Cat Food Commission Releases 'Shock Doctrine' Draft Version

Fiscal Commission Recommendations: VA Co-Pays, Top Tax Rate 23%

OK, here's the draft document for the cat food commission co-chair's mark. In addition, there's a page with specific "illustrative cuts",
$100 billion in domestic spending and $100 billion in military
spending. Between the two, you can get a sense of what Bowles and
Simpson have planned. Keep in mind that this is more of a shock doctrine document than a blueprint; they have no support on the commission for all this, and they're trying to gather it with this early release.

So let's bullet point some highlights:

* They're nice enough to wait a whole year to implement the cuts;
they wouldn't start until FY 2012 - in other words, the next budget.

* Their goal is to put revenue and spending at 21-22% of GDP. Their
plan would reduce the deficit below the recommended 3% of GDP by 2015,
down to about 2.2%.

* They put in spending caps, maybe the worst idea known to man, the
kind of program that has turned Colorado so sharply negative that the
business community begged the state to lift them. These caps, which are
unenforceable, as a current Congress cannot be bound by a previous
Congress, would bush spending 18% below the baseline by 2020, a drastic
bit of austerity.

* 75% of the solutions in the co-chair mark are spending reductions, 25% are tax increases.

* They want to add co-pays to the Veterans' Administration and
TRICARE, as well as pushing individuals covered by TRICARE into an
employer policy. They also want to freeze noncombat military pay for
three years. And, they want to end schools for families on military
bases, instead reintegrating soldier's kids into the public school
system (because that's so easy for a military family that moves every
other year).

* They would cut the federal workforce by 10%, freeze all salary
increases and bonuses for three years, and reduce Congressional and
White House budgets by 15%. Surely this is the way to a better and more
efficient federal workforce.

* They would eliminate all funding for commercial space flight, as
well as the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and increase fees at
national parks and the Smithsonian museums.

* Increase co-pays in Medicaid and cost sharing in Medicare. In
addition, the plan would cap Medicaid/Medicare growth, so that the
government would have to either increase premiums and co-pays or raise
the Medicare eligibility age if the cost grows above the baseline.

* Massively overhaul the tax code. They have a couple different
options on this. In the first, there would only be three brackets: at
8%, 14% and 23% for the top bracket. All tax expenditures - $1.1
trillion, including the Earned Income Tax Credit and the child tax
credit, would be eliminated. The corporate tax rate would go down from
35% to 26% as well. Option 2 borrows from the Wyden-Gregg tax reform,
establishing rates at 15%, 25% and 35%, increasing the standard
deduction, capping the mortgage interest deduction (and eliminating it
for second homes), limiting the charitable deduction, eliminating other
tax expenditures, and capping the employer deduction for health care.
Corporate rates would also go down, with loopholes removed.

* They would increase the gas tax by 15 cents a gallon beginning in 2013, to pay for transportation projects.

* They would pay for the "doctor's fix" by cutting other
reimbursements to hospitals and drug companies, as well as through tort
reform (yeah, that'll do it). They would also speed up a lot of the
cost controls in the health care law. They also ask, if health care
costs are still rising after the implementation of the exchanges, for
Congress to consider a variety of options, including this:

Add a robust public option and/or all-payer system in the exchange

* Reduce farm subsidies by $3 billion per year.

* On Social Security, gradually increase the retirement age to 69 by
2075. They would also institute progressive price indexing to cut
scheduled benefits for middle and high-income earners. They would index
cost of living increases to inflation and not wages. They would also
increase the payroll tax to capture 90% of wages, rather than the
current 86%. Social Security savings would stay inside the program to
keep it solvent, not be used for deficit reduction.

There's a lot more in there, but those are the highlights. It's a very aggressive plan.

UPDATE: More from The New York Times.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world

Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

© 2023 FireDogLake