SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Obama's Fate as Much in the Balance as Afghan Presidential Candidates
Aug 22, 2009
The Financial Times argues that the final judgment on how upright the Afghan elections were
matters enormously to the Obama administration. If the US public
decides these election results were phonied up, it will turn, FT
argues, even more against the war than it already is (51 percent oppose
the Afghanistan war in the US).
I don't think the US public
cares so much about these elections. I think support for the
Afghanistan war depends on the administration effectively tying it to
concerns about Americans' safety and security. And since that argument
is so hard to make convincingly, I can't see how public support for the
war is going to come back. With dozens of US troops killed in July,
moreover, people are hearing more bad news than good.
What I
think is true is that a poorly executed Afghanistan policy could turn
Obama into a one-term president. It is too early to judge exactly what
Obama's policy will be in Afghanistan, but it should become clear
within a few months. So far, Obama has not made the case and hasn't
explained what the end game is.
CNN International's Atia Abawi reports from Kabul on the election process.
She says the electoral commission says it won't have preliminary
results until August 25. She also suggests based on personal
observation that voter turnout was lighter than announced, and that
ballot-stuffing took place last Thursday.
Aljazeera English interviews Afghan presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah on the election process.
He says he thinks the process went well despite a relatively low
turnout, and says he won in areas where the votes have been counted.
His rival Hamed Karzai also claims to have won.
France24 English service on drug money corruption high in the Afghan government:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Juan Cole
Juan Cole
Juan Cole teaches Middle Eastern and South Asian history at the University of Michigan. His newest book, "Muhammad: Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires" was published in 2020. He is also the author of "The New Arabs: How the Millennial Generation Is Changing the Middle East" (2015) and "Napoleon's Egypt: Invading the Middle East" (2008). He has appeared widely on television, radio, and on op-ed pages as a commentator on Middle East affairs, and has a regular column at Salon.com. He has written, edited, or translated 14 books and has authored 60 journal articles.
The Financial Times argues that the final judgment on how upright the Afghan elections were
matters enormously to the Obama administration. If the US public
decides these election results were phonied up, it will turn, FT
argues, even more against the war than it already is (51 percent oppose
the Afghanistan war in the US).
I don't think the US public
cares so much about these elections. I think support for the
Afghanistan war depends on the administration effectively tying it to
concerns about Americans' safety and security. And since that argument
is so hard to make convincingly, I can't see how public support for the
war is going to come back. With dozens of US troops killed in July,
moreover, people are hearing more bad news than good.
What I
think is true is that a poorly executed Afghanistan policy could turn
Obama into a one-term president. It is too early to judge exactly what
Obama's policy will be in Afghanistan, but it should become clear
within a few months. So far, Obama has not made the case and hasn't
explained what the end game is.
CNN International's Atia Abawi reports from Kabul on the election process.
She says the electoral commission says it won't have preliminary
results until August 25. She also suggests based on personal
observation that voter turnout was lighter than announced, and that
ballot-stuffing took place last Thursday.
Aljazeera English interviews Afghan presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah on the election process.
He says he thinks the process went well despite a relatively low
turnout, and says he won in areas where the votes have been counted.
His rival Hamed Karzai also claims to have won.
France24 English service on drug money corruption high in the Afghan government:
Juan Cole
Juan Cole teaches Middle Eastern and South Asian history at the University of Michigan. His newest book, "Muhammad: Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires" was published in 2020. He is also the author of "The New Arabs: How the Millennial Generation Is Changing the Middle East" (2015) and "Napoleon's Egypt: Invading the Middle East" (2008). He has appeared widely on television, radio, and on op-ed pages as a commentator on Middle East affairs, and has a regular column at Salon.com. He has written, edited, or translated 14 books and has authored 60 journal articles.
The Financial Times argues that the final judgment on how upright the Afghan elections were
matters enormously to the Obama administration. If the US public
decides these election results were phonied up, it will turn, FT
argues, even more against the war than it already is (51 percent oppose
the Afghanistan war in the US).
I don't think the US public
cares so much about these elections. I think support for the
Afghanistan war depends on the administration effectively tying it to
concerns about Americans' safety and security. And since that argument
is so hard to make convincingly, I can't see how public support for the
war is going to come back. With dozens of US troops killed in July,
moreover, people are hearing more bad news than good.
What I
think is true is that a poorly executed Afghanistan policy could turn
Obama into a one-term president. It is too early to judge exactly what
Obama's policy will be in Afghanistan, but it should become clear
within a few months. So far, Obama has not made the case and hasn't
explained what the end game is.
CNN International's Atia Abawi reports from Kabul on the election process.
She says the electoral commission says it won't have preliminary
results until August 25. She also suggests based on personal
observation that voter turnout was lighter than announced, and that
ballot-stuffing took place last Thursday.
Aljazeera English interviews Afghan presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah on the election process.
He says he thinks the process went well despite a relatively low
turnout, and says he won in areas where the votes have been counted.
His rival Hamed Karzai also claims to have won.
France24 English service on drug money corruption high in the Afghan government:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy