

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
One of the things I like most about Barack
Obama is he understands the economic crisis we're in, and he grasps
much of what needs to be done.
Plus, he's not afraid to level with the American people that we need
to spend a lot of money--and yes, increase the deficit in the process--if
we're going to escape a depression.
He also understands that the much-ballyhooed private sector is incapable of solving this problem.
One of the things I like most about Barack
Obama is he understands the economic crisis we're in, and he grasps
much of what needs to be done.
Plus, he's not afraid to level with the American people that we need
to spend a lot of money--and yes, increase the deficit in the process--if
we're going to escape a depression.
He also understands that the much-ballyhooed private sector is incapable of solving this problem.
As he put it in his big economic speech at George Mason University
on Thursday: "At this particular moment, only government can provide
the short-term boost necessary to lift us from a recession this deep
and this severe. Only government can break the vicious cycles that are
crippling our economy -- where a lack of spending leads to lost jobs,
which leads to even less spending; where an inability to lend and
borrow stops growth and leads to even less credit."
Even rightwing economists like Martin Feldstein acknowledge this fact.
Basically, the private sector has punted.
The banks and investment houses created the crisis first by blowing
air into the housing bubble and then by gambling on unregulated
derivatives that were all wrapped up in that bubble.
And even after Paulson dropped $300 billion into their laps, they refused to lend and refused to refinance mortgages.
The auto manufacturers crawled to Washington, and the steel companies are on their way.
So we've got a credit crisis, a housing crisis, a collapse of
manufacturing, rising unemployment, and falling consumer spending,
which, in turn, will cause more companies to throw more people out of
work. Meanwhile, state governments are in deep holes, too, and are
having to cut payrolls.
Obama understands that this "bad situation could become dramatically worse," and he is wise to urgently call for bold action.
He recognizes the irrationality of a deep recession like this one,
where "there are millions of Americans trying to find work, even as,
all around the country, there is so much work to be done."
Many pieces of his "American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan" make a great deal of sense.
Like doubling the production of alternative energy in the next three years.
Like modernizing more than 75% of federal buildings.
Like improving the energy efficiency of two million homes.
Like building solar panels and wind turbines.
Like computerizing America's medical records.
Like rebuilding the infrastructure.
Like building a new electricity grid.
Like expanding broadband.
Like giving 95% of working families a $1,000 tax cut.
Like extending unemployment and health benefits to those looking for work.
Like helping states avoid harmful budget cuts.
Like stabilizing and repairing the financial system.
Like getting credit flowing to families and businesses.
Like addressing the foreclosure crisis.
Like having transparency about where all this money is going.
How Obama will do some of this remains to be seen, however.
For instance, it's unclear how he will go about re-regulating the
financial system, since he has surrounded himself with people who were
intimately involved with deregulating that system.
It's also unclear how he will address the foreclosure crisis "so we
can keep responsible families in their homes"--and how he will
differentiate between responsible and irresponsible families.
What's more, he may be aiming too low by vowing to "save or create
at least three million jobs over the next few years," since the economy
lost about 3 million jobs in 2008 alone.
And for some reason, he is insisting that "the overwhelming majority
of the jobs will be in the private sector," when there is much more job
security -- and union protection -- in public sector jobs. Why trust the
private sector when it bollixed everything up in the first place?
But at least Obama recognizes a crisis when he sees one.
At least he is fluent enough in economics to understand the
essential role that the federal government must play in such a crisis.
And at least he has put on the table several good ideas for ameliorating that crisis.
It's now up to Congress to get him a recovery bill he can sign -- in a hurry.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
One of the things I like most about Barack
Obama is he understands the economic crisis we're in, and he grasps
much of what needs to be done.
Plus, he's not afraid to level with the American people that we need
to spend a lot of money--and yes, increase the deficit in the process--if
we're going to escape a depression.
He also understands that the much-ballyhooed private sector is incapable of solving this problem.
As he put it in his big economic speech at George Mason University
on Thursday: "At this particular moment, only government can provide
the short-term boost necessary to lift us from a recession this deep
and this severe. Only government can break the vicious cycles that are
crippling our economy -- where a lack of spending leads to lost jobs,
which leads to even less spending; where an inability to lend and
borrow stops growth and leads to even less credit."
Even rightwing economists like Martin Feldstein acknowledge this fact.
Basically, the private sector has punted.
The banks and investment houses created the crisis first by blowing
air into the housing bubble and then by gambling on unregulated
derivatives that were all wrapped up in that bubble.
And even after Paulson dropped $300 billion into their laps, they refused to lend and refused to refinance mortgages.
The auto manufacturers crawled to Washington, and the steel companies are on their way.
So we've got a credit crisis, a housing crisis, a collapse of
manufacturing, rising unemployment, and falling consumer spending,
which, in turn, will cause more companies to throw more people out of
work. Meanwhile, state governments are in deep holes, too, and are
having to cut payrolls.
Obama understands that this "bad situation could become dramatically worse," and he is wise to urgently call for bold action.
