Sep 30, 2009
We hoped it wasn't true. We hoped that when Richard Trumka committed to back a public option and threatened to withhold support from Democrats who wouldn't vote for one that it wasn't just pre-convention rhetoric.
But then the big guns came out -- Baucus decided that rather than
taxing the rich, he would tax the health care plans that seriously
affected AFL-CIO workers who had given up wage hikes in exchange for
comprehensive health care coverage over years in contract
negotiations. When Gerry McEntee rightly called the Baucus bill
"bullshit" from the floor of the convention, Nancy Pelosi was then dispatched to say they were considering the same thing in the House.
I defy anyone to find me one single example of the White House
twisting one arm for a public option. Just one. But when Rahm and
Trumka meet today, it will be after a month of very serious threats to
the AFL-CIO carried out at the highest levels. It's the kind of "arm
twisting" that only the executive branch is capable of, and it has been
done to crush support for a public option, not opposition.
I wrote recently about the fact that people within the AFL-CIO were
getting tremendous pressure from the White House to push Trumka into
backing down. And sources familiar with the situation say that since
the other unions outside the AFL have already caved and are kicking
Rahm's trigger football, Trumka feels he has little support for his
position and no choice but to relent.
Contact the AFL-CIO and let them know that you support Richard
Trumka and his commitment to the public option. Let him know that
staying true to that commitment is extremely important to those of us
who strongly support labor.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
© 2023 FireDogLake
We hoped it wasn't true. We hoped that when Richard Trumka committed to back a public option and threatened to withhold support from Democrats who wouldn't vote for one that it wasn't just pre-convention rhetoric.
But then the big guns came out -- Baucus decided that rather than
taxing the rich, he would tax the health care plans that seriously
affected AFL-CIO workers who had given up wage hikes in exchange for
comprehensive health care coverage over years in contract
negotiations. When Gerry McEntee rightly called the Baucus bill
"bullshit" from the floor of the convention, Nancy Pelosi was then dispatched to say they were considering the same thing in the House.
I defy anyone to find me one single example of the White House
twisting one arm for a public option. Just one. But when Rahm and
Trumka meet today, it will be after a month of very serious threats to
the AFL-CIO carried out at the highest levels. It's the kind of "arm
twisting" that only the executive branch is capable of, and it has been
done to crush support for a public option, not opposition.
I wrote recently about the fact that people within the AFL-CIO were
getting tremendous pressure from the White House to push Trumka into
backing down. And sources familiar with the situation say that since
the other unions outside the AFL have already caved and are kicking
Rahm's trigger football, Trumka feels he has little support for his
position and no choice but to relent.
Contact the AFL-CIO and let them know that you support Richard
Trumka and his commitment to the public option. Let him know that
staying true to that commitment is extremely important to those of us
who strongly support labor.
We hoped it wasn't true. We hoped that when Richard Trumka committed to back a public option and threatened to withhold support from Democrats who wouldn't vote for one that it wasn't just pre-convention rhetoric.
But then the big guns came out -- Baucus decided that rather than
taxing the rich, he would tax the health care plans that seriously
affected AFL-CIO workers who had given up wage hikes in exchange for
comprehensive health care coverage over years in contract
negotiations. When Gerry McEntee rightly called the Baucus bill
"bullshit" from the floor of the convention, Nancy Pelosi was then dispatched to say they were considering the same thing in the House.
I defy anyone to find me one single example of the White House
twisting one arm for a public option. Just one. But when Rahm and
Trumka meet today, it will be after a month of very serious threats to
the AFL-CIO carried out at the highest levels. It's the kind of "arm
twisting" that only the executive branch is capable of, and it has been
done to crush support for a public option, not opposition.
I wrote recently about the fact that people within the AFL-CIO were
getting tremendous pressure from the White House to push Trumka into
backing down. And sources familiar with the situation say that since
the other unions outside the AFL have already caved and are kicking
Rahm's trigger football, Trumka feels he has little support for his
position and no choice but to relent.
Contact the AFL-CIO and let them know that you support Richard
Trumka and his commitment to the public option. Let him know that
staying true to that commitment is extremely important to those of us
who strongly support labor.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.