

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As all civilized countries agree, seizing ships on the high seas is a very bad thing.
This sentiment was greatly strengthened in 1985 when Palestinian gunmen seized the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro and killed a disabled American passenger. An outraged international community came together to make it an international crime (under the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against Maritime Navigation Safety) to seize control of a ship or to harm its passengers.
Canada has been part of this consensus, and in recent years has sent warships to thwart Somali pirate attacks in the Gulf of Aden.
Yet there hasn't been a murmur of protest from Canada over the Israeli seizure of a Turkish ship in international waters late last month, and the shocking killing of nine peace activists on board.
While governments around the world denounced the Israeli attack and Turkey decried it as an act of "state terrorism," Prime Minister Stephen Harper cheerfully followed through with a planned meeting the next day with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Appearing with Netanyahu, Harper merely expressed regret about the loss of life and the fact that it interfered with Netanyahu's visit to Canada: "I'm sorry this has coloured this [visit]," said Harper, "but delighted you were able to join me at least last night and today, and we've had some important talks, so welcome to Canada."
Welcome to Canada?
Needless to say, it's hard to imagine Harper being so welcoming and convivial had, say, the Iranian navy -- or Somali pirates -- seized a ship in international waters and killed nine people on board.
There is a compelling need for a serious, UN-mandated investigation of these killings, which are as horrific as the killing on the Achille Lauro.
Three of the victims on the Turkish ship bled to death after other passengers spent hours pleading in vain with Israeli commandos to get medical assistance, according to Al Jazeera reporter Jamal Elshayyal, who was on board the ship.
Both Elshayyal and Canadian activist Kevin Neish, also on-board, report that the attack began with Israeli commandos firing live ammunition onto the darkened ship from helicopters above, before descending onto it.
Israel has appointed its own inquiry -- a move that an editorial in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz dismissed as a "farce."
But Canada will give legitimacy to that "farce" by allowing Ken Watkin, former judge advocate general of the Canadian military, to serve on it.
The Haaretz editorial noted that Israel wants to put the focus on the activists, not on the decision-making that led to the ship's takeover.
Let's not lose sight of what was going on. Nearly 700 activists from 50 nations took great personal risks in order to bring humanitarian aid -- including medical supplies and wheelchairs -- to the 1.5 million blockaded people of Gaza, whose plight has been largely ignored by the world.
This unarmed "freedom flotilla" wasn't planning to attack heavily armed Israel.
The allegation of weapons on board turned out to be as mythical as Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.
But while the flotilla posed no physical threat to Israel whatsoever, it did pose another very real threat -- drawing world attention to the suffering caused by Israel's blockade.
Israel is desperate to refocus the story, to turn the humanitarians -- nine of whom are now dead -- into the aggressors. And it looks like our Prime Minister is delighted to help.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As all civilized countries agree, seizing ships on the high seas is a very bad thing.
This sentiment was greatly strengthened in 1985 when Palestinian gunmen seized the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro and killed a disabled American passenger. An outraged international community came together to make it an international crime (under the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against Maritime Navigation Safety) to seize control of a ship or to harm its passengers.
Canada has been part of this consensus, and in recent years has sent warships to thwart Somali pirate attacks in the Gulf of Aden.
Yet there hasn't been a murmur of protest from Canada over the Israeli seizure of a Turkish ship in international waters late last month, and the shocking killing of nine peace activists on board.
While governments around the world denounced the Israeli attack and Turkey decried it as an act of "state terrorism," Prime Minister Stephen Harper cheerfully followed through with a planned meeting the next day with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Appearing with Netanyahu, Harper merely expressed regret about the loss of life and the fact that it interfered with Netanyahu's visit to Canada: "I'm sorry this has coloured this [visit]," said Harper, "but delighted you were able to join me at least last night and today, and we've had some important talks, so welcome to Canada."
Welcome to Canada?
Needless to say, it's hard to imagine Harper being so welcoming and convivial had, say, the Iranian navy -- or Somali pirates -- seized a ship in international waters and killed nine people on board.
There is a compelling need for a serious, UN-mandated investigation of these killings, which are as horrific as the killing on the Achille Lauro.
