SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Netanyahu Didn't Deserve the Red Carpet Treatment
Jul 07, 2010
After his government killed nine people, including one U.S. citizen,
on that Gaza relief ship, Benjamin Netanyahu might have expected a
chilly reception in Washington.
And after approving more Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem, in
flagrant defiance of the Obama administration, Netanyahu didn't deserve
the red carpet treatment.
But that's what he got-and more, as Obama gushed all over him,
praising him as someone "willing to take risks for peace" and praising
Israel for showing "restraint" in recent months.
Obama didn't offer a word on the need to permanently halt settlements
on the West Bank, much less on the need to dismantle those settlements.
He gave Israel as close to explicit approval as possible for its
nuclear stockpile and for not signing on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty, saying, in the context of the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Conference, that Israel has "unique security requirements. ... And the
United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would
undermine their security interests."
The only blame he cast was on Palestinians, warning them not to "look
for excuses for incitement," and on Arab countries, which, Obama said,
"have to be supportive of peace." Never mind that Saudi Arabia brokered a
deal years ago to have Arab states recognize Israel if it withdrew from
the Occupied Territories.
For a few months there, the Obama administration was talking kind of
tough toward Israel. Not anymore.
Obama blinked.
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz commented, "For
Netanyahu this was a huge victory. His claim that he can stand against
U.S. pressure, making only tactical concessions, has proven true. He
leveraged internal U.S. politics in his favor, without weakening the
right-wing coalition in Jerusalem. Netanyahu got off easy."
Netanyahu and the designers of the ongoing Israeli occupation of
Palestinian land prefer a weak U.S. President.
And they have one now in Obama.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
After his government killed nine people, including one U.S. citizen,
on that Gaza relief ship, Benjamin Netanyahu might have expected a
chilly reception in Washington.
And after approving more Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem, in
flagrant defiance of the Obama administration, Netanyahu didn't deserve
the red carpet treatment.
But that's what he got-and more, as Obama gushed all over him,
praising him as someone "willing to take risks for peace" and praising
Israel for showing "restraint" in recent months.
Obama didn't offer a word on the need to permanently halt settlements
on the West Bank, much less on the need to dismantle those settlements.
He gave Israel as close to explicit approval as possible for its
nuclear stockpile and for not signing on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty, saying, in the context of the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Conference, that Israel has "unique security requirements. ... And the
United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would
undermine their security interests."
The only blame he cast was on Palestinians, warning them not to "look
for excuses for incitement," and on Arab countries, which, Obama said,
"have to be supportive of peace." Never mind that Saudi Arabia brokered a
deal years ago to have Arab states recognize Israel if it withdrew from
the Occupied Territories.
For a few months there, the Obama administration was talking kind of
tough toward Israel. Not anymore.
Obama blinked.
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz commented, "For
Netanyahu this was a huge victory. His claim that he can stand against
U.S. pressure, making only tactical concessions, has proven true. He
leveraged internal U.S. politics in his favor, without weakening the
right-wing coalition in Jerusalem. Netanyahu got off easy."
Netanyahu and the designers of the ongoing Israeli occupation of
Palestinian land prefer a weak U.S. President.
And they have one now in Obama.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
After his government killed nine people, including one U.S. citizen,
on that Gaza relief ship, Benjamin Netanyahu might have expected a
chilly reception in Washington.
And after approving more Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem, in
flagrant defiance of the Obama administration, Netanyahu didn't deserve
the red carpet treatment.
But that's what he got-and more, as Obama gushed all over him,
praising him as someone "willing to take risks for peace" and praising
Israel for showing "restraint" in recent months.
Obama didn't offer a word on the need to permanently halt settlements
on the West Bank, much less on the need to dismantle those settlements.
He gave Israel as close to explicit approval as possible for its
nuclear stockpile and for not signing on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty, saying, in the context of the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Conference, that Israel has "unique security requirements. ... And the
United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would
undermine their security interests."
The only blame he cast was on Palestinians, warning them not to "look
for excuses for incitement," and on Arab countries, which, Obama said,
"have to be supportive of peace." Never mind that Saudi Arabia brokered a
deal years ago to have Arab states recognize Israel if it withdrew from
the Occupied Territories.
For a few months there, the Obama administration was talking kind of
tough toward Israel. Not anymore.
Obama blinked.
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz commented, "For
Netanyahu this was a huge victory. His claim that he can stand against
U.S. pressure, making only tactical concessions, has proven true. He
leveraged internal U.S. politics in his favor, without weakening the
right-wing coalition in Jerusalem. Netanyahu got off easy."
Netanyahu and the designers of the ongoing Israeli occupation of
Palestinian land prefer a weak U.S. President.
And they have one now in Obama.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.