SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
After a Land Day (March 30) statement in which Marwan Barghouti called on Palestinians to launch a popular resistance campaign against Israel's occupation of Palestinian land, the popular Palestinian leader (who was already in prison) was placed in solitary confinement.
After a Land Day (March 30) statement in which Marwan Barghouti called on Palestinians to launch a popular resistance campaign against Israel's occupation of Palestinian land, the popular Palestinian leader (who was already in prison) was placed in solitary confinement. To ignore his warning is the wrong decision, one that can prove costly for the cause of peace in the region.
Barghouti's imprisonment has been sharply criticized by Haaretz, one of the leading Israeli newspapers. A recent Haaretz editorial states, "We can understand him. If Israel had wanted an agreement with the Palestinians it would have released him from prison by now. Barghouti is the most authentic leader Fatah has produced and he is one of the few who can lead his people to an agreement."
Barghouti, a stocky 53 year-old man, has an influence on Palestinians which is inversely proportional to his short stature. Born in the West Bank, since he was a young man he has been a fighter for Palestinian rights and for an end to the occupation of Palestinian land. He joined Fatah when he was 15 years-old and when he was 18 he was arrested by Israeli authorities for his involvement with Palestinian militant groups. He is fluent in Hebrew, which he learned while he was in prison.
In 1987, Barghouti was one of the leaders of the First Intifada, a Palestinian popular uprising against Israel in the West Bank and Gaza. It was a bloody uprising that resulted in the deaths of 1,100 Palestinians and 164 Israelis. In 1998, Barghouti earned an M.A. in International Relations from Birzeit University (BZU), and is married to Fadwa Ibrahim, a lawyer and a passionate advocate for Palestinian's rights.
Barghouti had also a leading role in the Second Intifada, also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada, which started after Ariel Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount, an area highly sacred to both Jews and Muslims. It began in late September of 2000 and ended roughly in 2005. The death toll was brutal: 5,500 Palestinians, 1,100 Israelis and 64 foreigners lost their lives. Barghouti was arrested during the uprising and deported to Jordan, where he stayed for seven years until he was allowed to return under the terms of the Oslo accords of 1994.
Disenchanted with the lack of progress of the Oslo accords, he advocated for a more militant approach in the conflict with Israel. In November of 2000 he declared, "We tried seven years of intifada without negotiations, then seven years of negotiations without intifada. Perhaps it is time to try both simultaneously." In 2002 he wrote in The Washington Post, "The lack of Israeli security is born of the lack of Palestinian freedom. Israel will have security only after the end of occupation, not before."
Barghouti has an unrivaled reputation for personal honesty. Because of that, he was in serious conflict with Yasser Arafat. He accused Arafat and the Fatah party of corruption and his security forces of human rights violations. Although Arafat remained silent about his conflict with Barghouti, Barghouti was highly regarded among Palestinians of all factions.
Barghouti has never hidden his opposition to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. To the accusation that he was a terrorist he answered, "I am not a terrorist, but neither I am a pacifist. I am simply a regular guy from the Palestinian street advocating only what every other oppressed person has advocated - the right to help myself in the absence of help from anywhere else...I don't seek to destroy Israel but only to end its occupation of my country."
After Barghouti was put on trial, Uri Avnery, one of the leading Israeli peace activists who calls Barghouti 'The New Mandela,' wrote, "His trial was a mockery, resembling a Roman gladiatorial arena more than a judicial process." Despite Israel's misgivings, Barghouti may still represent the best chance for peace in the region. As the Haaretz editorial stated, "We should listen to him before it's too late. If a third uprising breaks out, Israel will not be able to feign surprise. Barghouti warned us."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
After a Land Day (March 30) statement in which Marwan Barghouti called on Palestinians to launch a popular resistance campaign against Israel's occupation of Palestinian land, the popular Palestinian leader (who was already in prison) was placed in solitary confinement. To ignore his warning is the wrong decision, one that can prove costly for the cause of peace in the region.
Barghouti's imprisonment has been sharply criticized by Haaretz, one of the leading Israeli newspapers. A recent Haaretz editorial states, "We can understand him. If Israel had wanted an agreement with the Palestinians it would have released him from prison by now. Barghouti is the most authentic leader Fatah has produced and he is one of the few who can lead his people to an agreement."
Barghouti, a stocky 53 year-old man, has an influence on Palestinians which is inversely proportional to his short stature. Born in the West Bank, since he was a young man he has been a fighter for Palestinian rights and for an end to the occupation of Palestinian land. He joined Fatah when he was 15 years-old and when he was 18 he was arrested by Israeli authorities for his involvement with Palestinian militant groups. He is fluent in Hebrew, which he learned while he was in prison.
