SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Why the Attacks in India Should Surprise Nobody
Nov 27, 2008
Most
Americans were shocked to learn that coordinated terrorist attacks
struck the heart of Mumbai, India's commercial capital on Wednesday
evening. After all, India is not Iraq or Afghanistan or even Pakistan.
According to pundits such as Thomas Friedman of the New York Times,
India is a shining capitalist success story and the next global
superpower. In the pro-globalization narrative, India's
eager-beaver working class has benefited greatly from neoliberal
economic policies. Intellectuals extol India as the world's largest
democracy and an example for the rest of the developing world to
follow. Today, India is a popular tourist destination for everyone from
backpackers on spiritual voyages to white-collar executives on business
meetings.
Americans are largely shielded from the shocking reality of India. According
to the World Bank's own estimates on poverty, almost half of all
Indians live below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP)
per day.[1] The World Bank further estimates that 33% of the global poor now reside in India. [2]
Moreover, India also has 828 million people, or 75.6% of the population
living below $2 a day, compared to 72.2% for Sub-Saharan Africa.[3]
A quarter of the nation's population earns less than the
government-specified poverty threshold of $0.40/day. Someone should
tell the starving masses who have remained largely marginalized and
subjugated that India is a "success story" because that's not reflected
in most Indian's lives. Income inequality in India, as measured by the
Gini coefficient, is increasing at a disturbingly destabilizing rate.[4]
In addition, India has a higher rate of malnutrition among children
under the age of three than any other country in the world (46% in year
2007).[5],[6] India is possibly the world's largest democracy by some definitions; however, as
Mahatma Gandhi, once asked, "What difference does it make to the dead,
the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought
under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and
democracy?"
Pundits such as Friedman play golf with the global elite and then pontificate on perceived economic trends. In Friedman's book, The World is Flat, he suggests that "Indians should celebrate Y2K as its second independence day." Yet,
by some estimates, the high-tech sector employs just 0.2 percent of
India's one billion people. Americans are largely unaware of the
violent, systemic poverty plaguing India because the country is reduced
to a caricature where everyone fielding Americans' inquiries in call
centers is prospering. Having lived in India for four
years and visited the country every other year, I am painfully aware of
the reality on the ground. India is a country where children are
forcefully amputated by beggar-masters and sent to elicit money; where
poor women sell their bodies to truck drivers and contract HIV at
alarming rates; and, where American tourists nonchalantly spend enough
money in one day to support a hungry family for months.
The
recent attacks in India are morally repugnant, but the debate on how to
curb terrorism needs to consider why people engage in such desperate
acts in the first place. The perpetrators of yesterday's violence
targeted two of Mumbai's most luxurious hotels: Taj Mahal and the
Oberioi Trident. One night at either of these hotels costs, on average,
Rupees 17,500 (US $ 355) in a country where the annual salary is Rupees
29,069 (US $590).[7]
The death of over a hundred people on Wednesday should deeply upset the
world, but it should also lead us to question the death of the 18
million people who die annually from the systemic violence of endemic
poverty.[8] As
Yale professor Thomas Pogge notes, the affects of poverty are felt
exponentially more in certain parts of our "unflat" world: "If the
developed Western countries had their proportional shares of
[gratuitous] deaths, severe poverty would kill some 3,500 Britons and
16,500 Americans per week."[9]
Mahan
Abedin, an insurgency analyst, told Al Jazeera after Wednesday nights
attacks: "We have seen an increase in recent years in indigenous Indian
Muslim organizations beginning to take a violent stance towards the
Indian state and sections of the Indian society, particularly the
commercial elite of places like Mumbai, in order to highlight, they
would say, the sheer inequality of life in India."[10]
Abedin continued, "there is a middle class of around 100 million who
live very well but 800 million-plus people live in miserable
conditions." Even people who commit heinous acts of violence
occasionally make a valid point. The
latest attacks should not evoke a knee-jerk effort to ratchet up the
so-called Global War on Terror but, instead, make us question how to
avoid such attacks in the future. By
showing genuine concern for the plight of the millions of people who
are at risk of death from poverty and by honoring the sanctity of the
lives of the most destitute, we have the best chance of defeating the
ideologies of hate.[11]
[1] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/One-third_of_worlds_poor_in_India/articleshow/3409374.cms
[2] https://www.thehindu.com/2008/08/28/stories/2008082856061300.htm
[3] https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Editorials/Define_poverty_anew/articleshow/3423435.cms
[4] https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-05/english/sec/library/0405fs07e.pdf
[5] https://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOUTHASIAEXT/Resources/DPR_FullReport.pdf
[6] https://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article1421393.ece
[7] https://www.hindu.com/2007/02/20/stories/2007022011440400.htm
[8] Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights p. 99
[9] Pogge, Thomas W. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms . Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2002 p. 98
[10] https://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2008/11/20081127195677350.html
[11] Jeffrey D. Sachs "Net Gains." New York Times. April 29, 2006
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/29/opinion/29sachs.html
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deena Guzder
Deena Guzder is the co-News Director at the national TV/radio show Democracy Now! She has reported on human rights issues across the globe and is the author of Divine Rebels (Chicago Review Press 2011).
