The Charade of Not Talking to Hamas
We're talking to Israeli extremists. Why not to Palestinian extremists, too?
Looming over Hillary Clinton's foray into the Middle East are two
extremist movements that aren't likely to be persuaded to support
Clinton's vision of a two-state solution. The first is Hamas, which
runs Gaza, and the second is the Netanyahu-Lieberman bloc in Israel,
which is preparing to take over the Israeli government.
In Egypt yesterday, Clinton reaffirmed America's pledge to give $900 million in aid to the West Bank and Gaza. One-third of that will
go to Gaza, and she made it clear that all of the aid will be funneled
through the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas, so it won't end up in the
"wrong hands":
We will work with our Palestinian partners, President
Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad, to address critical humanitarian,
budgetary, security, and infrastructure needs. We have worked with the
Palestinian Authority to install safeguards that will ensure that our
funding is only used where, and for whom, it is intended, and does not
end up in the wrong hands.
She added that the United States will "vigorously pursue a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
In all, the conference of aid donors for Gaza is planning to assemble a
$3 billion package for Gaza, the equivalent of $2,000 for each of the
1.5 million Gaza residents. Since most of the cash will be funneled
through the PA, it's clear the Abbas and Fayyad will gain patronage
points. But Israel still maintains its blockade of Gaza, preventing key
items -- such as building materials, like cement -- from reaching rebuilding projects.
Egypt is mediating between Israel and Hamas in search of a workable
arrangement, but a deal will be hostage to the Netanyahu regime, which
has pledged to destroy Hamas.
Egypt is also taking the lead in trying to reconcile Hamas, Fatah,
and other elements of the Palestinian national movement. Were they to
succeed, it would confront the Obama administration with a quandary:
will Obama send hundreds of millions of dollars to the Palestinians if,
indeed, those with the "wrong hands" are part of the equation? The
Palestinian dialogue will start in earnest in Cairo on
March 10, involving Hamas, Fatah, and several smaller factions,
including left-leaning ones and Islamic Jihad. They've created five
committees aimed at "forming a national unity government, reforming the
Palestine Liberation Organization, rebuilding the security apparatus,
preparing for presidential and legislative elections, and the committee
of reconciliation."
Theoretically, it ought to be easy to finesse the problem,
diplomatically, for the United States. So far, Washington has said it
won't talk to Hamas unless the group halts violence and accepts
Israel's right to exist. If Hamas does indeed reunite with Fatah in the
PA, the United States can use that as an excuse to halt aid, or it can
pretend to look the other way and continue the aid on the theory that
the PA itself is engaged in two-state talks with Israel.
In fact, Israel is already talking to Hamas, through Egypt's
mediation efforts, and if the Hamas-Fatah talks succeed -- with Egypt's
help -- Hamas will be at the table there, too. Not talking to Hamas is
quickly becoming a charade.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Looming over Hillary Clinton's foray into the Middle East are two
extremist movements that aren't likely to be persuaded to support
Clinton's vision of a two-state solution. The first is Hamas, which
runs Gaza, and the second is the Netanyahu-Lieberman bloc in Israel,
which is preparing to take over the Israeli government.
In Egypt yesterday, Clinton reaffirmed America's pledge to give $900 million in aid to the West Bank and Gaza. One-third of that will
go to Gaza, and she made it clear that all of the aid will be funneled
through the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas, so it won't end up in the
"wrong hands":
We will work with our Palestinian partners, President
Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad, to address critical humanitarian,
budgetary, security, and infrastructure needs. We have worked with the
Palestinian Authority to install safeguards that will ensure that our
funding is only used where, and for whom, it is intended, and does not
end up in the wrong hands.
She added that the United States will "vigorously pursue a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
In all, the conference of aid donors for Gaza is planning to assemble a
$3 billion package for Gaza, the equivalent of $2,000 for each of the
1.5 million Gaza residents. Since most of the cash will be funneled
through the PA, it's clear the Abbas and Fayyad will gain patronage
points. But Israel still maintains its blockade of Gaza, preventing key
items -- such as building materials, like cement -- from reaching rebuilding projects.
