

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
On Monday, public interest groups called on federal authorities to
investigate a plan by the largest cable, satellite and phone companies that threatens the future
of Web-based video. "TV Everywhere" gets programmers like TNT, TBS and
CBS to keep their content offline unless a viewer also pays for TV
through a traditional company like Comcast or AT&T (phone companies
are starting to offer TV service, too).
TV Everywhere is designed to protect the current cable TV subscription
model and block competition from upstart online video ventures like
Vuze, Roku and Hulu. Cleverly marketed as a consumer-friendly product,
TV Everywhere is really a desperate bid by old media giants
to crush the emerging market for online TV. Cable giant Comcast just
became the first company to launch TV Everywhere under the brand "Fancast Xfinity," and the other dominant cable, satellite and phone companies have announced plans to follow suit.
At its core, TV Everywhere is about ensuring consumers don't cancel
their overpriced cable TV subscriptions that provide companies like
Comcast with huge profits ($6.7 billion in 2008 alone.) But the current
scheme also prevents competition between existing TV distributors.
Instead of being offered to all Americans, including those living in
Cox, Cablevision and Time Warner Cable regions, Fancast Xfinity is only
available in Comcast regions. The other distributors plan to follow
Comcast's lead, meaning that the incumbents will not compete with one
another outside of their "traditional" regions.
Statements made
by cable executives indicate that backroom deals are being cut without
asking for permission by regulators --- the kind of permission that the
nation's major newspapers recently sought before entering into
discussions about a coordinated online "paywall." So TV Everywhere not
only threatens the Net's potential to break open access and
distribution of video content, it also appears to be an illegal
collusion meant to block competition. Any way you slice it, it's bad
for consumers. On Monday, public interest groups released a major report at the same time that they sent a letter to federal regulators requesting an antitrust investigation of TV Everywhere.
New online-only TV distributors and independent channels are excluded from TV Everywhere. The "principles" of the plan, which were published by Comcast and Time Warner
(a content company distinct from Time Warner Cable), clearly state that
TV Everywhere is meant only for cable operators, satellite companies
and phone companies. By design, this plan would exclude new entrants
and result in fewer choices and higher prices for consumers.
This deal threatens to stifle the freedom and innovation that are
shaping our new media marketplace. The Internet is enabling people to
watch video how and when they want it. The programs we watch on TV are
increasingly available on your computer: on-demand through Hulu,
Fancast and other streaming sites. And the online video you can see on
YouTube, Miro, Fancast, Vimeo and other portals are available on
televisions and portable devices. Stranded at the airport, sitting in a
coffee shop, on vacation or at work, we can view programs from
basically anywhere. And thanks to the Internet's open, neutral
platform, anyone can create and share video, meaning we're no longer
confined to the programs that media executives choose to offer.
TV Everywhere represents a defining moment in the future of radio,
television and other media. In one scenario, we break from history and
achieve more consumer choice and an explosion of innovative content. We
may need to pay for video online, or continue to watch advertisements,
but we won't be forced to buy a traditional cable TV subscription that
we don't want or need.
In another scenario, we allow the big cable, satellite and phone
companies to use anticompetitive ventures like TV Everywhere to protect
the status quo, and make the Internet more like cable television: where
they, not you, pick and choose what you can watch, how and when you can
watch it, and how much you pay for it.
The central tenet of TV Everywhere is that it can only exist through
collusion among competitors. Our federal antitrust authorities and
Congress must launch an immediate investigation. The Internet offers an
unparalleled opportunity to democratize the TV screen now controlled by
a handful of powerful media companies. This revolution is televised -
and we should be able to view it online, too. Antitrust authorities should start enforcing antitrust laws and protect the public interest.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Monday, public interest groups called on federal authorities to
investigate a plan by the largest cable, satellite and phone companies that threatens the future
of Web-based video. "TV Everywhere" gets programmers like TNT, TBS and
CBS to keep their content offline unless a viewer also pays for TV
through a traditional company like Comcast or AT&T (phone companies
are starting to offer TV service, too).
TV Everywhere is designed to protect the current cable TV subscription
model and block competition from upstart online video ventures like
Vuze, Roku and Hulu. Cleverly marketed as a consumer-friendly product,
TV Everywhere is really a desperate bid by old media giants
to crush the emerging market for online TV. Cable giant Comcast just
became the first company to launch TV Everywhere under the brand "Fancast Xfinity," and the other dominant cable, satellite and phone companies have announced plans to follow suit.
At its core, TV Everywhere is about ensuring consumers don't cancel
their overpriced cable TV subscriptions that provide companies like
Comcast with huge profits ($6.7 billion in 2008 alone.) But the current
scheme also prevents competition between existing TV distributors.
Instead of being offered to all Americans, including those living in
Cox, Cablevision and Time Warner Cable regions, Fancast Xfinity is only
available in Comcast regions. The other distributors plan to follow
Comcast's lead, meaning that the incumbents will not compete with one
another outside of their "traditional" regions.
Statements made
by cable executives indicate that backroom deals are being cut without
asking for permission by regulators --- the kind of permission that the
nation's major newspapers recently sought before entering into
discussions about a coordinated online "paywall." So TV Everywhere not
only threatens the Net's potential to break open access and
distribution of video content, it also appears to be an illegal
collusion meant to block competition. Any way you slice it, it's bad
for consumers. On Monday, public interest groups released a major report at the same time that they sent a letter to federal regulators requesting an antitrust investigation of TV Everywhere.
