Published on

(A Little Bit of) Wall Street Reform

Four hundred forty-two days after Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy, the U.S. House of Representatives has finally passed financial reform legislation.

The long delay between the onset of the financial crisis -- a direct consequence of a quarter century of deregulation -- and the passage of Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 did not well serve the cause of reform.

As time passed, public anger over the Wall Street bailout became more diffuse. And Wall Street relentlessly continued its campaign to undermine meaningful efforts at reform.

The bill passed Friday contains some positive measures, but it does not do nearly enough to rein in the Wall Street banksters. It is wholly incommensurate with the devastation Wall Street has wreaked across the land and planet.

Most importantly on the positive side, the bill creates a powerful financial consumer watchdog agency. Had the Consumer Financial Protection Agency existed during the go-go years earlier this decade, it could have prevented millions of consumers from being ripped off -- and protected the banks from themselves. The financial crisis would have been significantly less severe.

The bill also contains some modestly beneficial provisions establishing liability for credit ratings firms, regulating derivatives and imposing leverage limits on the largest institutions. And it includes an important measure for a comprehensive public auditing of the Federal Reserve.

But there are huge holes in the legislation. Wall Street successfully maneuvered to keep most of the important big picture reforms off the table:

  • The bill does very little to address industry structure. Wall Street and the big banks engaged in reckless betting under the belief that they were too big to fail -- that they were protected by a federal backstop. The biggest banks are now even bigger than they were before the crisis. The solution to the too-big-to-fail problem is to break up the big banks, so that the system can absorb their failure. The bill fails to impose limits on bank size.

    Many news accounts misleadingly highlight that the bill gives regulators the authority to break up big financial institutions. The bill does confer that authority -- but only upon a finding of a "grave threat to the financial stability or economy of the United States." It is extraordinarily unlikely that regulators will ever reach such a finding.
  • A related problem is the intermixing of commercial and investment banking in single firms and resultant excessive risk taking by federal insurance-backed commercial banks. The bill fails to separate commercial and investment banking, as the Glass Steagall law did before repeal in 1999, or otherwise address this problem.
  • Financial derivatives and other exotic instruments -- labeled by Warren Buffett as weapons of financial mass destruction -- fueled the crisis. The bill contains very modest regulations over financial derivatives but leaves more than a quarter of the market free from regulation and contains loopholes to enable another substantial chunk to escape regulatory control. Even for derivatives covered by the bill, the new rules are very limited. The bill does not establish a regulated exchange for derivatives trades. It does not ban financial instruments that do little more than enable high-stakes gambling. And it does not require the purveyors of derivative instruments to prove that the benefits of their new products outweigh the costs and risks to the financial system.
  • The bill also fails to tackle seriously the problem of executive and high-level pay. Wall Street mocks the Congress -- and the American people -- by preparing to pay tens of billions of dollars in bonuses, in the shadow of a vote on financial regulation and while the financial sector continues to benefit from trillions of dollars of public supports.

    At a minimum, there should be binding rules mandating that bonus pay be tied to long-term performance. For 2009, there should also be a windfall tax imposed on Wall Street profits and bonuses.

It's no mystery why this legislation is not stronger. Wall Street spent $5 billion in political investments in the decade before the financial crisis to obtain deregulation and nonenforcement of existing rules. Despite Wall Street having crashed the economy, nothing has changed on Capitol Hill. Wall Street continues to invest heavily in politics and wield enormous influence. More than 900 former federal employees, including 70 former members of Congress, are working as lobbyists for the financial services sector this year. Wall Street has spent more than $40 million on campaign contributions since November 2008.

But Wall Street was not wholly able to get its way. Leading Wall Street lobbyists announced at the outset of the legislative process that they intended to "kill" the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, and they failed. Now, as the bill heads to the Senate, there is still an opportunity for a populist upsurge to demand far-reaching controls on Wall Street.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Won't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Robert Weissman

Robert Weissman

Robert Weissman is the president of Public Citizen. Weissman was formerly director of Essential Action, editor of Multinational Monitor, a magazine that tracks corporate actions worldwide, and a public interest attorney at the Center for Study of Responsive Law. He was a leader in organizing the 2000 IMF and World Bank protests in D.C. and helped make HIV drugs available to the developing world.


Share This Article

More in: