The Changing US Tune on Yemen
Over the weekend of April 2-3 in Yemen, the death toll of anti-government protesters continued to rise as security forces loyal to President Ali Abdullah Saleh reportedly shot dead twelve people and injured hundreds of others in the southern city of Taiz. Amid the violence, news broke late Sunday night that the Obama administration has quietly begun to withdraw its support for Saleh's regime. Over the past two months of violence in Yemen, the United States has continued to back Saleh despite his violent response to widespread nonviolent protests against his regime.
Over the weekend of April 2-3 in Yemen, the death toll of anti-government protesters continued to rise as security forces loyal to President Ali Abdullah Saleh reportedly shot dead twelve people and injured hundreds of others in the southern city of Taiz. Amid the violence, news broke late Sunday night that the Obama administration has quietly begun to withdraw its support for Saleh's regime. Over the past two months of violence in Yemen, the United States has continued to back Saleh despite his violent response to widespread nonviolent protests against his regime.
Citing US and Yemeni officials, the New York Times reports: "The United States, which long supported Yemen's president, even in the face of recent widespread protests, has now quietly shifted positions and has concluded that he is unlikely to bring about the required reforms and must be eased out of office." The report adds, "For Washington, the key to his departure would be arranging a transfer of power that would enable the counterterrorism operation in Yemen to continue."
The US counterterrorism operation in Yemen was launched under the Bush administration and then greatly expanded by President Obama, as I reported last week in my article "The Dangerous US Game in Yemen." The US military presence, composed of special forces troops who not only conduct counterterrorism training for Yemeni forces but engage in their own unilateral "kinetic" actions against Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), have operated with great freedom in the country with President Saleh's blessing.
The current negotiations in Yemen between the Saleh government and a bloc of opposition forces, known as the Joint Meeting Parties (JMP), center around a proposal to temporarily hand power to Saleh's vice president, Abdu Rabu Mansour Hadi. According to the JMP's five-point plan released over the weekend, Hadi would then preside over a restructuring of Yemen's security and military forces, including a purge of Saleh's relatives. A transitional council would also be formed and parliamentary and presidential elections would eventually take place.
Washington's counterterrorism campaign in Yemen, which is responsible for the deaths of dozens of civilians, may encounter vocal popular opposition if democratization proceeds. A March 2011 Glevum Stability Assessment found that an "overwhelming majority of Yemenis disapprove of President Saleh's cooperation with the U.S.," with only four percent approving strongly or somewhat of the cooperation. Meanwhile, the study found that 96 percent of Yemenis believe the "West is at war against Islam" and a majority view AQAP's violence as "self-defense." However, the overwhelming majority of Yemenis, according to the study, do not view AQAP as the "true defender of Islam."
"It is unfortunate that the Obama administration's policy only began 'to shift in the past week.' Saleh's demise has been self-evident for much longer than that, and consistent US refusals to see that and the resulting dithering and calls for negotiations (asking protesters to give up the only leverage they have) has only put US security interests more at risk," observed Yemen expert Gregory Johnsen, adding: "We should be clear, both scenarios--Saleh leaving or staying--are potentially dangerous for US national security, which is one of the reasons the Obama administration is so hesitant to withdraw its support from Saleh."
Note: Read Jeremy Scahill's in-depth cover story on "The Dangerous US Game in Yemen."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Over the weekend of April 2-3 in Yemen, the death toll of anti-government protesters continued to rise as security forces loyal to President Ali Abdullah Saleh reportedly shot dead twelve people and injured hundreds of others in the southern city of Taiz. Amid the violence, news broke late Sunday night that the Obama administration has quietly begun to withdraw its support for Saleh's regime. Over the past two months of violence in Yemen, the United States has continued to back Saleh despite his violent response to widespread nonviolent protests against his regime.
Citing US and Yemeni officials, the New York Times reports: "The United States, which long supported Yemen's president, even in the face of recent widespread protests, has now quietly shifted positions and has concluded that he is unlikely to bring about the required reforms and must be eased out of office." The report adds, "For Washington, the key to his departure would be arranging a transfer of power that would enable the counterterrorism operation in Yemen to continue."
The US counterterrorism operation in Yemen was launched under the Bush administration and then greatly expanded by President Obama, as I reported last week in my article "The Dangerous US Game in Yemen." The US military presence, composed of special forces troops who not only conduct counterterrorism training for Yemeni forces but engage in their own unilateral "kinetic" actions against Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), have operated with great freedom in the country with President Saleh's blessing.
