

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Nick Skala was in a bit of shock.
In early June, he was invited to speak before the Progressive Caucus
of the House of Representatives about single payer health care.
There are about 71 members of the House who belong to the Progressive Caucus -- about a third of the Democratic Caucus.
Skala is a true believer in single payer -- having spent four years with Physicians for a National Health Program.
Nick Skala was in a bit of shock.
In early June, he was invited to speak before the Progressive Caucus of the House of Representatives about single payer health care.
There are about 71 members of the House who belong to the Progressive Caucus -- about a third of the Democratic Caucus.
Skala is a true believer in single payer -- having spent four years with Physicians for a National Health Program.
So, yes of course, he would love to speak before the Progressive Caucus to explain why single payer was the only way to control costs and cover everyone.
And that Obama's public option was bound to fail.
He sent his presentation ahead of time to Bill Goold, the executive director of the Progressive Caucus, and Darcy Burner, executive director of the American Progressive Caucus Foundation.
Both were not pleased with Skala.
"Bill Gould emailed me after reading my testimony and materials I was going to present to tell me that they were not acceptable and that there could be no comparison between single payer and the public option with side by side comparison," Skala told Single Payer Action. "Darcy Burner told me that they would construe talking about the public option -- even comparing it to single payer -- as an attack on the members of the Progressive Caucus."
"Now, I can't see how honest discourse about whether or not a public option will work -- especially when it comes from 16,000 doctors and the majority of nurses -- as an attack on anybody who supports it. We see it as telling the truth."
Despite Goold's and Burner's objections, on June 4, Skala went ahead and made his presentation to the caucus.
"During the presentation it was very nasty," Skala said. "I got some very dirty looks from Darcy Burner. During the question period and once during the testimony, I was interrupted, told that the Progressive Caucus had taken a position on this issue and unless I had something positive to contribute, then there wasn't really much point to answering my questions. At least one of my questions to the staff of the Chairman of the caucus was interrupted by the staff of the Congressional Progressive Caucus unfortunately."
And what exactly was Skala's crime?
He believes the public option being pushed by Obama and the Democrats will fail.
"The public option preserves all the systemic deficiencies that we see in the current system," Skala said. "It maintains a finance system that is based on private insurance and private insurers and their drive to fight claims, issue denials, screen out the sick and make a big profit generate tremendous administrative waste -- 400 billion dollars a year."
"Now you can expand coverage by just raising taxes and paying insurers to cover people but that's not a sustainable system," Skala said. "But it won't cover every body and it will fall apart quickly due to rising cost as we've seen in Massachusetts, Vermont, Oregon, Tennessee and Minnesota -- state after state after state and it hasn't worked."
"Now the definition of insanity is to repeat what has gone on in the past and expect a different result. Yet that's what we're doing with the public option. And as a representative of physicians in that capacity, and certainly the relationship I have with nurses and patients, I feel it's my duty to be honest about the best policy research, the best literature, and the best experience that we have and that all indicates that the public option is going to fail."
The complete interview with Nick Skala, see video here or below:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Nick Skala was in a bit of shock.
In early June, he was invited to speak before the Progressive Caucus of the House of Representatives about single payer health care.
There are about 71 members of the House who belong to the Progressive Caucus -- about a third of the Democratic Caucus.
Skala is a true believer in single payer -- having spent four years with Physicians for a National Health Program.
So, yes of course, he would love to speak before the Progressive Caucus to explain why single payer was the only way to control costs and cover everyone.
And that Obama's public option was bound to fail.
He sent his presentation ahead of time to Bill Goold, the executive director of the Progressive Caucus, and Darcy Burner, executive director of the American Progressive Caucus Foundation.
Both were not pleased with Skala.
"Bill Gould emailed me after reading my testimony and materials I was going to present to tell me that they were not acceptable and that there could be no comparison between single payer and the public option with side by side comparison," Skala told Single Payer Action. "Darcy Burner told me that they would construe talking about the public option -- even comparing it to single payer -- as an attack on the members of the Progressive Caucus."
"Now, I can't see how honest discourse about whether or not a public option will work -- especially when it comes from 16,000 doctors and the majority of nurses -- as an attack on anybody who supports it. We see it as telling the truth."
Despite Goold's and Burner's objections, on June 4, Skala went ahead and made his presentation to the caucus.
"During the presentation it was very nasty," Skala said. "I got some very dirty looks from Darcy Burner. During the question period and once during the testimony, I was interrupted, told that the Progressive Caucus had taken a position on this issue and unless I had something positive to contribute, then there wasn't really much point to answering my questions. At least one of my questions to the staff of the Chairman of the caucus was interrupted by the staff of the Congressional Progressive Caucus unfortunately."
And what exactly was Skala's crime?
He believes the public option being pushed by Obama and the Democrats will fail.
"The public option preserves all the systemic deficiencies that we see in the current system," Skala said. "It maintains a finance system that is based on private insurance and private insurers and their drive to fight claims, issue denials, screen out the sick and make a big profit generate tremendous administrative waste -- 400 billion dollars a year."
"Now you can expand coverage by just raising taxes and paying insurers to cover people but that's not a sustainable system," Skala said. "But it won't cover every body and it will fall apart quickly due to rising cost as we've seen in Massachusetts, Vermont, Oregon, Tennessee and Minnesota -- state after state after state and it hasn't worked."
"Now the definition of insanity is to repeat what has gone on in the past and expect a different result. Yet that's what we're doing with the public option. And as a representative of physicians in that capacity, and certainly the relationship I have with nurses and patients, I feel it's my duty to be honest about the best policy research, the best literature, and the best experience that we have and that all indicates that the public option is going to fail."
The complete interview with Nick Skala, see video here or below:
Nick Skala was in a bit of shock.
In early June, he was invited to speak before the Progressive Caucus of the House of Representatives about single payer health care.
There are about 71 members of the House who belong to the Progressive Caucus -- about a third of the Democratic Caucus.
Skala is a true believer in single payer -- having spent four years with Physicians for a National Health Program.
So, yes of course, he would love to speak before the Progressive Caucus to explain why single payer was the only way to control costs and cover everyone.
And that Obama's public option was bound to fail.
He sent his presentation ahead of time to Bill Goold, the executive director of the Progressive Caucus, and Darcy Burner, executive director of the American Progressive Caucus Foundation.
Both were not pleased with Skala.
"Bill Gould emailed me after reading my testimony and materials I was going to present to tell me that they were not acceptable and that there could be no comparison between single payer and the public option with side by side comparison," Skala told Single Payer Action. "Darcy Burner told me that they would construe talking about the public option -- even comparing it to single payer -- as an attack on the members of the Progressive Caucus."
"Now, I can't see how honest discourse about whether or not a public option will work -- especially when it comes from 16,000 doctors and the majority of nurses -- as an attack on anybody who supports it. We see it as telling the truth."
Despite Goold's and Burner's objections, on June 4, Skala went ahead and made his presentation to the caucus.
"During the presentation it was very nasty," Skala said. "I got some very dirty looks from Darcy Burner. During the question period and once during the testimony, I was interrupted, told that the Progressive Caucus had taken a position on this issue and unless I had something positive to contribute, then there wasn't really much point to answering my questions. At least one of my questions to the staff of the Chairman of the caucus was interrupted by the staff of the Congressional Progressive Caucus unfortunately."
And what exactly was Skala's crime?
He believes the public option being pushed by Obama and the Democrats will fail.
"The public option preserves all the systemic deficiencies that we see in the current system," Skala said. "It maintains a finance system that is based on private insurance and private insurers and their drive to fight claims, issue denials, screen out the sick and make a big profit generate tremendous administrative waste -- 400 billion dollars a year."
"Now you can expand coverage by just raising taxes and paying insurers to cover people but that's not a sustainable system," Skala said. "But it won't cover every body and it will fall apart quickly due to rising cost as we've seen in Massachusetts, Vermont, Oregon, Tennessee and Minnesota -- state after state after state and it hasn't worked."
"Now the definition of insanity is to repeat what has gone on in the past and expect a different result. Yet that's what we're doing with the public option. And as a representative of physicians in that capacity, and certainly the relationship I have with nurses and patients, I feel it's my duty to be honest about the best policy research, the best literature, and the best experience that we have and that all indicates that the public option is going to fail."
The complete interview with Nick Skala, see video here or below: