

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
On May 24th, a piece headlined
"U.S. Is Said to Expand Secret Actions
in Mideast" appeared on the front page of the
New York Times. It clearly involved a leak of a key, previously
unknown document, though not as far as a reader could tell by someone unfriendly
to its policy implications; nor did the Obama administration make a fuss about
it. In fact, despite its front-paging, it vanished from the news with next
to no commentary or follow up, and few expressions of surprise.
Too bad. It should have been attended
to. According to the Times' Mark Mazzetti, in September 2009
Centcom commander General David Petraeus signed a "secret directive" expanding
the use of U.S. Special Operations forces throughout the Greater Middle East
"and beyond" -- "to build networks that could 'penetrate, disrupt, defeat or
destroy' al Qaeda and other militant groups, as well as to 'prepare the
environment' for future attacks by American or local military
forces..."
Among the most striking, if least
discussed, aspects of this leaked story were the brief summaries of Centcom's
military policy towards Iran where, we were told, the seven-page directive
"appears to authorize specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather
intelligence about the country's nuclear program or identify dissident groups
that might be useful for a future military offensive." The report -- too
ho-hum for most Americans to concern themselves with -- was surely read with
care in Tehran,
for it offered a genuine gift to the present Iranian regime. How useful to
its hardline leaders to know that the U.S. military has already inserted,
or is considering inserting, Special Forces teams into their country to
"identify dissident groups that might be useful for a future military
offensive."
And there was more. The piece quoted
an unnamed "Pentagon official with knowledge of General Petraeus's order"
saying, "The Defense Department can't be caught flat-footed" -- in the event,
that is, "that President Obama ever authorizes a strike [on
Iran]."
In fact, this sort of thing is little
better than a poison pill for that country's dissident Green Movement,
reinforcing the claims Iranian hardliners find it so convenient to make -- that
some reformist elements are proxies for foreigners, even paving the way for
future U.S. military action. From a purely practical point of view, this
new policy is delusional, whether ordered only by General Petraeus or by
President Obama himself, since -- despite raging fears on the left in the U.S.
-- the Obama administration, like the Bush
administration before it, is
functionally incapable of launching a military operation against Iranian nuclear
facilities, no less the Iranian fundamentalist government, while it has two wars
on its hands. It is, however, remarkably typical of the blustering and
blundering in Washington that has left Iranian dissidents
saying, as one did in the Los Angeles Times recently,
"Just leave us alone, please."
On the first anniversary of the fraudulent
Iranian elections and the rise of the Green Movement Juan Cole, who runs
Informed Comment,
the blog that offers the single best running commentary on the Middle East
available, recently offered quite a list of similar "gifts" offered up by Washington
and Tel Aviv, as both U.S. and Israeli policy moves continue to backfire when it
comes to Iran.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The above piece, published here with permission, first appeared at Tom Engelhardt's substack page, where you can find more of his writing.
Engelhardt, was editor-in-chief of TomDispatch.com for over 24 years, is the author of numerous books, including: "A Nation Unmade by War" (2018, Dispatch Books), "Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World" (2014, with an introduction by Glenn Greenwald), "Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050"(co-authored with Nick Turse), "The United States of Fear" (2011), "The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's" (2010), and "The End of Victory Culture: a History of the Cold War and Beyond" (2007).
On May 24th, a piece headlined
"U.S. Is Said to Expand Secret Actions
in Mideast" appeared on the front page of the
New York Times. It clearly involved a leak of a key, previously
unknown document, though not as far as a reader could tell by someone unfriendly
to its policy implications; nor did the Obama administration make a fuss about
it. In fact, despite its front-paging, it vanished from the news with next
to no commentary or follow up, and few expressions of surprise.
Too bad. It should have been attended
to. According to the Times' Mark Mazzetti, in September 2009
Centcom commander General David Petraeus signed a "secret directive" expanding
the use of U.S. Special Operations forces throughout the Greater Middle East
"and beyond" -- "to build networks that could 'penetrate, disrupt, defeat or
destroy' al Qaeda and other militant groups, as well as to 'prepare the
environment' for future attacks by American or local military
forces..."
Among the most striking, if least
discussed, aspects of this leaked story were the brief summaries of Centcom's
military policy towards Iran where, we were told, the seven-page directive
"appears to authorize specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather
intelligence about the country's nuclear program or identify dissident groups
that might be useful for a future military offensive." The report -- too
ho-hum for most Americans to concern themselves with -- was surely read with
care in Tehran,
for it offered a genuine gift to the present Iranian regime. How useful to
its hardline leaders to know that the U.S. military has already inserted,
or is considering inserting, Special Forces teams into their country to
"identify dissident groups that might be useful for a future military
offensive."