New online-only TV distributors and independent channels are excluded from TV Everywhere. The "principles" of the plan, which were published by Comcast and Time Warner
(a content company distinct from Time Warner Cable), clearly state that
TV Everywhere is meant only for cable operators, satellite companies
and phone companies. By design, this plan would exclude new entrants
and result in fewer choices and higher prices for consumers.
This deal threatens to stifle the freedom and innovation that are
shaping our new media marketplace. The Internet is enabling people to
watch video how and when they want it. The programs we watch on TV are
increasingly available on your computer: on-demand through Hulu,
Fancast and other streaming sites. And the online video you can see on
YouTube, Miro, Fancast, Vimeo and other portals are available on
televisions and portable devices. Stranded at the airport, sitting in a
coffee shop, on vacation or at work, we can view programs from
basically anywhere. And thanks to the Internet's open, neutral
platform, anyone can create and share video, meaning we're no longer
confined to the programs that media executives choose to offer.
TV Everywhere represents a defining moment in the future of radio,
television and other media. In one scenario, we break from history and
achieve more consumer choice and an explosion of innovative content. We
may need to pay for video online, or continue to watch advertisements,
but we won't be forced to buy a traditional cable TV subscription that
we don't want or need.
In another scenario, we allow the big cable, satellite and phone
companies to use anticompetitive ventures like TV Everywhere to protect
the status quo, and make the Internet more like cable television: where
they, not you, pick and choose what you can watch, how and when you can
watch it, and how much you pay for it.
The central tenet of TV Everywhere is that it can only exist through
collusion among competitors. Our federal antitrust authorities and
Congress must launch an immediate investigation. The Internet offers an
unparalleled opportunity to democratize the TV screen now controlled by
a handful of powerful media companies. This revolution is televised -
and we should be able to view it online, too. Antitrust authorities should start enforcing antitrust laws and protect the public interest.
On Monday, public interest groups called on federal authorities to
investigate a plan by the largest cable, satellite and phone companies that threatens the future
of Web-based video. "TV Everywhere" gets programmers like TNT, TBS and
CBS to keep their content offline unless a viewer also pays for TV
through a traditional company like Comcast or AT&T (phone companies
are starting to offer TV service, too).
TV Everywhere is designed to protect the current cable TV subscription
model and block competition from upstart online video ventures like
Vuze, Roku and Hulu. Cleverly marketed as a consumer-friendly product,
TV Everywhere is really a desperate bid by old media giants
to crush the emerging market for online TV. Cable giant Comcast just
became the first company to launch TV Everywhere under the brand "Fancast Xfinity," and the other dominant cable, satellite and phone companies have announced plans to follow suit.
At its core, TV Everywhere is about ensuring consumers don't cancel
their overpriced cable TV subscriptions that provide companies like
Comcast with huge profits ($6.7 billion in 2008 alone.) But the current
scheme also prevents competition between existing TV distributors.
Instead of being offered to all Americans, including those living in
Cox, Cablevision and Time Warner Cable regions, Fancast Xfinity is only
available in Comcast regions. The other distributors plan to follow
Comcast's lead, meaning that the incumbents will not compete with one
another outside of their "traditional" regions.
Statements made
by cable executives indicate that backroom deals are being cut without
asking for permission by regulators --- the kind of permission that the
nation's major newspapers recently sought before entering into
discussions about a coordinated online "paywall." So TV Everywhere not
only threatens the Net's potential to break open access and
distribution of video content, it also appears to be an illegal
collusion meant to block competition. Any way you slice it, it's bad
for consumers. On Monday, public interest groups released a major report at the same time that they sent a letter to federal regulators requesting an antitrust investigation of TV Everywhere.
New online-only TV distributors and independent channels are excluded from TV Everywhere. The "principles" of the plan, which were published by Comcast and Time Warner
(a content company distinct from Time Warner Cable), clearly state that
TV Everywhere is meant only for cable operators, satellite companies
and phone companies. By design, this plan would exclude new entrants
and result in fewer choices and higher prices for consumers.
This deal threatens to stifle the freedom and innovation that are
shaping our new media marketplace. The Internet is enabling people to
watch video how and when they want it. The programs we watch on TV are
increasingly available on your computer: on-demand through Hulu,
Fancast and other streaming sites. And the online video you can see on
YouTube, Miro, Fancast, Vimeo and other portals are available on
televisions and portable devices. Stranded at the airport, sitting in a
coffee shop, on vacation or at work, we can view programs from
basically anywhere. And thanks to the Internet's open, neutral
platform, anyone can create and share video, meaning we're no longer
confined to the programs that media executives choose to offer.
TV Everywhere represents a defining moment in the future of radio,
television and other media. In one scenario, we break from history and
achieve more consumer choice and an explosion of innovative content. We
may need to pay for video online, or continue to watch advertisements,
but we won't be forced to buy a traditional cable TV subscription that
we don't want or need.
In another scenario, we allow the big cable, satellite and phone
companies to use anticompetitive ventures like TV Everywhere to protect
the status quo, and make the Internet more like cable television: where
they, not you, pick and choose what you can watch, how and when you can
watch it, and how much you pay for it.
The central tenet of TV Everywhere is that it can only exist through
collusion among competitors. Our federal antitrust authorities and
Congress must launch an immediate investigation. The Internet offers an
unparalleled opportunity to democratize the TV screen now controlled by
a handful of powerful media companies. This revolution is televised -
and we should be able to view it online, too. Antitrust authorities should start enforcing antitrust laws and protect the public interest.