To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
The "debate"
over all the bad and scary things that will happen if Obama closes
Guantanamo and we then incarcerate those detainees in American prisons
is so painfully stupid even by the standards of our political discourse
that it's hard to put into words, and it also perfectly illustrates the
steps that typically lead to America's National Security policies:
(1) Right-wing
super-tough-guy warriors project some frightened, adolescent, neurotic
fantasy onto the world -- either because they are really petrified by
it or because they want others to be ("Putting Muslim Terrorists in our prisons will make us Unsafe! -- Keep them away from me, please!!!");
(2) Rather
than scoff at the inane fear-mongering or point out simple facts to
reveal its idiocy, Democratic "leaders" such as Harry Reid echo the right-wing fears
in order to prove how Serious and Tough they are -- in our political
debates, the more frightened one is, the more Serious and Tough one is
-- and/or because they are genuinely frightened of being called mean
names by Sean Hannity ("Harry Reid isn't as scared of this as I am, which shows that he's weak");
(3) "Journalists" who are capable of nothing other than mindlessly reciting what they hear then write articles depicting
the Right's frightened neurosis as a Serious argument, and then
overnight, a consensus emerges: Democrats are in big trouble
politically unless they show that they, too, are as deeply frightened
as the Right is.
Until recently, I thought the single most
embarrassingly stupid event of the last decade's national security
debates -- the kind that will make historians look back with
slack-jawed amazement -- was the joint dissemination in the run-up to
the war by the Bush administration and the American media of playing cards that featured all of the "Most Wanted" Iraqi Villains and their cartoon villain nicknames. Saddam Hussein was the Ace of Spades; Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash -- Mrs. Anthrax -- was the Five of Hearts; Ali Hassan al-Majid -- Chemical Ali -- was the King of Spades;
sadly, Dr. Rihab Rashid Taha -- the dreaded "Dr. Germ" -- didn't make
it to the deck, but she certainly had her day in the American media sun
(AP: "Iraq's 'Dr. Germ' Surrenders to Coalition" -- CNN: "U.S. military holding 'Dr. Germ,' 'Mrs. Anthrax'").
If you weren't on board with all of that -- if you weren't hiding under
your bed shaking when these cartoons were shown on the TV -- that meant
that you were neither Tough nor Serious. Just as is true now, the
Tough and Serious people were the ones who became frightened by the
comic book villians. All of that led to reports like this from CNN:
U.S.
commanders said that they have no intention of resting until the
mission is complete and they have the top prize, Saddam -- the ace of
spades in the notorious deck of cards.Saddam's sons Qusay,
the ace of clubs, and Uday, the ace of hearts, died in a raid in the
northern Iraqi city of Mosul. . . .Key to tracking down Qusay and Uday
was the capture of the ace of diamonds, No. 4 on the list, Abid Hamid
Mahmud al-Tikriti, . . . Still unclear is the fate of No. 5 -- the king
of spades -- Ali Hassan al-Majid, known as "Chemical Ali" . . . . U.S.
military officials said they still want to capture or kill those who
remain at large and put the entire deck of cards out of business.
And this from CNN:
KELLI ARENA, CNN ANCHOR: Let's go to the Pentagon for details of that capture of another player in the Pentagon's deck of cards. CNN's Patty Davis is on the story -- Patty.
PATTY DAVIS, CNN CORRESPONDENT: That's right, Kelli. Another big fish now in U.S. custody. The U.S. Central Command says it is retiring the six of clubs from that deck of most wanted Iraqis. Now he is Lieutenant General Husam Muhammad Amin Al-Yasin.
Now, Lieutenant General Amin was the liaison for the U.S. weapons inspectors before the war, a key figure in Saddam Hussein's weapons program.
He held briefings, giving Iraq's point of view about those inspections
and could very well have valuable information about, for the U.S. about
any Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Now clearly a very big get for the U.S. On the deck of cards now, 13 of the 55 now in custody.
How
can "journalists" who said things even show their face in public? If
there were transcripts of you saying things like this on national
television, wouldn't you want to go immediately jump off the nearest
bridge? Yet not a single American media organization ever questioned
why they kept warning Americans about Chemical Ali, Mrs. Anthrax and
Dr. Germ once there were no chemical weapons found in the entire nation
of Iraq.