Three of the victims on the Turkish ship bled to death after other passengers spent hours pleading in vain with Israeli commandos to get medical assistance, according to Al Jazeera reporter Jamal Elshayyal, who was on board the ship.
Both Elshayyal and Canadian activist Kevin Neish, also on-board, report that the attack began with Israeli commandos firing live ammunition onto the darkened ship from helicopters above, before descending onto it.
Israel has appointed its own inquiry -- a move that an editorial in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz dismissed as a "farce."
But Canada will give legitimacy to that "farce" by allowing Ken Watkin, former judge advocate general of the Canadian military, to serve on it.
The Haaretz editorial noted that Israel wants to put the focus on the activists, not on the decision-making that led to the ship's takeover.
Let's not lose sight of what was going on. Nearly 700 activists from 50 nations took great personal risks in order to bring humanitarian aid -- including medical supplies and wheelchairs -- to the 1.5 million blockaded people of Gaza, whose plight has been largely ignored by the world.
This unarmed "freedom flotilla" wasn't planning to attack heavily armed Israel.
The allegation of weapons on board turned out to be as mythical as Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.
But while the flotilla posed no physical threat to Israel whatsoever, it did pose another very real threat -- drawing world attention to the suffering caused by Israel's blockade.
Israel is desperate to refocus the story, to turn the humanitarians -- nine of whom are now dead -- into the aggressors. And it looks like our Prime Minister is delighted to help.
As all civilized countries agree, seizing ships on the high seas is a very bad thing.
This sentiment was greatly strengthened in 1985 when Palestinian gunmen seized the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro and killed a disabled American passenger. An outraged international community came together to make it an international crime (under the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against Maritime Navigation Safety) to seize control of a ship or to harm its passengers.
Canada has been part of this consensus, and in recent years has sent warships to thwart Somali pirate attacks in the Gulf of Aden.
Yet there hasn't been a murmur of protest from Canada over the Israeli seizure of a Turkish ship in international waters late last month, and the shocking killing of nine peace activists on board.
While governments around the world denounced the Israeli attack and Turkey decried it as an act of "state terrorism," Prime Minister Stephen Harper cheerfully followed through with a planned meeting the next day with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Appearing with Netanyahu, Harper merely expressed regret about the loss of life and the fact that it interfered with Netanyahu's visit to Canada: "I'm sorry this has coloured this [visit]," said Harper, "but delighted you were able to join me at least last night and today, and we've had some important talks, so welcome to Canada."
Welcome to Canada?
Needless to say, it's hard to imagine Harper being so welcoming and convivial had, say, the Iranian navy -- or Somali pirates -- seized a ship in international waters and killed nine people on board.
There is a compelling need for a serious, UN-mandated investigation of these killings, which are as horrific as the killing on the Achille Lauro.
Three of the victims on the Turkish ship bled to death after other passengers spent hours pleading in vain with Israeli commandos to get medical assistance, according to Al Jazeera reporter Jamal Elshayyal, who was on board the ship.
Both Elshayyal and Canadian activist Kevin Neish, also on-board, report that the attack began with Israeli commandos firing live ammunition onto the darkened ship from helicopters above, before descending onto it.
Israel has appointed its own inquiry -- a move that an editorial in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz dismissed as a "farce."
But Canada will give legitimacy to that "farce" by allowing Ken Watkin, former judge advocate general of the Canadian military, to serve on it.
The Haaretz editorial noted that Israel wants to put the focus on the activists, not on the decision-making that led to the ship's takeover.
Let's not lose sight of what was going on. Nearly 700 activists from 50 nations took great personal risks in order to bring humanitarian aid -- including medical supplies and wheelchairs -- to the 1.5 million blockaded people of Gaza, whose plight has been largely ignored by the world.
This unarmed "freedom flotilla" wasn't planning to attack heavily armed Israel.
The allegation of weapons on board turned out to be as mythical as Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.
But while the flotilla posed no physical threat to Israel whatsoever, it did pose another very real threat -- drawing world attention to the suffering caused by Israel's blockade.
Israel is desperate to refocus the story, to turn the humanitarians -- nine of whom are now dead -- into the aggressors. And it looks like our Prime Minister is delighted to help.