Jan 05, 2010
On Monday, public interest groups called on federal authorities to
investigate a plan by the largest cable, satellite and phone companies that threatens the future
of Web-based video. "TV Everywhere" gets programmers like TNT, TBS and
CBS to keep their content offline unless a viewer also pays for TV
through a traditional company like Comcast or AT&T (phone companies
are starting to offer TV service, too).
TV Everywhere is designed to protect the current cable TV subscription
model and block competition from upstart online video ventures like
Vuze, Roku and Hulu. Cleverly marketed as a consumer-friendly product,
TV Everywhere is really a desperate bid by old media giants
to crush the emerging market for online TV. Cable giant Comcast just
became the first company to launch TV Everywhere under the brand "Fancast Xfinity," and the other dominant cable, satellite and phone companies have announced plans to follow suit.
At its core, TV Everywhere is about ensuring consumers don't cancel
their overpriced cable TV subscriptions that provide companies like
Comcast with huge profits ($6.7 billion in 2008 alone.) But the current
scheme also prevents competition between existing TV distributors.
Instead of being offered to all Americans, including those living in
Cox, Cablevision and Time Warner Cable regions, Fancast Xfinity is only
available in Comcast regions. The other distributors plan to follow
Comcast's lead, meaning that the incumbents will not compete with one
another outside of their "traditional" regions.
Statements made
by cable executives indicate that backroom deals are being cut without
asking for permission by regulators --- the kind of permission that the
nation's major newspapers recently sought before entering into
discussions about a coordinated online "paywall." So TV Everywhere not
only threatens the Net's potential to break open access and
distribution of video content, it also appears to be an illegal
collusion meant to block competition. Any way you slice it, it's bad
for consumers. On Monday, public interest groups released a major report at the same time that they sent a letter to federal regulators requesting an antitrust investigation of TV Everywhere.
New online-only TV distributors and independent channels are excluded from TV Everywhere. The "principles" of the plan, which were published by Comcast and Time Warner
(a content company distinct from Time Warner Cable), clearly state that
TV Everywhere is meant only for cable operators, satellite companies
and phone companies. By design, this plan would exclude new entrants
and result in fewer choices and higher prices for consumers.
This deal threatens to stifle the freedom and innovation that are
shaping our new media marketplace. The Internet is enabling people to
watch video how and when they want it. The programs we watch on TV are
increasingly available on your computer: on-demand through Hulu,
Fancast and other streaming sites. And the online video you can see on
YouTube, Miro, Fancast, Vimeo and other portals are available on
televisions and portable devices. Stranded at the airport, sitting in a
coffee shop, on vacation or at work, we can view programs from
basically anywhere. And thanks to the Internet's open, neutral
platform, anyone can create and share video, meaning we're no longer
confined to the programs that media executives choose to offer.
TV Everywhere represents a defining moment in the future of radio,
television and other media. In one scenario, we break from history and
achieve more consumer choice and an explosion of innovative content. We
may need to pay for video online, or continue to watch advertisements,
but we won't be forced to buy a traditional cable TV subscription that
we don't want or need.
In another scenario, we allow the big cable, satellite and phone
companies to use anticompetitive ventures like TV Everywhere to protect
the status quo, and make the Internet more like cable television: where
they, not you, pick and choose what you can watch, how and when you can
watch it, and how much you pay for it.
The central tenet of TV Everywhere is that it can only exist through
collusion among competitors. Our federal antitrust authorities and
Congress must launch an immediate investigation. The Internet offers an
unparalleled opportunity to democratize the TV screen now controlled by
a handful of powerful media companies. This revolution is televised -
and we should be able to view it online, too. Antitrust authorities should start enforcing antitrust laws and protect the public interest.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Josh Silver
Josh Silver is the director of Represent.us, dedicated to building a fiercely non-partisan movement to pass tough anti-corruption laws in cities and states across America, and end the legalized corruption that has come to define modern politics. Prior to that, Josh was the Executive Director of Free Press a national, nonpartisan organization that he co-founded with Robert McChesney and John Nichols in 2002 to engage citizens in media policy debates and create a more democratic and diverse media system.