Despite all that, we never tire of the specter of the
Big, Bad, Villainous, Omnipotent Muslim Terrorist. They're back, and
now they're going to wreak havoc on the Homeland -- devastate our
communities -- even as they're imprisoned in super-max prison
facilities. How utterly irrational is that fear? For one thing, it's
empirically disproven. Anyone with the most minimal amount of
rationality would look at the fact that we have already convicted
numerous alleged high-level Al Qaeda Terrorists in our civilian court
system (something we're not being told can't be done) -- including the
cast of villains known as the Blind Shiekh a.k.a. Mastermind of the
First World Trade Center attack, the Shoe Bomber, the Dirty Bomber,
the American Taliban, the 20th Hijacker, and many more -- and are imprisoning them right now in American prisons located in various communities.
We've
been doing that for two decades. What are all the bad and scary things
that have happened as a result? The answer is: "nothing." Take note, Chris Cillizza
and friends: while it's true that "not a single prisoner has escaped
from Gitmo since it was created," it's also true that no Muslim
Terrorists have escaped from American prisons and SuperMax prison "has had no escapes or serious attempts to escape." The only person to even make an attempt is Green Arrow, who hasn't succeeded despite the help of Joker and Lex Luthor.
I really want to know: when our nation's stalwart right-wing warriors (along with Harry "Fighting the Good Fight"
Reid) become petrified at the thought of keeping Muslim Terrorists in
our prisons, what exactly do they fantasize will happen? What bad
things specifically do they fear are going to occur? I asked that question last night on Twitter and these were some of the responses I received:
Atrios: crawl up through our toilets and steal our vital essence
GeorgiePorger: Abu Ghraib in their backyard?
akaBruno: They'll join up with T-Bag, Lincoln Burrows and Michael Scofield and break out of Fox River
JonahKeri: That they'll turn this into a lawless, chaotic state and make people live in a constant state of riled-up fear. Oh wait...
One right-wing warrior-blogger tried to answer the question earnestly by pointing out that in November, 200o, a Muslim Terrorist violently attacked a prison guard. A report from the Dallas Morning News on prisoner-on-guard attacks found that in 2007 alone -- just in Texas -- there were "more than three dozen staff assaults with weapons." But that's a perfect distillation of the fear-wallowing right-wing mindset: hey,
one time, 9 years ago, a Muslim Terrorist attacked a prison guard, so
now we have to keep all Muslim Terrorist-prisoners in cages on a Cuban
island with no trial because I'm too scared to keep them in an American
prison.
Isn't it rather obvious how degraded a citizenry
becomes when there's this constant effort to keep them in a state of
intense fear of everything? Even after eight long years of the Bush
era, our leading political figures and media stars -- especially
the Toughest and Most Serious ones -- still quiver with paralyzing
fear, completely take leave of their senses, the minute someone utters
the word "Terrorist" and especially the phrase "Muslim Terrorist." The
last two elections proved
that Americans themselves generally are no longer frightened by this
tactic, but for our poltiical and media elites, "Terrorist" is still an
all-purpose justifying phrase.
Here's a dramatic and deeply
serious video that examines the National Security Crisis caused by
Terrorists in American prisons, and illustrates the level of our
political debates in Serious Circles over these matters:
The "debate"
over all the bad and scary things that will happen if Obama closes
Guantanamo and we then incarcerate those detainees in American prisons
is so painfully stupid even by the standards of our political discourse
that it's hard to put into words, and it also perfectly illustrates the
steps that typically lead to America's National Security policies:
(1) Right-wing
super-tough-guy warriors project some frightened, adolescent, neurotic
fantasy onto the world -- either because they are really petrified by
it or because they want others to be ("Putting Muslim Terrorists in our prisons will make us Unsafe! -- Keep them away from me, please!!!");
(2) Rather
than scoff at the inane fear-mongering or point out simple facts to
reveal its idiocy, Democratic "leaders" such as Harry Reid echo the right-wing fears
in order to prove how Serious and Tough they are -- in our political
debates, the more frightened one is, the more Serious and Tough one is
-- and/or because they are genuinely frightened of being called mean
names by Sean Hannity ("Harry Reid isn't as scared of this as I am, which shows that he's weak");
(3) "Journalists" who are capable of nothing other than mindlessly reciting what they hear then write articles depicting
the Right's frightened neurosis as a Serious argument, and then
overnight, a consensus emerges: Democrats are in big trouble
politically unless they show that they, too, are as deeply frightened
as the Right is.
