An Alternative to the Auto Bailout
As the Big Three US automakers ramp up their pressure on Congress to cough
up $25 billion in bailout money, the absence of a long term vision for
economic recovery has never been more clear.
The outgoing Bush administration and Congress are careening from bailout
proposal to bailout proposal, putting hundreds of billions into the hands of
the same people that created this toxic economic brew. Naomi Klein has
recently detailed the horrifying parallels between the "free-fraud" zone
created by the Bush administration in Iraq and the Treasury Department's
handling of the bank bailout
(https://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/10/bailout-profiteers).
As tempting as it is to offer bailout money to the US automakers in return
for fleet-wide mileage reductions, changes in the mix of their fleets to
include more hybrids and electric vehicles, and to support labor, it would
be the wrong thing to do under current conditions. Imports from foreign
automakers have backed up in American ports over the last few months and now
represent roughly double the normal inventory, so the difficulties faced by
automakers are not limited to US firms. US automakers, however, have
additional problems because their fleets are dominated by too-large,
fuel-inefficient models. That fleet makeup cannot be quickly changed.
No matter what Congress does, US automakers are unlikely to survive this
economic crisis as major car manufacturers. Over the years they have
consistently made decisions that wedded themselves to the cheap oil past.
And now, unsurprisingly, Congress is legitimately concerned that the $25
billion the industry wants will just postpone the inevitable.
We need an alternative vision of economic development that is fully
articulated and backed by a long term plan that builds momentum for a new
green economy. Each new stimulus proposal must be evaluated in the context
of its contribution to building green infrastructure, providing training for
green careers and furthering a vision to build our local green economies.
In that context, it is easy to see how wasteful $25 billion for the US auto
industry would really be.
Obama has already signaled that he understands massive expenditures will be
required over the next several years to avoid economic catastrophe. No
single issue gets to the heart of what is clearly an unsustainable American
lifestyle as effectively as transportation. We should be prepared to spend
3-4 trillion dollars over the next 20 years, much of it front-loaded to have
maximum impact upon the current economic downturn, to massively overhaul the
structure of transportation in this country in a way that supports local
green space, local agriculture, local artisans, local industry, relies
solely upon clean energy, and improves the livability of American towns and
cities.
The federal government should rebuild passenger rail systems throughout the
country and should offer to pay 100% of the cost for transit systems
(including bus, light rail, train, subway, jitney, whatever) in any area
with population over 10,000. The conditions for 100% subsidy of a local
transit system should be that transportation must be FREE, it must rely
solely upon clean energy, and coverage in terms of both hours and geography
must be adequate to offer a complete replacement for automobile ownership
for those who wish to abandon their cars.
Why free? For years and years, the US has encouraged automobile usage and
suburban/exurban sprawl by subsidizing cheap oil and providing massive sums
for interstate highway construction. The result has been an ecological and
human catastrophe. Providing free mass transit amounts to reversal of that
tax benefit in a way that encourages, but does not require, the abandonment
of the automobile as the dominant mode of transportation in the US.
Imagine metropolitan areas with 50% or more of the acreage currently devoted
to individual cars suddenly available for green space, pedestrian malls,
community gardens, and bike paths. Imagine urban agriculture zones and
walkable neighborhoods. Imagine a sharp reduction in CO2 emissions from
transportation. All of this and more will happen when we move away from the
individual auto.
The needs of this country and the world are so huge after 8 years of Bush
that it will be very difficult for Obama to avoid being pulled all over the
map by competing interests. It is tremendously important that he and
Congress understand which initiatives are the key, momentum-building,
transformative proposals.
For Obama and the incoming Congress, it's important to forego the bailout of
the Big Three and develop a bold transportation alternative that reverses
the dysfunctional growth of our autombile-driven economy.
Reede Stockton works on Climate Equity and coordinates Online Activism for Global Exchange, and international human rights organization based in San Francisco.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the Big Three US automakers ramp up their pressure on Congress to cough
up $25 billion in bailout money, the absence of a long term vision for
economic recovery has never been more clear.
The outgoing Bush administration and Congress are careening from bailout
proposal to bailout proposal, putting hundreds of billions into the hands of
the same people that created this toxic economic brew. Naomi Klein has
recently detailed the horrifying parallels between the "free-fraud" zone
created by the Bush administration in Iraq and the Treasury Department's
handling of the bank bailout
(https://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/10/bailout-profiteers).
As tempting as it is to offer bailout money to the US automakers in return
for fleet-wide mileage reductions, changes in the mix of their fleets to
include more hybrids and electric vehicles, and to support labor, it would
be the wrong thing to do under current conditions. Imports from foreign
automakers have backed up in American ports over the last few months and now
represent roughly double the normal inventory, so the difficulties faced by
automakers are not limited to US firms. US automakers, however, have
additional problems because their fleets are dominated by too-large,
fuel-inefficient models. That fleet makeup cannot be quickly changed.
No matter what Congress does, US automakers are unlikely to survive this
economic crisis as major car manufacturers. Over the years they have
consistently made decisions that wedded themselves to the cheap oil past.
And now, unsurprisingly, Congress is legitimately concerned that the $25
billion the industry wants will just postpone the inevitable.
We need an alternative vision of economic development that is fully
articulated and backed by a long term plan that builds momentum for a new
green economy. Each new stimulus proposal must be evaluated in the context
of its contribution to building green infrastructure, providing training for
green careers and furthering a vision to build our local green economies.
In that context, it is easy to see how wasteful $25 billion for the US auto
industry would really be.
