Calling Out Bush's War in Gaza
It may well be that in denouncing "Israel's" attack on Gaza one, in an
important way, unwittingly does a disservice to the cause of holding
the Bush Administration accountable for its crimes.
Is there any doubt that the Bush Administration approved this assault?
Is there any doubt that it could not have taken place without the Bush
Administration's approval?
Is there any doubt that it could not continue without the support of
the Bush Administration and the protective umbrella of its veto at the
UN Security Council? Is there any doubt that it will stop the very day
that the Bush Administration says that it must?
If so, is it in the interest of humanity that we Americans engage in
the charade that the Israeli government is an autonomous actor in this
matter?
All these observations are true in general, but we have plenty of
specific evidence in this case.
In August, Haaretz reported
that the U.S. had "rejected an Israeli request for military equipment
and support that would improve Israel's ability to attack Iran's
nuclear facilities."
The Americans viewed the request, which was transmitted
(and rejected) at the highest level, as a sign that Israel is in the
advanced stages of preparations to attack Iran. They therefore warned
Israel against attacking, saying such a strike would undermine
American interests. They also demanded that Israel give them prior
notice if it nevertheless decided to strike Iran.
In early September, Haaretz reported that
the request had included GBU-28 "bunker-buster" bombs.
In mid-September, the U.S. agreed instead to sell Israel 1000 GBU-39
"bunker buster" bombs which Israeli military experts said "could
provide a powerful new weapon" in Gaza, AP reported.
These bombs have been used to bomb tunnels in Gaza in the current
offensive, the Jerusalem Post reports.
Israel claims that its goal in bombing tunnels is to stop the
smuggling of weapons, but tunnels are also used to bring in goods, so
blowing up tunnels has the effect of reinforcing the blockade on Gaza.
So: when Israel requested weapons that the U.S. expected would be used
for bombing Iran, the U.S. said no, and added explicitly that it did
not want to see an Israeli attack on Iran. And there was no Israeli
attack on Iran.
Instead, the U.S. provided bombs that it had every reason to believe
would be used for an attack on Gaza. And now there is an Israeli
attack on Gaza, using those very bombs.
And therefore, there is no reason to doubt the active approval of the
United States government for the current attack.
So, if one happens to be living in the United States, it seems clear
that one's complaints ought to be addressed to U.S. officials. You can
write to President Bush and your Congressional representatives here
and to President-elect Obama here.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It may well be that in denouncing "Israel's" attack on Gaza one, in an
important way, unwittingly does a disservice to the cause of holding
the Bush Administration accountable for its crimes.
Is there any doubt that the Bush Administration approved this assault?
Is there any doubt that it could not have taken place without the Bush
Administration's approval?
Is there any doubt that it could not continue without the support of
the Bush Administration and the protective umbrella of its veto at the
UN Security Council? Is there any doubt that it will stop the very day
that the Bush Administration says that it must?
If so, is it in the interest of humanity that we Americans engage in
the charade that the Israeli government is an autonomous actor in this
matter?
All these observations are true in general, but we have plenty of
specific evidence in this case.
In August, Haaretz reported
that the U.S. had "rejected an Israeli request for military equipment
and support that would improve Israel's ability to attack Iran's
nuclear facilities."
The Americans viewed the request, which was transmitted
(and rejected) at the highest level, as a sign that Israel is in the
advanced stages of preparations to attack Iran. They therefore warned
Israel against attacking, saying such a strike would undermine
American interests. They also demanded that Israel give them prior
notice if it nevertheless decided to strike Iran.
In early September, Haaretz reported that
the request had included GBU-28 "bunker-buster" bombs.
In mid-September, the U.S. agreed instead to sell Israel 1000 GBU-39
"bunker buster" bombs which Israeli military experts said "could
provide a powerful new weapon" in Gaza, AP reported.
These bombs have been used to bomb tunnels in Gaza in the current
offensive, the Jerusalem Post reports.
Israel claims that its goal in bombing tunnels is to stop the
smuggling of weapons, but tunnels are also used to bring in goods, so
blowing up tunnels has the effect of reinforcing the blockade on Gaza.
So: when Israel requested weapons that the U.S. expected would be used
for bombing Iran, the U.S. said no, and added explicitly that it did
not want to see an Israeli attack on Iran. And there was no Israeli
attack on Iran.
Instead, the U.S. provided bombs that it had every reason to believe
would be used for an attack on Gaza. And now there is an Israeli
attack on Gaza, using those very bombs.
And therefore, there is no reason to doubt the active approval of the
United States government for the current attack.
So, if one happens to be living in the United States, it seems clear
that one's complaints ought to be addressed to U.S. officials. You can
write to President Bush and your Congressional representatives here
and to President-elect Obama here.
It may well be that in denouncing "Israel's" attack on Gaza one, in an
important way, unwittingly does a disservice to the cause of holding
the Bush Administration accountable for its crimes.
Is there any doubt that the Bush Administration approved this assault?
Is there any doubt that it could not have taken place without the Bush
Administration's approval?
Is there any doubt that it could not continue without the support of
the Bush Administration and the protective umbrella of its veto at the
UN Security Council? Is there any doubt that it will stop the very day
that the Bush Administration says that it must?
If so, is it in the interest of humanity that we Americans engage in
the charade that the Israeli government is an autonomous actor in this
matter?
All these observations are true in general, but we have plenty of
specific evidence in this case.
In August, Haaretz reported
that the U.S. had "rejected an Israeli request for military equipment
and support that would improve Israel's ability to attack Iran's
nuclear facilities."
The Americans viewed the request, which was transmitted
(and rejected) at the highest level, as a sign that Israel is in the
advanced stages of preparations to attack Iran. They therefore warned
Israel against attacking, saying such a strike would undermine
American interests. They also demanded that Israel give them prior
notice if it nevertheless decided to strike Iran.
In early September, Haaretz reported that
the request had included GBU-28 "bunker-buster" bombs.
In mid-September, the U.S. agreed instead to sell Israel 1000 GBU-39
"bunker buster" bombs which Israeli military experts said "could
provide a powerful new weapon" in Gaza, AP reported.
These bombs have been used to bomb tunnels in Gaza in the current
offensive, the Jerusalem Post reports.
Israel claims that its goal in bombing tunnels is to stop the
smuggling of weapons, but tunnels are also used to bring in goods, so
blowing up tunnels has the effect of reinforcing the blockade on Gaza.
So: when Israel requested weapons that the U.S. expected would be used
for bombing Iran, the U.S. said no, and added explicitly that it did
not want to see an Israeli attack on Iran. And there was no Israeli
attack on Iran.
Instead, the U.S. provided bombs that it had every reason to believe
would be used for an attack on Gaza. And now there is an Israeli
attack on Gaza, using those very bombs.
And therefore, there is no reason to doubt the active approval of the
United States government for the current attack.
So, if one happens to be living in the United States, it seems clear
that one's complaints ought to be addressed to U.S. officials. You can
write to President Bush and your Congressional representatives here
and to President-elect Obama here.