Until recently, I thought the single most
embarrassingly stupid event of the last decade's national security
debates -- the kind that will make historians look back with
slack-jawed amazement -- was the joint dissemination in the run-up to
the war by the Bush administration and the American media of playing cards that featured all of the "Most Wanted" Iraqi Villains and their cartoon villain nicknames. Saddam Hussein was the Ace of Spades; Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash -- Mrs. Anthrax -- was the Five of Hearts; Ali Hassan al-Majid -- Chemical Ali -- was the King of Spades;
sadly, Dr. Rihab Rashid Taha -- the dreaded "Dr. Germ" -- didn't make
it to the deck, but she certainly had her day in the American media sun
(AP: "Iraq's 'Dr. Germ' Surrenders to Coalition" -- CNN: "U.S. military holding 'Dr. Germ,' 'Mrs. Anthrax'").
If you weren't on board with all of that -- if you weren't hiding under
your bed shaking when these cartoons were shown on the TV -- that meant
that you were neither Tough nor Serious. Just as is true now, the
Tough and Serious people were the ones who became frightened by the
comic book villians. All of that led to reports like this from CNN:
U.S.
commanders said that they have no intention of resting until the
mission is complete and they have the top prize, Saddam -- the ace of
spades in the notorious deck of cards.Saddam's sons Qusay,
the ace of clubs, and Uday, the ace of hearts, died in a raid in the
northern Iraqi city of Mosul. . . .Key to tracking down Qusay and Uday
was the capture of the ace of diamonds, No. 4 on the list, Abid Hamid
Mahmud al-Tikriti, . . . Still unclear is the fate of No. 5 -- the king
of spades -- Ali Hassan al-Majid, known as "Chemical Ali" . . . . U.S.
military officials said they still want to capture or kill those who
remain at large and put the entire deck of cards out of business.
And this from CNN:
KELLI ARENA, CNN ANCHOR: Let's go to the Pentagon for details of that capture of another player in the Pentagon's deck of cards. CNN's Patty Davis is on the story -- Patty.
PATTY DAVIS, CNN CORRESPONDENT: That's right, Kelli. Another big fish now in U.S. custody. The U.S. Central Command says it is retiring the six of clubs from that deck of most wanted Iraqis. Now he is Lieutenant General Husam Muhammad Amin Al-Yasin.
Now, Lieutenant General Amin was the liaison for the U.S. weapons inspectors before the war, a key figure in Saddam Hussein's weapons program.
He held briefings, giving Iraq's point of view about those inspections
and could very well have valuable information about, for the U.S. about
any Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Now clearly a very big get for the U.S. On the deck of cards now, 13 of the 55 now in custody.
How
can "journalists" who said things even show their face in public? If
there were transcripts of you saying things like this on national
television, wouldn't you want to go immediately jump off the nearest
bridge? Yet not a single American media organization ever questioned
why they kept warning Americans about Chemical Ali, Mrs. Anthrax and
Dr. Germ once there were no chemical weapons found in the entire nation
of Iraq.
Despite all that, we never tire of the specter of the
Big, Bad, Villainous, Omnipotent Muslim Terrorist. They're back, and
now they're going to wreak havoc on the Homeland -- devastate our
communities -- even as they're imprisoned in super-max prison
facilities. How utterly irrational is that fear? For one thing, it's
empirically disproven. Anyone with the most minimal amount of
rationality would look at the fact that we have already convicted
numerous alleged high-level Al Qaeda Terrorists in our civilian court
system (something we're not being told can't be done) -- including the
cast of villains known as the Blind Shiekh a.k.a. Mastermind of the
First World Trade Center attack, the Shoe Bomber, the Dirty Bomber,
the American Taliban, the 20th Hijacker, and many more -- and are imprisoning them right now in American prisons located in various communities.
We've
been doing that for two decades. What are all the bad and scary things
that have happened as a result? The answer is: "nothing." Take note, Chris Cillizza
and friends: while it's true that "not a single prisoner has escaped
from Gitmo since it was created," it's also true that no Muslim
Terrorists have escaped from American prisons and SuperMax prison "has had no escapes or serious attempts to escape." The only person to even make an attempt is Green Arrow, who hasn't succeeded despite the help of Joker and Lex Luthor.
I really want to know: when our nation's stalwart right-wing warriors (along with Harry "Fighting the Good Fight"
Reid) become petrified at the thought of keeping Muslim Terrorists in
our prisons, what exactly do they fantasize will happen? What bad
things specifically do they fear are going to occur? I asked that question last night on Twitter and these were some of the responses I received:
Atrios: crawl up through our toilets and steal our vital essence
GeorgiePorger: Abu Ghraib in their backyard?
akaBruno: They'll join up with T-Bag, Lincoln Burrows and Michael Scofield and break out of Fox River
JonahKeri: That they'll turn this into a lawless, chaotic state and make people live in a constant state of riled-up fear. Oh wait...
One right-wing warrior-blogger tried to answer the question earnestly by pointing out that in November, 200o, a Muslim Terrorist violently attacked a prison guard. A report from the Dallas Morning News on prisoner-on-guard attacks found that in 2007 alone -- just in Texas -- there were "more than three dozen staff assaults with weapons." But that's a perfect distillation of the fear-wallowing right-wing mindset: hey,
one time, 9 years ago, a Muslim Terrorist attacked a prison guard, so
now we have to keep all Muslim Terrorist-prisoners in cages on a Cuban
island with no trial because I'm too scared to keep them in an American
prison.
Isn't it rather obvious how degraded a citizenry
becomes when there's this constant effort to keep them in a state of
intense fear of everything? Even after eight long years of the Bush
era, our leading political figures and media stars -- especially
the Toughest and Most Serious ones -- still quiver with paralyzing
fear, completely take leave of their senses, the minute someone utters
the word "Terrorist" and especially the phrase "Muslim Terrorist." The
last two elections proved
that Americans themselves generally are no longer frightened by this
tactic, but for our poltiical and media elites, "Terrorist" is still an
all-purpose justifying phrase.
Here's a dramatic and deeply
serious video that examines the National Security Crisis caused by
Terrorists in American prisons, and illustrates the level of our
political debates in Serious Circles over these matters:
The "debate"
over all the bad and scary things that will happen if Obama closes
Guantanamo and we then incarcerate those detainees in American prisons
is so painfully stupid even by the standards of our political discourse
that it's hard to put into words, and it also perfectly illustrates the
steps that typically lead to America's National Security policies:
(1) Right-wing
super-tough-guy warriors project some frightened, adolescent, neurotic
fantasy onto the world -- either because they are really petrified by
it or because they want others to be ("Putting Muslim Terrorists in our prisons will make us Unsafe! -- Keep them away from me, please!!!");
(2) Rather
than scoff at the inane fear-mongering or point out simple facts to
reveal its idiocy, Democratic "leaders" such as Harry Reid echo the right-wing fears
in order to prove how Serious and Tough they are -- in our political
debates, the more frightened one is, the more Serious and Tough one is
-- and/or because they are genuinely frightened of being called mean
names by Sean Hannity ("Harry Reid isn't as scared of this as I am, which shows that he's weak");
(3) "Journalists" who are capable of nothing other than mindlessly reciting what they hear then write articles depicting
the Right's frightened neurosis as a Serious argument, and then
overnight, a consensus emerges: Democrats are in big trouble
politically unless they show that they, too, are as deeply frightened
as the Right is.
Until recently, I thought the single most
embarrassingly stupid event of the last decade's national security
debates -- the kind that will make historians look back with
slack-jawed amazement -- was the joint dissemination in the run-up to
the war by the Bush administration and the American media of playing cards that featured all of the "Most Wanted" Iraqi Villains and their cartoon villain nicknames. Saddam Hussein was the Ace of Spades; Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash -- Mrs. Anthrax -- was the Five of Hearts; Ali Hassan al-Majid -- Chemical Ali -- was the King of Spades;
sadly, Dr. Rihab Rashid Taha -- the dreaded "Dr. Germ" -- didn't make
it to the deck, but she certainly had her day in the American media sun
(AP: "Iraq's 'Dr. Germ' Surrenders to Coalition" -- CNN: "U.S. military holding 'Dr. Germ,' 'Mrs. Anthrax'").
If you weren't on board with all of that -- if you weren't hiding under
your bed shaking when these cartoons were shown on the TV -- that meant
that you were neither Tough nor Serious. Just as is true now, the
Tough and Serious people were the ones who became frightened by the
comic book villians. All of that led to reports like this from CNN:
U.S.
commanders said that they have no intention of resting until the
mission is complete and they have the top prize, Saddam -- the ace of
spades in the notorious deck of cards.Saddam's sons Qusay,
the ace of clubs, and Uday, the ace of hearts, died in a raid in the
northern Iraqi city of Mosul. . . .Key to tracking down Qusay and Uday
was the capture of the ace of diamonds, No. 4 on the list, Abid Hamid
Mahmud al-Tikriti, . . . Still unclear is the fate of No. 5 -- the king
of spades -- Ali Hassan al-Majid, known as "Chemical Ali" . . . . U.S.
military officials said they still want to capture or kill those who
remain at large and put the entire deck of cards out of business.