Egypt is mediating between Israel and Hamas in search of a workable
arrangement, but a deal will be hostage to the Netanyahu regime, which
has pledged to destroy Hamas.
Egypt is also taking the lead in trying to reconcile Hamas, Fatah,
and other elements of the Palestinian national movement. Were they to
succeed, it would confront the Obama administration with a quandary:
will Obama send hundreds of millions of dollars to the Palestinians if,
indeed, those with the "wrong hands" are part of the equation? The
Palestinian dialogue will start in earnest in Cairo on
March 10, involving Hamas, Fatah, and several smaller factions,
including left-leaning ones and Islamic Jihad. They've created five
committees aimed at "forming a national unity government, reforming the
Palestine Liberation Organization, rebuilding the security apparatus,
preparing for presidential and legislative elections, and the committee
of reconciliation."
Theoretically, it ought to be easy to finesse the problem,
diplomatically, for the United States. So far, Washington has said it
won't talk to Hamas unless the group halts violence and accepts
Israel's right to exist. If Hamas does indeed reunite with Fatah in the
PA, the United States can use that as an excuse to halt aid, or it can
pretend to look the other way and continue the aid on the theory that
the PA itself is engaged in two-state talks with Israel.
In fact, Israel is already talking to Hamas, through Egypt's
mediation efforts, and if the Hamas-Fatah talks succeed -- with Egypt's
help -- Hamas will be at the table there, too. Not talking to Hamas is
quickly becoming a charade.
Looming over Hillary Clinton's foray into the Middle East are two
extremist movements that aren't likely to be persuaded to support
Clinton's vision of a two-state solution. The first is Hamas, which
runs Gaza, and the second is the Netanyahu-Lieberman bloc in Israel,
which is preparing to take over the Israeli government.
In Egypt yesterday, Clinton reaffirmed America's pledge to give $900 million in aid to the West Bank and Gaza. One-third of that will
go to Gaza, and she made it clear that all of the aid will be funneled
through the Palestinian Authority, not Hamas, so it won't end up in the
"wrong hands":
We will work with our Palestinian partners, President
Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad, to address critical humanitarian,
budgetary, security, and infrastructure needs. We have worked with the
Palestinian Authority to install safeguards that will ensure that our
funding is only used where, and for whom, it is intended, and does not
end up in the wrong hands.
She added that the United States will "vigorously pursue a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
In all, the conference of aid donors for Gaza is planning to assemble a
$3 billion package for Gaza, the equivalent of $2,000 for each of the
1.5 million Gaza residents. Since most of the cash will be funneled
through the PA, it's clear the Abbas and Fayyad will gain patronage
points. But Israel still maintains its blockade of Gaza, preventing key
items -- such as building materials, like cement -- from reaching rebuilding projects.
Egypt is mediating between Israel and Hamas in search of a workable
arrangement, but a deal will be hostage to the Netanyahu regime, which
has pledged to destroy Hamas.
Egypt is also taking the lead in trying to reconcile Hamas, Fatah,
and other elements of the Palestinian national movement. Were they to
succeed, it would confront the Obama administration with a quandary:
will Obama send hundreds of millions of dollars to the Palestinians if,
indeed, those with the "wrong hands" are part of the equation? The
Palestinian dialogue will start in earnest in Cairo on
March 10, involving Hamas, Fatah, and several smaller factions,
including left-leaning ones and Islamic Jihad. They've created five
committees aimed at "forming a national unity government, reforming the
Palestine Liberation Organization, rebuilding the security apparatus,
preparing for presidential and legislative elections, and the committee
of reconciliation."
Theoretically, it ought to be easy to finesse the problem,
diplomatically, for the United States. So far, Washington has said it
won't talk to Hamas unless the group halts violence and accepts
Israel's right to exist. If Hamas does indeed reunite with Fatah in the
PA, the United States can use that as an excuse to halt aid, or it can
pretend to look the other way and continue the aid on the theory that
the PA itself is engaged in two-state talks with Israel.
In fact, Israel is already talking to Hamas, through Egypt's
mediation efforts, and if the Hamas-Fatah talks succeed -- with Egypt's
help -- Hamas will be at the table there, too. Not talking to Hamas is
quickly becoming a charade.