SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Geithner's Public Private Partnership Puts Public Most at Risk
Tim Geithner's at it again, doing somersaults, with hundreds of
billions of federal money flying out of his pockets in the process, all
to distract us from the more sensible course of action, which is to
nationalize the insolvent banks.
Instead, he wants to scrub their assets clean by having the government and some private speculators buy up their bad bets.
Geithner calls it the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, and if he were playing scrabble, he'd be all out of Ps.
Mar 24, 2009
Tim Geithner's at it again, doing somersaults, with hundreds of
billions of federal money flying out of his pockets in the process, all
to distract us from the more sensible course of action, which is to
nationalize the insolvent banks.
Instead, he wants to scrub their assets clean by having the government and some private speculators buy up their bad bets.
Geithner calls it the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, and if he were playing scrabble, he'd be all out of Ps.
But don't be confused. The public is taking the biggest risk,
whereas the private speculators, for a tiny investment, can gain quite
a lot.
Here's the deal. Say a bank has a bad mortgage loan that it is holding for $100,000.
The government will set up an auction to determine what the mortgage really is worth.
Say the highest private bid for the mortgage is $84,000.
The government will provide $72,000 in a loan guarantee, and then
the private investor would put up only $6,000, which the government
would match with its own $6,000 stake.
So the government, you and I, are on the hook for $78,000 whereas the private investor has only $6,000 of skin in the game.
But get this: The private speculator gets to control the management
of the asset, and not the government, even though we're on the hook for
about 93% of the risk.
"The Treasury intends to provide 50 percent of the equity capital," Geithner's fact sheet says, "but private managers will retain control of asset management subject to rigorous oversight from the FDIC."
Geithner infamously said, just a few days after he became Treasury
Secretary, that "we have a financial system that is run by private
shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we'd like to do our
best to preserve that system."
And he is doing his best at that, which is all the worse for us.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
Tim Geithner's at it again, doing somersaults, with hundreds of
billions of federal money flying out of his pockets in the process, all
to distract us from the more sensible course of action, which is to
nationalize the insolvent banks.
Instead, he wants to scrub their assets clean by having the government and some private speculators buy up their bad bets.
Geithner calls it the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, and if he were playing scrabble, he'd be all out of Ps.
But don't be confused. The public is taking the biggest risk,
whereas the private speculators, for a tiny investment, can gain quite
a lot.
Here's the deal. Say a bank has a bad mortgage loan that it is holding for $100,000.
The government will set up an auction to determine what the mortgage really is worth.
Say the highest private bid for the mortgage is $84,000.
The government will provide $72,000 in a loan guarantee, and then
the private investor would put up only $6,000, which the government
would match with its own $6,000 stake.
So the government, you and I, are on the hook for $78,000 whereas the private investor has only $6,000 of skin in the game.
But get this: The private speculator gets to control the management
of the asset, and not the government, even though we're on the hook for
about 93% of the risk.
"The Treasury intends to provide 50 percent of the equity capital," Geithner's fact sheet says, "but private managers will retain control of asset management subject to rigorous oversight from the FDIC."
Geithner infamously said, just a few days after he became Treasury
Secretary, that "we have a financial system that is run by private
shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we'd like to do our
best to preserve that system."
And he is doing his best at that, which is all the worse for us.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
Tim Geithner's at it again, doing somersaults, with hundreds of
billions of federal money flying out of his pockets in the process, all
to distract us from the more sensible course of action, which is to
nationalize the insolvent banks.
Instead, he wants to scrub their assets clean by having the government and some private speculators buy up their bad bets.
Geithner calls it the Public Private Partnership Investment Program, and if he were playing scrabble, he'd be all out of Ps.
But don't be confused. The public is taking the biggest risk,
whereas the private speculators, for a tiny investment, can gain quite
a lot.
Here's the deal. Say a bank has a bad mortgage loan that it is holding for $100,000.
The government will set up an auction to determine what the mortgage really is worth.
Say the highest private bid for the mortgage is $84,000.
The government will provide $72,000 in a loan guarantee, and then
the private investor would put up only $6,000, which the government
would match with its own $6,000 stake.
So the government, you and I, are on the hook for $78,000 whereas the private investor has only $6,000 of skin in the game.
But get this: The private speculator gets to control the management
of the asset, and not the government, even though we're on the hook for
about 93% of the risk.
"The Treasury intends to provide 50 percent of the equity capital," Geithner's fact sheet says, "but private managers will retain control of asset management subject to rigorous oversight from the FDIC."
Geithner infamously said, just a few days after he became Treasury
Secretary, that "we have a financial system that is run by private
shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we'd like to do our
best to preserve that system."
And he is doing his best at that, which is all the worse for us.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.