

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
PRESIDENT OBAMA had it right the first time in talking about the
mosque proposed near ground zero of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,
2001. Speaking last Friday at the White House celebration of the Muslim
holy month of Ramadan, Obama said, "The 9/11 attacks were a deeply
traumatic event for our country. And the pain and the experience of
suffering by those who lost loved ones is just unimaginable. So I
understand the emotions that this issue engenders. And ground zero is,
indeed, hallowed ground.
"But let me be clear. As a citizen, and as president, I believe that
Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else
in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship
and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in
accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our
commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.''
Unfortunately, Obama and his aides were clearly shaken by poll
numbers against the mosque, fueled by the predictable blowback from
fearmongers who see anything Muslim as evil.
The very next day, while visiting the Gulf of Mexico, he said, "I was
not commenting, and I will not comment, on the wisdom of making the
decision to put a mosque there. I was commenting very specifically on
the right people have that dates back to our founding. That's what our
country is about.''
There is no need for Obama to dance on semantics on this issue,
especially when the Republican response is a blatant blunderbuss of
ignorance. New York Representative Peter King called the "Muslim
community'' insensitive and uncaring to build a mosque in the shadow of
ground zero and said the "Muslim community'' was "needlessly offending
so many people who have suffered so much.'' Former House Speaker Newt
Gingrich said a mosque near ground zero was "like putting a Nazi sign
next to the Holocaust Museum.''
Such Republicans forget that their own President Bush, in hosting
many dinners to break the fast of Ramadan said, "All of us gathered
tonight share a conviction that America must remain a welcoming and
tolerant land . . . we cannot carry the message of freedom and the
baggage of bigotry at the same time.'' Bush also said, "The freedom of
worship is central to the American character. It's the first protection
in the Bill of Rights.''
There is no need for Obama even to give the appearance of
equivocation when he is defending the very Bill of Rights. In a rational
United States, this debate would have been over two weeks ago. New York
City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is Jewish and likely knows a lot more
than Gingrich about the Holocaust, gave a stirring speech defending the
right of people to build a mosque.
"The government has no right whatsoever to deny that right, and if it
were tried, the courts would almost certainly strike it down as a
violation of the US Constitution,'' he said. ". . . Let us not forget
that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11 and that our Muslim
neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would
betray our values and play into our enemies' hands if we were to treat
Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular
sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists and we should not
stand for that.''
The next time Obama has to talk about the mosque or issues similar to
it, he can stand on the words of founding father James Madison. In a
1788 letter to Thomas Jefferson, Madison wrote of myopic fears in New
England that the freedom of religion in the Constitution "opened a door
for Jews, Turks and infidels.'' He warned that a bill of rights should
guard against "the danger of oppression'' by majorities that render the
rights of minorities "insecure.''
Bloomberg said of the victims of 9/11, "We do not honor their lives
by denying the very constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor
their lives by defending those rights.'' Likewise, on issues like the
mosque, Obama should speak with no insecurity whatsoever. His own
commitment to religious freedom must remain unshakable.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
PRESIDENT OBAMA had it right the first time in talking about the
mosque proposed near ground zero of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,
2001. Speaking last Friday at the White House celebration of the Muslim
holy month of Ramadan, Obama said, "The 9/11 attacks were a deeply
traumatic event for our country. And the pain and the experience of
suffering by those who lost loved ones is just unimaginable. So I
understand the emotions that this issue engenders. And ground zero is,
indeed, hallowed ground.
"But let me be clear. As a citizen, and as president, I believe that
Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else
in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship
and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in
accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our
commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.''
Unfortunately, Obama and his aides were clearly shaken by poll
numbers against the mosque, fueled by the predictable blowback from
fearmongers who see anything Muslim as evil.
The very next day, while visiting the Gulf of Mexico, he said, "I was
not commenting, and I will not comment, on the wisdom of making the
decision to put a mosque there. I was commenting very specifically on
the right people have that dates back to our founding. That's what our
country is about.''
There is no need for Obama to dance on semantics on this issue,
especially when the Republican response is a blatant blunderbuss of
ignorance. New York Representative Peter King called the "Muslim
community'' insensitive and uncaring to build a mosque in the shadow of
ground zero and said the "Muslim community'' was "needlessly offending
so many people who have suffered so much.'' Former House Speaker Newt
Gingrich said a mosque near ground zero was "like putting a Nazi sign
next to the Holocaust Museum.''
Such Republicans forget that their own President Bush, in hosting
many dinners to break the fast of Ramadan said, "All of us gathered
tonight share a conviction that America must remain a welcoming and
tolerant land . . . we cannot carry the message of freedom and the
baggage of bigotry at the same time.'' Bush also said, "The freedom of
worship is central to the American character. It's the first protection
in the Bill of Rights.''
There is no need for Obama even to give the appearance of
equivocation when he is defending the very Bill of Rights. In a rational
United States, this debate would have been over two weeks ago. New York
City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is Jewish and likely knows a lot more
than Gingrich about the Holocaust, gave a stirring speech defending the
right of people to build a mosque.
"The government has no right whatsoever to deny that right, and if it
were tried, the courts would almost certainly strike it down as a
violation of the US Constitution,'' he said. ". . . Let us not forget
that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11 and that our Muslim
neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would
betray our values and play into our enemies' hands if we were to treat
Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular
sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists and we should not
stand for that.''
The next time Obama has to talk about the mosque or issues similar to
it, he can stand on the words of founding father James Madison. In a
1788 letter to Thomas Jefferson, Madison wrote of myopic fears in New
England that the freedom of religion in the Constitution "opened a door
for Jews, Turks and infidels.'' He warned that a bill of rights should
guard against "the danger of oppression'' by majorities that render the
rights of minorities "insecure.''
Bloomberg said of the victims of 9/11, "We do not honor their lives
by denying the very constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor
their lives by defending those rights.'' Likewise, on issues like the
mosque, Obama should speak with no insecurity whatsoever. His own
commitment to religious freedom must remain unshakable.
PRESIDENT OBAMA had it right the first time in talking about the
mosque proposed near ground zero of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,
2001. Speaking last Friday at the White House celebration of the Muslim
holy month of Ramadan, Obama said, "The 9/11 attacks were a deeply
traumatic event for our country. And the pain and the experience of
suffering by those who lost loved ones is just unimaginable. So I
understand the emotions that this issue engenders. And ground zero is,
indeed, hallowed ground.
"But let me be clear. As a citizen, and as president, I believe that
Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else
in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship
and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in
accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our
commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable.''
Unfortunately, Obama and his aides were clearly shaken by poll
numbers against the mosque, fueled by the predictable blowback from
fearmongers who see anything Muslim as evil.
The very next day, while visiting the Gulf of Mexico, he said, "I was
not commenting, and I will not comment, on the wisdom of making the
decision to put a mosque there. I was commenting very specifically on
the right people have that dates back to our founding. That's what our
country is about.''
There is no need for Obama to dance on semantics on this issue,
especially when the Republican response is a blatant blunderbuss of
ignorance. New York Representative Peter King called the "Muslim
community'' insensitive and uncaring to build a mosque in the shadow of
ground zero and said the "Muslim community'' was "needlessly offending
so many people who have suffered so much.'' Former House Speaker Newt
Gingrich said a mosque near ground zero was "like putting a Nazi sign
next to the Holocaust Museum.''
Such Republicans forget that their own President Bush, in hosting
many dinners to break the fast of Ramadan said, "All of us gathered
tonight share a conviction that America must remain a welcoming and
tolerant land . . . we cannot carry the message of freedom and the
baggage of bigotry at the same time.'' Bush also said, "The freedom of
worship is central to the American character. It's the first protection
in the Bill of Rights.''
There is no need for Obama even to give the appearance of
equivocation when he is defending the very Bill of Rights. In a rational
United States, this debate would have been over two weeks ago. New York
City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is Jewish and likely knows a lot more
than Gingrich about the Holocaust, gave a stirring speech defending the
right of people to build a mosque.
"The government has no right whatsoever to deny that right, and if it
were tried, the courts would almost certainly strike it down as a
violation of the US Constitution,'' he said. ". . . Let us not forget
that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11 and that our Muslim
neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would
betray our values and play into our enemies' hands if we were to treat
Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular
sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists and we should not
stand for that.''
The next time Obama has to talk about the mosque or issues similar to
it, he can stand on the words of founding father James Madison. In a
1788 letter to Thomas Jefferson, Madison wrote of myopic fears in New
England that the freedom of religion in the Constitution "opened a door
for Jews, Turks and infidels.'' He warned that a bill of rights should
guard against "the danger of oppression'' by majorities that render the
rights of minorities "insecure.''
Bloomberg said of the victims of 9/11, "We do not honor their lives
by denying the very constitutional rights they died protecting. We honor
their lives by defending those rights.'' Likewise, on issues like the
mosque, Obama should speak with no insecurity whatsoever. His own
commitment to religious freedom must remain unshakable.