Netanyahu Didn't Deserve the Red Carpet Treatment
After his government killed nine people, including one U.S. citizen,
on that Gaza relief ship, Benjamin Netanyahu might have expected a
chilly reception in Washington.
And after approving more Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem, in
flagrant defiance of the Obama administration, Netanyahu didn't deserve
the red carpet treatment.
But that's what he got-and more, as Obama gushed all over him,
praising him as someone "willing to take risks for peace" and praising
Israel for showing "restraint" in recent months.
Obama didn't offer a word on the need to permanently halt settlements
on the West Bank, much less on the need to dismantle those settlements.
He gave Israel as close to explicit approval as possible for its
nuclear stockpile and for not signing on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty, saying, in the context of the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Conference, that Israel has "unique security requirements. ... And the
United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would
undermine their security interests."
The only blame he cast was on Palestinians, warning them not to "look
for excuses for incitement," and on Arab countries, which, Obama said,
"have to be supportive of peace." Never mind that Saudi Arabia brokered a
deal years ago to have Arab states recognize Israel if it withdrew from
the Occupied Territories.
For a few months there, the Obama administration was talking kind of
tough toward Israel. Not anymore.
Obama blinked.
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz commented, "For
Netanyahu this was a huge victory. His claim that he can stand against
U.S. pressure, making only tactical concessions, has proven true. He
leveraged internal U.S. politics in his favor, without weakening the
right-wing coalition in Jerusalem. Netanyahu got off easy."
Netanyahu and the designers of the ongoing Israeli occupation of
Palestinian land prefer a weak U.S. President.
And they have one now in Obama.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
After his government killed nine people, including one U.S. citizen,
on that Gaza relief ship, Benjamin Netanyahu might have expected a
chilly reception in Washington.
And after approving more Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem, in
flagrant defiance of the Obama administration, Netanyahu didn't deserve
the red carpet treatment.
But that's what he got-and more, as Obama gushed all over him,
praising him as someone "willing to take risks for peace" and praising
Israel for showing "restraint" in recent months.
Obama didn't offer a word on the need to permanently halt settlements
on the West Bank, much less on the need to dismantle those settlements.
He gave Israel as close to explicit approval as possible for its
nuclear stockpile and for not signing on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty, saying, in the context of the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Conference, that Israel has "unique security requirements. ... And the
United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would
undermine their security interests."
The only blame he cast was on Palestinians, warning them not to "look
for excuses for incitement," and on Arab countries, which, Obama said,
"have to be supportive of peace." Never mind that Saudi Arabia brokered a
deal years ago to have Arab states recognize Israel if it withdrew from
the Occupied Territories.
For a few months there, the Obama administration was talking kind of
tough toward Israel. Not anymore.
Obama blinked.
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz commented, "For
Netanyahu this was a huge victory. His claim that he can stand against
U.S. pressure, making only tactical concessions, has proven true. He
leveraged internal U.S. politics in his favor, without weakening the
right-wing coalition in Jerusalem. Netanyahu got off easy."
Netanyahu and the designers of the ongoing Israeli occupation of
Palestinian land prefer a weak U.S. President.
And they have one now in Obama.
After his government killed nine people, including one U.S. citizen,
on that Gaza relief ship, Benjamin Netanyahu might have expected a
chilly reception in Washington.
And after approving more Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem, in
flagrant defiance of the Obama administration, Netanyahu didn't deserve
the red carpet treatment.
But that's what he got-and more, as Obama gushed all over him,
praising him as someone "willing to take risks for peace" and praising
Israel for showing "restraint" in recent months.
Obama didn't offer a word on the need to permanently halt settlements
on the West Bank, much less on the need to dismantle those settlements.
He gave Israel as close to explicit approval as possible for its
nuclear stockpile and for not signing on to the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Treaty, saying, in the context of the Nuclear Nonproliferation
Conference, that Israel has "unique security requirements. ... And the
United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would
undermine their security interests."
The only blame he cast was on Palestinians, warning them not to "look
for excuses for incitement," and on Arab countries, which, Obama said,
"have to be supportive of peace." Never mind that Saudi Arabia brokered a
deal years ago to have Arab states recognize Israel if it withdrew from
the Occupied Territories.
For a few months there, the Obama administration was talking kind of
tough toward Israel. Not anymore.
Obama blinked.
As the Israeli newspaper Haaretz commented, "For
Netanyahu this was a huge victory. His claim that he can stand against
U.S. pressure, making only tactical concessions, has proven true. He
leveraged internal U.S. politics in his favor, without weakening the
right-wing coalition in Jerusalem. Netanyahu got off easy."
Netanyahu and the designers of the ongoing Israeli occupation of
Palestinian land prefer a weak U.S. President.
And they have one now in Obama.