And this from CNN:
KELLI ARENA, CNN ANCHOR: Let's go to the Pentagon for details of that capture of another player in the Pentagon's deck of cards. CNN's Patty Davis is on the story -- Patty.
PATTY DAVIS, CNN CORRESPONDENT: That's right, Kelli. Another big fish now in U.S. custody. The U.S. Central Command says it is retiring the six of clubs from that deck of most wanted Iraqis. Now he is Lieutenant General Husam Muhammad Amin Al-Yasin.
Now, Lieutenant General Amin was the liaison for the U.S. weapons inspectors before the war, a key figure in Saddam Hussein's weapons program.
He held briefings, giving Iraq's point of view about those inspections
and could very well have valuable information about, for the U.S. about
any Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Now clearly a very big get for the U.S. On the deck of cards now, 13 of the 55 now in custody.
How
can "journalists" who said things even show their face in public? If
there were transcripts of you saying things like this on national
television, wouldn't you want to go immediately jump off the nearest
bridge? Yet not a single American media organization ever questioned
why they kept warning Americans about Chemical Ali, Mrs. Anthrax and
Dr. Germ once there were no chemical weapons found in the entire nation
of Iraq.
Despite all that, we never tire of the specter of the
Big, Bad, Villainous, Omnipotent Muslim Terrorist. They're back, and
now they're going to wreak havoc on the Homeland -- devastate our
communities -- even as they're imprisoned in super-max prison
facilities. How utterly irrational is that fear? For one thing, it's
empirically disproven. Anyone with the most minimal amount of
rationality would look at the fact that we have already convicted
numerous alleged high-level Al Qaeda Terrorists in our civilian court
system (something we're not being told can't be done) -- including the
cast of villains known as the Blind Shiekh a.k.a. Mastermind of the
First World Trade Center attack, the Shoe Bomber, the Dirty Bomber,
the American Taliban, the 20th Hijacker, and many more -- and are imprisoning them right now in American prisons located in various communities.
We've
been doing that for two decades. What are all the bad and scary things
that have happened as a result? The answer is: "nothing." Take note, Chris Cillizza
and friends: while it's true that "not a single prisoner has escaped
from Gitmo since it was created," it's also true that no Muslim
Terrorists have escaped from American prisons and SuperMax prison "has had no escapes or serious attempts to escape." The only person to even make an attempt is Green Arrow, who hasn't succeeded despite the help of Joker and Lex Luthor.
I really want to know: when our nation's stalwart right-wing warriors (along with Harry "Fighting the Good Fight"
Reid) become petrified at the thought of keeping Muslim Terrorists in
our prisons, what exactly do they fantasize will happen? What bad
things specifically do they fear are going to occur? I asked that question last night on Twitter and these were some of the responses I received:
Atrios: crawl up through our toilets and steal our vital essence
GeorgiePorger: Abu Ghraib in their backyard?
akaBruno: They'll join up with T-Bag, Lincoln Burrows and Michael Scofield and break out of Fox River
JonahKeri: That they'll turn this into a lawless, chaotic state and make people live in a constant state of riled-up fear. Oh wait...
One right-wing warrior-blogger tried to answer the question earnestly by pointing out that in November, 200o, a Muslim Terrorist violently attacked a prison guard. A report from the Dallas Morning News on prisoner-on-guard attacks found that in 2007 alone -- just in Texas -- there were "more than three dozen staff assaults with weapons." But that's a perfect distillation of the fear-wallowing right-wing mindset: hey,
one time, 9 years ago, a Muslim Terrorist attacked a prison guard, so
now we have to keep all Muslim Terrorist-prisoners in cages on a Cuban
island with no trial because I'm too scared to keep them in an American
prison.
Isn't it rather obvious how degraded a citizenry
becomes when there's this constant effort to keep them in a state of
intense fear of everything? Even after eight long years of the Bush
era, our leading political figures and media stars -- especially
the Toughest and Most Serious ones -- still quiver with paralyzing
fear, completely take leave of their senses, the minute someone utters
the word "Terrorist" and especially the phrase "Muslim Terrorist." The
last two elections proved
that Americans themselves generally are no longer frightened by this
tactic, but for our poltiical and media elites, "Terrorist" is still an
all-purpose justifying phrase.
Here's a dramatic and deeply
serious video that examines the National Security Crisis caused by
Terrorists in American prisons, and illustrates the level of our
political debates in Serious Circles over these matters:
