

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The best comment so far about the
brilliant diplomatic coup engineered by Brazil, Turkey, and Iran
yesterday comes from the Turkish ambassador to the United Nations, who
said, in reacting to the smarmy, negative reaction from Washington:
"I would have expected a more encouraging statement. We don't
believe in sanctions, and I don't believe anyone can challenge us,
certainly not the United States. They don't work."
Despite the huffing and puffing from the Obama administration, there
are other powers reaction positively to the dramatic development.
President Sarkozy of France called it a "positive step," [1]adding:
"France will examine this with the Group of Six [international
powers] and is ready to discuss without preconceptions all its
implications for the whole of the Iran dossier."
China, too, which had reluctantly joined the idiotic U.S. sanctions bandwagon, now seems to be backing off, and China's foreign minister said [1]:
"China has noted the relevant reports and expresses its welcome and
appreciation for the diplomatic efforts all parties have made to
positively seek an appropriate solution to the Iranian nuclear issue."
Before traveling to Iran, Brazil's President Lula da Silva said that
he believed that he had a 99 percent chance of a successful
breakthrough in the talks with Iran, even as U.S. officials expressed
extreme skepticism that anything could be accomplished. What Brazil and
Turkey did is to get Iran to reaffirm the terms of the October, 2009,
deal that was worked out in Geneva, by which Iran would have sent the
bulk of its enriched uranium to Russia and France for reprocessing into
fuel rods for a medical research reactor in Tehran. Under the new
accord, worked out by Brazil and Turkey, Iran will send about half of
its enriched uranium to Turkey, instead. True, Iran has more enriched
uranium now than it had in October, but the very fact that Iran is
still ready to ship some of its fuel abroad is a sign that diplomacy
can still work.
In the United States, however, reaction is sharply negative. It's
almost as if the Obama administration is more concerned that it's
hard-fought battle to get Russian and Chinese support for more
(useless) sanctions on Iran is unraveling than it is about a real
solution to the problem.
The Washington Post, petulant and petty in its editorial today [2],
called "Bad Bargain," says that the Brazil-Turkey accord will "do
nothing to restrain Tehran's nuclear program," that it might "derail"
the Obama administration's sanctions push, and that it represents a
"major diplomatic coup for the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei." In
fact, it might have been a diplomatic coup for the United States, if
Washington hadn't foolishly insisted that the terms of the October deal
were sacrosanct and couldn't be altered in order to get the deal back
on track, after Iran first accepted it and then rejected it. It could
have been a diplomatic coup for President Obama if he'd encouraged
Brazil and Turkey to go ahead, rather than having his spokesmen
pooh-pooh the effort and issue ugly warnings to Brazil.
The New York Times reports that the Obama administration is angry [3]over
the deal, in part because Obama met personally with the Brazilian and
Turkish leaders in Washington earlier this month and then sent them
letters urging them to reject a deal with Iran.
The text of the 10-point plan [4], which you can read here [4], specifically says that Iran, as a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), has the right to enrich uranium:
"We reaffirm our commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation
of Nuclear Weapons and in accordance with the related articles of the
NPT, recall the right of all State Parties, including the Islamic
Republic of Iran, to develop research, production and use of nuclear
energy (as well as nuclear fuel cycle including enrichment activities)
for peaceful purposes without discrimination."
That, more than anything else, is driving some at the Post and
the Obama administration wild. In fact, despite the existence of UN
resolutions calling on Iran to suspend its enrichment program,
President Obama should have long ago declared that Iran has the right
to enrich, under appropriate IAEA safeguards. He hasn't.
The Post, in its account of the deal [5]today,
calls the diplomacy by Brazil and Turkey a "revolt by smaller powers
over the rights to nuclear power and prestige." How very imperial!
Since sanctions won't work, and since military action would be a
catastrophe, you'd think Obama would be thrilled to see diplomatic
progress. You'd be wrong. The Post reports that, right on schedule, the United States has ready the text of a draft UN resolution calling for new sanctions on Iran [5].
