

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Since last September, the Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by more than $1 trillion,
and has engaged in even much larger amounts of off-balance-sheet
transactions. In January of this year, freshman Rep. Alan Grayson repeatedly asked Federal Reserve Vice chairman Donald Kohn
the identity of the companies which had received those loans, only to
be told that the Fed had no obligation and no desire to disclose that
information to Congress.
Since last September, the Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by more than $1 trillion,
and has engaged in even much larger amounts of off-balance-sheet
transactions. In January of this year, freshman Rep. Alan Grayson repeatedly asked Federal Reserve Vice chairman Donald Kohn
the identity of the companies which had received those loans, only to
be told that the Fed had no obligation and no desire to disclose that
information to Congress. That obviously leads to the question of who
exerts oversight over the Fed and the vast amounts of money it
transfers.
One answer -- the only real answer -- is that the Fed's activities are monitored by an Inspector General, which ostensibly
"conducts independent and objective audits, inspections, evaluations,
investigations, and other reviews related to programs and operations of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board)" and "promote[s] integrity, economy, efficiency, and
effectiveness; help prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse; and
strengthen accountability to the Congress and the public." At minimum,
then, one would assume that the Fed's Inspector General is actively
monitoring the extraordinary actions in which the Fed has been engaging
since September. After all, nobody else is monitoring or even can
monitor any of that, since the Fed will not tell anyone what it is
doing.
Yesterday, the Fed's Inspector General, Elizabeth Coleman,
appeared before the House Financial Services Committee and was
questioned by Rep. Grayson about her office's oversight duties. Just
watch this five-minute question-and-answer session to get a sense for
the true breadth of decay and corruption in our political and financial
classes and for what a sorry joke the concept of "oversight" is in
Washington:
As the Democrats' second-most-senior Senator, Dick Durbin, said about Congress,
though it applies every bit as much to Washington generally: "the
banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis
that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on
Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Since last September, the Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by more than $1 trillion,
and has engaged in even much larger amounts of off-balance-sheet
transactions. In January of this year, freshman Rep. Alan Grayson repeatedly asked Federal Reserve Vice chairman Donald Kohn
the identity of the companies which had received those loans, only to
be told that the Fed had no obligation and no desire to disclose that
information to Congress. That obviously leads to the question of who
exerts oversight over the Fed and the vast amounts of money it
transfers.
One answer -- the only real answer -- is that the Fed's activities are monitored by an Inspector General, which ostensibly
"conducts independent and objective audits, inspections, evaluations,
investigations, and other reviews related to programs and operations of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board)" and "promote[s] integrity, economy, efficiency, and
effectiveness; help prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse; and
strengthen accountability to the Congress and the public." At minimum,
then, one would assume that the Fed's Inspector General is actively
monitoring the extraordinary actions in which the Fed has been engaging
since September. After all, nobody else is monitoring or even can
monitor any of that, since the Fed will not tell anyone what it is
doing.
Yesterday, the Fed's Inspector General, Elizabeth Coleman,
appeared before the House Financial Services Committee and was
questioned by Rep. Grayson about her office's oversight duties. Just
watch this five-minute question-and-answer session to get a sense for
the true breadth of decay and corruption in our political and financial
classes and for what a sorry joke the concept of "oversight" is in
Washington:
As the Democrats' second-most-senior Senator, Dick Durbin, said about Congress,
though it applies every bit as much to Washington generally: "the
banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis
that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on
Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."
Since last September, the Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by more than $1 trillion,
and has engaged in even much larger amounts of off-balance-sheet
transactions. In January of this year, freshman Rep. Alan Grayson repeatedly asked Federal Reserve Vice chairman Donald Kohn
the identity of the companies which had received those loans, only to
be told that the Fed had no obligation and no desire to disclose that
information to Congress. That obviously leads to the question of who
exerts oversight over the Fed and the vast amounts of money it
transfers.
One answer -- the only real answer -- is that the Fed's activities are monitored by an Inspector General, which ostensibly
"conducts independent and objective audits, inspections, evaluations,
investigations, and other reviews related to programs and operations of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board)" and "promote[s] integrity, economy, efficiency, and
effectiveness; help prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse; and
strengthen accountability to the Congress and the public." At minimum,
then, one would assume that the Fed's Inspector General is actively
monitoring the extraordinary actions in which the Fed has been engaging
since September. After all, nobody else is monitoring or even can
monitor any of that, since the Fed will not tell anyone what it is
doing.
Yesterday, the Fed's Inspector General, Elizabeth Coleman,
appeared before the House Financial Services Committee and was
questioned by Rep. Grayson about her office's oversight duties. Just
watch this five-minute question-and-answer session to get a sense for
the true breadth of decay and corruption in our political and financial
classes and for what a sorry joke the concept of "oversight" is in
Washington:
As the Democrats' second-most-senior Senator, Dick Durbin, said about Congress,
though it applies every bit as much to Washington generally: "the
banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis
that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on
Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."