

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
It's not surprising that people are fed up with politics.
When money determines who gets elected, when campaign promises are as
easily tossed out as garbage and when most elected officials knowingly
support policy that puts the special interests ahead of the people's
interests, why bother with a rigged game?
The Senate is firmly under the control of a Republican minority of 41,
the House is stalled and thinking about re-election, the Supreme Court
has decided that political office should be for sale to the special
interest that is willing to spend the most on behalf of their chosen
candidate and the President continues to "play nice" instead of pushing
a progressive agenda.
Just a year ago there was a great sense of hope, not seen since the end of WWII.
A president whose idea of peace might not mean more "boots on the ground".
A President who supported health care for all.
A President who believed in fair trade, not free trade.
A President who felt banks should help people better their lives, not gamble away their money.
Boy did we take the bait, the drift to the right continues with
President Obama still thinking he can work with a Republican party
whose game plan is blocking legislation.
Just as people used to hide those they were ashamed of away from public
view, the Republicans have successfully hidden George Bush and the
failures of his administration away.
The ills of the nation are now Obama's problem, Obama's fault and still
he panders to those who vilify him; to those who want less oversight,
more war, more for the rich and less for everyone else.
The militarism, the Wall Street free for all, the bankruptcies, the
mortgage foreclosures, the top down bail out at the expense of the
bottom; all the legacies of the Bush Administration are dumped on Obama
and for solutions he turns to those who created the problems and offer
more of the same as a solution.
In his State of the Union Address the President stated that "jobs must be our number one focus in 2010", yet he intends to push for more free trade agreements,
policies Presidents Clinton and Bush championed, policies that shipped
jobs overseas and crushed the workers, the farmers, the labor unions
and the families of America. Policies that have caused pain, policies
that Obama seems reluctant to stop.
He barely mentioned Afghanistan and the nearly one hundred thousand
American troops there, what could he say? It's good? It's working? How
about the truth, that it's bad policy with no end in sight.
The President said he was open to better ideas on how to remake the
nation's health care system, but he offered no ideas of his own,
nothing he was willing to push forward.
What might the late Howard Zinn have said about President Obama's speech? I doubt he would have
criticized the President as a failure, but I do think he would have
criticized him because he was afraid to try, because he was afraid to
formulate his own policy and to push it relentlessly.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It's not surprising that people are fed up with politics.
When money determines who gets elected, when campaign promises are as
easily tossed out as garbage and when most elected officials knowingly
support policy that puts the special interests ahead of the people's
interests, why bother with a rigged game?
The Senate is firmly under the control of a Republican minority of 41,
the House is stalled and thinking about re-election, the Supreme Court
has decided that political office should be for sale to the special
interest that is willing to spend the most on behalf of their chosen
candidate and the President continues to "play nice" instead of pushing
a progressive agenda.
Just a year ago there was a great sense of hope, not seen since the end of WWII.
A president whose idea of peace might not mean more "boots on the ground".
A President who supported health care for all.
A President who believed in fair trade, not free trade.
A President who felt banks should help people better their lives, not gamble away their money.
Boy did we take the bait, the drift to the right continues with
President Obama still thinking he can work with a Republican party
whose game plan is blocking legislation.
Just as people used to hide those they were ashamed of away from public
view, the Republicans have successfully hidden George Bush and the
failures of his administration away.
The ills of the nation are now Obama's problem, Obama's fault and still
he panders to those who vilify him; to those who want less oversight,
more war, more for the rich and less for everyone else.
The militarism, the Wall Street free for all, the bankruptcies, the
mortgage foreclosures, the top down bail out at the expense of the
bottom; all the legacies of the Bush Administration are dumped on Obama
and for solutions he turns to those who created the problems and offer
more of the same as a solution.
In his State of the Union Address the President stated that "jobs must be our number one focus in 2010", yet he intends to push for more free trade agreements,
policies Presidents Clinton and Bush championed, policies that shipped
jobs overseas and crushed the workers, the farmers, the labor unions
and the families of America. Policies that have caused pain, policies
that Obama seems reluctant to stop.
He barely mentioned Afghanistan and the nearly one hundred thousand
American troops there, what could he say? It's good? It's working? How
about the truth, that it's bad policy with no end in sight.
The President said he was open to better ideas on how to remake the
nation's health care system, but he offered no ideas of his own,
nothing he was willing to push forward.
What might the late Howard Zinn have said about President Obama's speech? I doubt he would have
criticized the President as a failure, but I do think he would have
criticized him because he was afraid to try, because he was afraid to
formulate his own policy and to push it relentlessly.
It's not surprising that people are fed up with politics.
When money determines who gets elected, when campaign promises are as
easily tossed out as garbage and when most elected officials knowingly
support policy that puts the special interests ahead of the people's
interests, why bother with a rigged game?
The Senate is firmly under the control of a Republican minority of 41,
the House is stalled and thinking about re-election, the Supreme Court
has decided that political office should be for sale to the special
interest that is willing to spend the most on behalf of their chosen
candidate and the President continues to "play nice" instead of pushing
a progressive agenda.
Just a year ago there was a great sense of hope, not seen since the end of WWII.
A president whose idea of peace might not mean more "boots on the ground".
A President who supported health care for all.
A President who believed in fair trade, not free trade.
A President who felt banks should help people better their lives, not gamble away their money.
Boy did we take the bait, the drift to the right continues with
President Obama still thinking he can work with a Republican party
whose game plan is blocking legislation.
Just as people used to hide those they were ashamed of away from public
view, the Republicans have successfully hidden George Bush and the
failures of his administration away.
The ills of the nation are now Obama's problem, Obama's fault and still
he panders to those who vilify him; to those who want less oversight,
more war, more for the rich and less for everyone else.
The militarism, the Wall Street free for all, the bankruptcies, the
mortgage foreclosures, the top down bail out at the expense of the
bottom; all the legacies of the Bush Administration are dumped on Obama
and for solutions he turns to those who created the problems and offer
more of the same as a solution.
In his State of the Union Address the President stated that "jobs must be our number one focus in 2010", yet he intends to push for more free trade agreements,
policies Presidents Clinton and Bush championed, policies that shipped
jobs overseas and crushed the workers, the farmers, the labor unions
and the families of America. Policies that have caused pain, policies
that Obama seems reluctant to stop.
He barely mentioned Afghanistan and the nearly one hundred thousand
American troops there, what could he say? It's good? It's working? How
about the truth, that it's bad policy with no end in sight.
The President said he was open to better ideas on how to remake the
nation's health care system, but he offered no ideas of his own,
nothing he was willing to push forward.
What might the late Howard Zinn have said about President Obama's speech? I doubt he would have
criticized the President as a failure, but I do think he would have
criticized him because he was afraid to try, because he was afraid to
formulate his own policy and to push it relentlessly.