

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Earlier this week, I received three pieces of mail from my insurance company, Aetna. All three confirmed it. In their eyes and in every manner of decision they make, I am either a medical loss if a claim must be paid or I am a profit if they can deny me.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
Earlier this week, I received three pieces of mail from my insurance company, Aetna. All three confirmed it. In their eyes and in every manner of decision they make, I am either a medical loss if a claim must be paid or I am a profit if they can deny me.

If only we had Medicare for all for life...
My first piece of mail from Aetna was the first round of denials of the medication my doctor ordered to help reduce my gut pain as diagnostic effort and other care continues. That instantly made me upset which also makes me feel worse.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
But it was second piece of mail from Aetna that gnaws at me more. The letter informed me that my employer would be getting a rebate check since Aetna failed to meet the amounts they needed to in approved/paid claims. The letter was a bit celebratory in that it told me that my employer could choose to use the funds for other employee health costs, but I wasn't celebrating. It would have made me happy and healthier to have my medication. While I am sure many employers were pleased to get their insurance rebate checks, I also suspect few will actually use those funds to better the health of their employees in any significant way.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
My gut doesn't feel good. So I appealed, in writing, the decision on my meds. I sent mine through their website on a form and then followed up with a call to make sure they had received it. First they said they didn't and then another person said they did. That brings me to the third piece of mail from Aetna - the acknowledgement that they have received my appeal. Now they have 30 days to work up the next denial for me or to decide to cover the medication. I'm not holding my breath.
To make matters worse, I then get emails from several political campaigns asking me how happy I am about the changes to the system that forced Aetna to send rebates to my employer. Talk about salt in an already painful wound.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
It was amid this that I came upon an e-alert from the New York Times: "Hospital Chain Internal Reports Found Dubious Cardiac Work".
"HCA, the largest for-profit hospital chain in the country, is confronting evidence of unnecessary cardiac treatments at some of its medical centers in Florida after a nurse's complaint prompted an internal investigation.
"The inquiry found that the complaint was far from the only evidence that unnecessary -- even dangerous -- procedures were taking place at some HCA hospitals, driving up costs and increasing profits."
Get it? "Unnecessary cardiac work." What a nice way of putting it when the patients had invasive, painful procedures, or had their chests cracked open for profit. Ugly business, and anything for a buck.
So, what's up with all this fellow patients? It's a pretty screwed up system, eh? The for-profit providers want to test and treat, and the for-profit insurance companies want to deny those tests and that treatment. Who's lying? The answer is not clear as not every decision is without medical merit or even some coincidental evidence that it might have been done in our best interests. But who knows for sure?
And across the table from me sits my husband who has had many heart and artery issues and procedures in his life. Can we ever know for certain all of that was appropriate and necessary? No. What we can know for certain is that big profits were made and that unless a significant number of Americans get sick enough of this system to demand an improved and expanded Medicare for all for life system, the mail and the news will continue to bring messages that simply reinforce the sickness that is entrenched and strengthening within our healthcare system in America.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Earlier this week, I received three pieces of mail from my insurance company, Aetna. All three confirmed it. In their eyes and in every manner of decision they make, I am either a medical loss if a claim must be paid or I am a profit if they can deny me.

If only we had Medicare for all for life...
My first piece of mail from Aetna was the first round of denials of the medication my doctor ordered to help reduce my gut pain as diagnostic effort and other care continues. That instantly made me upset which also makes me feel worse.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
But it was second piece of mail from Aetna that gnaws at me more. The letter informed me that my employer would be getting a rebate check since Aetna failed to meet the amounts they needed to in approved/paid claims. The letter was a bit celebratory in that it told me that my employer could choose to use the funds for other employee health costs, but I wasn't celebrating. It would have made me happy and healthier to have my medication. While I am sure many employers were pleased to get their insurance rebate checks, I also suspect few will actually use those funds to better the health of their employees in any significant way.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
My gut doesn't feel good. So I appealed, in writing, the decision on my meds. I sent mine through their website on a form and then followed up with a call to make sure they had received it. First they said they didn't and then another person said they did. That brings me to the third piece of mail from Aetna - the acknowledgement that they have received my appeal. Now they have 30 days to work up the next denial for me or to decide to cover the medication. I'm not holding my breath.
To make matters worse, I then get emails from several political campaigns asking me how happy I am about the changes to the system that forced Aetna to send rebates to my employer. Talk about salt in an already painful wound.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
It was amid this that I came upon an e-alert from the New York Times: "Hospital Chain Internal Reports Found Dubious Cardiac Work".
"HCA, the largest for-profit hospital chain in the country, is confronting evidence of unnecessary cardiac treatments at some of its medical centers in Florida after a nurse's complaint prompted an internal investigation.
"The inquiry found that the complaint was far from the only evidence that unnecessary -- even dangerous -- procedures were taking place at some HCA hospitals, driving up costs and increasing profits."
Get it? "Unnecessary cardiac work." What a nice way of putting it when the patients had invasive, painful procedures, or had their chests cracked open for profit. Ugly business, and anything for a buck.
So, what's up with all this fellow patients? It's a pretty screwed up system, eh? The for-profit providers want to test and treat, and the for-profit insurance companies want to deny those tests and that treatment. Who's lying? The answer is not clear as not every decision is without medical merit or even some coincidental evidence that it might have been done in our best interests. But who knows for sure?
And across the table from me sits my husband who has had many heart and artery issues and procedures in his life. Can we ever know for certain all of that was appropriate and necessary? No. What we can know for certain is that big profits were made and that unless a significant number of Americans get sick enough of this system to demand an improved and expanded Medicare for all for life system, the mail and the news will continue to bring messages that simply reinforce the sickness that is entrenched and strengthening within our healthcare system in America.
Earlier this week, I received three pieces of mail from my insurance company, Aetna. All three confirmed it. In their eyes and in every manner of decision they make, I am either a medical loss if a claim must be paid or I am a profit if they can deny me.

If only we had Medicare for all for life...
My first piece of mail from Aetna was the first round of denials of the medication my doctor ordered to help reduce my gut pain as diagnostic effort and other care continues. That instantly made me upset which also makes me feel worse.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
But it was second piece of mail from Aetna that gnaws at me more. The letter informed me that my employer would be getting a rebate check since Aetna failed to meet the amounts they needed to in approved/paid claims. The letter was a bit celebratory in that it told me that my employer could choose to use the funds for other employee health costs, but I wasn't celebrating. It would have made me happy and healthier to have my medication. While I am sure many employers were pleased to get their insurance rebate checks, I also suspect few will actually use those funds to better the health of their employees in any significant way.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
My gut doesn't feel good. So I appealed, in writing, the decision on my meds. I sent mine through their website on a form and then followed up with a call to make sure they had received it. First they said they didn't and then another person said they did. That brings me to the third piece of mail from Aetna - the acknowledgement that they have received my appeal. Now they have 30 days to work up the next denial for me or to decide to cover the medication. I'm not holding my breath.
To make matters worse, I then get emails from several political campaigns asking me how happy I am about the changes to the system that forced Aetna to send rebates to my employer. Talk about salt in an already painful wound.
If only we had Medicare for all for life...
It was amid this that I came upon an e-alert from the New York Times: "Hospital Chain Internal Reports Found Dubious Cardiac Work".
"HCA, the largest for-profit hospital chain in the country, is confronting evidence of unnecessary cardiac treatments at some of its medical centers in Florida after a nurse's complaint prompted an internal investigation.
"The inquiry found that the complaint was far from the only evidence that unnecessary -- even dangerous -- procedures were taking place at some HCA hospitals, driving up costs and increasing profits."
Get it? "Unnecessary cardiac work." What a nice way of putting it when the patients had invasive, painful procedures, or had their chests cracked open for profit. Ugly business, and anything for a buck.
So, what's up with all this fellow patients? It's a pretty screwed up system, eh? The for-profit providers want to test and treat, and the for-profit insurance companies want to deny those tests and that treatment. Who's lying? The answer is not clear as not every decision is without medical merit or even some coincidental evidence that it might have been done in our best interests. But who knows for sure?
And across the table from me sits my husband who has had many heart and artery issues and procedures in his life. Can we ever know for certain all of that was appropriate and necessary? No. What we can know for certain is that big profits were made and that unless a significant number of Americans get sick enough of this system to demand an improved and expanded Medicare for all for life system, the mail and the news will continue to bring messages that simply reinforce the sickness that is entrenched and strengthening within our healthcare system in America.