On Monday, public interest groups called on federal authorities to
investigate a plan by the largest cable, satellite and phone companies that threatens the future
of Web-based video. "TV Everywhere" gets programmers like TNT, TBS and
CBS to keep their content offline unless a viewer also pays for TV
through a traditional company like Comcast or AT&T (phone companies
are starting to offer TV service, too).
TV Everywhere is designed to protect the current cable TV subscription
model and block competition from upstart online video ventures like
Vuze, Roku and Hulu. Cleverly marketed as a consumer-friendly product,
TV Everywhere is really a desperate bid by old media giants
to crush the emerging market for online TV. Cable giant Comcast just
became the first company to launch TV Everywhere under the brand "Fancast Xfinity," and the other dominant cable, satellite and phone companies have announced plans to follow suit.
At its core, TV Everywhere is about ensuring consumers don't cancel
their overpriced cable TV subscriptions that provide companies like
Comcast with huge profits ($6.7 billion in 2008 alone.) But the current
scheme also prevents competition between existing TV distributors.
Instead of being offered to all Americans, including those living in
Cox, Cablevision and Time Warner Cable regions, Fancast Xfinity is only
available in Comcast regions. The other distributors plan to follow
Comcast's lead, meaning that the incumbents will not compete with one
another outside of their "traditional" regions.
Statements made
by cable executives indicate that backroom deals are being cut without
asking for permission by regulators --- the kind of permission that the
nation's major newspapers recently sought before entering into
discussions about a coordinated online "paywall." So TV Everywhere not
only threatens the Net's potential to break open access and
distribution of video content, it also appears to be an illegal
collusion meant to block competition. Any way you slice it, it's bad
for consumers. On Monday, public interest groups released a major report at the same time that they sent a letter to federal regulators requesting an antitrust investigation of TV Everywhere.
New online-only TV distributors and independent channels are excluded from TV Everywhere. The "principles" of the plan, which were published by Comcast and Time Warner
(a content company distinct from Time Warner Cable), clearly state that
TV Everywhere is meant only for cable operators, satellite companies
and phone companies. By design, this plan would exclude new entrants
and result in fewer choices and higher prices for consumers.
This deal threatens to stifle the freedom and innovation that are
shaping our new media marketplace. The Internet is enabling people to
watch video how and when they want it. The programs we watch on TV are
increasingly available on your computer: on-demand through Hulu,
Fancast and other streaming sites. And the online video you can see on
YouTube, Miro, Fancast, Vimeo and other portals are available on
televisions and portable devices. Stranded at the airport, sitting in a
coffee shop, on vacation or at work, we can view programs from
basically anywhere. And thanks to the Internet's open, neutral
platform, anyone can create and share video, meaning we're no longer
confined to the programs that media executives choose to offer.
TV Everywhere represents a defining moment in the future of radio,
television and other media. In one scenario, we break from history and
achieve more consumer choice and an explosion of innovative content. We
may need to pay for video online, or continue to watch advertisements,
but we won't be forced to buy a traditional cable TV subscription that
we don't want or need.
In another scenario, we allow the big cable, satellite and phone
companies to use anticompetitive ventures like TV Everywhere to protect
the status quo, and make the Internet more like cable television: where
they, not you, pick and choose what you can watch, how and when you can
watch it, and how much you pay for it.
The central tenet of TV Everywhere is that it can only exist through
collusion among competitors. Our federal antitrust authorities and
Congress must launch an immediate investigation. The Internet offers an
unparalleled opportunity to democratize the TV screen now controlled by
a handful of powerful media companies. This revolution is televised -
and we should be able to view it online, too. Antitrust authorities should start enforcing antitrust laws and protect the public interest.
