Republicans Incite Class Warfare--Within the Middle Class
The Republicans have found a new scapegoat for the economy, in addition to illegal immigrants.
The new scapegoat is public sector workers.
Unwilling to blame Bush for the budget deficit, unable to blame Wall
Street for wrecking the economy, and incapable of blaming a lack of
regulation or capitalism itself for the morass we're in, Republicans
are pointing their fingers now at public sector workers.
The teachers, police officers, fire fighters, and other government
employees are just making too much money, the Republicans say,
regardless of the fact that public sector workers in state after state
have been laid off or put on unpaid furloughs.
But Republicans don't want you to think about. Much less do they
want you to notice that it's the top 1 percent that's made off like
bandits over the last 30 years. God forbid we raise the marginal income
tax rates, or the capital gains tax, or the estate tax.
The last thing Republicans want is to incite class warfare against
the upper class. Far better to incite warfare within the middle class
and have the majority of Americans blaming each other. (See "War on Public Workers," by Amy Traub in The Nation, July 5.)
One Republican politician after another is joining the chorus
against public sector workers, whether it's Scott Brown of
Massachusetts or Mitch Daniels of Indiana or Rand Paul of Kentucky or
even Arnold Schwarzenegger of California, who has ordered all state
workers to get minimum wage until the budget mess there is resolved.
In Wisconsin, where I live, the Wisconsin State Journal just ran a story
about public sector workers in Dane County earning more than workers
doing similar jobs in the private sector, with at least one local
politician complaining about this.
But the average public sector salary is only about $35,000. Are we
really going to accept that such a salary is too high? Shall we just
kiss the middle class goodbye?
Part of this strategy of blaming the public sector worker is mere
distraction-a shell game to keep people from focusing on those who are
really feasting at the trough: the corporations and the richest of the
rich.
And part of it is a calculated attack on unions, since the public
sector has a 37.4 percent unionization rate, while the private sector
is down at 7.2 percent.
But whatever the motivation, it's a disgusting strategy.
The next time you hear a politician or a pundit trash public sector
workers, ask them if they'd like to take minimum wage-or even a salary
of $35,000.
Chances are, they're making a lot more than that.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Republicans have found a new scapegoat for the economy, in addition to illegal immigrants.
The new scapegoat is public sector workers.
Unwilling to blame Bush for the budget deficit, unable to blame Wall
Street for wrecking the economy, and incapable of blaming a lack of
regulation or capitalism itself for the morass we're in, Republicans
are pointing their fingers now at public sector workers.
The teachers, police officers, fire fighters, and other government
employees are just making too much money, the Republicans say,
regardless of the fact that public sector workers in state after state
have been laid off or put on unpaid furloughs.
But Republicans don't want you to think about. Much less do they
want you to notice that it's the top 1 percent that's made off like
bandits over the last 30 years. God forbid we raise the marginal income
tax rates, or the capital gains tax, or the estate tax.
The last thing Republicans want is to incite class warfare against
the upper class. Far better to incite warfare within the middle class
and have the majority of Americans blaming each other. (See "War on Public Workers," by Amy Traub in The Nation, July 5.)
One Republican politician after another is joining the chorus
against public sector workers, whether it's Scott Brown of
Massachusetts or Mitch Daniels of Indiana or Rand Paul of Kentucky or
even Arnold Schwarzenegger of California, who has ordered all state
workers to get minimum wage until the budget mess there is resolved.
In Wisconsin, where I live, the Wisconsin State Journal just ran a story
about public sector workers in Dane County earning more than workers
doing similar jobs in the private sector, with at least one local
politician complaining about this.
But the average public sector salary is only about $35,000. Are we
really going to accept that such a salary is too high? Shall we just
kiss the middle class goodbye?
Part of this strategy of blaming the public sector worker is mere
distraction-a shell game to keep people from focusing on those who are
really feasting at the trough: the corporations and the richest of the
rich.
And part of it is a calculated attack on unions, since the public
sector has a 37.4 percent unionization rate, while the private sector
is down at 7.2 percent.
But whatever the motivation, it's a disgusting strategy.
The next time you hear a politician or a pundit trash public sector
workers, ask them if they'd like to take minimum wage-or even a salary
of $35,000.
Chances are, they're making a lot more than that.
The Republicans have found a new scapegoat for the economy, in addition to illegal immigrants.
The new scapegoat is public sector workers.
Unwilling to blame Bush for the budget deficit, unable to blame Wall
Street for wrecking the economy, and incapable of blaming a lack of
regulation or capitalism itself for the morass we're in, Republicans
are pointing their fingers now at public sector workers.
The teachers, police officers, fire fighters, and other government
employees are just making too much money, the Republicans say,
regardless of the fact that public sector workers in state after state
have been laid off or put on unpaid furloughs.
But Republicans don't want you to think about. Much less do they
want you to notice that it's the top 1 percent that's made off like
bandits over the last 30 years. God forbid we raise the marginal income
tax rates, or the capital gains tax, or the estate tax.
The last thing Republicans want is to incite class warfare against
the upper class. Far better to incite warfare within the middle class
and have the majority of Americans blaming each other. (See "War on Public Workers," by Amy Traub in The Nation, July 5.)
One Republican politician after another is joining the chorus
against public sector workers, whether it's Scott Brown of
Massachusetts or Mitch Daniels of Indiana or Rand Paul of Kentucky or
even Arnold Schwarzenegger of California, who has ordered all state
workers to get minimum wage until the budget mess there is resolved.
In Wisconsin, where I live, the Wisconsin State Journal just ran a story
about public sector workers in Dane County earning more than workers
doing similar jobs in the private sector, with at least one local
politician complaining about this.
But the average public sector salary is only about $35,000. Are we
really going to accept that such a salary is too high? Shall we just
kiss the middle class goodbye?
Part of this strategy of blaming the public sector worker is mere
distraction-a shell game to keep people from focusing on those who are
really feasting at the trough: the corporations and the richest of the
rich.
And part of it is a calculated attack on unions, since the public
sector has a 37.4 percent unionization rate, while the private sector
is down at 7.2 percent.
But whatever the motivation, it's a disgusting strategy.
The next time you hear a politician or a pundit trash public sector
workers, ask them if they'd like to take minimum wage-or even a salary
of $35,000.
Chances are, they're making a lot more than that.