

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Without taxpayer support, the President
of the United States would have no paycheck. Without taxpayer support, the CEOs
of many of America's biggest financial firms would now have no companies.
Both President Barack Obama and
high-finance CEOs, in other words, rely on taxpayers. Yet the compensation of
taxpayer-reliant financial industry CEOs dwarfs the White House paycheck. In
2008, the 20 financial chief executives whose firms have received the most
bailout money received average pay packages worth 34 times the
president's $400,000 annual salary.
Without taxpayer support, the President
of the United States would have no paycheck. Without taxpayer support, the CEOs
of many of America's biggest financial firms would now have no companies.
Both President Barack Obama and
high-finance CEOs, in other words, rely on taxpayers. Yet the compensation of
taxpayer-reliant financial industry CEOs dwarfs the White House paycheck. In
2008, the 20 financial chief executives whose firms have received the most
bailout money received average pay packages worth 34 times the
president's $400,000 annual salary.
Earlier this year, for a brief period, that
contrast struck many members of Congress as extraordinarily odd. Firms relying
on government assistance, these members believed, should not pay their
executives more than the head of our government.
In February, the Senate approved a bill
that included a $400,000 cap on all compensation for employees of bailed-out
firms. But since the House version of the bill did not include that cap, it
never made it into the final legislation.
Much more modest executive pay
restrictions placed on bailout companies apply only to a small number of
executives at these firms. Even then, they do precious little to rein in pay at
the top of the corporate ladder.
In effect, the CEO pay bubble on Wall
Street remains un-popped -- nearly a year after last September's
financial meltdown.
In the "pre-bubble" days of
the 1980s, top corporate executives seldom earned much more than 30 to 40 times
the pay of average American workers. In 2008, amid an economic collapse that
rivaled the early days of the Great Depression, top executives averaged 319
times more than average American workers.
The architects of the country's
collapse, America's top 20 financial industry executives, took home even
more than that. They averaged compensation that outpaced typical American
worker pay by 436 times.
CEO pay clearly remains completely
disconnected from any real underlying value that executives may offer.
President Obama, early in his term,
committed to fixing an executive pay system that in his words had
"contributed to a reckless culture and quarter-by-quarter mentality that
in turn have wrought havoc in our financial system."
This article was distributed by Minuteman Media
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Without taxpayer support, the President
of the United States would have no paycheck. Without taxpayer support, the CEOs
of many of America's biggest financial firms would now have no companies.
Both President Barack Obama and
high-finance CEOs, in other words, rely on taxpayers. Yet the compensation of
taxpayer-reliant financial industry CEOs dwarfs the White House paycheck. In
2008, the 20 financial chief executives whose firms have received the most
bailout money received average pay packages worth 34 times the
president's $400,000 annual salary.
Earlier this year, for a brief period, that
contrast struck many members of Congress as extraordinarily odd. Firms relying
on government assistance, these members believed, should not pay their
executives more than the head of our government.
In February, the Senate approved a bill
that included a $400,000 cap on all compensation for employees of bailed-out
firms. But since the House version of the bill did not include that cap, it
never made it into the final legislation.
Much more modest executive pay
restrictions placed on bailout companies apply only to a small number of
executives at these firms. Even then, they do precious little to rein in pay at
the top of the corporate ladder.
In effect, the CEO pay bubble on Wall
Street remains un-popped -- nearly a year after last September's
financial meltdown.
In the "pre-bubble" days of
the 1980s, top corporate executives seldom earned much more than 30 to 40 times
the pay of average American workers. In 2008, amid an economic collapse that
rivaled the early days of the Great Depression, top executives averaged 319
times more than average American workers.
The architects of the country's
collapse, America's top 20 financial industry executives, took home even
more than that. They averaged compensation that outpaced typical American
worker pay by 436 times.
CEO pay clearly remains completely
disconnected from any real underlying value that executives may offer.
President Obama, early in his term,
committed to fixing an executive pay system that in his words had
"contributed to a reckless culture and quarter-by-quarter mentality that
in turn have wrought havoc in our financial system."
This article was distributed by Minuteman Media
Without taxpayer support, the President
of the United States would have no paycheck. Without taxpayer support, the CEOs
of many of America's biggest financial firms would now have no companies.
Both President Barack Obama and
high-finance CEOs, in other words, rely on taxpayers. Yet the compensation of
taxpayer-reliant financial industry CEOs dwarfs the White House paycheck. In
2008, the 20 financial chief executives whose firms have received the most
bailout money received average pay packages worth 34 times the
president's $400,000 annual salary.
Earlier this year, for a brief period, that
contrast struck many members of Congress as extraordinarily odd. Firms relying
on government assistance, these members believed, should not pay their
executives more than the head of our government.
In February, the Senate approved a bill
that included a $400,000 cap on all compensation for employees of bailed-out
firms. But since the House version of the bill did not include that cap, it
never made it into the final legislation.
Much more modest executive pay
restrictions placed on bailout companies apply only to a small number of
executives at these firms. Even then, they do precious little to rein in pay at
the top of the corporate ladder.
In effect, the CEO pay bubble on Wall
Street remains un-popped -- nearly a year after last September's
financial meltdown.
In the "pre-bubble" days of
the 1980s, top corporate executives seldom earned much more than 30 to 40 times
the pay of average American workers. In 2008, amid an economic collapse that
rivaled the early days of the Great Depression, top executives averaged 319
times more than average American workers.
The architects of the country's
collapse, America's top 20 financial industry executives, took home even
more than that. They averaged compensation that outpaced typical American
worker pay by 436 times.
CEO pay clearly remains completely
disconnected from any real underlying value that executives may offer.
President Obama, early in his term,
committed to fixing an executive pay system that in his words had
"contributed to a reckless culture and quarter-by-quarter mentality that
in turn have wrought havoc in our financial system."
This article was distributed by Minuteman Media