

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
If public schools or Medicare providers were held to the same
standards as military contractors, they'd never have to beg for cash.
Need money? Sure! -- Congress would say -- what's a few missing billions
of tax dollars?
Congress agreed to pump an extra $33 billion into Afghanistan this
week, even as a new report revealed that almost nine billion earmarked
for the nation's other occupation -- Iraq -- simply, it seems, went
missing.
The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction says $8.7
billion earmarked for Iraq reconstruction has gone. Precisely where, no
one can tell him.
Not one percent or five percent, but a full 96 percent of the special
fund created from the sale of Iraqi oil and gas-and frozen Saddam
Hussein-era assets -- is missing according to the BBC. The Pentagon is
"unable to fully account for" it.
And they're blaming a lack of accounting, oversight, and who knows
what -- probably some secretaries. Powerful politicians have a habit of
blaming their secretaries.
It's not the first time billions have disappeared-in 2005, the
Coalition Provisional Authority faced a criminal investigation over its
management of an $8.8 billion fund. This isn't the same $9 billion. It's
a different one. In that case, eight US officials were convicted of
bribery, fraud and money-laundering.
It's not the same $9 billion but it is the the same old story. How
many strikes and the Pentagon's pals are out? There's a very different
law for shop-lifters.
Officials are now, as they always do, mouthing words like "undetected
loss" and "significant archival retrieval efforts." I'd say -- no more
talk of deficits or cash crunches or tax -- until the lost cash is
accounted for. Can't afford to support the troops you've deployed?
Bring them home then.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
If public schools or Medicare providers were held to the same
standards as military contractors, they'd never have to beg for cash.
Need money? Sure! -- Congress would say -- what's a few missing billions
of tax dollars?
Congress agreed to pump an extra $33 billion into Afghanistan this
week, even as a new report revealed that almost nine billion earmarked
for the nation's other occupation -- Iraq -- simply, it seems, went
missing.
The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction says $8.7
billion earmarked for Iraq reconstruction has gone. Precisely where, no
one can tell him.
Not one percent or five percent, but a full 96 percent of the special
fund created from the sale of Iraqi oil and gas-and frozen Saddam
Hussein-era assets -- is missing according to the BBC. The Pentagon is
"unable to fully account for" it.
And they're blaming a lack of accounting, oversight, and who knows
what -- probably some secretaries. Powerful politicians have a habit of
blaming their secretaries.
It's not the first time billions have disappeared-in 2005, the
Coalition Provisional Authority faced a criminal investigation over its
management of an $8.8 billion fund. This isn't the same $9 billion. It's
a different one. In that case, eight US officials were convicted of
bribery, fraud and money-laundering.
It's not the same $9 billion but it is the the same old story. How
many strikes and the Pentagon's pals are out? There's a very different
law for shop-lifters.
Officials are now, as they always do, mouthing words like "undetected
loss" and "significant archival retrieval efforts." I'd say -- no more
talk of deficits or cash crunches or tax -- until the lost cash is
accounted for. Can't afford to support the troops you've deployed?
Bring them home then.
If public schools or Medicare providers were held to the same
standards as military contractors, they'd never have to beg for cash.
Need money? Sure! -- Congress would say -- what's a few missing billions
of tax dollars?
Congress agreed to pump an extra $33 billion into Afghanistan this
week, even as a new report revealed that almost nine billion earmarked
for the nation's other occupation -- Iraq -- simply, it seems, went
missing.
The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction says $8.7
billion earmarked for Iraq reconstruction has gone. Precisely where, no
one can tell him.
Not one percent or five percent, but a full 96 percent of the special
fund created from the sale of Iraqi oil and gas-and frozen Saddam
Hussein-era assets -- is missing according to the BBC. The Pentagon is
"unable to fully account for" it.
And they're blaming a lack of accounting, oversight, and who knows
what -- probably some secretaries. Powerful politicians have a habit of
blaming their secretaries.
It's not the first time billions have disappeared-in 2005, the
Coalition Provisional Authority faced a criminal investigation over its
management of an $8.8 billion fund. This isn't the same $9 billion. It's
a different one. In that case, eight US officials were convicted of
bribery, fraud and money-laundering.
It's not the same $9 billion but it is the the same old story. How
many strikes and the Pentagon's pals are out? There's a very different
law for shop-lifters.
Officials are now, as they always do, mouthing words like "undetected
loss" and "significant archival retrieval efforts." I'd say -- no more
talk of deficits or cash crunches or tax -- until the lost cash is
accounted for. Can't afford to support the troops you've deployed?
Bring them home then.