SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
On November 2, Americans will have the opportunity to vote for their
representatives in Congress, an election likely to affect whether the
"normal" retirement age is raised for Social Security and how
decisively President Obama moves to end the war in Afghanistan. There
are many legitimate criticisms to be made of the electoral system in
the United States as we know it. But it could be much worse. We could
be confronted with the electoral system that Haitians are currently
facing in elections scheduled for November 28.
In Haiti, as things are currently run, political parties are
completely excluded from participation if the people currently in
power don't like them, including Haiti's largest political party, the
Fanmi Lavalas party of deposed and exiled former President
Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
It is a telling fact of our political-media culture that while
American newspapers regularly carry articles, op-eds and editorials
raising the alarm about democracy and human rights in countries where
the U.S. has little influence, the major U.S. media are virtually
silent about extreme violations of democratic rights in Haiti, a
country where the U.S. has tremendous influence. (Two rare,
praiseworthy exceptions have been the Miami Herald, which
last month published this
op-ed by Ira Kurzban, and the reporting
of the AP's Jonathan Katz.)
In particular, the unfair elections that Haitians are expected to
endure are expected to be paid for by foreign donors, including the
U.S. There is no serious question whether the U.S. has influence it
can use. Indeed, in Afghanistan, the U.S. and other Western donors,
who pay for Afghan elections, told the Afghan government, unless you
implement certain reforms, we're not paying for the election.
But, although both Republican and Democratic Members of Congress have
called for the U.S. to use its influence in Haiti to ensure a fair
electoral process, there has been so far no visible change in U.S.
policy. Despite all the blather following the earthquake about how
"this time it's going to be different, this time Haitians will have a
say," it's not different this time. Not yet.
In June, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee published
a report prepared under the direction of Republican Senator
Richard Lugar, the ranking Member. Senator Lugar's report called on
the State Department to press the Haitian government to reform Haiti's
Provisional Electoral Council so that political parties, including
Fanmi Lavalas, would not be arbitrarily excluded from participating in
the election. But, as far as anyone can tell, the State Department
never said boo about it.
Now Representative Maxine Waters is circulating to her colleagues a letter to Secretary of State
Clinton, urging Secretary Clinton to make a clear statement that
elections must include "all eligible political parties" and "access to
voting for all Haitians, including those displaced by the earthquake."
Rep. Waters' letter urges that the US not provide funding for
elections that do not meet these minimum, basic democratic
requirements.
Shouldn't it be a no-brainer to say that the U.S. shouldn't pay for
elections in Haiti from which the largest political party is excluded?
If you agree, ask your Representative to sign the Waters letter for
fair elections in Haiti. You can reach the Capitol Switchboard at
202-224-3121; ask to be transferred to your Representative's office.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On November 2, Americans will have the opportunity to vote for their
representatives in Congress, an election likely to affect whether the
"normal" retirement age is raised for Social Security and how
decisively President Obama moves to end the war in Afghanistan. There
are many legitimate criticisms to be made of the electoral system in
the United States as we know it. But it could be much worse. We could
be confronted with the electoral system that Haitians are currently
facing in elections scheduled for November 28.
In Haiti, as things are currently run, political parties are
completely excluded from participation if the people currently in
power don't like them, including Haiti's largest political party, the
Fanmi Lavalas party of deposed and exiled former President
Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
It is a telling fact of our political-media culture that while
American newspapers regularly carry articles, op-eds and editorials
raising the alarm about democracy and human rights in countries where
the U.S. has little influence, the major U.S. media are virtually
silent about extreme violations of democratic rights in Haiti, a
country where the U.S. has tremendous influence. (Two rare,
praiseworthy exceptions have been the Miami Herald, which
last month published this
op-ed by Ira Kurzban, and the reporting
of the AP's Jonathan Katz.)
In particular, the unfair elections that Haitians are expected to
endure are expected to be paid for by foreign donors, including the
U.S. There is no serious question whether the U.S. has influence it
can use. Indeed, in Afghanistan, the U.S. and other Western donors,
who pay for Afghan elections, told the Afghan government, unless you
implement certain reforms, we're not paying for the election.