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The best comment so far about the
brilliant diplomatic coup engineered by Brazil, Turkey, and Iran
yesterday comes from the Turkish ambassador to the United Nations, who
said, in reacting to the smarmy, negative reaction from Washington:
"I would have expected a more encouraging statement. We don't
believe in sanctions, and I don't believe anyone can challenge us,
certainly not the United States. They don't work."
Despite the huffing and puffing from the Obama administration, there
are other powers reaction positively to the dramatic development.
President Sarkozy of France called it a "positive step," [1]adding:
"France will examine this with the Group of Six [international
powers] and is ready to discuss without preconceptions all its
implications for the whole of the Iran dossier."
China, too, which had reluctantly joined the idiotic U.S. sanctions bandwagon, now seems to be backing off, and China's foreign minister said [1]:
"China has noted the relevant reports and expresses its welcome and
appreciation for the diplomatic efforts all parties have made to
positively seek an appropriate solution to the Iranian nuclear issue."
Before traveling to Iran, Brazil's President Lula da Silva said that
he believed that he had a 99 percent chance of a successful
breakthrough in the talks with Iran, even as U.S. officials expressed
extreme skepticism that anything could be accomplished. What Brazil and
Turkey did is to get Iran to reaffirm the terms of the October, 2009,
deal that was worked out in Geneva, by which Iran would have sent the
bulk of its enriched uranium to Russia and France for reprocessing into
fuel rods for a medical research reactor in Tehran. Under the new
accord, worked out by Brazil and Turkey, Iran will send about half of
its enriched uranium to Turkey, instead. True, Iran has more enriched
uranium now than it had in October, but the very fact that Iran is
still ready to ship some of its fuel abroad is a sign that diplomacy
can still work.
In the United States, however, reaction is sharply negative. It's
almost as if the Obama administration is more concerned that it's
hard-fought battle to get Russian and Chinese support for more
(useless) sanctions on Iran is unraveling than it is about a real
solution to the problem.
The Washington Post, petulant and petty in its editorial today [2],
called "Bad Bargain," says that the Brazil-Turkey accord will "do
nothing to restrain Tehran's nuclear program," that it might "derail"
the Obama administration's sanctions push, and that it represents a
"major diplomatic coup for the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei." In
fact, it might have been a diplomatic coup for the United States, if
Washington hadn't foolishly insisted that the terms of the October deal
were sacrosanct and couldn't be altered in order to get the deal back
on track, after Iran first accepted it and then rejected it. It could
have been a diplomatic coup for President Obama if he'd encouraged
Brazil and Turkey to go ahead, rather than having his spokesmen
pooh-pooh the effort and issue ugly warnings to Brazil.
The New York Times reports that the Obama administration is angry [3]over
the deal, in part because Obama met personally with the Brazilian and
Turkish leaders in Washington earlier this month and then sent them
letters urging them to reject a deal with Iran.
The text of the 10-point plan [4], which you can read here [4], specifically says that Iran, as a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), has the right to enrich uranium:
"We reaffirm our commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation
of Nuclear Weapons and in accordance with the related articles of the
NPT, recall the right of all State Parties, including the Islamic
Republic of Iran, to develop research, production and use of nuclear
energy (as well as nuclear fuel cycle including enrichment activities)
for peaceful purposes without discrimination."
That, more than anything else, is driving some at the Post and
the Obama administration wild. In fact, despite the existence of UN
resolutions calling on Iran to suspend its enrichment program,
President Obama should have long ago declared that Iran has the right
to enrich, under appropriate IAEA safeguards. He hasn't.
The Post, in its account of the deal [5]today,
calls the diplomacy by Brazil and Turkey a "revolt by smaller powers
over the rights to nuclear power and prestige." How very imperial!
Since sanctions won't work, and since military action would be a
catastrophe, you'd think Obama would be thrilled to see diplomatic
progress. You'd be wrong. The Post reports that, right on schedule, the United States has ready the text of a draft UN resolution calling for new sanctions on Iran [5].
The best comment so far about the
brilliant diplomatic coup engineered by Brazil, Turkey, and Iran
yesterday comes from the Turkish ambassador to the United Nations, who
said, in reacting to the smarmy, negative reaction from Washington:
"I would have expected a more encouraging statement. We don't
believe in sanctions, and I don't believe anyone can challenge us,
certainly not the United States. They don't work."
Despite the huffing and puffing from the Obama administration, there
are other powers reaction positively to the dramatic development.
President Sarkozy of France called it a "positive step," [1]adding:
"France will examine this with the Group of Six [international
powers] and is ready to discuss without preconceptions all its
implications for the whole of the Iran dossier."
China, too, which had reluctantly joined the idiotic U.S. sanctions bandwagon, now seems to be backing off, and China's foreign minister said [1]:
"China has noted the relevant reports and expresses its welcome and
appreciation for the diplomatic efforts all parties have made to
positively seek an appropriate solution to the Iranian nuclear issue."
Before traveling to Iran, Brazil's President Lula da Silva said that
he believed that he had a 99 percent chance of a successful
breakthrough in the talks with Iran, even as U.S. officials expressed
extreme skepticism that anything could be accomplished. What Brazil and
Turkey did is to get Iran to reaffirm the terms of the October, 2009,
deal that was worked out in Geneva, by which Iran would have sent the
bulk of its enriched uranium to Russia and France for reprocessing into
fuel rods for a medical research reactor in Tehran. Under the new
accord, worked out by Brazil and Turkey, Iran will send about half of
its enriched uranium to Turkey, instead. True, Iran has more enriched
uranium now than it had in October, but the very fact that Iran is
still ready to ship some of its fuel abroad is a sign that diplomacy
can still work.
In the United States, however, reaction is sharply negative. It's
almost as if the Obama administration is more concerned that it's
hard-fought battle to get Russian and Chinese support for more
(useless) sanctions on Iran is unraveling than it is about a real
solution to the problem.
The Washington Post, petulant and petty in its editorial today [2],
called "Bad Bargain," says that the Brazil-Turkey accord will "do
nothing to restrain Tehran's nuclear program," that it might "derail"
the Obama administration's sanctions push, and that it represents a
"major diplomatic coup for the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei." In
fact, it might have been a diplomatic coup for the United States, if
Washington hadn't foolishly insisted that the terms of the October deal
were sacrosanct and couldn't be altered in order to get the deal back
on track, after Iran first accepted it and then rejected it. It could
have been a diplomatic coup for President Obama if he'd encouraged
Brazil and Turkey to go ahead, rather than having his spokesmen
pooh-pooh the effort and issue ugly warnings to Brazil.
The New York Times reports that the Obama administration is angry [3]over
the deal, in part because Obama met personally with the Brazilian and
Turkish leaders in Washington earlier this month and then sent them
letters urging them to reject a deal with Iran.
The text of the 10-point plan [4], which you can read here [4], specifically says that Iran, as a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), has the right to enrich uranium:
"We reaffirm our commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation
of Nuclear Weapons and in accordance with the related articles of the
NPT, recall the right of all State Parties, including the Islamic
Republic of Iran, to develop research, production and use of nuclear
energy (as well as nuclear fuel cycle including enrichment activities)
for peaceful purposes without discrimination."
That, more than anything else, is driving some at the Post and
the Obama administration wild. In fact, despite the existence of UN
resolutions calling on Iran to suspend its enrichment program,
President Obama should have long ago declared that Iran has the right
to enrich, under appropriate IAEA safeguards. He hasn't.
The Post, in its account of the deal [5]today,
calls the diplomacy by Brazil and Turkey a "revolt by smaller powers
over the rights to nuclear power and prestige." How very imperial!
Since sanctions won't work, and since military action would be a
catastrophe, you'd think Obama would be thrilled to see diplomatic
progress. You'd be wrong. The Post reports that, right on schedule, the United States has ready the text of a draft UN resolution calling for new sanctions on Iran [5].