Obama has already signaled that he understands massive expenditures will be
required over the next several years to avoid economic catastrophe. No
single issue gets to the heart of what is clearly an unsustainable American
lifestyle as effectively as transportation. We should be prepared to spend
3-4 trillion dollars over the next 20 years, much of it front-loaded to have
maximum impact upon the current economic downturn, to massively overhaul the
structure of transportation in this country in a way that supports local
green space, local agriculture, local artisans, local industry, relies
solely upon clean energy, and improves the livability of American towns and
cities.
The federal government should rebuild passenger rail systems throughout the
country and should offer to pay 100% of the cost for transit systems
(including bus, light rail, train, subway, jitney, whatever) in any area
with population over 10,000. The conditions for 100% subsidy of a local
transit system should be that transportation must be FREE, it must rely
solely upon clean energy, and coverage in terms of both hours and geography
must be adequate to offer a complete replacement for automobile ownership
for those who wish to abandon their cars.
Why free? For years and years, the US has encouraged automobile usage and
suburban/exurban sprawl by subsidizing cheap oil and providing massive sums
for interstate highway construction. The result has been an ecological and
human catastrophe. Providing free mass transit amounts to reversal of that
tax benefit in a way that encourages, but does not require, the abandonment
of the automobile as the dominant mode of transportation in the US.
Imagine metropolitan areas with 50% or more of the acreage currently devoted
to individual cars suddenly available for green space, pedestrian malls,
community gardens, and bike paths. Imagine urban agriculture zones and
walkable neighborhoods. Imagine a sharp reduction in CO2 emissions from
transportation. All of this and more will happen when we move away from the
individual auto.
The needs of this country and the world are so huge after 8 years of Bush
that it will be very difficult for Obama to avoid being pulled all over the
map by competing interests. It is tremendously important that he and
Congress understand which initiatives are the key, momentum-building,
transformative proposals.
For Obama and the incoming Congress, it's important to forego the bailout of
the Big Three and develop a bold transportation alternative that reverses
the dysfunctional growth of our autombile-driven economy.
Reede Stockton works on Climate Equity and coordinates Online Activism for Global Exchange, and international human rights organization based in San Francisco.
As the Big Three US automakers ramp up their pressure on Congress to cough
up $25 billion in bailout money, the absence of a long term vision for
economic recovery has never been more clear.
The outgoing Bush administration and Congress are careening from bailout
proposal to bailout proposal, putting hundreds of billions into the hands of
the same people that created this toxic economic brew. Naomi Klein has
recently detailed the horrifying parallels between the "free-fraud" zone
created by the Bush administration in Iraq and the Treasury Department's
handling of the bank bailout
(https://www.naomiklein.org/articles/2008/10/bailout-profiteers).
As tempting as it is to offer bailout money to the US automakers in return
for fleet-wide mileage reductions, changes in the mix of their fleets to
include more hybrids and electric vehicles, and to support labor, it would
be the wrong thing to do under current conditions. Imports from foreign
automakers have backed up in American ports over the last few months and now
represent roughly double the normal inventory, so the difficulties faced by
automakers are not limited to US firms. US automakers, however, have
additional problems because their fleets are dominated by too-large,
fuel-inefficient models. That fleet makeup cannot be quickly changed.
No matter what Congress does, US automakers are unlikely to survive this
economic crisis as major car manufacturers. Over the years they have
consistently made decisions that wedded themselves to the cheap oil past.
And now, unsurprisingly, Congress is legitimately concerned that the $25
billion the industry wants will just postpone the inevitable.
We need an alternative vision of economic development that is fully
articulated and backed by a long term plan that builds momentum for a new
green economy. Each new stimulus proposal must be evaluated in the context
of its contribution to building green infrastructure, providing training for
green careers and furthering a vision to build our local green economies.
In that context, it is easy to see how wasteful $25 billion for the US auto
industry would really be.
Obama has already signaled that he understands massive expenditures will be
required over the next several years to avoid economic catastrophe. No
single issue gets to the heart of what is clearly an unsustainable American
lifestyle as effectively as transportation. We should be prepared to spend
3-4 trillion dollars over the next 20 years, much of it front-loaded to have
maximum impact upon the current economic downturn, to massively overhaul the
structure of transportation in this country in a way that supports local
green space, local agriculture, local artisans, local industry, relies
solely upon clean energy, and improves the livability of American towns and
cities.
The federal government should rebuild passenger rail systems throughout the
country and should offer to pay 100% of the cost for transit systems
(including bus, light rail, train, subway, jitney, whatever) in any area
with population over 10,000. The conditions for 100% subsidy of a local
transit system should be that transportation must be FREE, it must rely
solely upon clean energy, and coverage in terms of both hours and geography
must be adequate to offer a complete replacement for automobile ownership
for those who wish to abandon their cars.
Why free? For years and years, the US has encouraged automobile usage and
suburban/exurban sprawl by subsidizing cheap oil and providing massive sums
for interstate highway construction. The result has been an ecological and
human catastrophe. Providing free mass transit amounts to reversal of that
tax benefit in a way that encourages, but does not require, the abandonment
of the automobile as the dominant mode of transportation in the US.
Imagine metropolitan areas with 50% or more of the acreage currently devoted
to individual cars suddenly available for green space, pedestrian malls,
community gardens, and bike paths. Imagine urban agriculture zones and
walkable neighborhoods. Imagine a sharp reduction in CO2 emissions from
transportation. All of this and more will happen when we move away from the
individual auto.
The needs of this country and the world are so huge after 8 years of Bush
that it will be very difficult for Obama to avoid being pulled all over the
map by competing interests. It is tremendously important that he and
Congress understand which initiatives are the key, momentum-building,
transformative proposals.
For Obama and the incoming Congress, it's important to forego the bailout of
the Big Three and develop a bold transportation alternative that reverses
the dysfunctional growth of our autombile-driven economy.
Reede Stockton works on Climate Equity and coordinates Online Activism for Global Exchange, and international human rights organization based in San Francisco.