Most
Americans were shocked to learn that coordinated terrorist attacks
struck the heart of Mumbai, India's commercial capital on Wednesday
evening. After all, India is not Iraq or Afghanistan or even Pakistan.
According to pundits such as Thomas Friedman of the New York Times,
India is a shining capitalist success story and the next global
superpower. In the pro-globalization narrative, India's
eager-beaver working class has benefited greatly from neoliberal
economic policies. Intellectuals extol India as the world's largest
democracy and an example for the rest of the developing world to
follow. Today, India is a popular tourist destination for everyone from
backpackers on spiritual voyages to white-collar executives on business
meetings.
Americans are largely shielded from the shocking reality of India. According
to the World Bank's own estimates on poverty, almost half of all
Indians live below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP)
per day.[1] The World Bank further estimates that 33% of the global poor now reside in India. [2]
Moreover, India also has 828 million people, or 75.6% of the population
living below $2 a day, compared to 72.2% for Sub-Saharan Africa.[3]
A quarter of the nation's population earns less than the
government-specified poverty threshold of $0.40/day. Someone should
tell the starving masses who have remained largely marginalized and
subjugated that India is a "success story" because that's not reflected
in most Indian's lives. Income inequality in India, as measured by the
Gini coefficient, is increasing at a disturbingly destabilizing rate.[4]
In addition, India has a higher rate of malnutrition among children
under the age of three than any other country in the world (46% in year
2007).[5],[6] India is possibly the world's largest democracy by some definitions; however, as
Mahatma Gandhi, once asked, "What difference does it make to the dead,
the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought
under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and
democracy?"
Pundits such as Friedman play golf with the global elite and then pontificate on perceived economic trends. In Friedman's book, The World is Flat, he suggests that "Indians should celebrate Y2K as its second independence day." Yet,
by some estimates, the high-tech sector employs just 0.2 percent of
India's one billion people. Americans are largely unaware of the
violent, systemic poverty plaguing India because the country is reduced
to a caricature where everyone fielding Americans' inquiries in call
centers is prospering. Having lived in India for four
years and visited the country every other year, I am painfully aware of
the reality on the ground. India is a country where children are
forcefully amputated by beggar-masters and sent to elicit money; where
poor women sell their bodies to truck drivers and contract HIV at
alarming rates; and, where American tourists nonchalantly spend enough
money in one day to support a hungry family for months.
The
recent attacks in India are morally repugnant, but the debate on how to
curb terrorism needs to consider why people engage in such desperate
acts in the first place. The perpetrators of yesterday's violence
targeted two of Mumbai's most luxurious hotels: Taj Mahal and the
Oberioi Trident. One night at either of these hotels costs, on average,
Rupees 17,500 (US $ 355) in a country where the annual salary is Rupees
29,069 (US $590).[7]
The death of over a hundred people on Wednesday should deeply upset the
world, but it should also lead us to question the death of the 18
million people who die annually from the systemic violence of endemic
poverty.[8] As
Yale professor Thomas Pogge notes, the affects of poverty are felt
exponentially more in certain parts of our "unflat" world: "If the
developed Western countries had their proportional shares of
[gratuitous] deaths, severe poverty would kill some 3,500 Britons and
16,500 Americans per week."[9]
Mahan
Abedin, an insurgency analyst, told Al Jazeera after Wednesday nights
attacks: "We have seen an increase in recent years in indigenous Indian
Muslim organizations beginning to take a violent stance towards the
Indian state and sections of the Indian society, particularly the
commercial elite of places like Mumbai, in order to highlight, they
would say, the sheer inequality of life in India."[10]
Abedin continued, "there is a middle class of around 100 million who
live very well but 800 million-plus people live in miserable
conditions." Even people who commit heinous acts of violence
occasionally make a valid point. The
latest attacks should not evoke a knee-jerk effort to ratchet up the
so-called Global War on Terror but, instead, make us question how to
avoid such attacks in the future. By
showing genuine concern for the plight of the millions of people who
are at risk of death from poverty and by honoring the sanctity of the
lives of the most destitute, we have the best chance of defeating the
ideologies of hate.[11]
[1] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/One-third_of_worlds_poor_in_India/articleshow/3409374.cms
[2] https://www.thehindu.com/2008/08/28/stories/2008082856061300.htm
[3] https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Editorials/Define_poverty_anew/articleshow/3423435.cms
[4] https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-05/english/sec/library/0405fs07e.pdf
[5] https://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOUTHASIAEXT/Resources/DPR_FullReport.pdf
[6] https://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article1421393.ece
[7] https://www.hindu.com/2007/02/20/stories/2007022011440400.htm
[8] Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights p. 99
[9] Pogge, Thomas W. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms . Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2002 p. 98
[10] https://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2008/11/20081127195677350.html
[11] Jeffrey D. Sachs "Net Gains." New York Times. April 29, 2006
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/29/opinion/29sachs.html
Deena Guzder
Deena Guzder is the co-News Director at the national TV/radio show Democracy Now! She has reported on human rights issues across the globe and is the author of Divine Rebels (Chicago Review Press 2011).
