SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sitting Atop Trillions: What Would Business Do with Another Tax Break?
Conservatives routinely declare that businesses can't hire anyone because tax burdens are too high (or "uncertain"--the bete noir of the day) and the way to create jobs is to give business more money.
Jul 18, 2011
Conservatives routinely declare that businesses can't hire anyone because tax burdens are too high (or "uncertain"--the bete noir of the day) and the way to create jobs is to give business more money. Among other things, corporations have launched a new campaign in Washington for a tax repatriation holiday that would allow businesses to bring home as much as $1 trillion in offshore profits at a very low-tax rate, cash they say could be used to create jobs and boost the economy.
But business already has plenty of cash, and if you look at what corporate America is actually doing with this money, it's not pretty.
In 2010, businesses in the U.S. were sitting on $2 trillion in cash (a record high percentage of assets) and when we look at the global picture we see that the top 1,000 non-financial companies in the world are still sitting on more than $3.4 trillion in cash. In case you were wondering what happens with that cash, cash does not create jobs--investments do and investments don't happen without consumer demand. Thus, giving business more money leads to bigger numbers in checking accounts, not jobs.
Maybe things have changed in 2011? As the economy inches back to health, how are these companies deciding to spend all this pent up cash? The Federal Flow of Funds reports that the ratio of nonfinancial corporate cash assets to total assets has actually continued to grow through the second quarter of 2011. The biggest growth is in checkable deposits and currency which has risen 51 percent since the second quarter of 2010. So not only are businesses refusing to hire workers, they're buying currency in a bet against America in the hope that the dollar will fall.
But aren't businesses doing something productive with that cash? Well, yes. Not only is corporate America using cash to fill space in bank boxes and stuff speculative mattresses overseas, they have decided to use some of it to pad the salaries of their CEOs. In 2010, the S&P 500 companies paid their CEOs an average of $11.4 million--an increase in CEO total compensation by 23 percent! This collective raise could have hired nearly 32,000 median earning workers instead (or 63 workers per company).
Using the public purse to give even more tax break cash to businesses is exactly the wrong move. This country needs investments such as that called for in Conyers' jobs bill, not cash hoarding, asset speculation, and CEO raises. The best investment the public purse can make right now is jobs.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Joseph Dwyer
Joseph T. Dwyer writes for the PolicyShop, blog for the non-partisan public policy research and advocacy organization Demos.
Conservatives routinely declare that businesses can't hire anyone because tax burdens are too high (or "uncertain"--the bete noir of the day) and the way to create jobs is to give business more money. Among other things, corporations have launched a new campaign in Washington for a tax repatriation holiday that would allow businesses to bring home as much as $1 trillion in offshore profits at a very low-tax rate, cash they say could be used to create jobs and boost the economy.
But business already has plenty of cash, and if you look at what corporate America is actually doing with this money, it's not pretty.
In 2010, businesses in the U.S. were sitting on $2 trillion in cash (a record high percentage of assets) and when we look at the global picture we see that the top 1,000 non-financial companies in the world are still sitting on more than $3.4 trillion in cash. In case you were wondering what happens with that cash, cash does not create jobs--investments do and investments don't happen without consumer demand. Thus, giving business more money leads to bigger numbers in checking accounts, not jobs.
Maybe things have changed in 2011? As the economy inches back to health, how are these companies deciding to spend all this pent up cash? The Federal Flow of Funds reports that the ratio of nonfinancial corporate cash assets to total assets has actually continued to grow through the second quarter of 2011. The biggest growth is in checkable deposits and currency which has risen 51 percent since the second quarter of 2010. So not only are businesses refusing to hire workers, they're buying currency in a bet against America in the hope that the dollar will fall.
But aren't businesses doing something productive with that cash? Well, yes. Not only is corporate America using cash to fill space in bank boxes and stuff speculative mattresses overseas, they have decided to use some of it to pad the salaries of their CEOs. In 2010, the S&P 500 companies paid their CEOs an average of $11.4 million--an increase in CEO total compensation by 23 percent! This collective raise could have hired nearly 32,000 median earning workers instead (or 63 workers per company).
Using the public purse to give even more tax break cash to businesses is exactly the wrong move. This country needs investments such as that called for in Conyers' jobs bill, not cash hoarding, asset speculation, and CEO raises. The best investment the public purse can make right now is jobs.
Joseph Dwyer
Joseph T. Dwyer writes for the PolicyShop, blog for the non-partisan public policy research and advocacy organization Demos.
Conservatives routinely declare that businesses can't hire anyone because tax burdens are too high (or "uncertain"--the bete noir of the day) and the way to create jobs is to give business more money. Among other things, corporations have launched a new campaign in Washington for a tax repatriation holiday that would allow businesses to bring home as much as $1 trillion in offshore profits at a very low-tax rate, cash they say could be used to create jobs and boost the economy.
But business already has plenty of cash, and if you look at what corporate America is actually doing with this money, it's not pretty.
In 2010, businesses in the U.S. were sitting on $2 trillion in cash (a record high percentage of assets) and when we look at the global picture we see that the top 1,000 non-financial companies in the world are still sitting on more than $3.4 trillion in cash. In case you were wondering what happens with that cash, cash does not create jobs--investments do and investments don't happen without consumer demand. Thus, giving business more money leads to bigger numbers in checking accounts, not jobs.
Maybe things have changed in 2011? As the economy inches back to health, how are these companies deciding to spend all this pent up cash? The Federal Flow of Funds reports that the ratio of nonfinancial corporate cash assets to total assets has actually continued to grow through the second quarter of 2011. The biggest growth is in checkable deposits and currency which has risen 51 percent since the second quarter of 2010. So not only are businesses refusing to hire workers, they're buying currency in a bet against America in the hope that the dollar will fall.
But aren't businesses doing something productive with that cash? Well, yes. Not only is corporate America using cash to fill space in bank boxes and stuff speculative mattresses overseas, they have decided to use some of it to pad the salaries of their CEOs. In 2010, the S&P 500 companies paid their CEOs an average of $11.4 million--an increase in CEO total compensation by 23 percent! This collective raise could have hired nearly 32,000 median earning workers instead (or 63 workers per company).
Using the public purse to give even more tax break cash to businesses is exactly the wrong move. This country needs investments such as that called for in Conyers' jobs bill, not cash hoarding, asset speculation, and CEO raises. The best investment the public purse can make right now is jobs.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.