Hillary Peddles Worst Sort of Wares in India

To assist the corporate bottom line, the Obama Administration is peddling the worst sort of wares abroad.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just concluded a visit to India in which she acted as a shill for U.S. arms and nuclear companies.
The United States and India signed an agreement that will pave the way
for the possible sale of more than 100 fighter planes to India, the
largest pending weapons deal globally (Lockheed Martin and Boeing are
in the running for the contract). And India announced that two civilian
nuclear reactors--most likely to be constructed by General Electric and
Westinghouse--will be set up in the country as part of the U.S.-India
nuclear deal signed a couple of years ago.

The Indian elite was nervous about the new Administration in Washington,
uncertain whether India would receive the same warm embrace it had from
Dubya's people. It needn't have worried (though differences did crop up
during the Clinton trip on issues like climate change).

In a recent interview with me (available in the July issue),
Rajmohan Gandhi, the Mahatma's grandson, expressed apprehension about
how the Indian political leadership has veered away from the ideals of
his grandfather. He bemoaned its enthusiasm for nuclear weapons, its
desire to cultivate a strategic relationship with the United States,
and its muted tone as a moral authority on the global stage. The Bush
Administration encouraged these tendencies, and the Obama folks seem to
be heading down the same path.

The fighter jet deal has been in the works for years now, but that
doesn't make it any less repugnant. Presumably, it is meant as a
counterbalance to the billions in military aid that the Bush
Administration showered Pakistan with over the years, and to the Obama
Administration's announcement a few months ago of a $3 billion,
five-year military aid package to Pakistan (much of which will be
transferred back to the coffers of U.S. arms companies).

As a result, both nations are spending their scarce resources on
shiny new military hardware. And if they still feel insecure, there's
plenty more where that came from.

Like the Bush Administration, the Obama Administration is using
Pakistan in the "war on terrorism," and flattering India as a junior
global partner, a role India is willing to be employed in as long as
the United States assuages its ego (as Clinton did by referring to it
as "a global leader for the 21st century"). The United States fulfills
its geostrategic aims, while U.S. arms manufacturers rake in the
moolah. The losers in this scenario are the Indian and Pakistani people.

The nuclear deal is also very problematic. By agreeing to supply
fuel, reactors and other technology to India's civilian nuclear sector,
the Bush Administration legitimized a nuclear weapons project that
India conceived in dishonesty. India, in return, gave up any pretense
of pressing for global nuclear disarmament, and signaled that it would
open up its vast civilian nuclear sector to U.S. corporations. The pact
"will present a major opportunity for U.S. and Indian companies," Ron
Somers, president of the U.S-India Business Council, said in 2007. He
was so right.

But the really interesting thing here is what the United States is
demanding: that the Indian Parliament pass a law releasing the U.S.
companies from legal responsibility if there's an accident. Since the
worst industrial disaster in history, with a toll of tens of thousands
of lives, was caused by a U.S. corporation in India, some Indians are
not too happy and are promising a tough fight against any such measure.

"With what happened in Bhopal in view, we will oppose any move to
bring in legislation to shield U.S. suppliers from liability in the
event of a nuclear accident," says S.P. Udayakumar, convenor of the National Alliance of Anti-nuclear Movements.

This is not the first time that a U.S. company has sought immunity from the consequences of a disaster in India. DuPont asked to be released from all such responsibility
when it was negotiating with the Indian government in the 1990s to set
up a nylon plant, but the people of the state of Goa, where the plant
was slated to be located, mobilized to nix the venture.

The deals that the Obama Administration is pushing will be worth $20
billion to U.S. corporations if they go through. The damage that they
cause could be incalculable, however.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world

Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

© 2023 The Progressive