State Department Recommends Aid Cutoff to Honduras
After two months, the State Department is poised to formally declare
what was obvious to most of the world: on June 28, Honduras
experienced a military coup.
State Department staff have recommended to Secretary of State Clinton
that the ouster of Honduran President Zelaya be formally declared a
"military coup," which could cut off as much as $150 million in U.S.
funding, Reuters reports.
The semi-official story has been that State Department lawyers were
studying the events in Honduras to see if they met the "technical
definition" of a "military coup." But all along the State Department
made clear that it was purposely delaying its formal determination to
give "diplomacy" -- the talks in Costa Rica between representatives of
President Zelaya and representatives of the coup regime -- a chance to
work.
It was never explained why making this determination -- which, under
U.S. law, requires a cutoff of aid to the coup government -- would
have interfered with "diplomacy." On the contrary: it was immediately
obvious that the obstacle to a negotiated solution was the
intransigence of the coup regime, which refused to accept a compromise
proposal that would allow President Zelaya to return. So, as many
Latin American governments argued -- including the Costa Rican
government -- if the U.S. wanted a negotiated solution, it needed to
ramp up pressure on the coup regime.
But the State Department is now, at last, conceding that its previous
efforts were insufficient. Better late than never -- much better.
No doubt Republicans in Congress who have supported the coup regime in
Honduras will now complain loudly when Secretary Clinton makes her
formal determination -- assuming that she follows the recommendation
of her staff.
In anticipation of right-wing Republican complaints, it is important
to note two key facts.
First, in making this determination, the State Department is simply
following the law. The Foreign Assistance Act requires a cutoff of
U.S. aid "to the government of any country whose duly elected head of
government is deposed by military coup or decree." That's what
happened on June 28 -- about that central fact there has been no
serious dispute. Even the top legal advisor of the Honduran military
conceded
that the Honduran military broke Honduran law when it removed
President Zelaya from office -- and from Honduras.
Second, in making this determination -- and cutting off aid -- the
State Department is simply following past practice. As the Center for
Economic and Policy Research documented
in a recent report, when there were coups in Mauritania and
Madagascar, Millennium Challenge Corporation money was cut off within
days.
So complain away, right-wing coup-lovers. If we want Latin America to
take seriously the claim of a new U.S. approach to Latin America in
the Obama administration -- or maintain a credible commitment to the
rule of law in the region -- this is the minimum.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
After two months, the State Department is poised to formally declare
what was obvious to most of the world: on June 28, Honduras
experienced a military coup.
State Department staff have recommended to Secretary of State Clinton
that the ouster of Honduran President Zelaya be formally declared a
"military coup," which could cut off as much as $150 million in U.S.
funding, Reuters reports.
The semi-official story has been that State Department lawyers were
studying the events in Honduras to see if they met the "technical
definition" of a "military coup." But all along the State Department
made clear that it was purposely delaying its formal determination to
give "diplomacy" -- the talks in Costa Rica between representatives of
President Zelaya and representatives of the coup regime -- a chance to
work.
It was never explained why making this determination -- which, under
U.S. law, requires a cutoff of aid to the coup government -- would
have interfered with "diplomacy." On the contrary: it was immediately
obvious that the obstacle to a negotiated solution was the
intransigence of the coup regime, which refused to accept a compromise
proposal that would allow President Zelaya to return. So, as many
Latin American governments argued -- including the Costa Rican
government -- if the U.S. wanted a negotiated solution, it needed to
ramp up pressure on the coup regime.
But the State Department is now, at last, conceding that its previous
efforts were insufficient. Better late than never -- much better.
No doubt Republicans in Congress who have supported the coup regime in
Honduras will now complain loudly when Secretary Clinton makes her
formal determination -- assuming that she follows the recommendation
of her staff.
In anticipation of right-wing Republican complaints, it is important
to note two key facts.
First, in making this determination, the State Department is simply
following the law. The Foreign Assistance Act requires a cutoff of
U.S. aid "to the government of any country whose duly elected head of
government is deposed by military coup or decree." That's what
happened on June 28 -- about that central fact there has been no
serious dispute. Even the top legal advisor of the Honduran military
conceded
that the Honduran military broke Honduran law when it removed
President Zelaya from office -- and from Honduras.
Second, in making this determination -- and cutting off aid -- the
State Department is simply following past practice. As the Center for
Economic and Policy Research documented
in a recent report, when there were coups in Mauritania and
Madagascar, Millennium Challenge Corporation money was cut off within
days.
So complain away, right-wing coup-lovers. If we want Latin America to
take seriously the claim of a new U.S. approach to Latin America in
the Obama administration -- or maintain a credible commitment to the
rule of law in the region -- this is the minimum.
After two months, the State Department is poised to formally declare
what was obvious to most of the world: on June 28, Honduras
experienced a military coup.
State Department staff have recommended to Secretary of State Clinton
that the ouster of Honduran President Zelaya be formally declared a
"military coup," which could cut off as much as $150 million in U.S.
funding, Reuters reports.
The semi-official story has been that State Department lawyers were
studying the events in Honduras to see if they met the "technical
definition" of a "military coup." But all along the State Department
made clear that it was purposely delaying its formal determination to
give "diplomacy" -- the talks in Costa Rica between representatives of
President Zelaya and representatives of the coup regime -- a chance to
work.
It was never explained why making this determination -- which, under
U.S. law, requires a cutoff of aid to the coup government -- would
have interfered with "diplomacy." On the contrary: it was immediately
obvious that the obstacle to a negotiated solution was the
intransigence of the coup regime, which refused to accept a compromise
proposal that would allow President Zelaya to return. So, as many
Latin American governments argued -- including the Costa Rican
government -- if the U.S. wanted a negotiated solution, it needed to
ramp up pressure on the coup regime.
But the State Department is now, at last, conceding that its previous
efforts were insufficient. Better late than never -- much better.
No doubt Republicans in Congress who have supported the coup regime in
Honduras will now complain loudly when Secretary Clinton makes her
formal determination -- assuming that she follows the recommendation
of her staff.
In anticipation of right-wing Republican complaints, it is important
to note two key facts.
First, in making this determination, the State Department is simply
following the law. The Foreign Assistance Act requires a cutoff of
U.S. aid "to the government of any country whose duly elected head of
government is deposed by military coup or decree." That's what
happened on June 28 -- about that central fact there has been no
serious dispute. Even the top legal advisor of the Honduran military
conceded
that the Honduran military broke Honduran law when it removed
President Zelaya from office -- and from Honduras.
Second, in making this determination -- and cutting off aid -- the
State Department is simply following past practice. As the Center for
Economic and Policy Research documented
in a recent report, when there were coups in Mauritania and
Madagascar, Millennium Challenge Corporation money was cut off within
days.
So complain away, right-wing coup-lovers. If we want Latin America to
take seriously the claim of a new U.S. approach to Latin America in
the Obama administration -- or maintain a credible commitment to the
rule of law in the region -- this is the minimum.