The current negotiations in Yemen between the Saleh government and a bloc of opposition forces, known as the Joint Meeting Parties (JMP), center around a proposal to temporarily hand power to Saleh's vice president, Abdu Rabu Mansour Hadi. According to the JMP's five-point plan released over the weekend, Hadi would then preside over a restructuring of Yemen's security and military forces, including a purge of Saleh's relatives. A transitional council would also be formed and parliamentary and presidential elections would eventually take place.
Washington's counterterrorism campaign in Yemen, which is responsible for the deaths of dozens of civilians, may encounter vocal popular opposition if democratization proceeds. A March 2011 Glevum Stability Assessment found that an "overwhelming majority of Yemenis disapprove of President Saleh's cooperation with the U.S.," with only four percent approving strongly or somewhat of the cooperation. Meanwhile, the study found that 96 percent of Yemenis believe the "West is at war against Islam" and a majority view AQAP's violence as "self-defense." However, the overwhelming majority of Yemenis, according to the study, do not view AQAP as the "true defender of Islam."
"It is unfortunate that the Obama administration's policy only began 'to shift in the past week.' Saleh's demise has been self-evident for much longer than that, and consistent US refusals to see that and the resulting dithering and calls for negotiations (asking protesters to give up the only leverage they have) has only put US security interests more at risk," observed Yemen expert Gregory Johnsen, adding: "We should be clear, both scenarios--Saleh leaving or staying--are potentially dangerous for US national security, which is one of the reasons the Obama administration is so hesitant to withdraw its support from Saleh."
Note: Read Jeremy Scahill's in-depth cover story on "The Dangerous US Game in Yemen."
Over the weekend of April 2-3 in Yemen, the death toll of anti-government protesters continued to rise as security forces loyal to President Ali Abdullah Saleh reportedly shot dead twelve people and injured hundreds of others in the southern city of Taiz. Amid the violence, news broke late Sunday night that the Obama administration has quietly begun to withdraw its support for Saleh's regime. Over the past two months of violence in Yemen, the United States has continued to back Saleh despite his violent response to widespread nonviolent protests against his regime.
Citing US and Yemeni officials, the New York Times reports: "The United States, which long supported Yemen's president, even in the face of recent widespread protests, has now quietly shifted positions and has concluded that he is unlikely to bring about the required reforms and must be eased out of office." The report adds, "For Washington, the key to his departure would be arranging a transfer of power that would enable the counterterrorism operation in Yemen to continue."
The US counterterrorism operation in Yemen was launched under the Bush administration and then greatly expanded by President Obama, as I reported last week in my article "The Dangerous US Game in Yemen." The US military presence, composed of special forces troops who not only conduct counterterrorism training for Yemeni forces but engage in their own unilateral "kinetic" actions against Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), have operated with great freedom in the country with President Saleh's blessing.
The current negotiations in Yemen between the Saleh government and a bloc of opposition forces, known as the Joint Meeting Parties (JMP), center around a proposal to temporarily hand power to Saleh's vice president, Abdu Rabu Mansour Hadi. According to the JMP's five-point plan released over the weekend, Hadi would then preside over a restructuring of Yemen's security and military forces, including a purge of Saleh's relatives. A transitional council would also be formed and parliamentary and presidential elections would eventually take place.
Washington's counterterrorism campaign in Yemen, which is responsible for the deaths of dozens of civilians, may encounter vocal popular opposition if democratization proceeds. A March 2011 Glevum Stability Assessment found that an "overwhelming majority of Yemenis disapprove of President Saleh's cooperation with the U.S.," with only four percent approving strongly or somewhat of the cooperation. Meanwhile, the study found that 96 percent of Yemenis believe the "West is at war against Islam" and a majority view AQAP's violence as "self-defense." However, the overwhelming majority of Yemenis, according to the study, do not view AQAP as the "true defender of Islam."
"It is unfortunate that the Obama administration's policy only began 'to shift in the past week.' Saleh's demise has been self-evident for much longer than that, and consistent US refusals to see that and the resulting dithering and calls for negotiations (asking protesters to give up the only leverage they have) has only put US security interests more at risk," observed Yemen expert Gregory Johnsen, adding: "We should be clear, both scenarios--Saleh leaving or staying--are potentially dangerous for US national security, which is one of the reasons the Obama administration is so hesitant to withdraw its support from Saleh."
Note: Read Jeremy Scahill's in-depth cover story on "The Dangerous US Game in Yemen."