SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Since last September, the Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by more than $1 trillion,
and has engaged in even much larger amounts of off-balance-sheet
transactions. In January of this year, freshman Rep. Alan Grayson repeatedly asked Federal Reserve Vice chairman Donald Kohn
the identity of the companies which had received those loans, only to
be told that the Fed had no obligation and no desire to disclose that
information to Congress.
Since last September, the Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by more than $1 trillion,
and has engaged in even much larger amounts of off-balance-sheet
transactions. In January of this year, freshman Rep. Alan Grayson repeatedly asked Federal Reserve Vice chairman Donald Kohn
the identity of the companies which had received those loans, only to
be told that the Fed had no obligation and no desire to disclose that
information to Congress. That obviously leads to the question of who
exerts oversight over the Fed and the vast amounts of money it
transfers.
One answer -- the only real answer -- is that the Fed's activities are monitored by an Inspector General, which ostensibly
"conducts independent and objective audits, inspections, evaluations,
investigations, and other reviews related to programs and operations of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board)" and "promote[s] integrity, economy, efficiency, and
effectiveness; help prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse; and
strengthen accountability to the Congress and the public." At minimum,
then, one would assume that the Fed's Inspector General is actively
monitoring the extraordinary actions in which the Fed has been engaging
since September. After all, nobody else is monitoring or even can
monitor any of that, since the Fed will not tell anyone what it is
doing.
Yesterday, the Fed's Inspector General, Elizabeth Coleman,
appeared before the House Financial Services Committee and was
questioned by Rep. Grayson about her office's oversight duties. Just
watch this five-minute question-and-answer session to get a sense for
the true breadth of decay and corruption in our political and financial
classes and for what a sorry joke the concept of "oversight" is in
Washington:
As the Democrats' second-most-senior Senator, Dick Durbin, said about Congress,
though it applies every bit as much to Washington generally: "the
banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis
that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on
Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Since last September, the Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by more than $1 trillion,
and has engaged in even much larger amounts of off-balance-sheet
transactions. In January of this year, freshman Rep. Alan Grayson repeatedly asked Federal Reserve Vice chairman Donald Kohn
the identity of the companies which had received those loans, only to
be told that the Fed had no obligation and no desire to disclose that
information to Congress. That obviously leads to the question of who
exerts oversight over the Fed and the vast amounts of money it
transfers.
One answer -- the only real answer -- is that the Fed's activities are monitored by an Inspector General, which ostensibly
"conducts independent and objective audits, inspections, evaluations,
investigations, and other reviews related to programs and operations of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board)" and "promote[s] integrity, economy, efficiency, and
effectiveness; help prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse; and
strengthen accountability to the Congress and the public." At minimum,
then, one would assume that the Fed's Inspector General is actively
monitoring the extraordinary actions in which the Fed has been engaging
since September. After all, nobody else is monitoring or even can
monitor any of that, since the Fed will not tell anyone what it is
doing.
Yesterday, the Fed's Inspector General, Elizabeth Coleman,
appeared before the House Financial Services Committee and was
questioned by Rep. Grayson about her office's oversight duties. Just
watch this five-minute question-and-answer session to get a sense for
the true breadth of decay and corruption in our political and financial
classes and for what a sorry joke the concept of "oversight" is in
Washington:
As the Democrats' second-most-senior Senator, Dick Durbin, said about Congress,
though it applies every bit as much to Washington generally: "the
banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis
that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on
Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."
Since last September, the Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by more than $1 trillion,
and has engaged in even much larger amounts of off-balance-sheet
transactions. In January of this year, freshman Rep. Alan Grayson repeatedly asked Federal Reserve Vice chairman Donald Kohn
the identity of the companies which had received those loans, only to
be told that the Fed had no obligation and no desire to disclose that
information to Congress. That obviously leads to the question of who
exerts oversight over the Fed and the vast amounts of money it
transfers.
One answer -- the only real answer -- is that the Fed's activities are monitored by an Inspector General, which ostensibly
"conducts independent and objective audits, inspections, evaluations,
investigations, and other reviews related to programs and operations of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board)" and "promote[s] integrity, economy, efficiency, and
effectiveness; help prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse; and
strengthen accountability to the Congress and the public." At minimum,
then, one would assume that the Fed's Inspector General is actively
monitoring the extraordinary actions in which the Fed has been engaging
since September. After all, nobody else is monitoring or even can
monitor any of that, since the Fed will not tell anyone what it is
doing.
Yesterday, the Fed's Inspector General, Elizabeth Coleman,
appeared before the House Financial Services Committee and was
questioned by Rep. Grayson about her office's oversight duties. Just
watch this five-minute question-and-answer session to get a sense for
the true breadth of decay and corruption in our political and financial
classes and for what a sorry joke the concept of "oversight" is in
Washington:
As the Democrats' second-most-senior Senator, Dick Durbin, said about Congress,
though it applies every bit as much to Washington generally: "the
banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis
that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on
Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."