Josh Silver
Josh Silver is the director of Represent.us, dedicated to building a fiercely non-partisan movement to pass tough anti-corruption laws in cities and states across America, and end the legalized corruption that has come to define modern politics. Prior to that, Josh was the Executive Director of Free Press a national, nonpartisan organization that he co-founded with Robert McChesney and John Nichols in 2002 to engage citizens in media policy debates and create a more democratic and diverse media system.
On Monday, public interest groups called on federal authorities to
investigate a plan by the largest cable, satellite and phone companies that threatens the future
of Web-based video. "TV Everywhere" gets programmers like TNT, TBS and
CBS to keep their content offline unless a viewer also pays for TV
through a traditional company like Comcast or AT&T (phone companies
are starting to offer TV service, too).
TV Everywhere is designed to protect the current cable TV subscription
model and block competition from upstart online video ventures like
Vuze, Roku and Hulu. Cleverly marketed as a consumer-friendly product,
TV Everywhere is really a desperate bid by old media giants
to crush the emerging market for online TV. Cable giant Comcast just
became the first company to launch TV Everywhere under the brand "Fancast Xfinity," and the other dominant cable, satellite and phone companies have announced plans to follow suit.
At its core, TV Everywhere is about ensuring consumers don't cancel
their overpriced cable TV subscriptions that provide companies like
Comcast with huge profits ($6.7 billion in 2008 alone.) But the current
scheme also prevents competition between existing TV distributors.
Instead of being offered to all Americans, including those living in
Cox, Cablevision and Time Warner Cable regions, Fancast Xfinity is only
available in Comcast regions. The other distributors plan to follow
Comcast's lead, meaning that the incumbents will not compete with one
another outside of their "traditional" regions.
Statements made
by cable executives indicate that backroom deals are being cut without
asking for permission by regulators --- the kind of permission that the
nation's major newspapers recently sought before entering into
discussions about a coordinated online "paywall." So TV Everywhere not
only threatens the Net's potential to break open access and
distribution of video content, it also appears to be an illegal
collusion meant to block competition. Any way you slice it, it's bad
for consumers. On Monday, public interest groups released a major report at the same time that they sent a letter to federal regulators requesting an antitrust investigation of TV Everywhere.
New online-only TV distributors and independent channels are excluded from TV Everywhere. The "principles" of the plan, which were published by Comcast and Time Warner
(a content company distinct from Time Warner Cable), clearly state that
TV Everywhere is meant only for cable operators, satellite companies
and phone companies. By design, this plan would exclude new entrants
and result in fewer choices and higher prices for consumers.
This deal threatens to stifle the freedom and innovation that are
shaping our new media marketplace. The Internet is enabling people to
watch video how and when they want it. The programs we watch on TV are
increasingly available on your computer: on-demand through Hulu,
Fancast and other streaming sites. And the online video you can see on
YouTube, Miro, Fancast, Vimeo and other portals are available on
televisions and portable devices. Stranded at the airport, sitting in a
coffee shop, on vacation or at work, we can view programs from
basically anywhere. And thanks to the Internet's open, neutral
platform, anyone can create and share video, meaning we're no longer
confined to the programs that media executives choose to offer.
TV Everywhere represents a defining moment in the future of radio,
television and other media. In one scenario, we break from history and
achieve more consumer choice and an explosion of innovative content. We
may need to pay for video online, or continue to watch advertisements,
but we won't be forced to buy a traditional cable TV subscription that
we don't want or need.
In another scenario, we allow the big cable, satellite and phone
companies to use anticompetitive ventures like TV Everywhere to protect
the status quo, and make the Internet more like cable television: where
they, not you, pick and choose what you can watch, how and when you can
watch it, and how much you pay for it.
The central tenet of TV Everywhere is that it can only exist through
collusion among competitors. Our federal antitrust authorities and
Congress must launch an immediate investigation. The Internet offers an
unparalleled opportunity to democratize the TV screen now controlled by
a handful of powerful media companies. This revolution is televised -
and we should be able to view it online, too. Antitrust authorities should start enforcing antitrust laws and protect the public interest.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.