But, although both Republican and Democratic Members of Congress have
called for the U.S. to use its influence in Haiti to ensure a fair
electoral process, there has been so far no visible change in U.S.
policy. Despite all the blather following the earthquake about how
"this time it's going to be different, this time Haitians will have a
say," it's not different this time. Not yet.
In June, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee published
a report prepared under the direction of Republican Senator
Richard Lugar, the ranking Member. Senator Lugar's report called on
the State Department to press the Haitian government to reform Haiti's
Provisional Electoral Council so that political parties, including
Fanmi Lavalas, would not be arbitrarily excluded from participating in
the election. But, as far as anyone can tell, the State Department
never said boo about it.
Now Representative Maxine Waters is circulating to her colleagues a letter to Secretary of State
Clinton, urging Secretary Clinton to make a clear statement that
elections must include "all eligible political parties" and "access to
voting for all Haitians, including those displaced by the earthquake."
Rep. Waters' letter urges that the US not provide funding for
elections that do not meet these minimum, basic democratic
requirements.
Shouldn't it be a no-brainer to say that the U.S. shouldn't pay for
elections in Haiti from which the largest political party is excluded?
If you agree, ask your Representative to sign the Waters letter for
fair elections in Haiti. You can reach the Capitol Switchboard at
202-224-3121; ask to be transferred to your Representative's office.
On November 2, Americans will have the opportunity to vote for their
representatives in Congress, an election likely to affect whether the
"normal" retirement age is raised for Social Security and how
decisively President Obama moves to end the war in Afghanistan. There
are many legitimate criticisms to be made of the electoral system in
the United States as we know it. But it could be much worse. We could
be confronted with the electoral system that Haitians are currently
facing in elections scheduled for November 28.
In Haiti, as things are currently run, political parties are
completely excluded from participation if the people currently in
power don't like them, including Haiti's largest political party, the
Fanmi Lavalas party of deposed and exiled former President
Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
It is a telling fact of our political-media culture that while
American newspapers regularly carry articles, op-eds and editorials
raising the alarm about democracy and human rights in countries where
the U.S. has little influence, the major U.S. media are virtually
silent about extreme violations of democratic rights in Haiti, a
country where the U.S. has tremendous influence. (Two rare,
praiseworthy exceptions have been the Miami Herald, which
last month published this
op-ed by Ira Kurzban, and the reporting
of the AP's Jonathan Katz.)
In particular, the unfair elections that Haitians are expected to
endure are expected to be paid for by foreign donors, including the
U.S. There is no serious question whether the U.S. has influence it
can use. Indeed, in Afghanistan, the U.S. and other Western donors,
who pay for Afghan elections, told the Afghan government, unless you
implement certain reforms, we're not paying for the election.
But, although both Republican and Democratic Members of Congress have
called for the U.S. to use its influence in Haiti to ensure a fair
electoral process, there has been so far no visible change in U.S.
policy. Despite all the blather following the earthquake about how
"this time it's going to be different, this time Haitians will have a
say," it's not different this time. Not yet.
In June, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee published
a report prepared under the direction of Republican Senator
Richard Lugar, the ranking Member. Senator Lugar's report called on
the State Department to press the Haitian government to reform Haiti's
Provisional Electoral Council so that political parties, including
Fanmi Lavalas, would not be arbitrarily excluded from participating in
the election. But, as far as anyone can tell, the State Department
never said boo about it.
Now Representative Maxine Waters is circulating to her colleagues a letter to Secretary of State
Clinton, urging Secretary Clinton to make a clear statement that
elections must include "all eligible political parties" and "access to
voting for all Haitians, including those displaced by the earthquake."
Rep. Waters' letter urges that the US not provide funding for
elections that do not meet these minimum, basic democratic
requirements.
Shouldn't it be a no-brainer to say that the U.S. shouldn't pay for
elections in Haiti from which the largest political party is excluded?
If you agree, ask your Representative to sign the Waters letter for
fair elections in Haiti. You can reach the Capitol Switchboard at
202-224-3121; ask to be transferred to your Representative's office.