And there was more. The piece quoted
an unnamed "Pentagon official with knowledge of General Petraeus's order"
saying, "The Defense Department can't be caught flat-footed" -- in the event,
that is, "that President Obama ever authorizes a strike [on
Iran]."
In fact, this sort of thing is little
better than a poison pill for that country's dissident Green Movement,
reinforcing the claims Iranian hardliners find it so convenient to make -- that
some reformist elements are proxies for foreigners, even paving the way for
future U.S. military action. From a purely practical point of view, this
new policy is delusional, whether ordered only by General Petraeus or by
President Obama himself, since -- despite raging fears on the left in the U.S.
-- the Obama administration, like the Bush
administration before it, is
functionally incapable of launching a military operation against Iranian nuclear
facilities, no less the Iranian fundamentalist government, while it has two wars
on its hands. It is, however, remarkably typical of the blustering and
blundering in Washington that has left Iranian dissidents
saying, as one did in the Los Angeles Times recently,
"Just leave us alone, please."
On the first anniversary of the fraudulent
Iranian elections and the rise of the Green Movement Juan Cole, who runs
Informed Comment,
the blog that offers the single best running commentary on the Middle East
available, recently offered quite a list of similar "gifts" offered up by Washington
and Tel Aviv, as both U.S. and Israeli policy moves continue to backfire when it
comes to Iran.
The above piece, published here with permission, first appeared at Tom Engelhardt's substack page, where you can find more of his writing.
Engelhardt, was editor-in-chief of TomDispatch.com for over 24 years, is the author of numerous books, including: "A Nation Unmade by War" (2018, Dispatch Books), "Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World" (2014, with an introduction by Glenn Greenwald), "Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050"(co-authored with Nick Turse), "The United States of Fear" (2011), "The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's" (2010), and "The End of Victory Culture: a History of the Cold War and Beyond" (2007).
On May 24th, a piece headlined
"U.S. Is Said to Expand Secret Actions
in Mideast" appeared on the front page of the
New York Times. It clearly involved a leak of a key, previously
unknown document, though not as far as a reader could tell by someone unfriendly
to its policy implications; nor did the Obama administration make a fuss about
it. In fact, despite its front-paging, it vanished from the news with next
to no commentary or follow up, and few expressions of surprise.
Too bad. It should have been attended
to. According to the Times' Mark Mazzetti, in September 2009
Centcom commander General David Petraeus signed a "secret directive" expanding
the use of U.S. Special Operations forces throughout the Greater Middle East
"and beyond" -- "to build networks that could 'penetrate, disrupt, defeat or
destroy' al Qaeda and other militant groups, as well as to 'prepare the
environment' for future attacks by American or local military
forces..."
Among the most striking, if least
discussed, aspects of this leaked story were the brief summaries of Centcom's
military policy towards Iran where, we were told, the seven-page directive
"appears to authorize specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather
intelligence about the country's nuclear program or identify dissident groups
that might be useful for a future military offensive." The report -- too
ho-hum for most Americans to concern themselves with -- was surely read with
care in Tehran,
for it offered a genuine gift to the present Iranian regime. How useful to
its hardline leaders to know that the U.S. military has already inserted,
or is considering inserting, Special Forces teams into their country to
"identify dissident groups that might be useful for a future military
offensive."
And there was more. The piece quoted
an unnamed "Pentagon official with knowledge of General Petraeus's order"
saying, "The Defense Department can't be caught flat-footed" -- in the event,
that is, "that President Obama ever authorizes a strike [on
Iran]."
In fact, this sort of thing is little
better than a poison pill for that country's dissident Green Movement,
reinforcing the claims Iranian hardliners find it so convenient to make -- that
some reformist elements are proxies for foreigners, even paving the way for
future U.S. military action. From a purely practical point of view, this
new policy is delusional, whether ordered only by General Petraeus or by
President Obama himself, since -- despite raging fears on the left in the U.S.
-- the Obama administration, like the Bush
administration before it, is
functionally incapable of launching a military operation against Iranian nuclear
facilities, no less the Iranian fundamentalist government, while it has two wars
on its hands. It is, however, remarkably typical of the blustering and
blundering in Washington that has left Iranian dissidents
saying, as one did in the Los Angeles Times recently,
"Just leave us alone, please."
On the first anniversary of the fraudulent
Iranian elections and the rise of the Green Movement Juan Cole, who runs
Informed Comment,
the blog that offers the single best running commentary on the Middle East
available, recently offered quite a list of similar "gifts" offered up by Washington
and Tel Aviv, as both U.S. and Israeli policy moves continue to backfire when it
comes to Iran.