Most
Americans were shocked to learn that coordinated terrorist attacks
struck the heart of Mumbai, India's commercial capital on Wednesday
evening. After all, India is not Iraq or Afghanistan or even Pakistan.
According to pundits such as Thomas Friedman of the New York Times,
India is a shining capitalist success story and the next global
superpower. In the pro-globalization narrative, India's
eager-beaver working class has benefited greatly from neoliberal
economic policies. Intellectuals extol India as the world's largest
democracy and an example for the rest of the developing world to
follow. Today, India is a popular tourist destination for everyone from
backpackers on spiritual voyages to white-collar executives on business
meetings.
Americans are largely shielded from the shocking reality of India. According
to the World Bank's own estimates on poverty, almost half of all
Indians live below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP)
per day.[1] The World Bank further estimates that 33% of the global poor now reside in India. [2]
Moreover, India also has 828 million people, or 75.6% of the population
living below $2 a day, compared to 72.2% for Sub-Saharan Africa.[3]
A quarter of the nation's population earns less than the
government-specified poverty threshold of $0.40/day. Someone should
tell the starving masses who have remained largely marginalized and
subjugated that India is a "success story" because that's not reflected
in most Indian's lives. Income inequality in India, as measured by the
Gini coefficient, is increasing at a disturbingly destabilizing rate.[4]
In addition, India has a higher rate of malnutrition among children
under the age of three than any other country in the world (46% in year
2007).[5],[6] India is possibly the world's largest democracy by some definitions; however, as
Mahatma Gandhi, once asked, "What difference does it make to the dead,
the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought
under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and
democracy?"
Pundits such as Friedman play golf with the global elite and then pontificate on perceived economic trends. In Friedman's book, The World is Flat, he suggests that "Indians should celebrate Y2K as its second independence day." Yet,
by some estimates, the high-tech sector employs just 0.2 percent of
India's one billion people. Americans are largely unaware of the
violent, systemic poverty plaguing India because the country is reduced
to a caricature where everyone fielding Americans' inquiries in call
centers is prospering. Having lived in India for four
years and visited the country every other year, I am painfully aware of
the reality on the ground. India is a country where children are
forcefully amputated by beggar-masters and sent to elicit money; where
poor women sell their bodies to truck drivers and contract HIV at
alarming rates; and, where American tourists nonchalantly spend enough
money in one day to support a hungry family for months.
The
recent attacks in India are morally repugnant, but the debate on how to
curb terrorism needs to consider why people engage in such desperate
acts in the first place. The perpetrators of yesterday's violence
targeted two of Mumbai's most luxurious hotels: Taj Mahal and the
Oberioi Trident. One night at either of these hotels costs, on average,
Rupees 17,500 (US $ 355) in a country where the annual salary is Rupees
29,069 (US $590).[7]
The death of over a hundred people on Wednesday should deeply upset the
world, but it should also lead us to question the death of the 18
million people who die annually from the systemic violence of endemic
poverty.[8] As
Yale professor Thomas Pogge notes, the affects of poverty are felt
exponentially more in certain parts of our "unflat" world: "If the
developed Western countries had their proportional shares of
[gratuitous] deaths, severe poverty would kill some 3,500 Britons and
16,500 Americans per week."[9]
Mahan
Abedin, an insurgency analyst, told Al Jazeera after Wednesday nights
attacks: "We have seen an increase in recent years in indigenous Indian
Muslim organizations beginning to take a violent stance towards the
Indian state and sections of the Indian society, particularly the
commercial elite of places like Mumbai, in order to highlight, they
would say, the sheer inequality of life in India."[10]
Abedin continued, "there is a middle class of around 100 million who
live very well but 800 million-plus people live in miserable
conditions." Even people who commit heinous acts of violence
occasionally make a valid point. The
latest attacks should not evoke a knee-jerk effort to ratchet up the
so-called Global War on Terror but, instead, make us question how to
avoid such attacks in the future. By
showing genuine concern for the plight of the millions of people who
are at risk of death from poverty and by honoring the sanctity of the
lives of the most destitute, we have the best chance of defeating the
ideologies of hate.[11]
[1] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/One-third_of_worlds_poor_in_India/articleshow/3409374.cms
[2] https://www.thehindu.com/2008/08/28/stories/2008082856061300.htm
[3] https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Editorials/Define_poverty_anew/articleshow/3423435.cms
[4] https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr04-05/english/sec/library/0405fs07e.pdf
[5] https://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOUTHASIAEXT/Resources/DPR_FullReport.pdf
[6] https://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article1421393.ece
[7] https://www.hindu.com/2007/02/20/stories/2007022011440400.htm
[8] Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights p. 99
[9] Pogge, Thomas W. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms . Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2002 p. 98
[10] https://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2008/11/20081127195677350.html
[11] Jeffrey D. Sachs "Net Gains." New York Times. April 29, 2006
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/29/opinion/29sachs.html
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.