SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
This is what must make it hard for people working inside the Obama administration. No sooner does the White House start talking up something good, than it does something bad.
Take contracting. As reported here on GRITtv, the Obama's administration's been talking up "High Road Contracting." That's the using of the power of the government's $500 billion purse to reward companies that offer better wages and benefits and disqualify from federal contracts those that violate labor and environmental law. Sounds good right? The debate was just heating up when the second shoe dropped.
After no fewer than 20 Senate hearings on Pentagon contracting fraud and abuse, one of the most controversial contractors, KBR, was awarded a new contract worth up to $2.8 billion for work in Iraq. Formerly a subsidiary of Halliburton, KBR's appeared at no end of fraud hearings -- it stands accused most spectacularly of the electrocution deaths of US troops and the exposure of troops to carcinogens.
Just last fall, the Senate passed a measure specifically to ban from federal contracts companies that do what KBR has done -- which is deny victims of workplace sexual assault the right to bring their cases to court.
A whole bunch of female KBR workers have accused fellow employees of rape. One, reportedly received a $3 m settlement in private arbitration last fall. Another, Jamie Leigh Jones, says she was raped at 19 by a bunch of fellow KBR workers in Iraq -- and locked up in a crate when she tried reporting them...
Unless I'm dreaming, Senator Al Franken's amendment was supposed to bar companies like that from receiving federal contracts. Yet here we are: amidst all this talk of high road contracting, KBR announced its new contract March 2, saying it "demonstrates the U.S. government's recognition of KBR's ability to deliver high-quality logistics services in challenging contingency environments."
You want challenging environments -- let's talk about the US Senate. Contracting with KBR again is about as low-road as it gets.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This is what must make it hard for people working inside the Obama administration. No sooner does the White House start talking up something good, than it does something bad.
Take contracting. As reported here on GRITtv, the Obama's administration's been talking up "High Road Contracting." That's the using of the power of the government's $500 billion purse to reward companies that offer better wages and benefits and disqualify from federal contracts those that violate labor and environmental law. Sounds good right? The debate was just heating up when the second shoe dropped.
After no fewer than 20 Senate hearings on Pentagon contracting fraud and abuse, one of the most controversial contractors, KBR, was awarded a new contract worth up to $2.8 billion for work in Iraq. Formerly a subsidiary of Halliburton, KBR's appeared at no end of fraud hearings -- it stands accused most spectacularly of the electrocution deaths of US troops and the exposure of troops to carcinogens.
Just last fall, the Senate passed a measure specifically to ban from federal contracts companies that do what KBR has done -- which is deny victims of workplace sexual assault the right to bring their cases to court.
A whole bunch of female KBR workers have accused fellow employees of rape. One, reportedly received a $3 m settlement in private arbitration last fall. Another, Jamie Leigh Jones, says she was raped at 19 by a bunch of fellow KBR workers in Iraq -- and locked up in a crate when she tried reporting them...
Unless I'm dreaming, Senator Al Franken's amendment was supposed to bar companies like that from receiving federal contracts. Yet here we are: amidst all this talk of high road contracting, KBR announced its new contract March 2, saying it "demonstrates the U.S. government's recognition of KBR's ability to deliver high-quality logistics services in challenging contingency environments."
You want challenging environments -- let's talk about the US Senate. Contracting with KBR again is about as low-road as it gets.
This is what must make it hard for people working inside the Obama administration. No sooner does the White House start talking up something good, than it does something bad.
Take contracting. As reported here on GRITtv, the Obama's administration's been talking up "High Road Contracting." That's the using of the power of the government's $500 billion purse to reward companies that offer better wages and benefits and disqualify from federal contracts those that violate labor and environmental law. Sounds good right? The debate was just heating up when the second shoe dropped.
After no fewer than 20 Senate hearings on Pentagon contracting fraud and abuse, one of the most controversial contractors, KBR, was awarded a new contract worth up to $2.8 billion for work in Iraq. Formerly a subsidiary of Halliburton, KBR's appeared at no end of fraud hearings -- it stands accused most spectacularly of the electrocution deaths of US troops and the exposure of troops to carcinogens.
Just last fall, the Senate passed a measure specifically to ban from federal contracts companies that do what KBR has done -- which is deny victims of workplace sexual assault the right to bring their cases to court.
A whole bunch of female KBR workers have accused fellow employees of rape. One, reportedly received a $3 m settlement in private arbitration last fall. Another, Jamie Leigh Jones, says she was raped at 19 by a bunch of fellow KBR workers in Iraq -- and locked up in a crate when she tried reporting them...
Unless I'm dreaming, Senator Al Franken's amendment was supposed to bar companies like that from receiving federal contracts. Yet here we are: amidst all this talk of high road contracting, KBR announced its new contract March 2, saying it "demonstrates the U.S. government's recognition of KBR's ability to deliver high-quality logistics services in challenging contingency environments."
You want challenging environments -- let's talk about the US Senate. Contracting with KBR again is about as low-road as it gets.