SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
No Propaganda Obama
Nov 30, 2009
No Drama Obama is -- in the case of Afghanistan -- no propaganda Obama.
In comparison, of course, with the improperganda used by presidents in conflicts such as the war in Vietnam or the more recent misadventure in Iraq. No fabrications like the Gulf of Tonkin "incident" or weapons of mass destructions are being used to "justify" the planned escalation of the war in Afghanistan.
Why a No Propaganda Obama?
--The President is an
honorable man (aren't we all honorable wo/men?), and apparently doesn't
want to lie to the American people about the need for more troops in
Afghanistan. In other words, he, a man of conscience, refuses to sell
his war through crude, manipulative propaganda.--The Afghan war is not popular among Americans. So glamorizing it is not good politics.
--In
his presidential campaign, Mr. Obama stressed that the Afghan war was
justifiable (his way of saying that although he was against the war in
Iraq, he still intended "to get the terrorists"?)--Obama doesn't want to look like mission-accomplished Bush, who -- we now know -- so blatantly lied to get public support for his macho-man invasion of Iraq.
Longer-term
From a longer-term perspective we have
other possible reasons why Mr. Obama is not acting like a war salesman
-- or feels the need to even act as a war salesman -- as he goes about
expanding his Afghan war:
--We don't have a nation-wide military draft; and in a time of
economic hardship, the Pentagon can be staffed with the unemployed. So,
no need to "sell" war to the populace, even if it doesn't particularly
like it.--Robots, rather than men/women, are increasingly fighting our wars. No need to propagandize robots.
--War is good for business -- business being the
"military-industrial complex" Mr. Obama has been so careful not to
offend (as the administration's bail-out of Wall Street suggests).
Most Important
-- And, perhaps most important, war has become as American as apple pie. As Andrew J. Bacevich puts it, "permanent war has become the de facto policy of the United States."
US taxpayers have gotten so used to wars (even those they don't
like) outsourced to the professional military that there's no need --
beltway pundits/bandits, perhaps not so imaginary, would argue -- for
the US government to promote war anymore.
Not even overseas through "public diplomacy."
Bottom Line
Bottom Line: War is now, like, so, like, totally all-American (have you noticed how many ads on NFL football games are by the military?).
So why does Mr. Obama even need propaganda for his Afghan war?
War, after all, has become, for the U.S., as "natural" as much of the so-called "food" we buy in supermarkets.
Except for American soldiers in coffins. And Pakistani children killed by a Predator drone.
Meanwhile, "President [Obama] is on track to spend more on defense,
in real dollars, than any other president has in one term of office
since World War II," reports National Journal's Government Executive magazine.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
No Drama Obama is -- in the case of Afghanistan -- no propaganda Obama.
In comparison, of course, with the improperganda used by presidents in conflicts such as the war in Vietnam or the more recent misadventure in Iraq. No fabrications like the Gulf of Tonkin "incident" or weapons of mass destructions are being used to "justify" the planned escalation of the war in Afghanistan.
Why a No Propaganda Obama?
--The President is an
honorable man (aren't we all honorable wo/men?), and apparently doesn't
want to lie to the American people about the need for more troops in
Afghanistan. In other words, he, a man of conscience, refuses to sell
his war through crude, manipulative propaganda.--The Afghan war is not popular among Americans. So glamorizing it is not good politics.
--In
his presidential campaign, Mr. Obama stressed that the Afghan war was
justifiable (his way of saying that although he was against the war in
Iraq, he still intended "to get the terrorists"?)--Obama doesn't want to look like mission-accomplished Bush, who -- we now know -- so blatantly lied to get public support for his macho-man invasion of Iraq.
Longer-term
From a longer-term perspective we have
other possible reasons why Mr. Obama is not acting like a war salesman
-- or feels the need to even act as a war salesman -- as he goes about
expanding his Afghan war:
--We don't have a nation-wide military draft; and in a time of
economic hardship, the Pentagon can be staffed with the unemployed. So,
no need to "sell" war to the populace, even if it doesn't particularly
like it.--Robots, rather than men/women, are increasingly fighting our wars. No need to propagandize robots.