In 1987, Barghouti was one of the leaders of the First Intifada, a Palestinian popular uprising against Israel in the West Bank and Gaza. It was a bloody uprising that resulted in the deaths of 1,100 Palestinians and 164 Israelis. In 1998, Barghouti earned an M.A. in International Relations from Birzeit University (BZU), and is married to Fadwa Ibrahim, a lawyer and a passionate advocate for Palestinian's rights.
Barghouti had also a leading role in the Second Intifada, also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada, which started after Ariel Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount, an area highly sacred to both Jews and Muslims. It began in late September of 2000 and ended roughly in 2005. The death toll was brutal: 5,500 Palestinians, 1,100 Israelis and 64 foreigners lost their lives. Barghouti was arrested during the uprising and deported to Jordan, where he stayed for seven years until he was allowed to return under the terms of the Oslo accords of 1994.
Disenchanted with the lack of progress of the Oslo accords, he advocated for a more militant approach in the conflict with Israel. In November of 2000 he declared, "We tried seven years of intifada without negotiations, then seven years of negotiations without intifada. Perhaps it is time to try both simultaneously." In 2002 he wrote in The Washington Post, "The lack of Israeli security is born of the lack of Palestinian freedom. Israel will have security only after the end of occupation, not before."
Barghouti has an unrivaled reputation for personal honesty. Because of that, he was in serious conflict with Yasser Arafat. He accused Arafat and the Fatah party of corruption and his security forces of human rights violations. Although Arafat remained silent about his conflict with Barghouti, Barghouti was highly regarded among Palestinians of all factions.
Barghouti has never hidden his opposition to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. To the accusation that he was a terrorist he answered, "I am not a terrorist, but neither I am a pacifist. I am simply a regular guy from the Palestinian street advocating only what every other oppressed person has advocated - the right to help myself in the absence of help from anywhere else...I don't seek to destroy Israel but only to end its occupation of my country."
After Barghouti was put on trial, Uri Avnery, one of the leading Israeli peace activists who calls Barghouti 'The New Mandela,' wrote, "His trial was a mockery, resembling a Roman gladiatorial arena more than a judicial process." Despite Israel's misgivings, Barghouti may still represent the best chance for peace in the region. As the Haaretz editorial stated, "We should listen to him before it's too late. If a third uprising breaks out, Israel will not be able to feign surprise. Barghouti warned us."
After a Land Day (March 30) statement in which Marwan Barghouti called on Palestinians to launch a popular resistance campaign against Israel's occupation of Palestinian land, the popular Palestinian leader (who was already in prison) was placed in solitary confinement. To ignore his warning is the wrong decision, one that can prove costly for the cause of peace in the region.
Barghouti's imprisonment has been sharply criticized by Haaretz, one of the leading Israeli newspapers. A recent Haaretz editorial states, "We can understand him. If Israel had wanted an agreement with the Palestinians it would have released him from prison by now. Barghouti is the most authentic leader Fatah has produced and he is one of the few who can lead his people to an agreement."
Barghouti, a stocky 53 year-old man, has an influence on Palestinians which is inversely proportional to his short stature. Born in the West Bank, since he was a young man he has been a fighter for Palestinian rights and for an end to the occupation of Palestinian land. He joined Fatah when he was 15 years-old and when he was 18 he was arrested by Israeli authorities for his involvement with Palestinian militant groups. He is fluent in Hebrew, which he learned while he was in prison.
In 1987, Barghouti was one of the leaders of the First Intifada, a Palestinian popular uprising against Israel in the West Bank and Gaza. It was a bloody uprising that resulted in the deaths of 1,100 Palestinians and 164 Israelis. In 1998, Barghouti earned an M.A. in International Relations from Birzeit University (BZU), and is married to Fadwa Ibrahim, a lawyer and a passionate advocate for Palestinian's rights.
Barghouti had also a leading role in the Second Intifada, also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada, which started after Ariel Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount, an area highly sacred to both Jews and Muslims. It began in late September of 2000 and ended roughly in 2005. The death toll was brutal: 5,500 Palestinians, 1,100 Israelis and 64 foreigners lost their lives. Barghouti was arrested during the uprising and deported to Jordan, where he stayed for seven years until he was allowed to return under the terms of the Oslo accords of 1994.
Disenchanted with the lack of progress of the Oslo accords, he advocated for a more militant approach in the conflict with Israel. In November of 2000 he declared, "We tried seven years of intifada without negotiations, then seven years of negotiations without intifada. Perhaps it is time to try both simultaneously." In 2002 he wrote in The Washington Post, "The lack of Israeli security is born of the lack of Palestinian freedom. Israel will have security only after the end of occupation, not before."
Barghouti has an unrivaled reputation for personal honesty. Because of that, he was in serious conflict with Yasser Arafat. He accused Arafat and the Fatah party of corruption and his security forces of human rights violations. Although Arafat remained silent about his conflict with Barghouti, Barghouti was highly regarded among Palestinians of all factions.
Barghouti has never hidden his opposition to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. To the accusation that he was a terrorist he answered, "I am not a terrorist, but neither I am a pacifist. I am simply a regular guy from the Palestinian street advocating only what every other oppressed person has advocated - the right to help myself in the absence of help from anywhere else...I don't seek to destroy Israel but only to end its occupation of my country."
After Barghouti was put on trial, Uri Avnery, one of the leading Israeli peace activists who calls Barghouti 'The New Mandela,' wrote, "His trial was a mockery, resembling a Roman gladiatorial arena more than a judicial process." Despite Israel's misgivings, Barghouti may still represent the best chance for peace in the region. As the Haaretz editorial stated, "We should listen to him before it's too late. If a third uprising breaks out, Israel will not be able to feign surprise. Barghouti warned us."
"Congressman Bresnahan didn't just vote to gut Pennsylvania hospitals. He looked out for his own bottom line before doing it," said one advocate.
Congressman Rob Bresnahan, a Republican who campaigned on banning stock trading by lawmakers only to make at least 626 stock trades since taking office in January, was under scrutiny Monday for a particular sale he made just before he voted for the largest Medicaid cut in US history.
Soon after a report showed that 10 rural hospitals in Bresnahan's state of Pennsylvania were at risk of being shut down, the congressman sold between $100,001 and $250,000 in bonds issued by the Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority for the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
The New York Times reported on the sale a month after it was revealed that Bresnahan sold up to $15,000 of stock he held in Centene Corporation, the largest Medicaid provider in the country. When President Donald Trump signed the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law last month, Centene's stock plummeted by 40%.
Bresnahan repeatedly said he would not vote to cut the safety net before he voted in favor of the bill.
The law is expected to cut $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next decade, with 10-15 million people projected to lose health coverage through the safety net program, according to one recent analysis. More than 700 hospitals, particularly those in rural areas, are likely to close due to a loss of Medicaid funding.
"His prolific stock trading is more than just a broken promise," said Cousin. "It's political malpractice and a scandal of his own making."
The economic justice group Unrig the Economy said that despite Bresnahan's introduction of a bill in May to bar members of Congress from buying and selling stocks—with the caveat that they could keep stocks they held before starting their terms in a blind trust—the congressman is "the one doing the selling... out of Pennsylvania hospitals."
"Congressman Bresnahan didn't just vote to gut Pennsylvania hospitals. He looked out for his own bottom line before doing it," said Unrig Our Economy campaign director Leor Tal. "Hospitals across Pennsylvania could close thanks to his vote, forcing families to drive long distances and experience longer wait times for critical care."
"Not everyone has a secret helicopter they can use whenever they want," added Tal, referring to recent reports that the multi-millionaire congressman owns a helicopter worth as much as $1.5 million, which he purchased through a limited liability company he set up.
Eli Cousin, a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told the Times that Bresnahan's stock trading "will define his time in Washington and be a major reason why he will lose his seat."
"His prolific stock trading is more than just a broken promise," said Cousin. "It's political malpractice and a scandal of his own making."
"If troops or federal agents violate our rights, they must be held accountable," the ACLU said.
As President Donald Trump escalates the US military occupation of Washington, DC—including by importing hundreds of out-of-state National Guard troops and allowing others to start carrying guns on missions in the nation's capital—the ACLU on Monday reminded his administration that federal forces are constitutionally obligated to protect, not violate, residents' rights.
"With additional state National Guard troops deploying to DC as untrained federal law enforcement agents perform local police duties in city streets, the American Civil Liberties Union is issuing a stark reminder to all federal and military officials that—no matter what uniform they wear or what authority they claim—they are bound by the US Constitution and all federal and local laws," the group said in a statement.
Over the weekend, the Republican governors of Ohio, South Carolina, and West Virginia announced that they are deploying hundreds of National Guard troops to join the 800 DC guardsmen and women recently activated by Trump, who also asserted federal control over the city's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD).
Sending military troops and heavily-armed federal agents to patrol the streets and scare vulnerable communities does not make us safer.
— ACLU (@aclu.org) August 18, 2025 at 12:08 PM
Trump dubiously declared a public safety emergency in a city where violent crime is down 26% from a year ago, when it was at its second-lowest level since 1966, according to official statistics. Critics have noted that Trump's crackdown isn't just targeting criminals, but also unhoused and mentally ill people, who have had their homes destroyed and property taken.
Contradicting assurances from military officials, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday that the newly deployed troops may be ordered to start carrying firearms. This, along with the president's vow to let police "do whatever the hell they want" to reduce crime in the city and other statements, have raised serious concerns of possible abuses.
"Through his manufactured emergency, President Trump is engaging in dangerous political theater to expand his power and sow fear in our communities," ACLU National Security Project director Hina Shamsi said Monday. "Sending heavily armed federal agents and National Guard troops from hundreds of miles away into our nation's capital is unnecessary, inflammatory, and puts people's rights at high risk of being violated."
Shamsi stressed that "federal agents and military troops are bound by the Constitution, including our rights to peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, due process, and safeguards against unlawful searches and seizures. If troops or federal agents violate our rights, they must be held accountable."
On Friday, the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration to block its order asserting federal authority over the MPD, arguing the move violated the Home Rule Act. U.S. Attorney General Bondi subsequently rescinded her order to replace DC Police Chief Pamela Smith with Drug Enforcement Administration Administrator Terry Cole.
Also on Friday, a group of House Democrats introduced a resolution to terminate Trump's emergency declaration.
The deployment of out-of-state National Guard troops onto our streets is a brazen abuse of power meant to create fear in the District.Join us in the fight for statehood to give D.C. residents the same guardrails against federal overreach as other states: dcstatehoodnow.org
[image or embed]
— ACLU of the District of Columbia (@aclu-dc.bsky.social) August 18, 2025 at 7:23 AM
ACLU of DC executive director Monica Hopkins argued Monday that there is a way to curb Trump's "brazen abuse of power" in the District.
"We need the nation to join us in the fight for statehood so that DC residents are treated like those in every other state and have the same guardrails against federal overreach," she said.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness estimates that the proposal could increase the number of homeless people in the US by 36%.
As US President Donald Trump moves forward with a nationwide purge of homeless people from America's streets, his administration is moving to kill a program that has helped many of those in need find permanent housing.
The White House's fiscal year 2026 budget proposes ending a program under the Department of Housing and Urban Development known as Continuum of Care, which has helped cities across the country address or, in some cases, nearly eliminate their homelessness problem.
To receive federal funds, cities are required to adopt community-wide plans to end homelessness with the goal of moving people from the streets into shelters and then into stable housing.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness describes Continuum of Care as "the federal government's key vehicle for distributing homelessness funds."
As the Washington Post reports, Dallas has become a model for the program's effectiveness:
Instead of shuffling people to other neighborhoods, [the city] offered wraparound social services—and a permanent place to live.
The approach worked. Even as homelessness nationwide has surged to record levels, Dallas has emerged as a national model. The city declared an end to downtown homelessness in May after more than 270 people moved off the streets.
Other places, it says, have used Continuum of Care to substantially reduce homelessness, including San Bernardino, California, and Montgomery County, Maryland.
But the White House budget, unveiled in May, would eliminate Continuum of Care, instead shifting its resources to the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) program, which prioritizes shelters and transitional housing, as well as mental health and substance abuse counselling, rather than "Housing First" solutions.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness says the administration's plan to consolidate the program "would place thousands of projects and the hundreds of thousands of people they serve at risk."
The Alliance estimated that the proposal would effectively end funding of permanent supportive housing for 170,000 residents and potentially increase the number of homeless people in the US by 36%.
In addition to eliminating Continuum of Care, the White House budget cuts $532 million in funding to the federal government's Homeless Assistance Grants account. That money, the Alliance says, could fund over 60,000 Rapid Re-Housing Units—enough to serve 8% of the US homeless population.
"Between 2023 and 2024, homelessness increased by 18%, yet this proposal would strip funding for the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)'s homelessness programs by 12%," said Ann Oliva, CEO of the National Alliance to End Homelessness. "That is a recipe for disaster. We know that these programs have been chronically underfunded for decades."
In recent weeks, the Trump administration has declared an all-out war on the nation's homeless population. In July, he signed an executive order requiring states and cities to remove homeless people from public places, expanding cases where they must be involuntarily committed to psychiatric hospitals, and requiring sobriety preconditions for them to receive housing assistance.
During his federal takeover of Washington, DC, Trump ordered homeless people in encampments to move "FAR from the Capital." Press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said those who refuse to accept services at a shelter will face jail time.
The advocacy group Housing Not Handcuffs reported Friday that "police evicted and destroyed the property of homeless people throughout DC, throwing away people's personal belongings, including tents and other property."
"Homelessness is a market failure, a housing problem," said Rob Robinson, a formerly homeless community organizer in New York City, in USA Today. "Rent prices have exceeded income gains by 325% nationally since 1985. Rates of homelessness are tied to rental affordability."
"The White House's recent moves toward the criminalization of homelessness and forced institutionalization," he said, "ignore decades of research and real-world outcomes."
"If Donald Trump really wanted to help people and solve homelessness, he would use his power to lower rents and help people make ends meet," said Jesse Rabinowitz from the National Homelessness Law Center. "Estimates show that taxpayers are spending over $400,000 a day for Trump to use the DC National Guard for photo ops. Why can they find money for that but not for housing and help?"