He recognizes the irrationality of a deep recession like this one,
where "there are millions of Americans trying to find work, even as,
all around the country, there is so much work to be done."
Many pieces of his "American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan" make a great deal of sense.
Like doubling the production of alternative energy in the next three years.
Like modernizing more than 75% of federal buildings.
Like improving the energy efficiency of two million homes.
Like building solar panels and wind turbines.
Like computerizing America's medical records.
Like rebuilding the infrastructure.
Like building a new electricity grid.
Like expanding broadband.
Like giving 95% of working families a $1,000 tax cut.
Like extending unemployment and health benefits to those looking for work.
Like helping states avoid harmful budget cuts.
Like stabilizing and repairing the financial system.
Like getting credit flowing to families and businesses.
Like addressing the foreclosure crisis.
Like having transparency about where all this money is going.
How Obama will do some of this remains to be seen, however.
For instance, it's unclear how he will go about re-regulating the
financial system, since he has surrounded himself with people who were
intimately involved with deregulating that system.
It's also unclear how he will address the foreclosure crisis "so we
can keep responsible families in their homes"--and how he will
differentiate between responsible and irresponsible families.
What's more, he may be aiming too low by vowing to "save or create
at least three million jobs over the next few years," since the economy
lost about 3 million jobs in 2008 alone.
And for some reason, he is insisting that "the overwhelming majority
of the jobs will be in the private sector," when there is much more job
security -- and union protection -- in public sector jobs. Why trust the
private sector when it bollixed everything up in the first place?
But at least Obama recognizes a crisis when he sees one.
At least he is fluent enough in economics to understand the
essential role that the federal government must play in such a crisis.
And at least he has put on the table several good ideas for ameliorating that crisis.
It's now up to Congress to get him a recovery bill he can sign -- in a hurry.
One of the things I like most about Barack
Obama is he understands the economic crisis we're in, and he grasps
much of what needs to be done.
Plus, he's not afraid to level with the American people that we need
to spend a lot of money--and yes, increase the deficit in the process--if
we're going to escape a depression.
He also understands that the much-ballyhooed private sector is incapable of solving this problem.
As he put it in his big economic speech at George Mason University
on Thursday: "At this particular moment, only government can provide
the short-term boost necessary to lift us from a recession this deep
and this severe. Only government can break the vicious cycles that are
crippling our economy -- where a lack of spending leads to lost jobs,
which leads to even less spending; where an inability to lend and
borrow stops growth and leads to even less credit."
Even rightwing economists like Martin Feldstein acknowledge this fact.
Basically, the private sector has punted.
The banks and investment houses created the crisis first by blowing
air into the housing bubble and then by gambling on unregulated
derivatives that were all wrapped up in that bubble.
And even after Paulson dropped $300 billion into their laps, they refused to lend and refused to refinance mortgages.
The auto manufacturers crawled to Washington, and the steel companies are on their way.
So we've got a credit crisis, a housing crisis, a collapse of
manufacturing, rising unemployment, and falling consumer spending,
which, in turn, will cause more companies to throw more people out of
work. Meanwhile, state governments are in deep holes, too, and are
having to cut payrolls.
Obama understands that this "bad situation could become dramatically worse," and he is wise to urgently call for bold action.
He recognizes the irrationality of a deep recession like this one,
where "there are millions of Americans trying to find work, even as,
all around the country, there is so much work to be done."
Many pieces of his "American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan" make a great deal of sense.
Like doubling the production of alternative energy in the next three years.
Like modernizing more than 75% of federal buildings.
Like improving the energy efficiency of two million homes.
Like building solar panels and wind turbines.
Like computerizing America's medical records.
Like rebuilding the infrastructure.
Like building a new electricity grid.
Like expanding broadband.
Like giving 95% of working families a $1,000 tax cut.
Like extending unemployment and health benefits to those looking for work.
Like helping states avoid harmful budget cuts.
Like stabilizing and repairing the financial system.
Like getting credit flowing to families and businesses.
Like addressing the foreclosure crisis.
Like having transparency about where all this money is going.
How Obama will do some of this remains to be seen, however.
For instance, it's unclear how he will go about re-regulating the
financial system, since he has surrounded himself with people who were
intimately involved with deregulating that system.
It's also unclear how he will address the foreclosure crisis "so we
can keep responsible families in their homes"--and how he will
differentiate between responsible and irresponsible families.
What's more, he may be aiming too low by vowing to "save or create
at least three million jobs over the next few years," since the economy
lost about 3 million jobs in 2008 alone.
And for some reason, he is insisting that "the overwhelming majority
of the jobs will be in the private sector," when there is much more job
security -- and union protection -- in public sector jobs. Why trust the
private sector when it bollixed everything up in the first place?
But at least Obama recognizes a crisis when he sees one.
At least he is fluent enough in economics to understand the
essential role that the federal government must play in such a crisis.
And at least he has put on the table several good ideas for ameliorating that crisis.
It's now up to Congress to get him a recovery bill he can sign -- in a hurry.