--War is good for business -- business being the
"military-industrial complex" Mr. Obama has been so careful not to
offend (as the administration's bail-out of Wall Street suggests).
Most Important
-- And, perhaps most important, war has become as American as apple pie. As Andrew J. Bacevich puts it, "permanent war has become the de facto policy of the United States."
US taxpayers have gotten so used to wars (even those they don't
like) outsourced to the professional military that there's no need --
beltway pundits/bandits, perhaps not so imaginary, would argue -- for
the US government to promote war anymore.
Not even overseas through "public diplomacy."
Bottom Line
Bottom Line: War is now, like, so, like, totally all-American (have you noticed how many ads on NFL football games are by the military?).
So why does Mr. Obama even need propaganda for his Afghan war?
War, after all, has become, for the U.S., as "natural" as much of the so-called "food" we buy in supermarkets.
Except for American soldiers in coffins. And Pakistani children killed by a Predator drone.
Meanwhile, "President [Obama] is on track to spend more on defense,
in real dollars, than any other president has in one term of office
since World War II," reports National Journal's Government Executive magazine.
No Drama Obama is -- in the case of Afghanistan -- no propaganda Obama.
In comparison, of course, with the improperganda used by presidents in conflicts such as the war in Vietnam or the more recent misadventure in Iraq. No fabrications like the Gulf of Tonkin "incident" or weapons of mass destructions are being used to "justify" the planned escalation of the war in Afghanistan.
Why a No Propaganda Obama?
--The President is an
honorable man (aren't we all honorable wo/men?), and apparently doesn't
want to lie to the American people about the need for more troops in
Afghanistan. In other words, he, a man of conscience, refuses to sell
his war through crude, manipulative propaganda.--The Afghan war is not popular among Americans. So glamorizing it is not good politics.
--In
his presidential campaign, Mr. Obama stressed that the Afghan war was
justifiable (his way of saying that although he was against the war in
Iraq, he still intended "to get the terrorists"?)--Obama doesn't want to look like mission-accomplished Bush, who -- we now know -- so blatantly lied to get public support for his macho-man invasion of Iraq.
Longer-term
From a longer-term perspective we have
other possible reasons why Mr. Obama is not acting like a war salesman
-- or feels the need to even act as a war salesman -- as he goes about
expanding his Afghan war:
--We don't have a nation-wide military draft; and in a time of
economic hardship, the Pentagon can be staffed with the unemployed. So,
no need to "sell" war to the populace, even if it doesn't particularly
like it.--Robots, rather than men/women, are increasingly fighting our wars. No need to propagandize robots.
--War is good for business -- business being the
"military-industrial complex" Mr. Obama has been so careful not to
offend (as the administration's bail-out of Wall Street suggests).
Most Important
-- And, perhaps most important, war has become as American as apple pie. As Andrew J. Bacevich puts it, "permanent war has become the de facto policy of the United States."
US taxpayers have gotten so used to wars (even those they don't
like) outsourced to the professional military that there's no need --
beltway pundits/bandits, perhaps not so imaginary, would argue -- for
the US government to promote war anymore.
Not even overseas through "public diplomacy."
Bottom Line
Bottom Line: War is now, like, so, like, totally all-American (have you noticed how many ads on NFL football games are by the military?).
So why does Mr. Obama even need propaganda for his Afghan war?
War, after all, has become, for the U.S., as "natural" as much of the so-called "food" we buy in supermarkets.
Except for American soldiers in coffins. And Pakistani children killed by a Predator drone.
Meanwhile, "President [Obama] is on track to spend more on defense,
in real dollars, than any other president has in one term of office
since World War II," reports National Journal's Government Executive magazine.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.