Policy Institute documents, unions not only help their own members but they also set industry-wide standards. So when unions lose ground, all workers lose out.
The ads imply the opposite by suggesting that individual workers don't need solidarity (ie. collective bargaining, unions, etc.) to get ahead, and what's particularly galling is that this message comes from interests that have been hostile to the labor movement.
For example, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority may ostensibly speak for a city with a comparatively high union density -- but that's not because that city's key tourism industry is friendly to labor. On the contrary, the casino industry has often led vicious fights against unions.
McDonald's and Coca-Cola are even worse. While the former touts the virtues of lunch breaks -- workplace benefits standardized through labor movement activism -- journalist Eric Schlosser has documented the fast food company's aggressive union busting. Meanwhile, the beverage conglomerate advertising the need for more worker vacations -- again, benefits originally secured through labor organizing -- has fought organizing drives in the United States and has faced international outrage over alleged anti-union violence abroad.
Put it all together, and you see the sleight of hand: in the same way rapacious oil companies try to greenwash their brands to align them with environmental sentiment, the particular industries and companies airing these ads are subtly "workerwashing" their brands in an attempt to equate themselves with populist economic outrage.
That they can accomplish this with so few noticing proves that in the age of truthiness, anything can be corporatized -- even the anti-corporate zeitgeist.
Big Industrial Ag pretends to go organic. PC behemoths mimic Apple products. Barack Obama goes to the right of the Republicans on civil liberties. Mitt Romney suddenly portrays himself as a left-leaning moderate on immigration. It seems no matter the arena, the most cliched move in corporate and political combat is to co-opt an opponent's message, expecting nobody to notice or care.

One spot for the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (read: the casinos) shows a woman climbing onto her desk to demand a vacation. Another for McDonald's implores us to fight back against employers and "overthrow the working lunch." Still another for a Coca-Cola subsidiary seizes on the stress of harsh working conditions to create buzz for a branded "Take the Year Off" contest.
"Marketers are adopting the theme of workers' rights at a time when unions themselves are confronting declines in membership and influence," notes the Times. "In effect, some labor experts say, they are turning a pro-worker theme on its head to serve the corporate interest."
In one sense, this is good news for organized labor -- at a moment when unions are under assault, the ads reflect polls showing persistent mass support for both the concept of worker solidarity and the economic outrage voiced by worker protests. Indeed, companies wouldn't be echoing such themes if they didn't know they were wildly popular.
And yet, that's also why organized labor can't take too much solace. Image-wise, the ad campaign undermines unions by effectively severing the popular pro-worker message from the labor movement brand. Preposterously, the spots insinuate that workers can get better treatment -- and wield real power in the employer-employee relationship -- wholly without unions.
It's a fantasy, of course.
Not coincidentally, as union density in America has declined, so too have workers' wages, benefits, workplace protections and negotiating power. Additionally, as the Economic Policy Institute documents, unions not only help their own members but they also set industry-wide standards. So when unions lose ground, all workers lose out.
The ads imply the opposite by suggesting that individual workers don't need solidarity (ie. collective bargaining, unions, etc.) to get ahead, and what's particularly galling is that this message comes from interests that have been hostile to the labor movement.
For example, the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority may ostensibly speak for a city with a comparatively high union density -- but that's not because that city's key tourism industry is friendly to labor. On the contrary, the casino industry has often led vicious fights against unions.
McDonald's and Coca-Cola are even worse. While the former touts the virtues of lunch breaks -- workplace benefits standardized through labor movement activism -- journalist Eric Schlosser has documented the fast food company's aggressive union busting. Meanwhile, the beverage conglomerate advertising the need for more worker vacations -- again, benefits originally secured through labor organizing -- has fought organizing drives in the United States and has faced international outrage over alleged anti-union violence abroad.
Put it all together, and you see the sleight of hand: in the same way rapacious oil companies try to greenwash their brands to align them with environmental sentiment, the particular industries and companies airing these ads are subtly "workerwashing" their brands in an attempt to equate themselves with populist economic outrage.
That they can accomplish this with so few noticing proves that in the age of truthiness, anything can be corporatized -- even the anti-corporate zeitgeist.